ADVERTISEMENT

Why hasn’t the media said anything about the lack of social distancing at all the protests?

I have several friends from there and you don't know what you're talking about. There are few restrictions.
You obviously don't know what "herd immunity" is. I'm not surprised.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/21/health/sweden-herd-immunity-coronavirus-intl/index.html

Sweden is still nowhere near 'herd immunity,' even though it didn't go into lockdown
By Niamh Kennedy, CNN

Updated 5:12 PM ET, Thu May 21, 2020

(CNN)Sweden has revealed that despite adopting more relaxed measures to control coronavirus, only 7.3% of people in Stockholm had developed the antibodies needed to fight the disease by late April.

The figure, which Sweden's Public Health Authority confirmed to CNN, is roughly similar to other countries that have data and well below the 70-90% needed to create "herd immunity" in a population.
It comes after the country adopted a very different strategy to stop the spread of coronavirus to other countries by only imposing very light restrictions on daily life.
 
I don't think they care about social distancing when they are stealing flat screen televisions? And then there will more issues when they invite their other gangster/thug/terrorist friends when they get together and drink the stolen liquor and watch the stolen TV. Frankly, those looting thugs need less social distance from the real bullets instead of rubber ones. Anarchy cannot prevail, but I see most of the bad stuff going on is in liberal socialist cites and states, so I do not know if I would rater see them reap what they sow, or I just might feel sorry for their ignorance?

I know they say that Trump has the 82 Airborne, the 75th Ranger regiment, and the Military Police on standby, so should he actually try to help them or let them reap what they sow? For instance Los Angeles is in total anarchy and chaos right now. This looks like 3rd world Somalia with no rule of law.
 
I don't think they care about social distancing when they are stealing flat screen televisions? And then there will more issues when they invite their other gangster/thug/terrorist friends when they get together and drink the stolen liquor and watch the stolen TV. Frankly, those looting thugs need less social distance from the real bullets instead of rubber ones. Anarchy cannot prevail, but I see most of the bad stuff going on is in liberal socialist cites and states, so I do not know if I would rater see them reap what they sow, or I just might feel sorry for their ignorance?

I know they say that Trump has the 82 Airborne, the 75th Ranger regiment, and the Military Police on standby, so should he actually try to help them or let them reap what they sow? For instance Los Angeles is in total anarchy and chaos right now. This looks like 3rd world Somalia with no rule of law.

I'm a little impressed with the number of dog whistles you squeezed into your post!
 
You obviously don't know what "herd immunity" is. I'm not surprised.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/21/health/sweden-herd-immunity-coronavirus-intl/index.html

Sweden is still nowhere near 'herd immunity,' even though it didn't go into lockdown
By Niamh Kennedy, CNN

Updated 5:12 PM ET, Thu May 21, 2020

(CNN)Sweden has revealed that despite adopting more relaxed measures to control coronavirus, only 7.3% of people in Stockholm had developed the antibodies needed to fight the disease by late April.

The figure, which Sweden's Public Health Authority confirmed to CNN, is roughly similar to other countries that have data and well below the 70-90% needed to create "herd immunity" in a population.
It comes after the country adopted a very different strategy to stop the spread of coronavirus to other countries by only imposing very light restrictions on daily life.

Very misleading. Do we really believe everybody in Sweeden went in to get an antibody test? Good for them for staying open and not destroying their economy
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaxCalifornia
Very misleading. Do we really believe everybody in Sweeden went in to get an antibody test? Good for them for staying open and not destroying their economy

Very misleading. Do we really expect that they actually tested at least 7.4% of the population? OH! They probably sampled a statistically significant group to arrive at that number. Because, you know, we have centuries of mathematical data that this is possible.
 
all i know is this is absolutely nuts.

mayor to scared to send in national guard

he says perception it would create is worse than all the small business owners loosing their inventory (their money).

the police do move in to protect the actual property after it had been looted.

antifa and ms13

this is organized looting .

i would not be surprised if 75% of these business owners either move to safer cities or change careers.
 
Very misleading. Do we really expect that they actually tested at least 7.4% of the population? OH! They probably sampled a statistically significant group to arrive at that number. Because, you know, we have centuries of mathematical data that this is possible.

What? All Im saying is, a lot of people who get the virus don't show any symptoms. Those people may have antibodies but aren't getting tested. Not sure what is so hard to understand about that. I can dumb it down for you if that would help.
 
This response tells me that much of the dem coronavirus response and retoric is bullshit.

So quick and aggressive to trample constitutional rights and wreck the economy over the Chinese wuhan virus from China except when it interferes with the ability of professional radicals and their mobs of useful idiots to burn and loot private property.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ForzaTigre

Your post was acting like statistical sampling isn't a thing. You can predict the percentage of the population that has antibodies without literally testing every single one of them.

EDIT: Also, if they were only testing people who were symptomatic you'd have 100% antibodies. So obviously they're testing random people.
 
Last edited:
You obviously don't know what "herd immunity" is. I'm not surprised.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/21/health/sweden-herd-immunity-coronavirus-intl/index.html

Sweden is still nowhere near 'herd immunity,' even though it didn't go into lockdown
By Niamh Kennedy, CNN

Updated 5:12 PM ET, Thu May 21, 2020

(CNN)Sweden has revealed that despite adopting more relaxed measures to control coronavirus, only 7.3% of people in Stockholm had developed the antibodies needed to fight the disease by late April.

The figure, which Sweden's Public Health Authority confirmed to CNN, is roughly similar to other countries that have data and well below the 70-90% needed to create "herd immunity" in a population.
It comes after the country adopted a very different strategy to stop the spread of coronavirus to other countries by only imposing very light restrictions on daily life.
You seem upset.
 
article in last couple days from Sweden: according to the leading health official, the country has only been able to “allow” less than 15% of the population to be exposed.

Most infectious disease doctors believe that a minimum of 60-70% of a population needs to be exposed to reach herd immunity

What is correct is that Sweden did not impose any restrictions or lockdowns.....in the HOPES of getting herd immunity.

But the country is a LONG way from that at the moment

edit to add cut and paste from that article:
Sweden's Public Health Agency last week released the initial findings of an ongoing antibodies study that showed that 7.3% of people in Stockholm had developed antibodies against COVID-19 by late April. Tegnell later described the study's figure as a "bit lower than we'd thought," adding that the findings represented a snapshot of the situation some weeks ago and he believed that by now "a little more than 20%" of Stockholm's population should have contracted the virus.

sweden’s health minister is a deep state never trumper, only explanation.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT