Wow. Now I understand everything professor douchebag. You’ve done such a good job of proving just how smart you are.
And the bleeding continues.
Will the US have fair elections in 2028 to elect a Dem to fix all this?
- Thread starter johnhugh
- Start date
And the bleeding continues.
Not possible. A couple presidents ago we had a guy who promised to repeal and replace that shit healthcare. I guess I never followed up on how that went though.
In capable. Perfect. Explain more things to me. I need your huge brain to help me understand things like in capable.
If you're more upset about Smith Mundt being amended than the fairness doctrine being repealed, you've lost the plot.
Can’t repeal anything when Obamas judges block literally every single piece of legislation put forth. Gfy. 🔥
The fairness doctrine lol. You mean having about 70:1 liberal to conservative ratio. You can gfy too. How bout Soros just buying up like 200 stations. That fairness you stupid pos. Do you even work?
Also why can’t you losers stay on topic. This post was about how big of a loser Obama is. Not the fairness doctrine. What a dipshit.
Lol. You mean like Sinclair Broadcasting buying up nearly every local news radio station across the country and flooding the market with RW propaganda?*
You mean like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh cornering the market on AM talk radio in the 80s/90s/2000s? You mean like the billions pouring in to fund RW podcasts/youtube channels/etc over the last 15+ years? You mean like once the Fairness Doctrine being repealed it opened the door for ENTERTAINMENT NEWS AND OPINION SHOWS which has done more irreparable damage to this country than probably anything else over the last ~40 years?
I'd love to see some data supporting the 70:1 liberal to conservative ratio, but it's probably just bullshit you made up.
*
Furthermore, lol at Obama being a "liberal hero." Dude was a milquetoast centrist/corporatist who passed a conservative healthcare bill (CREATED BY MITT ROMNEY AND OTHER REPUBLICANS) instead of a true singlepayer system which would have likely not been such a failure. Though, i will say, the one good thing about the ACA was it codified pre-existing conditions.
The only problem with your example is Rush and Tucker and Beck had audiences. They still do. That was always the point. NPR has like 80 liberals in their lineup and no one listens bc it’s shit. Seeing the same thing now with the left saying, “where’s our Joe Rogan?” If your ideas were worth a shit those programs would have audiences. People don’t wanna listen to propaganda like the NPR lady. lol.
Single payer would have been much worse. Are you not familiar with Europe at all. They wait like 6 months to see a Dr for a stomach ache. I’ve experienced it personally in Italy. Some one is paying for all that. It’s not free or universal. It’s subsidized off the backs of hard working people.
I can’t believe this anti American racist doesn’t have an audience. Liberal media = woke horseshit.
I would love to know how much money her stupid ass his given to reparations. We need a fairness doctrine so they can spew this.
The left has plenty of podcasters, just none on the level of what the right currently has. The right has done a good job of blitzing the podcast/YT sphere and funneled money to influencers to corner the market. Republicans always complained about the MSM, but no one watches the MSM anymore except maybe 10-15% of the population and it's all boomers. Social media/YT/Podcasts/etc is how everyone gets their news these days, and that is heavily dominated by RW influencers - a good bit of which are on the Russian payroll.*** Regarding the bolded, there's a reason that democratic policies poll much higher than republican ones - it's because people prefer them. The problem is the Democrats are worthless and have completely botched the messaging. They're perpetually reactive instead of proactive, and they're owned by consultants and corporatists who prefer to raise money being the opposition party instead of actually leading and pushing for policies the people actually want.
*** https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/07/business/media/russia-tenet-media-tim-pool.html
Yes, I'm very familiar with Europe as I vacation there frequently and have had to use their healthcare system before. Was on a ski trip with friends in Switzerland and my buddy's wife broke her leg. Everything about it was great. Now, anecdotal evidence means ****all, but it's not all nightmares like everyone claims.
Regardless, there's a reason that the #1 cause of bankruptcy in the US is Medical Debt. Do I think singlepayer is going to be the perfect solution? No, but it would likely be better than the catastrophe we currently have in place. Insurance companies denying coverage/procedures left and right because they don't deem them "necessary" despite doctors saying they are. I'd much rather pay $500/month in additional taxes to not have to worry about being denied coverage/having to go somewhere out of pocket and getting zero coverage from my provider, than pay $2k/month to an insurance company is going to **** me any chance they get.
I don't see an issue with her personal tweets. I do have an issue with that if she were to read those things on air during a segment. However, since the Republicans decided to repeal the Fairness Doctrine, it's unfortunately legal to do it.
NO WAY I WANT IT FAIR
In 2028 I want the Republicans to arrest and charge any and all viable Presidential candidates with treason. Lock them all up. As to voting close the polls and only allow Trump votes to be counted.
Yep and I want Trump to run for the third term as Emperor
Maybe Mob Boss would be better.
Yep @johnhugh I want the Christian Conservative Pro Life Right to pound the Left Liberal American Hating Fear Mongering Hate Breeding Lawless Violence Supporting Communists and Facist Soros Crowd to suck hind teat.
That is my guilty pleasure dream I wake up every night and say man that would be bad.
What I want is honest fair elections unlike what the Democratic Party runs.
So either he wasn’t smart enough to figure that out beforehand or ….
#Promises kept.
We don’t have a free market health care system. We have a large insurance company oligarchy
How bout now?
I don't know if I have the energy to tackle nonsense today
BREAKING: Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett just announced that over 50 countries have already reached out to begin negotiations following President Trump's new tariff policies:
"I got a report from the USDR last night that more than 50 countries have reached out to the President to begin a negotiation. But they're doing that because they understand that they bear a lot of the tariff."
I don’t understand your math here. You seriously think universal single payer healthcare will cost you 25% of what you at today? ($500/mo in taxes vs $2k/mo premiums).
This is completely unrealistic. It’s just going to shift the cost burden even more heavily to those with means, which I assume includes you.
For someone like me, I would face significantly higher costs (taxes) plus lower quality care, less access to care and less incentive for innovation, which the US excels at due to the current structure.
Anyone suggesting that path can kindly go fvck themselves.
Instead, we need to get people to take care of themselves and penalize people who do not. They are the problem. Don’t punish the people who actually give a shit about their bodies with higher taxes. Make the willfully unhealthy people pay their fair share.
we must first have a fair election in the mid terms. I dont know if we have much of any voting apparatus, honest personnel, or procedure, in place by then. Sad to say but true.
he said it was intentional and on purpose. just gonna be temporary pain, he said.
i dont know if he is trying to be misleading, he is just misinformed, watches sean calamity for his lessons on economics
I just threw numbers out there. I don't care about paying more money if it means i don't have to worry about an insurance company refusing to cover fees, having to worry about out of network providers, or any other bullshit that the insurance industry throws at people to prevent covering service. Do I think this is a perfect idea? No. Do I think it will help address the #1 cause of bankruptcy in the US? Yes, I do. Will people who are less fortunate get more out of this than the upper middle class? Yes, and I think that will be better for the long-term health of the country. You want to help people take care of themselves and be more productive? Make it easier/more affordable for people to get routine checkups/specialist visits/medical care without the concern of bankruptcy.
Edit: Also, this wouldn't get rid of private business/pharmaceutical company R&D. Do I have a problem with pharmaceutical companies charging exorbitant fees for their products? Absolutely, but that's not the leading cause of medical bankruptcies - debt due to procedures is.
Last edited:
We won't even have free and fair elections in 2026. This country will be in open conflict with Trump/Maga in the next 18 months. It is utterly unavoidable at this point.
You may not believe what happened was purposeful.
Coincidences are not coincidences.
Could have been. Doesnt change the fact that the risk and harm that trump is doing to our country is purposeful.
To a simple-minded linear thinker that would be obvious
Open your mind and use analog thinking
