ADVERTISEMENT

Your top 3 most hated "journalists"

Pick your 3 that would make the world a better place if they went away...

  • Dana Bash - CNN

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • Joy Reid - MSNBC

    Votes: 6 85.7%
  • Tucker Carlson- Pod

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Rachel Maddow - MSNBC

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • David Muir- ABC

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sean Hannity- Fox

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Lester Holt - NBC

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sunny Hostin - ABC (the View)

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • Megan Kelly - Pod

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charlie Kirk - Pod

    Votes: 1 14.3%

  • Total voters
    7
  • This poll will close: .

JJtiger

Valles Marineris
Gold Member
Aug 24, 2001
714
1,258
93
This group seems to be (arguably) the most divisive regardless of your party. Curious to see if the group's #1 matches mine.
 
This group seems to be (arguably) the most divisive regardless of your party. Curious to see if the group's #1 matches mine.
Tucker Carlson for me. Mostly because of the audience he reaches. He’s managed to wedge himself into the club of these neo-conservative celebrities like Rogan and he just feeds them absolute nonsense which they parrot.

Hannity is the same but his audience is primarily 70 year olds who don’t know what a podcast is.

I actually don’t mind Kirk that much, he’s at least honest and up front about what he is and what his goals are. He’s selective and strategic about who he “debates” and mostly just walks right over them with fallacies that they don’t know how to respond to, but he doesn’t try to hide that he’s a Christian nationalist who wants to completely erase the 1st amendment’s establishment clause and turn our education system upside down.

Megan Kelly is a hypocrite who has hated Trump then loved him, preaches traditional family values but goes on Howard stern to talk about how big her husband’s dick is, and has more or less just attached herself to this weird anti-trans movement that lacks any intellectualism.

I’d also argue that none of the people on your list qualify as journalists, with the exception of Lester Holt. Everyone else is a commentator hosting opinion shows.

Except maybe David Muir. Never heard of him so don’t know where to categorize him.
 
Tucker Carlson for me. Mostly because of the audience he reaches. He’s managed to wedge himself into the club of these neo-conservative celebrities like Rogan and he just feeds them absolute nonsense which they parrot.

Hannity is the same but his audience is primarily 70 year olds who don’t know what a podcast is.

I actually don’t mind Kirk that much, he’s at least honest and up front about what he is and what his goals are. He’s selective and strategic about who he “debates” and mostly just walks right over them with fallacies that they don’t know how to respond to, but he doesn’t try to hide that he’s a Christian nationalist who wants to completely erase the 1st amendment’s establishment clause and turn our education system upside down.

Megan Kelly is a hypocrite who has hated Trump then loved him, preaches traditional family values but goes on Howard stern to talk about how big her husband’s dick is, and has more or less just attached herself to this weird anti-trans movement that lacks any intellectualism.

I’d also argue that none of the people on your list qualify as journalists, with the exception of Lester Holt. Everyone else is a commentator hosting opinion shows.

Except maybe David Muir. Never heard of him so don’t know where to categorize him.
Hence the quotes around "journalists" :) David Muir was the main moderator for the only debate between Harris and Trump and also ABC's main anchor.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT