You could say that unless you can imagine this happening under any other administration in the history of this country. It's not something he would have done without the fear of what this fascist administration would do to harm his business interests and you know it.
Correct.
Exactly the answer i expected from you. Something totally detached from reality.
Look on the bright side. Without fact checkers that are in collusion with the government, meta users won't have to worry that their posts from inside the Trump concentration camps will be censored.
Another highlight to opening the platform to droves of maga disinformation agents is the campers will be told they're at a resort for a vacation and they'll be none the wiser.
austin.culturemap.com
Eh, all it's doing is allowing Zuck an excuse for laying off an entire department of people under the guise of letting users moderate themselves. The optics of moving what's left from California to Texas is hilarious and something only idiot chuds will celebrate since it doesn't change anything, but it LOOKS like a major change.
Only you know the truth dickpick (@dpic73 )! You are the only one who knows all this truth.
Why can't you just STFU?
Let me know if I need to spell this out for you.
A poll he didn't like.
What gives him the right to sue a pollster because he doesn't like the results? It is not a statistical impossibility that the sampling was different than the results of the vote, but even if it was fraudeulent, a poll is just a poll and isn't responsible for his win/loss. GD man, you'll give him a pass for anything, no matter how absurd.
It was also a statistical impossibility that he won 2020 just because he said so but that didn't stop him from repeating it for perpetuity now did it? But again, you're missing the point. Trump is all about that free speech unless he doesn't like what a pollster/network or author says. In other words, free speech for pro-Trump speech ONLY.
You really don’t see the irony? So you’re saying the poll was misinformation and they should be stopped from sharing it?
I will admit I’m ignorant here, is that a realm or area where fraud is a real charge? And lying isn’t considered free speech? Like, are polls regulated like that?
Does that give him the right to sue any pollster that showed Kamala winning? What about suing CBS for editing someone else's interview?
America rejected what the left has become.
Give it six months and America will be remorseful for what they did. They'll be begging the Dems to come back.
This simply spells, defeat.
Let me know if I need to spell this out for you.
No, it clearly states I'm in no mood to debase myself enough to have a debate with a vile idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about - ever.
That man is vile and does not represent me or my values so I don't see that happening
