Don't worry Trump going to jail its just a matter of time. Believe.....that's how stupid yall are.
Oh Fani
- Thread starter Joe Cobb
- Start date
Interesting how quickly you transformed from anti-Trump to an ultra-Maga who whines like a typical Trump supporter.
How is it that a proven liar like Big Fani is allowed to stay on the case. She lied right in front of the judge? Any lawyers on the board? Is that normal protocol?
I haven't followed this case at all, but what was she proven to have lied about? Only thing a quick google search pulls up is the potential beginning of Fani and Wade's relationship, which was never proven to be a lie.
You know what's not normal? A deranged sociopathic president who tried to illegally overturn the will of the people because his ego was bruised. A president who hasn't had to pay the consequences of the nightmarish chaos he created. That's what not normal is but all you care about is who gets to hold him accountable? It's like you think he's innocent or something. What a sad little magat you are.
Junior, you calling someone else stupid is the funniest thing I have seen all day.
Got to remember Fani was a mentor to the judge plus he donated $$$ to her campaign fund.
He also worked for Brian Kemp and is a conservative. Are you suggesting he's not qualified?
"At the University of Georgia Law School, he belonged to the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group that serves as a pipeline for lawyers and judges on the right, and the Republican student group. He also interned for Georgia Supreme Court Justices David Nahmias and Keith Blackwell.
"What really stands out is his temperament - he's not excitable, he's even-keeled," Mr Blackwell told the Atlanta Journal Constitution."
Judge Scott McAfee: The young jurist handling Trump's Georgia trial
At just 34 years of age, Judge Scott McAfee is presiding over the trial of the decade.
www.bbc.com
I am not sure if that is accurate, a lot of what yall say is made up BS. But lets assume it is true. Should that judge have recused himself?
No surprise that GOAT boy is exaggerating - it was a pithy little $150 that he donated in 2020, which I don't find weird since he worked under her at one time. Waiting for GOAT to go after Clarence Thomas as well....
Yes. Even if you don't think he'd be able to get a fair trial with a bunch of libs/independents on the jury, do you think Trump supporters don't live in New York or DC? Not to mention the horde of professional LEOs that are probably not flaming libs like you guys all assume.
No Law Left in America—From Willis to Hur?
From the testimonies of at least two associates of Fani Willis and Nathan Wade, from the inconsistent and self-contradictory statements of Willis and Wade themselves especially about large “cash” remittances, without any supporting proof, to Wade from Willis, from text messages from their associate Terrence Bradley, from phone records pinpointing their locations, from the preposterous nature of Willis’s use of the race card in both her testimony and her church appearance, Judge Scott McAfee surely knew—well aside from the bizarre contortions of using a racketeering charge to get Trump, whom she had demonized in her campaign for office and fund-raising efforts—that Willis herself was guilty of a number of felonies.
Namely that she was lying under oath; that she was lying about her cash transfers, and that she was pursuing a political vendetta against the current leading candidate for president.
Yet McAfee allowed her to stay on the case after dismissing Wade (which was a gift to the prosecution, given his incompetence and his apparent unlawful behavior by charging the state of Georgia for 24 straight hours of legal work.)
So the question arises, what would a Georgia prosecutor have to do to be disqualified from a case by Judge McAfee?
Lie even more under oath?
Have three, not just two, witnesses contradict her sworn testimony?
Have thirty or forty more telephone pings belie her testimony of her whereabouts?
Have, say, emails in addition to the current texts, of an associate contradicting almost everything she said?
In other words, McAfee nullified the evidence before him and removed the less culpable of the two guilty parties, given all these illegalities originated with Willis himself.
Is there still a law against perjury and fraud—or does ideology and race now determine guilt or innocence in America?
In his recent congressional testimony, the Democrats cleverly pivoted to hammer Hur on his correct characterization of Biden as essentially demented.
That melodrama was in their interest, given that Hur’s lengthy report otherwise revealed no real reason not to indict Biden.
His guilt was overwhelming.
Not under dispute according to Hur were the facts that Biden:
1) had unlawfully and knowingly removed and retained classified files since his senate days, possibly since 1973, or over a half-century;
2) removed the files to a possible 9 different locations, few of them secure, as evidenced by the sloppy mess and dilapidated boxes of files in the Biden garage;
3) that Biden removed them not inadvertently but did so to further his political career and to profit by providing a ghostwriter with classified material to enhance his memoirs—that had garnered a $8 million advance in a book deal;
4) That Biden had no statuary authority, before his presidency, to declassify any of these classified files;
5) that Biden knowingly disclosed the files’ presence and contents to his ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer, who had no security clearance;
6) that Biden is on tape at least as early as 2017 admitting that he was in violation of the law, and yet did not come forward for nearly six years, and then only in fear that his own DOJ’s special counsel was soon to indict Trump for the very same exposure—willfully retaining files at his home that he knew were classified;
and 7) that ghostwriter Zwonitzer willfully destroyed state’s evidence when he erased his incriminating tapes (recovered by Hur’s forensics team) and yet was never prosecuted for obstruction of justice or destroying requested materials.
So as in the Willis case, what would Biden have to do to become indicted?
Removed files for 60 years?
Remove them to 10 different locations and throw the contents on the floor?
Remove them for a $10 million book deal?
Be on tape since 2010 that he knew he was in violation of the law and did nothing to rectify that for 12 rather than 6 years?
Have his ghostwriter go full Hillary and destroy with sledgehammers the taped evidence of his illegality?
Was not the now exempt Zwonitzer’s deliberate destruction of incriminating and requested evidence far more serious than the various Trump aides facing felony convictions for allegedly moving classified files around on Trump’s orders?
So what happened?
Likely the following:
Hur was shocked after he completed his investigation over just how guilty Biden was, and just how asymmetrical that fact would become given the simultaneous indictments of Trump for less criminal exposure.
Yet he was not about to take out the likely Democratic presidential nominee and current president, in the fashion his special prosecutor twin Jack Smith had been tasked to do just that by Merrick Garland.
So Hur squared the circle by using the Comey jury ruse: Biden was guilty of violating the law, but he was so enfeebled that no jury would convict him. Hur feared the consequences of indicting Biden far more than he did the pushback about his accurate characterization of his dementia.
So what?
There is really no legal system left as we once knew it.
We have a prosecutor who has likely violated more laws than her target and yet the law was warped to excuse her in the same degree it was contorted to ensure that Trump was indicted.
We have one special prosecutor who found overwhelming evidence that a president was guilty of removing classified files; guilty of disclosing their contents to a contractor working for him; and guilty of keeping these facts hidden until forced to reveal him by the asymmetrical investigation of his political rival who was indicted by his own department of justice for the virtual same crimes that were dropped for Biden.
Finally, since when are any Americans able to plead either racial considerations or cognitive challenges to nullify legal consequences for their criminal activity?
How can it be that any outcome you don't like was caused by a rotating list of 50 conspiracies? You know you're a lunatic, right?
Exactly. She lied under oath. Not sure how that is not disqualifying
The decay of American justice is self evident
We are in a total mental and moral decay as evidenced by some posters on here and across the media spectrum
BREAKING.🚨
Judge Scott McAfee, a Fani Willis donor who once worked under the Fulton County DA, just upheld the criminal indictment against former President Donald Trump in Georgia.
McAfee rejected the argument that Trump’s efforts to legally challenge the 2020 election were protected under the First Amendment.
“The defense has not presented, nor is the Court able to find, any authority that the speech and conduct alleged is protected political speech,” McAfee wrote in his order.
The Democratic Party has sought to “overturn” the results of presidential elections in 2000, 2004, and 2016.
Democrats argued both Bush and Trump were “illegitimate” presidents and claimed the elections were “stolen.”
The radical left’s incendiary rhetoric about Trump led to interruptions of the electoral college proceedings in 2017 and incited violent riots on J20 during Trump’s inauguration.
Not a single, solitary Democrat has EVER been charged for seeking to “overturn” the results of an election.
This is ELECTION INTERFERENCE posing as a legal case. It has nothing to do with the law and it has nothing to do with justice.
