MTTiger19 said:

I am saying their cultures are not comparable to American culture. So offending them is irrelevant. They hate freedom. They are actively imprisoning people all over Europe for tweets and thought crimes. The fact that it’s important to you to impress or coddle them tells everyone on here where you stand.

Click to expand...

Pfftt, they have a very special understanding of the value of freedom, more than we could ever understand. We've never had a genocidal maniac take over our continent and slaughter three generations of our ancestors so I don't think it's our place to tell them how they should be more like the far-right in our country. They have first-hand evidence about how that could play out.

Just be honest and admit you hate them all because they are more liberal than you and that's more important than all the bodies they've lost and all the money they've spent sticking by our side through thick and thin. You're not fooling anyone about your real agenda.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

What a rat. I hope he lives long enough to pay for his crimes.

Login to view embedded media
Emails Uncover Biden Was In On The Takedown Of Trump Very Early On 🚨

The Biden White House, it turns out, was deeply involved with the National Archives and the Justice Department in the case against Donald Trump regarding classified documents. This involvement laid the groundwork for the federal case against Trump, which was ultimately dismissed. The nonprofit America First Legal released emails obtained through a lawsuit, revealing this collaboration.

Back in September 2021, Jonathan Su, then-Deputy White House Counsel, was in discussions with the National Archives about boxes allegedly held by Trump. These talks delayed the National Archives from referring the matter to the Justice Department until the White House made a “special access request” the following year.

America First Legal stated on social media that these emails confirm the case against Trump was a “sham prosecution” with the Biden White House’s involvement from the outset.

The legal proceedings focused on accusations that Trump took classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago residence after losing the 2020 election. America First Legal emphasized that the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago wasn’t about securing documents but rather about using the Justice Department against Trump. On September 15, 2022, Gary Stern, NARA’s general counsel, informed colleagues that Su was updated on the missing boxes issue.

Stern wrote that Su was open to meetings involving various parties and mentioned the need for access to notes from the prior administration. This required making a special access request. The National Archives chose not to send a letter to the DOJ due to ongoing discussions between the White House and Trump’s legal team.

The collaboration between Trump’s team and the National Archives was seen as potentially clarifying or resolving the document issue. However, Trump’s team argued the documents rightfully belonged to him, resisting the requests to hand them over. America First Legal argued that the Biden administration’s actions were a pretext for an FBI-led raid at Mar-a-Lago.

Reports from 2022 highlighted how the Biden White House worked closely with the Justice Department and the National Archives to spark the criminal investigation into Trump’s handling of documents.

The White House nullified Trump’s claims to executive privilege, allowing the FBI to examine evidence from his Florida estate. This marked a significant boost to the investigation’s momentum.

The emails suggest a strategic delay by the National Archives in involving the DOJ due to the active communication with Trump’s legal team. Trump’s cooperation was initially seen as possibly resolving the matter without a larger investigation. Yet, the Biden administration’s later actions suggest a calculated approach to involve federal law enforcement.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Allornothing said:

What part of my post didn't happen in history?

Now I guess you could go with Kum-allah didn't help sell out our country because she was too stupid, but all the rest of it happened.

W W 2 happened. Without our ancestors, we might all be speaking German. Those were some tough SOBs. Not to be confused with you.

As far as ole Joe, the info is out there. You just choose not to believe it. That's why you are a stupid bastard. How did all of his family get paid? What did they get paid for? What service did they provide? I'm sure you gave them tips on how to give a good/proper BJ, but outside of that why did all that money pour in?

Click to expand...

Let me help you a sec and show you how critical thinking works.

If you claim Joe sold out our country, you need to show proof of your charges, maybe do an investigation even. Oh wait, that's exactly what happened when Comer Pyle and his "commie"mittee spent two years investigating the Biden's and came up with ZERO evidence that supported any wrongdoing by Joe! ZERO.

And not only that, their star witness, Alexander Smirnov, was an old FBI informant who is in jail now for falsely claiming they were paid $5 million in bribes.

The other thing you have to consider is what did any other country gain by paying off Biden? Can you tell me? Was there a policy that was changed that favored that country? Did Congress sign off on that new policy? If you can't prove that any other country benefitted politically, there's no argument there either.

And a reminder that it's not illegal to do business in other countries, even if your last name gives you preferential treatment - just ask the Trump's how that works.

So basically, your beliefs are based on the false allegations of people who wanted to harm Joe to keep him from winning a second term. But I'd be open to you showing me some concrete evidence that shows otherwise. Got any?

CUTiger1977 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

YES, YES, YES. I want all the names. I don't care D/R/I. I don't care if every single one of them are Republicans, although I highly doubt that.

You just know that "pencil neck" Senator from CA is on that list, but he's just one.

I've never had a fund where I could act stupid around females (there's only 2 genders now like when I was growing up), and expect it to be covered up. Sorry, I forgot about the f**s. The thing is, I never had a problem with those folks either. One of the best workers I ever supervised was gay. He never caused me one problem, and I wish he was still part of our team.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.