Ard mentioned Wes is coaching for his job, I hope Riley is as well, and a couple of others too.

Really, he thinks a domestic abuser should be able to buy a gun. Even Alito voted against that.

Do you think we might know who has majority in the house by the midterms? Or who won Arizona? It is ridiculous that it takes a week to count votes in this day.

Where did our tempo go? Why don’t we use it anymore on offense? Even Wesco mentioned the need to use it this past week, yet we used little to no tempo again today. I believe our offense plays better when we have a lot of pre-snap motion and tempo, so I don’t understand why we rarely use it.

Sorry I doubted them. Go Tigers!!!

What a joke.

And it ain’t good.

First things first, we obviously have to win out. That gets Clemson to 7-1 in the ACC. In no scenario will Clemson get the nod over SMU or Miami in a 3-way tie.

The 3 common opponents of each team are FSU and Louisville.

Miami 2-0
SMU 2-0
Clemson 1-1

Now let’s look if Miami or SMU loses one game and finish 7-1 to create a 2-way tie.

Let’s say SMU loses one. The common opponents are FSU, Louisville, Stanford, Pitt and UVA. For arguments sake, let’s say they lose to UVA.

This would put both Clemson and SMU at 4-1 against common opponents. Since this is still a tie, you have to go to the next tiebreaker, which is win % vs common opponents on their order of finish. If Pitt finishes higher ranked, you would go to the next highest team since we both are 1-0 against them. So the next team would be Louisville and SMU would get the nod since they went 1-0 and we went 0-1. I don’t see any scenario where Louisville isn’t the higher ranked team (after Pitt, if they lose to them) in the ACC given their remaining schedule.

If Miami were to lose one it would have to be to Wake Forest to create a tie with common opponents. Then the next tiebreaker would be the same that I explained with Louisville and we can’t win that one either (if the ACC standings go as they should).

Clemson’s best chance is SMU or Miami lose two games, which is farfetched, although crazier things have happened or get an at-large at 10-2 to the CFP.

If you’ve made it this far, correct me if I’m wrong lol. Go Tigers!

Watched GT come in the field
Watched VT entrance
Watched LSU just a minute ago.
Clemson entrance in slow motion 2 by 2 has gone from the best to around 40-50
Forgot how bad it has got until watching schools with life in their entrance

Around 17 or so. It will ruin the Saturday of certain posters on this board that’s ready to bitch right now before the game even starts.

This is the worst DL I can remember us having in years. We were getting by when Woods was available at end, but feels like a huge drop off from previous years now.

Doesn’t take long to miss a good one after taking it for granted for many years.

We all get a mulligan occasionally.

one of them with 3.

Clemson leads the nation at 6.

So, hopefully, we will block one of theirs today.

I rarely even

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Is that I was really looking forward to posting this image at halftime

We just play teams that are absolutely freaking terrible!

Tigerillustrated.com's subscribers continue to make our members-only forum THE destination for discussion on Clemson football and recruiting.

Week one's in-game thread for Clemson vs. UGA yielded a whopping 76,000 views. Of course our all-time site record for a single in-game thread remains 94,000 set in the 2023 season opener for Clemson vs. Duke.

In-game thread views for other Clemson games this season ...

Appalachian State: 39,000
N.C. State: 31,000
Stanford: 31,000
Florida State: 36,000
Wake Forest: 24,000
Virginia: 23,000

A tip of the cap to all of you!

So again without any further ado, our eighth in-game thread of the 2024 season is now live!

Time to raise the roof in here!



Louisville (5-3, 3-2) at #11 Clemson (6-1, 5-0)
Saturday, November 2
7:30 p.m. ET
Clemson, South Carolina (Death Valley)
ESPN