ADVERTISEMENT

Inside the team meeting for Pat Fitzgerald's dismissal

----

Inside the team meeting for Pat Fitzgerald's dismissal

By: Matthew Shelton - Wildcat Report

Pat Fitzgerald was Northwestern's head coach for 17 seasons and yet the meeting to inform the players of his firing lasted just 30 minutes.

Fitzgerald, Northwestern’s all-time winningest coach, was fired on Monday. An investigation into hazing allegations initially resulted in his two-week suspension.

But, after subsequent reporting from The Daily Northwestern and other outlets detailing the allegations, Northwestern president Michael Schill reevaluated the punishment and determined that Fitzgerald's tenure was over.

"Coach Fitz's message was highly emotional for everyone in the room," a player that asked for anonymity said. "The same guy who sat in my living room and promised my parents and I that he wouldn't be going anywhere was now addressing us as players for the final time."

In a statement, Schill revealed that the results of the investigation showed that it was not a solitary whistleblower, but 11 different current or former players who acknowledged that hazing took place under Fitzgerald’s watch. At the time of the statement, Northwestern remained unable to prove that Fitzgerald had knowledge that the hazing took place.

WildcatReport talked with three players via Twitter who described the events of the meeting and their reaction: tight end Marshall Lang, and two players who requested anonymity. Their stories indicate that Northwestern's administration, which had not been proactive or consistent in communication during the hazing investigation scandal, was curt, bordering on flippant at the meeting and didn't entertain any player questions.

The players met in person at Walter Athletics Center, and the meeting started with athletic director Dr. Derrick Gragg. ESPN's Adam Rittenberg tweeted that Gragg, who had been "overseas" on vacation, addressed the team remotely via Zoom.

Gragg's statement reportedly lasted about five minutes, then he left abruptly without allowing time for the players to ask questions. All three players said this was incredibly frustrating for a team that had to learn about their coach's firing via Twitter, and had to now hear from administration remotely.

"Gragg came on a Zoom to start," the second anonymous player wrote. "[He] was on vacation so he couldn't make it back to tell us in person. He told us Fitz was relieved of his duties and then said they don't have an interim.

"He then turned his camera off and left the Zoom before anybody could ask him any questions."

Questions abounded for players who watched their head coach's punishment escalate from a two-week, offseason suspension to termination in the span of three days.

Lang listed some of the concerns and frustrations he would have voiced if given the opportunity.

"I would have asked why they posted the results [of the investigation] on Twitter before telling the team? Why did President Schill change the punishment when no new data was released? Why didn't he have the guts to even show up at least on Zoom?

“I'm sure there would have been dozens of other questions, those three are just from me," Lang wrote.

The first anonymous player concurred with that sentiment, writing that the program felt disrespected by the casual and distant nature of their communication during the meeting.

"We didn't even get the respect from the [athletic director] or the president to be told in person," the player said. "Fitz has been a cornerstone for this university's football program for longer than I've been alive.

"For the people in charge to get rid of him while they are 'halfway around the world', which really means they were on vacation, says a lot about what they think of our program and what they value."

The players' frustration with Gragg wasn't just with his swift exit. It was also the lack of new or important content to his latest statement.

"He didn't give us any reasoning or insight into why the decision was made," the first player said. "We were finding out information at the same time as the public.

"He just hopped on a Zoom call to confirm to us what the public had already made us aware of. He told us that he, the president, and the board of trustees all support us. That doesn't mean a lot coming from a guy behind a screen who will wake up tomorrow and enjoy the rest of his vacation."

Gragg did not indicate who would be named as interim coach, something the second player said "seems like something you would have figured out if you were going to fire the coach."

Once Gragg ended the Zoom call, Fitzgerald addressed the team in-person, alongside his wife and three sons, the oldest of whom is a freshman tight end for the Wildcats.

It was emotional for the coach and the players.

"He came in with his family," the second player said. "He said he was proud to coach us and that he was sorry if anybody was ever hurt."

"He mentioned that we have his number and address," Lang said. "He told us to reach out if we ever needed anything. He said he'd always be there for us."

Up next to the podium were offensive coordinator Mike Bajakian and defensive coordinator David Braun.

"Coach [Bajakian] and Coach Braun were emotional as well, but they told us how important it is for us to stick together and stare down the adversity as a family," the first player said. "When going through something like this, those words were exactly what we needed to hear at that moment."

The second player agreed, saying that Bajakian and Braun's message "connected".

The two coordinators have a Herculean task ahead of them. There's a mantle to pick up as head of the program, and the university's indecision and failure to name an interim has exacerbated the confusion.

The Athletic’s Matt Fortuna reported that Braun, who has never been a head coach and is in his first year on the Northwestern staff, is expected to serve as "the day-to-day liaison for the football program".

A short time after the meeting, Fitzgerald announced via a statement to ESPN that he had retained a high-profile attorney to “protect my rights” and pursue why Schill “unilaterally” decided to fire him after the two had come to “a mutual agreement” on the two-week suspension.

This story may be far from over.

1998 CU v USC & the musings of an old man.

The 1998 CU v USC popped into my Youtube feed this weekend. I watched the first half Sunday night and the second half last night. To refresh your memories, this was Tommy West's last game as the Tigers' head coach. Our win in the game put the Gamecocks at a glorious 1-10 and sent Brad Scott packing his bags in Columbia as well.

Just to wax nostalgic, it was fun to watch the game for a number of reasons. Mostly because so much has changed in college football in 25 years.
  • DV has sure changed. No West End Zone.
  • The TV commercials were left in the game broadcast. I watched many of them for. Man, technology and sales pitch have changed over 25 years. (no Taco Bell or Dr Pepper ads)
  • I timed the commercial breaks. Commercial breaks were only 2 minutes long. They are now 3:16
  • It was still an 11 game season. We still played every ACC team.
  • The game was still played before Thanksgiving. Many other Rivalry Game weekend games were played after Thanksgiving.
  • No conference championships for the commentators talk about. Just the BCS standings. Bowls were held in high regard.
  • There were ZERO official replays AND none needed. (Though there was a bad call during the game...it went our way.)
  • Very few injuries.
  • I saw several, what we would call today "Targeting" calls......no one cared. No one was hurt.
  • I saw two horse collar tackles. No one cared. No one was hurt.
  • Kickoffs from the 30 yard line. Kick returns, or the muffing of them, were relevant to the game.
  • Lots of old names that were stars back then but are largely forgotten now. Some exceptions: Rod Garner, Travis Zachery (fr), Brandon Streeter.
  • The announcers were amazed we ran the ball from the shotgun.
  • Fans mobbed the field and torn down the goalposts after our third win of the season.
The combination of shorter TV timeouts, no official replays, less injuries resulted in the game being under 3 hours. The game had a flow to it that made it nicer to watch.

Change is a part of life. Small changes happen and we accept them. However I'm not sure the sum of all the changes to the college game has made the sport better over the last 25 years. Just interesting and seeing the game then versus the corporate production its become now.

PS: Tommy West handled the whole situation with a lot of class.

OT Fundraiser ideas

My sons best friend, and recent River Bluff graduate got in a motorcycle accident near River Bluff a couple weeks back. He had his right leg amputated at the knee, and his left arm messed up pretty bad. He just got transferred to a rehab center today, in Atlanta. Friends of the family already have a go fund me account up, but my question for y’all is what other types of fundraising have you been apart of. The medical bills for this family are going to crazy. Some ideas we’ve thought of are raffling off signed football from Dabo, Beamer, a gun raffle etc. any other ideas would be appreciated. This kid is 17, and just made one bad decision. Thanks and Go Tigers

UGA officials firing back at published reports

UGA officials firing back at published reports
By: Anthony Dasher - UGASports.com

Georgia athletic officials pushed back at published reports that state the UGA Athletic Association tolerates sexual misconduct amongst members of the football team.

During a briefing with select reporters, Georgia athletic director Josh Brooks, head football coach Kirby Smart, senior deputy of athletics Darrice Griffin, and equal opportunity office/Title IX coordinator Qiana Wilson spoke for almost an hour, going into detail about numerous incidents over the past month, defending procedures, and current UGAA policies while also addressing recent critical coverage of the program by the Atlanta Constitution.

“Unfortunately, recent inaccurate and misleading reporting requires us to come before you and set the record straight. In recent months, when asked about the issue of speeding, we have never acknowledged that it’s not a problem, and we continue to address it,” Brooks said. “However, the suggestion that the University or the athletic department turns a blind eye to domestic abuse and sexual abuse by ignoring reports and turning a blind eye to bad behavior is absolutely wrong. It crossed a serious line, and we will not stand for this conjecture.”

1689118634240.png
Kirby Smart and other Georgia officials defended UGA on Tuesday. (Tony Walsh/UGA Sports Communications)

Three of the incidents cited by the AJC—the 2018 suspension of Tray Bishop for felony eavesdropping/surveillance, the 2019 arrest of wide receiver JJ Holloman for assault, and the 2022 arrest of linebacker Adam Anderson for alleged rape—were mentioned prominently.

In each instance, the players were suspended immediately after Smart learned of the charges involved. None ever took a snap for the Bulldogs again.

“I can handle a lot of talk, but I cannot and will not tolerate these false accusations that this football program or this university condones sexual misconduct. No tolerance for sexual misconduct or abuse, never have, never will. We have that. We have a protocol in place,” Smart said. “We address allegations swiftly and quickly, and two of the examples cited in recent reports illustrate our suspension policy: they never played another game for Georgia. How is that to be contorted as supportive of bad behavior?”

Brooks agreed.

“The three prominent examples used are misleading and irresponsible. These reports cite examples that are called the most egregious and significant, yet each one is grossly mischaracterized,” he said. “The reporting also conveniently minimizes the actions we have done in direct response to address these matters. Of the three most significant examples cited by this reporter that claim we rally around players accused of violence against women, none of these players ever took a single snap after being charged with a crime.”

UGASports broke the news of a letter from the UGA Athletic Constitution to the AJC demanding a retraction. You can read a copy of the letter here.

“We take these allegations extremely seriously. Me, personally, I take them extremely seriously. WE DO NOT TOLERATE sexual misconduct in our organization. I’m the football coach, and I’m responsible for this program, and that starts with me. I see this as a topic through the lenses of I have a wife, and I have a daughter,” Smart said. “I just want to be clear this is so far beyond that. We don’t tolerate that in any way, shape, or form. We’ve got expectations and values for the players in this organization. I might not always like the news that gets reported, but I know it needs to be shared, and it needs to be shared accurately. All I ask is to avoid twisting the facts and sensationalizing serious issues. It’s never OK. Work to get the facts correct and accurate.”

During the briefing, Griffin explained the process and protocol for what happens when a UGA student-athlete is accused of wrongdoing.

“We are all required under Title IX and the law to promptly report any allegations of sexual misconduct, discrimination, and/or harassment to the appropriate authorities,” she said. “Our standard and expectations in athletics are that we over-report. Athletics does not administer either policy, therefore we must give the information to the appropriate authorities, where they are reviewed and their analysis. Athletics employees may not investigate on their own.”

Griffin said responses to accusations have always been swift. Punishments, she added, have been decisive.

“We have taken swift and decisive action regarding team participation, just based on reports. With known reports, I have notified Coach Smart of the need for all parties involved for an individual to not represent us in competition and/or to modify their access to team activities until we have additional information regarding the legal process and the campus review,” she said. “I cannot think of an instance where we have not been completely aligned on the need to take quick and appropriate action.”

Griffin also responded to the notion that the athletic association needs to be more transparent regarding punishments given to student-athletes.

“For those who may be thinking why we don’t announce the specifics of individual disciplinary responses, students, both complainants and respondents, have privacy interest,” Griffin said. “What we are at liberty to say is our disciplinary measures may include but are not limited to dismissal from the team, suspension from competition, reduction of athletic achievement awards, reduction of athletics aid, cancellation of athletics aid, and/or mandatory educational resources and counseling interventions.”

The session with selected reporters did not center just on sexual misconduct. Smart addressed the ongoing issues with speeding and reckless driving, an issue he agrees continues to be a problem.

It’s been a difficult off-season for the Bulldogs, starting back in January when offensive lineman Devin Willock and Chandler LeCroy were killed in a tragic automobile accident.

But instead of serving as a deterrent, other incidents occurred.

Since the deaths of Willock and LeCroy, UGASports has reported on what could be described as numerous traffic-related arrests, including those of former defensive lineman Jalen Carter, De’Nylon Morrissette, and Marcus Rosemy-Jacksaint, while freshmen linebacker Samuel M’Pemba was cited for excessive speed in Oconee County.

“I don’t know if we can eradicate speeding,” Smart said. “But I’m damn sure going to try.”

Question Re/ Pat Fitzgerald Firing

Fitzgerald's attorney, Dan Webb, is quoted as saying

"I cannot understand how you could terminate someone for cause when they [Northwestern] admit that their own lawyer does not have any evidence that my client ever knew anything at all, about any of the alleged hazing behavior,"

My question is if homo-erotic bullying was a common practice in the company or organization you work for, and the CEO didn't know anything about it, would the CEO be fired?

In my organization the CEO would be fired immediately. You are negligent if that type of thing is occurring and you are not aware of it.

Just wondering

OL recruiting - Numbers, takes, & creating options (LONG)

TL/ DR - Clemson needs to take at least 4 OL EVERY CYCLE

I am cobbling together a string of posts / thoughts I have spread throughout a number of OL-related threads the last week, so if it sounds like I’m repeating myself I probably am. But I think it’s relevant and wanted to get it all in one place, so here we go:

As @Paul Strelow reminded us today, OL does not live or die with one cycle. However, the concern becomes the number of able-bodies on campus who are ready/able to contribute meaningful snaps, or lack thereof, when stacking classes of 2-3 OL on top of each other.

OL evals are notoriously tough and rankings are often a crapshoot. Add to that the fact that OL are at high risk for injury, plus the state of the portal has made attrition more likely than ever….and it’s a recipe for depth issues when signing that few every year.

It’s all about numbers and giving yourself options. There are 5 positions on the OL to be played at once, plus ideally want to have 2 or 3 rotational guys to sub in or spell an injured starter if needed. That’s 8 guys you want ready to contribute every year. Given the fact that it usually takes OL 2-3 years on campus to develop….it makes it increasingly harder to plug roster holes when a guy gets hurt, transfers, or just doesn’t pan out (especially when you don’t utilize the portal, but that’s a different conversation for a different thread.)

UGA has 6 OL committed this year after taking 5, 5, 4, & 6 the previous 4 cycles. With that many takes, they only have to “hit” on 33% of their commits to avoid a shortfall. Clemson appears to have “hit” on Miller, Sadler, Reed, & Sewell, which is great, but God forbid one of them suffers a season/career ending injury or has some crazy scenario where they transfer out. Clemson has to hit on nearly 100% of their takes if they’re only taking 2 or 3 every year. 4 should be the minimum EVERY CYCLE. If Clemson is only hitting on 1 or sometimes 2 OL recruits every year, it makes it nearly impossible to build experience & depth when they’re constantly going to be calling on 1st/2nd year players to contribute before they are ready.

Now, I know some of you are thinking, “But @funkbott, where are those extra OL scholarships going to come from? Are you suggesting Clemson should start processing guys???”

A good question, but the answer is no, not at all.

In this era, It’s safe to assume that quite a few of a class’s signees are not going to be on campus for 5 or even 4 years. Attrition due to injury, transfer, lack of playing time, etc is inevitable. And if they end up with 16-18 OL on scholarship instead of the normal 15 then so be it; you need options at OL, and several of them. Maybe they take one less DB or LB, or maybe they don’t have 4 specialists on scholarship, or maybe they don’t give the walk-on 3rd string QB a scholarship. And if they have to encourage a 4th/5th year who has graduated and is not expected to see the field or contribute to “move on,” I’d hardly consider that “processing” anybody.

Furthermore, unlike nearly every other school in the country, Clemson does not take transfers….so since they are losing so many every year to attrition, and not bringing any in via the portal, it should mean that they would have the liberty to take a couple more guys out of high school. The numbers will ALWAYS work out.

To emphasize this, below is a list of Clemson’s OL recruiting takes by year since 2017, as well as the recruits from the same classes who did not finish their careers here (& theoretically, where another potential OL scholarship could’ve come from)


2017:
Clemson signs 3 OL
- Noah DeHond
- Blake Vinson
- Matt Bockhorst
1/3 hits (Bockhorst was good at G but Dehond never panned out & Vinson had injuries)

That year Clemson also signed:
- Two QBs, both of whom eventually transfer
- LeAnthony Williams & Jordan Williams, eventual transfers
- Logan Rudolph, gives up football

2018:
Clemson went into December with ZERO OL commits, ended up with 2
- Jordan McFadden
- Jackson Carman
2/2 hits (2 NFL draft picks but not enough bodies, they were fortunate they got these 2)

That year Clemson also signed:
- Josh Belk, laziest player of all time who didn’t make it through the first summer
- Braden Galloway, 2nd laziest player of all time who somehow got worse every year
- Kyler McMichael, who transferred out early
- Dakereon Kendrick, Mike Jones, Lyn J Dixon, Darnell Jeffries, all transferred out (or dismissed) before year 4

2019:
Clemson went into December with ONE OL commit, ended up with 3
- Hunter Rayburn
- Kaleb Boateng
- Will Putnam
1.5/3 hits (Rayburn filled a void when needed & probably would’ve started another year had injuries not forced his retirement. Putnam solid but forced into action too early in his career due to previous OL recruiting shortcomings. Thankful he is still around)

That year, Clemson also signed:

- Jalyn Lay, 2nd TE of the class who looked the part but never contributed, transfer
- Chez Mellusi, transfer after minimal contribution
- Michael Dukes, late Dabo scholarship who was out of his league here and also a headcase, transfer
- Taisun Phummachan, I know we wanted Howell but this was our next choice? Transfer
- FOUR linebackers - only Maguire still around for year 5. Constantin injury & Bentley / Patterson transfer
- FOUR safeties - Charleston & Thornton transfer & Zanders early retirement from injury. Only Phillips still around
- FOUR project DE’s - only Ruke panned out, Logan Cash, ET Reuben, Greg Williams transfer
- Another project DT in Tayquan Johnson. That makes FIVE developmental DL prospect takes the same year Clemson puts 3 former blue chips in the first round of the draft. Unreal

2020:
Clemson backfills with 6 to make up for previous shortfalls. Good looking OL class on paper, but alas…

- Walker Parks
- Mitchell Mays
- Paul Tchio
- John Williams
- Bryn Tucker
- Trent Howard
(1.5 / 6 hits) - Parks is solid and Mays makes for a good but not great rotational guy…Tchio was Charmin-soft, transfer, Williams injuries, Tucker & Howard still here but probably won’t provide any meaningful snaps

That year, Clemson also took:
- AjoeAjoe, project, transfer
- Demarcus Bowman, headcase, transfer
- Kobe Pace, transfer
- Sergio Allen, transfer
- Kevin Swint, transfer
- Fred Davis, transfer
- Malcolm Greene, transfer

2021:
Clemson builds on the momentum of 2020 with 4 good-looking OL takes. 4 + 6 from last year = 10 AKA 5/ year avg and that makes @funkbott a happy boy
- Marcus Tate
- Dietrick Pennington
- Ryan Linthicum
- Tristan Leigh
(2/4 hits) - Tate is solid despite being forced into action early due to the previous OL recruiting shortfalls (sound familiar?) I’m giving Leigh the benefit of the doubt but he has to show it this year. Pennington certainly looks the part but has to stay healthy & conditioned. Jury still out. RL I do not expect much out of at all, over-ranked as a recruit

That year clemson also took:
- Bubba Chandler, MLB
- Dacari Collins, transfer
- Zaire Patterson, lazy project constantly in doghouse
- Troy Stellato & Will Taylor, injuries/baseball, color me shocked if either of these guys are still on the team this time next year

2022:
Clemson signs 2 good ones
- Blake Miller
- Collin Sadler
(2/2 hits) - And thank God. Pray for Miller’s health this year because we’re already having a hard enough time nailing down the other tackle spot

That year Clemson also took:
- Two kickers
- Keith Adams, decent looking but unheralded legacy recruit
- Kobe McCloud, Jaheim Lawson, Myles Oliver, Kylon Griffin - unheralded backfill prospects after Venables defections
- Cole Turner, good looking underrated WR prospect, but still an 11th hour Dabo scholarship

2023:
Clemson signs 3, giving them 5 over 2 cycles AKA 2.5/ year avg and that makes @funkbott a sad panda
- Ian Reed
- Harris Sewell
- Zach Owens
(Too early to call hit or miss here, but my money is on 2/3)

Last year, Clemson also took:

SEVEN defensive backs, including a local, unheralded, legacy prospect


The last couple weeks have been disappointing for OL recruiting…..here’s to hoping Clemson can identify a late bloomer, or flip a quality prospect from an inferior opponent, or snag a decommit at some point during the season. It’s about the ones you get…..I just want to see us get MOAR!

My Guess At The 2023 & 2024 2 Deep Offensive Line Depth Chart

2023
LT 71 Leigh So.*
50 Sadler Fr.*
LG 74 Tate Jr.
55 Sewell Fr.
C 56 Putnam Sr.^
53 Linthicum So.*
RG 64 Parks Jr.^
59 Pennington So.*
RT 78 Miller So.
77 Mayes Jr.^

2024
LT 71 Leigh Jr.*
50 Sadler So.*
LG 74 Tate Sr.
55 Sewell So.
77 Mayes Sr.^
C 53 Linthicum Jr.*
55 Sewell So.
RG 64 Parks Sr.^
59 Pennington Jr.*
54 Reed Fr.*
RT 78 Miller Jr.
77 Mayes Sr.^
72 Owens Fr.*

New York Times Closing its Sports Department

New York Times announces it will close down sports department after staff demands answers

Special needs charity. GAME DAY FOUNDATION year 2

First off, thank you for those who donated money / tickets last year. That was the first time Clemson was added to the game list. The family we were able to send had a blast.

Just a recap. This is a foundation / charity, started out of Alabama. It sends special needs children and their parent(s) to a college football game that they otherwise would not be able to attend. The three requirements are the child has to be special needs , a clemson fan, and the family has to be struggling financially. The combination of the two can really be a serious struggle and the goal here is to give the family a day they can remember.

Primarily in sec country ,we were able to partner with them last year for the first time and send a family to a clemson game. This year we are going for two families, they have been identified and are local upstate children.

The foundation meets the family at Death Valley ,takes a few photos and transfers the tickets in person. They use donation Money to give the family money for concessions , a souvenir , and even gas money. Then we get out of the way and let them have fun. (The little girl last year cried while the players came off the bus and man it was moving. )


Here’s what we need, donation of :

: 2 sets of tickets. One set of two (single parent and one child )
one set of three. ( 2 parents 1 child )
Can be the same game, can be different. Cupcakes are fine. Notre Dame is fine. We will take anything we can get.


Ps : You can donate here if you like the cause. We were able to jump from one family to two. If you do donate please put clemson in parenthesis so they know where to allocate the funds. Nothing goes to anybody involved it’s 100 percent used for the children and their families.

Please dm if you for sure have tickets available and I will get you the email to send questions/ the tickets to.

https://gofund.me/f017f895
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT