ADVERTISEMENT

*New MWP Podcast* ACC and Sun Belt Broadcaster Noah Frary!

Login to view embedded media
Noah Frary set out to make his broadcasting dream a reality. Today, he's living out that dream of doing what he loves. He joins me on this latest episode to give insight into his unusual journey and a peak behind the curtains in the broadcasting world.


Here's my interview with Trevion Thompson from last week if anyone missed it! - Login to view embedded media

“Power mapping”: How woke activists extract concessions from their targets with a carefully calculated playbook…

This is a patented process from the communist left.


Wokal Distance

Subscribe
@wokal_distance
Jun 1 • 33 tweets • 12 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Scrolly
Bookmark Save as PDF
1/
The Dodgers and Blue Jays both gave in to pressure from woke activists.

This happens is woke activists have sophisticated tactics for pressuring people into giving them what they want.

So, I'm going to explain EXACTLY how their tactics work so you can fight back

let's go🧵

2/

Using the activist handbook "beautiful trouble," as our guide I'll show you how none of the protests, marches, or social media campaigns are spontaneous, but are in fact well planned actions created by activists in order to extract concessions from whoever they target.Image
3/
The first step is called "power-mapping."
Power mapping is: "A tool to not only identify who holds that power, but, crucially, who holds influence over that person, and, therefore, who to target with your direct actions"
This is how the woke "survey the battlefield.

Image

Power mappingis how the woke determine who has the power to give them what they want,**and how they can be vulnerable to pressure.** Remember, the woke want to take power, and to do that they need to know WHO to take it from and how. Power mapping tells them who has power.
5/
Look at the diagram on power-mapping from Beautiful Trouble. Note that it includes their friends, their church, their family....everyone. The woke are looking for any angle they can find to put pressure on the person they are targeting.Image
6/
Once they map the power dynamics: who has the power, and the pressure points of those people, they have to figure out who to target. Sometimes the target has no direct weaknesses, so they have to go after them indirectly.

That means the woke: "Choose your target wisely"
7/
You must "Choose your target wisely" because, In their words: "You might not have enough power to push your primary target at first, but your actions may help you identify a secondary target...that can be pressured to leverage their influence on the primary target."
8/
If done correctly, the can determine smaller more vulnerable targets that can be pressured and leveraged to go after much bigger targets. Like a domino effect where a small domino knock over progressively larger dominoes. (Pic 1)
9/
See how that works? They map the power dynamics, figure out who has power, figure out where that persons pressure points are (in both their professional and *PRIVATE* life), and who they can pressure in order to build leverage and momentum to go after the main target.
10/
To Quote Beautiful Trouble: "You might not have enough power to push your primary target at first, but your actions may help you identify a secondary target — an individual or group that can be pressured to leverage their influence on the primary target"

Just like dominosImage
11/
Once they pick a target they analyze the "spectrum of allies."

The idea behind the spectrum of allies is that society isn't divided into those who are for you or against you, society a spectrum of various opinions on all sides, and the woke want to know who stands where.Image
12/
The woke determine the social blocs in play (the people/groups involved) and put them into 5 categories:
active allies-who fight with them
passive allies-who agree but don't act
neutrals
passive opposition-who disagree but don't act
active opposition -who actively fight themImage
13/
The goal is to shift each group over one notch on the spectrum (IE:They want passive opposition to become neutral, Neutrals to become passive allies, and passive allies to become active allies). If each group moves over one notch, that shifts the entire spectrum.Image
14/
The Dodgers were Passive allies (allowing a prode night but not hostility to Catholics) and were shifted into being Active Allies.

Blues Jays pitcher Anthony Bass was outspoken Activie opposition who was shifted one notch into passive opposition and must be quiet.

See that?
15/
As beautiful Trouble says: "Movements seldom win by overpowering the opposition; they win by shifting support out from under it"

The woke realize that people might not totally agree with them, but if everyone moves one notch toward them they shift society in their directionImage
16/
So, once the woke have done all that, they act.

The first strategy is to put their target in a "decision dilemma." This is where they pick and action that forces the target to react, but leaves them with no good options. The target is put in an impossible situation
17/
For example, The Dodgers could either stand firm in their decision and get a ton of backlash from LGBT groups and the media, or they could give in and offend all the Catholics.

They are forced to pick a side, and have no easy way out.

That's a Decision Dillema.
18/
The same is true with blockcades. If the police arrest you, you get to look like a martyr, if they don't you now control the road...police have no good options.

Decision Dillema's are paired with another strategy:
19/
"The Real Action if your Target's Reaction."
The goal is for the target to react to the woke pressure tactics, but to react in a way the woke can take advantage of.

It's like luring the target into a woke trap.ImageImage
20/
So, what the woke will do if force you into a situation where not matter how hard you try to please them, they'll just say it isn't good enough. and then demand more. IF you don't give in you get called a bigot, if you do give in, they just ask for more and demand more.
21/
Any reaction you give creates more publicity, draws more attention to the fight, and creates more bad publicity for you.

See how that works?

the whole POINT is to leave you with only bad options in hopes that you'll just cave completely.
22/
Once all of this is going on, and the woke have done an action (protest, boycott, demands, etc) they now have to win the fight in the media. They have tactics for this as well.

First "Seize the Means of Communication"Image
23/
So how do you do that? Well, Beautiful Trouble does not say exactly, but they do tell us one way that you might do that, and it is "Do the Media's Work For Them."

Basically, give the journalists the story you want them to write, and let THEM print it so it looks authentic.ImageImage
24/
This is how woke activist talking points come out of the mouths of so many journalists.

Further, they want to make sure that they tape their own events, publicize their own events, and try to wage a sort of narrative warfare that allows them to control the narrative....
25/
Again, none of this is organic or spontaneous....all of it is planned.

Part of the Narrative control is to "Play to the Audience That isn't There"

The idea here is simple, the largest audience isn't the people at a given event, it's people on social media and on cable newsImageImage
26/
To Quote Beautiful Trouble again: "In a media-saturated world, the audience you care about is rarely the one witnessing your action, but rather the one you’ll reach through mass media and social media. Design your action with them in mind."

What this means in practice...Image
27/
Is that the woke try to make it so that they always look like the victim, even when they are the ones picking the fight and trying to shut other people up.

By understanding how optics work, the woke are able to control how their actions are viewed by those watching.
28/
Finally, there are two more ideas we need to understand before we finish. "Use Your Radical Fringe to Shift the Overton WIndow."

This is one of the more common, and dishonest, tactics the woke engage in.ImageImage
29/
The idea is that there are two ways to win in politics.

The long, hard way is to continue making your actual case persistently and persuasively until your position becomes accepted. The easy say to to amplify the voices of those a few notches more radical than you...
30/
order to make yourself look more moderate...

This is why the left will amplify the voices of the most radical members of their group. It is so that less crazy people look sane by comparison. This is a way of making themselves appear closer to the center then they are. but...Image
31/
they haven't moved to the center, they just held up the most radical person they could find to make themselves look less crazy.

Do you see how all of that works?

Are you getting the picture yet?
32/
Everything the left does, all of their succesful actions, all of their victories in the culture, all of that is a result of carefully planned out analysis of the social groups in play, who has power, how the media can be used, how to shift society and the overton window...
33/
And how to move society in their direction.

So long as conservatives refuse to engage with this, and refuse to understand how these tactics work, they will continue to get hammered.

You *MUST* understand woke tactics in order to beat them. This thread is a good start.

OT: homeowners in Mt Pleasant. Holy crap!

Our fly by night homeowners just informed us that they will be dropping us. Our neighbors just received a $7k renewal. Our homeowners was $2300 two years ago, but the company went bankrupt and now we spend $4500 but have to find a new policy.

Our house is less than 3000 sq ft but our location kills us (we are across the street from the water).

Any body have a provider that will not kill me in the Charleston area (MTP)?

Some of yall baseball ‘woe is me’ posters are exhibit A of the butterfly effect. Like Steve Bartman.

I know, the title doesn't sound like it has anything to do with SEC Football, but bear with me. This is the story of how the fates of the Alabama Crimson Tide, the Chicago Cubs, the Miami Dolphins, the WVU Mountaineers, the LSU Tigers & the Michigan Wolverines would all be vastly different had Bartman not caught that foul ball.

I read a thread on CFB Reddit by a user named DisraeliEers, which I can't link here due to profanity in the comments, but I found the post so interesting, that I thought I'd try and convey and expound upon it's ideas here. It's definitely a stretch, but it's a fun idea, and it's a fun off-season topic. Feel free to google the original article.

In game 6 of the 2003 NL Championship series between the Cubs & Marlins, Steve Bartman interfered with a foul ball and made history. The Cubs went on to lose the game and eventually the NLCS sending the Marlins to the World Series.

In 2003, the Marlins and the Dolphins shared the same stadium and since the Marlins were in the World Series, the dirt on the pitchers mound remained on the playing field for a couple extra weeks during the early weeks of the NFL season.

One of those weeks, October 19th, 2003, the Dolphins played the Patriots. Olindo Mare, one of the best kickers in the game, missed 2 FG, both of which were kicked from the area used for the pitchers mound. Both missed kicks were blamed on kicking off of the soft dirt instead of the usual grass. The game went to OT where the Dolphins eventually lost.

The Dolphins finished their season at 10-6, one game shy of the playoffs. This was the second straight season the Dolphins had missed the playoffs, a first since 1996. The team was traded away & free agents were allowed to walk in order to rebuild the team. The next season, the Dolphins started 1-8, their coach, Dave Wannstedt left midway thru the season and became the Pittsburgh Panthers head coach. Nick Saban left LSU for the Dolphins, and Les Miles left OkSU for LSU.

In his 3rd season at Pitt, Wannstedt lead the Panthers to one of the biggest upsets of the decade. At 4-7 and a 28.5 point underdog, they took down the #2 Mountaineers in Morgantown, a team that was poised to play in the 2007 National Title game. This loss propelled a 2-loss LSU team back into the national title game where they eventually won and helped continue the streak of current SEC BCS Championships.

This loss is also what propelled Rich Rodriguez into the Michigan job. Had WVU won, Rodriguez would have stayed. What coach in their right mind leaves for another job when their current team is set to play in the National Title game? If Rodriguez stays at WVU, the SEC, and Alabama might look completely different.

Miles would have probably left for Michigan, leaving the door open for a Saban return to LSU. Remember, this was all during the time Saban was on the verge of leaving the Dolphins. Given the prospects of returning to an already stocked LSU team that he had built, or trying to rebuild a struggling Alabama program, I believe he would have returned to LSU.

The only point of contention is how much did the Dolphins missing the postseason for the 2nd straight year in 2003 really cause in regards to players leaving the team/rebuilding. Most believe quite a bit. Had the Dolphins gone 11-5, they wouldn't have let so many veterans walk away and they most certainly wouldn't have started 1-8 the following season.

Without Bartman catching that fly ball, the SEC wouldn't have 6 straight, and the league wouldn't have the recruiting advantage we currently do. Alabama probably wouldn't have Nick Saban. Either Ohio State or WVU would have an additional National Title. LSU probably wouldn't have Les Miles, Michigan wouldn't have Brady Hoke, WVU would probably still have Rich Rodriguez, etc. The outcry over the current BCS system probably wouldn't exist because 2 SEC teams wouldn't have played in the National Title game last year thus forcing other commissioners to rethink the NCAA postseason. Conference realignment either wouldn't have happened, or it would look much different than what we currently have. Had WVU won the National Title in 2007, I believe they would have been the 14th team invited to the SEC, not Missouri. Heck, the Cubs might even have finally won a World Series!

  • Poll
At what time should the Monday Morning Insider be released?

At what time should the Monday Morning Insider be released?

  • 11:59 PM Sunday - (Be Like Dabo and do it a day early)

    Votes: 28 26.4%
  • 12:01 AM Monday - (You have stuck to your word and waited until Monday)

    Votes: 30 28.3%
  • 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM Monday (Standard release time)

    Votes: 42 39.6%
  • 11:59 PM Monday (Be a BOSS and piss everyone off)

    Votes: 6 5.7%

At what time should the Monday Morning Insider be released?

OT: Weekend Outdoor Cooking Thread.....

Getting ready to fog up the neighborhood.

Sorry, not going Tommy Chong style...getting ready to light a chimney starter.




Wife wanted to try this:




Who's with me?
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT