“Pro life”

[Cavitybacks]

This was just a dumbass excuse used by the OBGYN. If a doctor cites a medical emergency, unless there’s just some sort of pattern, nobody is going win a lawsuit, especially if the mother agrees to the abortion to save her life. People sue doctors all the time to get some settlement money. My cousin is an obgyn and they’ve got a ton of malpractice insurance. They’re making quick decisions and also listening to these mothers as best they can.

You never know the conversation. The mom could’ve been begging to not do anything if there was still a heartbeat.

 

[Cavitybacks]

It’s fascinating though how this topic gets thrown around during elections and nobody cares. I work at an office full of women and they’re like well here we go again. Nobody cares.

The genius marketing ploy was changing it from “Pro-Life” “Pro-Choice” and protecting the life of the unborn to protecting “Women’s Rights”. That is much more palatable and genius from the democrats.

It’s also fascinating how political sides were chosen as this is much more of a spiritual issue than political.

As a conservative, why in the hell would you want 75 million (much more after they reproduce) extra low-income drain on the system humans who have a higher likelihood of crime, welfare, etc added to our country? Vast majority with single family moms who didn’t even desire to raise the kid. They would have ZERO chance. Harsh, but reality.

Liberals often act as the group who likes to protect “the least of these” - and it’s hard to think of a more vulnerable group than the unborn.

 

[J.Greenbeans]

It’s fascinating though how this topic gets thrown around during elections and nobody cares. I work at an office full of women and they’re like well here we go again. Nobody cares.

The genius marketing ploy was changing it from “Pro-Life” “Pro-Choice” and protecting the life of the unborn to protecting “Women’s Rights”. That is much more palatable and genius from the democrats.

It’s also fascinating how political sides were chosen as this is much more of a spiritual issue than political.

As a conservative, why in the hell would you want 75 million (much more after they reproduce) extra low-income drain on the system humans who have a higher likelihood of crime, welfare, etc added to our country? Vast majority with single family moms who didn’t even desire to raise the kid. They would have ZERO chance. Harsh, but reality.

Liberals often act as the group who likes to protect “the least of these” - and it’s hard to think of a more vulnerable group than the unborn.

Pro-life is something evangelical conservatives ( those that follow Jesus) cannot budge on. The Bible is pretty clear on this.

But yeah, I get what you're saying. I think it even says it in the book freakonomics.

 

[Cavitybacks]

Pro-life is something evangelical conservatives ( those that follow Jesus) cannot budge on. The Bible is pretty clear on this.

But yeah, I get what you're saying. I think it even says it in the book freakonomics.

IF the democrats had picked to be on team pro-life, which makes way more sense imo…I think they’d win a ton of elections if they had that in their back pocket.

 

[J.Greenbeans]

IF the democrats had picked to be on team pro-life, which makes way more sense imo…I think they’d win a ton of elections if they had that in their back pocket.

Yeah, But it would be another conundrum for feminists and the sexual promiscuous.