A Personal Heads Up from IG Michael Horowitz preceding the FISA Abuse Report coming Dec. 9th
- Thread starter orangelvis
- Start date
Bro, make your arguments in writing like the rest of us. It's just lazy to post a bunch of videos on a forum and expect us to go watch them.
Keep it up. He didn't say anything specifically contained within any investigation. Just stated his scope is broader and he has access to more evidence. Thus, you either have reading comprehension problems, or you just don't like the idea of getting to the truth of how the 2.5 year, 40 million nothing burger Russia narrative happened or why. You are the partisan hack. As soon we're NOT investigating Trump, you immediately disparage the outstanding men of the DOJ who have served multiple presidents.
Yes, BOTH IG Reports will be part of blowing up the Deep State. You think things like justice, happens overnight? As soon as the Report drops, and the Fake News spins it, (in your case, sometimes before the report drops), you think it's over. You could care less about evidence, just what your lefty sources say about it. The truth about this latest Report only started becoming clear in Horowitz's Senate testimony. There will be more testimony. Good grief, the thing is over 400 pages. As soon as the media spins Horowitz's summary statements, you think it's all over.
...and Rudy. Rudy was in Ukraine long before Barr was even appointed. Does the POTUS who was being investigated by Mueller, not have the right for his lawyer to investigate evidence of his innocence? Some of you people think only libs have rights. Also, a POTUS can appoint anyone to back channel foreign policy. Every POTUS since George Washington has done this. FDR had a guy, Harry Hopkins, who actually lived in the WH for a while. He sent Hopkins all over the world. Back channeled with Stalin, even.
Last edited:
sorry
lyndsay says this is a sham and he will not treat it with much respect.
mitch says he has to entertain this. if he didnt he would just table.
he says he will listen to schiffs attorney, then the presidents, the they will throw it in the trash.
hey @orangelvis
they are trolling you from here on out.
they now know for a fact a fbi attorney forged a document that started this whole mess.
a fake dossier and a fake fisa court order.
i cant believe the magnitude of such behavior.
once mitch throws this in the trash-
trump should fire every state dept official that was there before he arrived.
he needs to fire wray and find someone to clean up the fbi.
they are trolling you from here on out.
they now know for a fact a fbi attorney forged a document that started this whole mess.
a fake dossier and a fake fisa court order.
i cant believe the magnitude of such behavior.
once mitch throws this in the trash-
trump should fire every state dept official that was there before he arrived.
he needs to fire wray and find someone to clean up the fbi.
nobody expected anything different. the republicans are not going to go against trump, he has made all republican politicians his little bitches. History will not be kind to them though.
hey orange he is just fukking with you.
they know the truth now.
im curious what lyndsay is going to do about cnn and msnbc.
those 2 companies were definitely involved in fueling this coup.
what happened can be defined as an attempted "coup".
i wanna see graham drag jeff from cnn and whoever runs msnbc and rake those guys over the coals for lying to american people.
cnn is trying to figure out how to save face.
they got like a week.
the losers were the businesses who lost profit from them delaying the usmca
for a year.
thats way worse than holding money from ukraine.
schiff ......
for a year.
thats way worse than holding money from ukraine.
schiff ......
Don't c
What a fvckn joke. History will not be kind to the dems; as documented by what will happen in the 2020 elections.
obstruction of congress.
not justice.
why congress?
they skipped the courts and straight to impeachment.
that will be thrown out.
then they(graham) will probably open an investigation after the impeachment into joe bidens quids pro separate from trump all together.
not justice.
why congress?
they skipped the courts and straight to impeachment.
that will be thrown out.
then they(graham) will probably open an investigation after the impeachment into joe bidens quids pro separate from trump all together.
farmers in the midwest are going to be pissed when they realize there pocketbooks were thefted by the house democrats.
lol that is a well written summary, I do think you are 100% right that Mitch will handle it that way.
Was that in the Breitbart link? I read it but I didn't watch the video. I'll go back and do that. My bad.
the president did fukk up by mentioning biden.
he was with holding the aid to get nato to chip in more.
france and germany hate trump because he wants them to pay for our defense.
anyway, rudy, is running a private investigation seperate from official policy.
they need to make that clear.
that rudy represents candidate trump not president trump.
hillary and the dnc did some unethical things similar to what the fbi agent did.
rudy will get to the bottom of this.
but i argue-
make it public and transparent that rudy is investigating. which is good for both trump and future candidates.
make it clear that its not official us policy.
hey i wonder how much this affected trump trying to squeeze more money out of nato?
the real reason trump was with holding funds got lost.
did france chip more? did germany?
or did schiff completely kill trumps advantage he had to squeeze nato?
no worries, american taxpayers dont mind paying the bill.
the real reason trump was with holding funds got lost.
did france chip more? did germany?
or did schiff completely kill trumps advantage he had to squeeze nato?
no worries, american taxpayers dont mind paying the bill.
if i was lyndsay
first thing this morning i would be like-
"How much did this sham cost us?"
and put together a report of how much this affected and effected us.
i bet billions it cost us.
i heard that them sitting on usmca cost a full gdp point maybe a point 25.
dems are gon a suffer bigtime.
gonna be hard to spin this.
first thing this morning i would be like-
"How much did this sham cost us?"
and put together a report of how much this affected and effected us.
i bet billions it cost us.
i heard that them sitting on usmca cost a full gdp point maybe a point 25.
dems are gon a suffer bigtime.
gonna be hard to spin this.
wow wolf blitzer just froze raskin in his shoes.
a constitutional law professor just got busted lying on cnn....
a constitutional law professor just got busted lying on cnn....
cnn still spinning rudy this morning.
hmmm. wonder why they care so much?
she says "they are doing this in plain sight" LOL
cant wait to read his 20 page report
hmmm. wonder why they care so much?
she says "they are doing this in plain sight" LOL
cant wait to read his 20 page report
we got some dumbass professors in the poly sci dept.
wonder who is the head of that coaching tree
wonder who is the head of that coaching tree
nope. dems are doing what they are constitutionally obligated to do, whether popular or not. Trump only does what is in his own best interest, and that house of cards will soon come tumbling down.
Throughout the entire process, didn’t the dems say they wanted to negotiate the things that were eventually ironed out in the end?
And btw, Germany and France more than enough for our defense. They just pay private companies through a contracting mechanism. Trump wants them to pay the US government. That’s socialist.
US commitment to NATO
Defense spending, or the lack thereof, has created so much ire in Trump that there are reports that he frequently discussed pulling the U.S. out of the alliance, even with Congressional support.
In July, he also likened countries not meeting the defense spend target, like Germany, to delinquents.
“We’re the schmucks that are paying for the whole thing,” Trump said at a rally in July. “Frankly, many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back, where they’re delinquent, as far as I’m concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them,” singling out Germany as “the number one” culprit.
Defense spending, or the lack thereof, has created so much ire in Trump that there are reports that he frequently discussed pulling the U.S. out of the alliance, even with Congressional support.
In July, he also likened countries not meeting the defense spend target, like Germany, to delinquents.
“We’re the schmucks that are paying for the whole thing,” Trump said at a rally in July. “Frankly, many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back, where they’re delinquent, as far as I’m concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them,” singling out Germany as “the number one” culprit.
Similar threads
