Watching Hitchens highlights on youtube is fun.I gave you evidence. You are ignoring it. I'd bet that without google you couldn't tell us who Hitchens is in that meme.
Watching Hitchens highlights on youtube is fun.I gave you evidence. You are ignoring it. I'd bet that without google you couldn't tell us who Hitchens is in that meme.
He offered evidence in post #16, which I believe he was referring too.
Most of what I see in post 16 is unfounded, and frankly, uneducated opinion. Like his take on the Iran Deal. Totally and patently false. Iran never actually signed a deal, so technically, there is no official deal. Not even the dems in the Senate would back the deal at the time O was trying to make it. This was a concoction of the Obama admin that there was deal. If there was a deal, then I'm sure one of you can give the date on which it was signed.
The gov't shutdown was one of the most brilliant political moves in modern history. During the shutdown the press was forced to cover it and the public became aware that the dems have been for border walls in the past and now really are for open borders. Trumps poll numbers went up over 50% during this time.
The people who aren't now forced to buy something they don't need are very happy the individual mandate is gone. The truth is your premiums have going up at higher rates ever since O'care was rammed down the throats of the American people.
The Swamp is being drained. Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, James Baker, Bill Preistep, etc are all gone. Traitors all.
China: So he was inferring that everything was fine with China before. That's ignorance. Trump is beating them into a deal. Make no mistake, China is a much bigger threat to us than Russia could ever think about being.
12 Russian bot farms indicted for spending around 100K to influence social media. The LinkedIn gu did the same in an Alabama special election. WikiLeaks ha s stated that the emails they received did not come from Russia. Why would Assange lie? He also says he has proof. Better make sure he never makes i back in front of a Grand Jury.
So, apparently all the left-wing shills are starting to down play the Mueller report.Wonder why?
@orangelvis
Did you watch the Cohen hearing? I'd love an honest opinion about the criminal allegations he made against Trump and the moral shortcomings he demonstrated with his testimony.
(Unfortunately, all I expect from you and Growls at this point is something like--well he lied before (even if it was for or possibly at the behest of Trump) and he will lie again (even though that would mean increasing his hard prison time instead of helping him to possibly get a reduced sentence and makes ZERO sense at all.))
The Republican showing in that hearing--from the Gaetz witness intimidation, to Meadows ridiculously bizarre stunt, and Pants on Fire line was disgusting. I love the waste of taxpayers money and doing the people's business arguments after the past year of insane Republican hearings--laughable hypocrisy.
@orangelvis
Did you watch the Cohen hearing? I'd love an honest opinion about the criminal allegations he made against Trump and the moral shortcomings he demonstrated with his testimony.
(Unfortunately, all I expect from you and Growls at this point is something like--well he lied before (even if it was for or possibly at the behest of Trump) and he will lie again (even though that would mean increasing his hard prison time instead of helping him to possibly get a reduced sentence and makes ZERO sense at all.))
The Republican showing in that hearing--from the Gaetz witness intimidation, to Meadows ridiculously bizarre stunt, and Pants on Fire line was disgusting. I love the waste of taxpayers money and doing the people's business arguments after the past year of insane Republican hearings--laughable hypocrisy.
All I've seen are the snippets from the hearing. My main takeaway was that Cohen, once again, denied any Russian collusion and reiterated that he never traveled to the Ukraine or wherever. Also, I find it interesting that Lanny Davis has been representing him for free.
You're going to list out for me these criminal allegations. I didn't see anyone talking about criminal allegations last evening.
Allegedly Trump was inflating the value of his assets and lying about his revenue on loans. Republicans had no response to these accusations. They just kept calling Coehen a liar and he kept saying he brought proof.All I've seen are the snippets from the hearing. My main takeaway was that Cohen, once again, denied any Russian collusion and reiterated that he never traveled to the Ukraine or wherever. Also, I find it interesting that Lanny Davis has been representing him for free.
You're going to list out for me these criminal allegations. I didn't see anyone talking about criminal allegations last evening.
Allegedly Trump was inflating the value of his assets and lying about his revenue on loans. Republicans had no response to these accusations. They just kept calling Coehen a liar and he kept saying he brought proof.
Was a bunch of political nonsense theater. Cohen is trying to make himself look good.
This is correct, the Iran deal was not a signed document or a treaty. It was an agreement that was only ever going to be enforced as far as it was politically expedient to all parties.Most of what I see in post 16 is unfounded, and frankly, uneducated opinion. Like his take on the Iran Deal. Totally and patently false. Iran never actually signed a deal, so technically, there is no official deal. Not even the dems in the Senate would back the deal at the time O was trying to make it. This was a concoction of the Obama admin that there was deal. If there was a deal, then I'm sure one of you can give the date on which it was signed.
This is pretty much all not truthful, except that the Dems had been in favor of more border fencing before it was Trumps Wall in terms of politics. That said, it was not a brilliant move, and it hurt both Trump and congressional Republicans in almost every poll.The gov't shutdown was one of the most brilliant political moves in modern history. During the shutdown the press was forced to cover it and the public became aware that the dems have been for border walls in the past and now really are for open borders. Trumps poll numbers went up over 50% during this time.
Obamacare was never a good solution, it was just supposed to be better than the old status-quo. Was it a better solution than nothing? The Heritage Foundation thought so.The people who aren't now forced to buy something they don't need are very happy the individual mandate is gone. The truth is your premiums have going up at higher rates ever since O'care was rammed down the throats of the American people.
IP theft is our main issue with China and it is a big deal. All the trade imbalance and tariff nonsense is economic ignorance which I have been over already on this board.China: So he was inferring that everything was fine with China before. That's ignorance. Trump is beating them into a deal. Make no mistake, China is a much bigger threat to us than Russia could ever think about being.
This isn't even close to the actual situation and Trump himself acknowledged that when he took credit yesterday for signing off on U.S. Cyber Command shutting down the GRU's IRA group on election day.12 Russian bot farms indicted for spending around 100K to influence social media. The LinkedIn gu did the same in an Alabama special election. WikiLeaks ha s stated that the emails they received did not come from Russia. Why would Assange lie?
Yeah, don't know what to think about all of this. I'm guessing that SDNY will uncover any wrong doing if there is any.
What I'm looking forward to is the following and will probably happen in this order:
1. Mueller report
2. OIG report
3. Declass of everything Rosenstein has been hiding
AOC was clearly not playing up to the camera's but setting the stage for State level prosecution of the Trump organization.First--you should watch it in its entirety. Seriously. You will see this pattern emerge. One side is grandstanding with narratives--not interested in the truth or asking real questions. The other side also does grandstanding and gives some dumb speeches, but questions get asked--grilling and digging, something that hasn't been done on that oversight committee during the past two years (except when it was politically expedient to attack US institutions and law enforcement as a subterfuge).
I won't list everything alleged but we got details from Cohen about Russian collusion in 2016, Cohen said Trump knew in advance that his eldest son, Donald Jr, was meeting Russians promising dirt on Hillary Clinton – and that WikiLeaks would be releasing emails stolen from Democrats by Russian operatives. Trump talked to Stone is definitely important.
Then you have the evidence of hush money payments that violate campaign finance laws for Trump and Trump Jr (we now know is likely executive 2). Then you have the overvaluing or devaluing of assets and property on taxes and to insurance companies/banks that could all be breaking the law.
That is just off the top of my head.
We aren't going to get the Mueller report until the Trump children are either interviewed or indicted. They either have to be asked about their involvement or knowledge (esp with Trump Tower and Russians meeting) or they are targets of the probe.
The desire to have the report done this week was the same nonsense coming from people that kept saying it would be done by the end of the year, etc. etc. Wishful thinking with a new AG (unless he turns out to be corrupt, which I don't think is the case).
I can't wait for that OIG report too! Will it be like the Red November? Can't wait.
No, you're now officially full of shit. Trump did not ask the Russians to do any such thing. I was actually watching that press conference in Florida as it happened. Trump joked that maybe the Russians could find Hillary's missing 30k emails that mysteriously disappeared into thin air. The press laughed when he said it. It wasn't until the Hillary spin machine twisted it and the press got behind it, that weak-minded fools started believing that BS.
I love this. When Trump says something on a video, and there is no way for Orangeelvis to deny that Trump said it, then he employs the "trump was just kidding" argument.
This is correct, the Iran deal was not a signed document or a treaty. It was an agreement that was only ever going to be enforced as far as it was politically expedient to all parties.
This is pretty much all not truthful, except that the Dems had been in favor of more border fencing before it was Trumps Wall in terms of politics. That said, it was not a brilliant move, and it hurt both Trump and congressional Republicans in almost every poll.
Obamacare was never a good solution, it was just supposed to be better than the old status-quo. Was it a better solution than nothing? The Heritage Foundation thought so.
IP theft is our main issue with China and it is a big deal. All the trade imbalance and tariff nonsense is economic ignorance which I have been over already on this board.
This isn't even close to the actual situation and Trump himself acknowledged that when he took credit yesterday for signing off on U.S. Cyber Command shutting down the GRU's IRA group on election day.
First--you should watch it in its entirety. Seriously. You will see this pattern emerge. One side is grandstanding with narratives--not interested in the truth or asking real questions. The other side also does grandstanding and gives some dumb speeches, but questions get asked--grilling and digging, something that hasn't been done on that oversight committee during the past two years (except when it was politically expedient to attack US institutions and law enforcement as a subterfuge).
I won't list everything alleged but we got details from Cohen about Russian collusion in 2016, Cohen said Trump knew in advance that his eldest son, Donald Jr, was meeting Russians promising dirt on Hillary Clinton – and that WikiLeaks would be releasing emails stolen from Democrats by Russian operatives. Trump talked to Stone is definitely important.
Then you have the evidence of hush money payments that violate campaign finance laws for Trump and Trump Jr (we now know is likely executive 2). Then you have the overvaluing or devaluing of assets and property on taxes and to insurance companies/banks that could all be breaking the law.
That is just off the top of my head.
We aren't going to get the Mueller report until the Trump children are either interviewed or indicted. They either have to be asked about their involvement or knowledge (esp with Trump Tower and Russians meeting) or they are targets of the probe.
The desire to have the report done this week was the same nonsense coming from people that kept saying it would be done by the end of the year, etc. etc. Wishful thinking with a new AG (unless he turns out to be corrupt, which I don't think is the case).
I can't wait for that OIG report too! Will it be like the Red November? Can't wait.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/28/judge-overrules-steele-deposition/
I love getting you guys "on the record". Your "understanding" of the Don Jr situation always cracks me up.
There is a good chance that the ongoing SDNY investigation will implicate Don Jr and the Trump family. Was Donnie not at the Trump tower meeting?? Did that meeting not happen in your mind?
You mean the situation where his signature is on a hush money payment to a porn star?
You know, that thing that Trump lied about during the campaign and after.
Does a sitting president having sex with a porn star while his wife is pregnant and then paying that person to keep this information from the american people while telling strings of lies about it--also crack you up?
And anything about the sitting president ordering a security clearance for his son in law, endangering national security?? Then lying about that too (and Ivanka last week)! Nothing?
I guess ethics just aren't your thing...
There is a good chance that the ongoing SDNY investigation will implicate Don Jr and the Trump family. Was Donnie not at the Trump tower meeting?? Did that meeting not happen in your mind?
You mean the situation where his signature is on a hush money payment to a porn star?
You know, that thing that Trump lied about during the campaign and after.
Does a sitting president having sex with a porn star while his wife is pregnant and then paying that person to keep this information from the american people while telling strings of lies about it--also crack you up?
And anything about the sitting president ordering a security clearance for his son in law, endangering national security?? Then lying about that too (and Ivanka last week)! Nothing?
I guess ethics just aren't your thing...
While I do try to fact check myself, it is awful convenient for you to dismiss my points that way.I never realized you were Snopes!
In this post we learned that;
1" Milania has been pregnant at some point since Jan 2017 and Trump has had sex with a porn star since that time also.
2/ It is against the law to make non-disclosure agreements that include financial consideration.
3. It is somehow against the law for a Trump; in this case Don Jr, to attend meetings in his own office.
It really is sad what the msm has done to do. I really feel sorry for you.
Umm...are you trying to be obtuse?
Did you forget about Karen McDougal? The payments were hush money for an earlier affair Trump had with Stormy signed by Trump on some checks and Don Jr with the others. Lies upon lies.
We are talking about campaign finance laws, try to keep up...
It isn't against the law--but it was a meeting with RUSSIANS in Trump tower. This meeting was LIED about by Don Jr. Why? I added that to point out his potential Russian ties and connections to TRUMP TOWER MOSCOW.
But about that meeting there is the potential that he lied about it to Congress and also a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act, Section 30121 of Title 52, broadly outlaws donations or other contributions of a “thing of value” by any foreigner in connection with an American election — or even an express or implied promise to take such action, directly or indirectly.
Now--there would need to be corroboration to prove intent (which could lead to a charge to conspiracy to defraud the US). Very difficult to prove but it doesn't mean it isn't completely unethical behavior.
But you won't even read or understand any of this apparently. Double sad.
While I do try to fact check myself, it is awful convenient for you to dismiss my points that way.
Aggregate polling does not agree with you.Trump's favorables have absolutely been over 50% since the shut down.
This did not happen according to the DHSWe already know that the russian lawyer had to get a special visa from Loretta Lynch just to enter the country.
Aggregate polling does not agree with you.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Aggregate polling does not agree with you.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
This did not happen according to the DHS
Stay tuned. I'm not going anywhere and I'll be here to help you pick up the pieces when it all comes crumbling down for you Russia/Trump conspiracy guys. You obviously still believe msm propaganda.
Almost all the polls showed that Trump had a decent chance to win. If you think a 30% chance to win isn't a pretty good chance, then you don't understand the statistics behind polling.Aggregate polling didn't agree with the election results either.
It's good to see that you like to base your beliefs on facts.Of course not!
Aggregate polling didn't agree with the election results either. Rasmuesen had him at 52% at one point and he still remains as popular as Clinton and Obama at the same point in their terms.
Always surprises me these days at how willing folks are to speak authoritatively on issues they obviously have no understanding of.
Which is especially rich coming from you.
You are right. I don't literally make a living doing this...
It's good to see that you like to base your beliefs on facts.
You are right. I don't literally make a living doing this...
I believe it is a fact that some of the greatest minds in the IT world; with the most experience, do not believe that the DNC computers were hacked by Russians. What say you? Am I making a factual claim? Just because you give more credence to James Clapper than I do, doesn't prove anything.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-big-lie-about-russian-hacking_2825871.html
Here is a Dem Senator who also doesn't trust Clapper.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...t-nsa-surveillance-question-before-testimony/
Do you believe that Lynch and Bill Clinton accidentally crossed paths at the tarmac and although they spoke for 20-30 minutes, the conversation was about golf and grand kids? Based on what facts?
We already know that the russian lawyer had to get a special visa from Loretta Lynch just to enter the country.
You are changing the subject rather than addressing my criticism.
You are changing the subject rather than addressing my criticism.
You are changing the subject rather than addressing my criticism.No, I just proved James Clapper is a liar. Should go to jail for lying to Congress, but as we've all seen, only Trump associates take the hit for that. So far.
You are changing the subject rather than addressing my criticism.