ADVERTISEMENT

Andrew Tate

FYI Carlson has lost 83% of his viewership by ep 8. Which wasn't even viewership but impressions(which means you scrolled past his video). weak CLEARLY, he's debased himself by traveling to Romania hoping to gin up views.
So he "lost" 83% of the viewers of his first posted video? How do you lose an audience you never had?

He is also not getting paid anything right now (except from FOX) so not sure why it matters how many views he gets.

Stop being so butt hurt.
 
So he "lost" 83% of the viewers of his first posted video? How do you lose an audience you never had?

He is also not getting paid anything right now (except from FOX) so not sure why it matters how many views he gets.

Stop being so butt hurt.
Because you were coming on here every day breathlessly pumping the views like it was a sign of the media apocalypse with Elon and Tucker as heirs to the throne. 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Because you were coming on here every day breathlessly pumping the views like it was a sign of the media apocalypse with Elon and Tucker as heirs to the throne. 😅

Funny how he is trying to change his narrative. After weeks or posting about Twitter and Elon as the savior of American Media, he now acts like he said none of that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
So he "lost" 83% of the viewers of his first posted video? How do you lose an audience you never had?

He is also not getting paid anything right now (except from FOX) so not sure why it matters how many views he gets.

Stop being so butt hurt.
im not butt hurt, im laughing at the frozen dinner king losing his audience and thus his influence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger and dpic73
im not butt hurt, im laughing at the frozen dinner king losing his audience and thus his influence.
Lets do reality and check in on Tucker.

His latest video has 73.2 million views. Yep, I think he is doing alright.




Now you can go back to whatever world you live in while the rest of us stay in reality.
 
Those are impression numbers. Not views. But carry on Tucker stan, hitch your personality to his success
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Those are impression numbers. Not views. But carry on Tucker stan, hitch your personality to his success

And the way they measure regular TV is the same, so you are comparing apples to apples.

If you leave your TV on a channel but no one is watching, it still gets counted.

But thats neither here nor there. You say Tucker "lost" his audience when in fact over 73.5 million people have seen his video even if only briefly. You are wrong.
 
And the way they measure regular TV is the same, so you are comparing apples to apples.

If you leave your TV on a channel but no one is watching, it still gets counted.

But thats neither here nor there. You say Tucker "lost" his audience when in fact over 73.5 million people have seen his video even if only briefly. You are wrong.

That's not at all how it works. Keep being a fan of your guy though. How is that Twitter purchase working out for Elon again, he fixed public discourse yet?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73 and WapPride
And the way they measure regular TV is the same, so you are comparing apples to apples.

If you leave your TV on a channel but no one is watching, it still gets counted.

But thats neither here nor there. You say Tucker "lost" his audience when in fact over 73.5 million people have seen his video even if only briefly. You are wrong.
Impressions != as unique views, fyi.
 
Another note: Does everyone realize that Tate is charged with SEX TRAFFICKING? How is @TigerRagRob performing these mental gymnastics?
TRR you really trying to act like this guy, who according to authorities, trafficked women from the UK to Romania to run a sex cam business, is who you want to defend????
What mental gymnastics? He has a business much like onlyfans which Im sure you use. These are adult women that come there to do a job. They arent meeting guys to exchange sex for money and he was the pimp. Now Im sure if he was sex trafficking underage kids you would be very supportive of that and defend it right? But we are talking about grown women that choose to do this of their own free will. If they arent forced to do this against their will there is no crime. Im glad you are so concerned for women now and are supporting Biden being indicted for sexual assault right? Lets see who is playing mental gymnastics now...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
What mental gymnastics? He has a business much like onlyfans which Im sure you use. These are adult women that come there to do a job. They arent meeting guys to exchange sex for money and he was the pimp. Now Im sure if he was sex trafficking underage kids you would be very supportive of that and defend it right? But we are talking about grown women that choose to do this of their own free will. If they arent forced to do this against their will there is no crime. Im glad you are so concerned for women now and are supporting Biden being indicted for sexual assault right? Lets see who is playing mental gymnastics now...
But biden? What? No you are too messed up man. Tate is going to prison because he sex trafficked. If you actually believe his narrative then thats on you for being so easily duped. Its all online you can go read the charges. His ass is toast. You are gullible
 
But biden? What? No you are too messed up man. Tate is going to prison because he sex trafficked. If you actually believe his narrative then thats on you for being so easily duped. Its all online you can go read the charges. His ass is toast. You are gullible
According to this definition, sex trafficking involves the "recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs."

Good luck proving that with them on video laughing and coming and going when they wanted. But Hunter paid for an escort and paid her airfare to come meet him for sex and used business funds to do it. Was worst than Tate I might add...
 
According to this definition, sex trafficking involves the "recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs."

Good luck proving that with them on video laughing and coming and going when they wanted. But Hunter paid for an escort and paid her airfare to come meet him for sex and used business funds to do it. Was worst than Tate I might add...
They’re both pieces of shit….
 
I’m not scared of anything. But this push to normalize exposing children to things that would’ve had you investigated by CPS 10 years ago is inexcusable. Why do you need to expose a child to LGBTQ material? Why does your child need to be at a drag show or a pride parade? It’s wild that people can set back and defend that garbage

This is exactly my position

What the left wants to normalize today 40 years ago would have had a community vigilante group having you hung

10 years ago jailed by the conservatives

now the idea is indoctrinate every living thing to think one needs to be transgendered or develop values of guy or drag folks

let the parents impart their values in the kids and stop trying to build an army of children who follow the agenda of the long winded word soup
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
According to this definition, sex trafficking involves the "recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs."

Good luck proving that with them on video laughing and coming and going when they wanted. But Hunter paid for an escort and paid her airfare to come meet him for sex and used business funds to do it. Was worst than Tate I might add...
Sex trafficking is OK to the Bidens
 
I’m not scared of anything. But this push to normalize exposing children to things that would’ve had you investigated by CPS 10 years ago is inexcusable. Why do you need to expose a child to LGBTQ material? Why does your child need to be at a drag show or a pride parade? It’s wild that people can set back and defend that garbage
This guy thinks 'exposing' a child to LGBTQ material warranted a CPS report 10 years ago. JFC buddy, your bigotry is just wide open and out there.
 
This guy thinks 'exposing' a child to LGBTQ material warranted a CPS report 10 years ago. JFC buddy, your bigotry is just wide open and out there.
Meh. He poorly worded a valid point. Why there is such a push to expose children to sex is weird, and a bridge too far for a lot of people. Also a weird hill to die on for some of you folks.
 
Meh. He poorly worded a valid point. Why there is such a push to expose children to sex is weird, and a bridge too far for a lot of people. Also a weird hill to die on for some of you folks.
Let me attempt to make an important point here that gets talked past and is at the core maybe of the disagreement that exposing LGBTQ people to children is exposing them to sex. Telling kids that LGBTQ people exist and are not monsters is not exposing them to sex. I remember having this same discussion with someone like 15 years ago. He said: "If I'm with my kids at Walmart and they see two men holding hands and ask me why two dudes are doing that? What am I supposed to even tell them?" The same thing you'd say if they asked if it was a man and a woman. They love each other. Or were you going to turn to your kid and tell them that the couple is going to go home and put a penis in a vagina?

Love is the nuance and it seems this isn't talked about. LGBTQ people are attracted to different things. I don't understand why or how and I can't make myself be attracted to men but I can certainly respect them enough to understand they are people and treat them as such.

Normalizing LGBTQ people to children, is in NO WAY EXPOSING THEM TO SEX. Teaching kids empathy is good. Right?
 
Let me attempt to make an important point here that gets talked past and is at the core maybe of the disagreement that exposing LGBTQ people to children is exposing them to sex. Telling kids that LGBTQ people exist and are not monsters is not exposing them to sex. I remember having this same discussion with someone like 15 years ago. He said: "If I'm with my kids at Walmart and they see two men holding hands and ask me why two dudes are doing that? What am I supposed to even tell them?" The same thing you'd say if they asked if it was a man and a woman. They love each other. Or were you going to turn to your kid and tell them that the couple is going to go home and put a penis in a vagina?

Love is the nuance and it seems this isn't talked about. LGBTQ people are attracted to different things. I don't understand why or how and I can't make myself be attracted to men but I can certainly respect them enough to understand they are people and treat them as such.

Normalizing LGBTQ people to children, is in NO WAY EXPOSING THEM TO SEX. Teaching kids empathy is good. Right?
I don’t disagree with any of that. As a parent though, my goal is to teach my children to respect everyone no matter who they are. Defining a certain group by who they have sex with or what kind of porn they watch isn’t a part of the discussion right now (mine are 7, 6, and 2). They don’t need to discuss straight or gay or bi or whatever distinctions at this age. Full stop. You are correct on all counts. I just think there is an age below which the goal isn’t to engage them in discussion about top surgery or have them at drag queen children’s time at a library. It’s simply to teach them that all people deserve to be treated with kindness and dignity.

My oldest’s piano teacher is trans. He is a wonderful person and a great teacher. He is a professor at a local university and the music director at our church. All 3 of our girls love him and he’s great with them. However, my kids don’t know that about him, nor do they need to.
 
Let me attempt to make an important point here that gets talked past and is at the core maybe of the disagreement that exposing LGBTQ people to children is exposing them to sex. Telling kids that LGBTQ people exist and are not monsters is not exposing them to sex. I remember having this same discussion with someone like 15 years ago. He said: "If I'm with my kids at Walmart and they see two men holding hands and ask me why two dudes are doing that? What am I supposed to even tell them?" The same thing you'd say if they asked if it was a man and a woman. They love each other. Or were you going to turn to your kid and tell them that the couple is going to go home and put a penis in a vagina?

Love is the nuance and it seems this isn't talked about. LGBTQ people are attracted to different things. I don't understand why or how and I can't make myself be attracted to men but I can certainly respect them enough to understand they are people and treat them as such.

Normalizing LGBTQ people to children, is in NO WAY EXPOSING THEM TO SEX. Teaching kids empathy is good. Right?
I’m not referring to a simple conversation explaining to a 6 year old why Susie and Carly are holding hands, but you know that
 
Then wtf are you talking about? I have no clue
He saw some videos on Libs of TikTok, which means that everything he saw is rampant and happening everywhere 24/7. It also adds to his confirmation bias that LGBTQ = pedophila and indoctrination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
He saw some videos on Libs of TikTok, which means that everything he saw is rampant and happening everywhere 24/7. It also adds to his confirmation bias that LGBTQ = pedophila and indoctrination.
Right, thats what I figured. Libs of tictock is run by a Christian conservative who believes that homosexuality is an abomination. She's smart and her zealotry, conviction and bigotry has lead her to embrace sensationalizing issues to indoctrinate people to hate LGBTQ as much as she does. She wants the government to pass laws banning LGBTQ peoples life styles.
Problem is we live in the greatest country on earth and are protected from oppression from the government. She's dangerous though as dum dums will fall for her nonsense and smart religious fanatics whole heartedly support her and the goal to oppress people.
 
I don’t disagree with any of that. As a parent though, my goal is to teach my children to respect everyone no matter who they are. Defining a certain group by who they have sex with or what kind of porn they watch isn’t a part of the discussion right now (mine are 7, 6, and 2). They don’t need to discuss straight or gay or bi or whatever distinctions at this age. Full stop. You are correct on all counts. I just think there is an age below which the goal isn’t to engage them in discussion about top surgery or have them at drag queen children’s time at a library. It’s simply to teach them that all people deserve to be treated with kindness and dignity.

My oldest’s piano teacher is trans. He is a wonderful person and a great teacher. He is a professor at a local university and the music director at our church. All 3 of our girls love him and he’s great with them. However, my kids don’t know that about him, nor do they need to.
Thats your right as a parent to educate your kids however you want. I have 3 kids as well 9,4 and 1. I have had 0 convos about sex with any of them. I have talked to the 9 year old and 4 year old about not letting anyone touch them in certain places and that they must tell us if that happens. Gross but ... hey got to have a healthy convo about it.

The 9 year old knows that gay people exist, but its just not a thing that even is worth thinking about. What people are doing though is trying to get in front of kids and let them know they exist and they are people.

Im not in any way a supporter of telling my 9 year old what gay sex or sex is just yet, its not time. Thats my choice.
I respect parents decisions on how they want to instruct on sex. I would state though, the studies show that public sex ed has been overall a good thing for the country and allow parents to opt in and out.

I mainly have a big problem with the sensationalization and association of people with sex. It seems some equate the existence of LGBTQ with sex only and this correlation leads them to push back on any discussion about LGBTQ. Its a false equivalency and is very destructive and oppressing.
 
Thats your right as a parent to educate your kids however you want. I have 3 kids as well 9,4 and 1. I have had 0 convos about sex with any of them. I have talked to the 9 year old and 4 year old about not letting anyone touch them in certain places and that they must tell us if that happens. Gross but ... hey got to have a healthy convo about it.

The 9 year old knows that gay people exist, but its just not a thing that even is worth thinking about. What people are doing though is trying to get in front of kids and let them know they exist and they are people.

Im not in any way a supporter of telling my 9 year old what gay sex or sex is just yet, its not time. Thats my choice.
I respect parents decisions on how they want to instruct on sex. I would state though, the studies show that public sex ed has been overall a good thing for the country and allow parents to opt in and out.

I mainly have a big problem with the sensationalization and association of people with sex. It seems some equate the existence of LGBTQ with sex only and this correlation leads them to push back on any discussion about LGBTQ. Its a false equivalency and is very destructive and oppressing.

Such great points. Thank you for summarizing so well what many of us feel. Truly, I appreciate it.

One point I would add is that gender doesn't equal sexuality which is really hard for many, including myself to understand. For example I know a trans Women(born biological Man) who dates women and considers herself a lesbian. I have asked why she didn't stay a man, since that would have been easier, she said she felt authentic as a women and that's what made her feel most true. Hard for me to rationalize, but that's her right and I just want her to be happy.

At the end of the day, just basically don't be a dick and let others be happy living their lives. Who someone sleeps with doesn't impact me in the slightest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT