Agreed completely. That's what I was alluding to. I think they're a very important part of this conversation and this progress that we hope to see. I'm only saying that the view that many of us have of our university isn't necessarily the same view that many black students (current and former) have, and the things they are currently advocating for will be key steps in improving the culture at the university to where it's more inclusive and one that everyone can be proud of.
All I hope is that the discussion is balanced and not purely emotional reaction to 'temporarily placate a mob.' Do you judge someone by 2020 standards on something that was unfortunately a societal norm at the time, or do you recognize that there would be no Clemson without John C. Calhoun? Do you weight the fact that generational change and wealth has been created for african american college graduates (many the 1st in their families) because of the land given to start a university against the fact that african americans were potentially enslaved on those same grounds? Is recognizing both a signal of just how far we've come. Is an african american graduating from Calhoun Honors College a "symbolic victory" over the past?
Is it ironic or symbolic that Tillman Hall is only linked to the "modern world" by Gantt Circle?
If its a rational and reasoned discussion, I'm pretty confident in the leadership of Clemson to come up with some way to recognize both concerns.