ADVERTISEMENT

Assistant Attorney General Refuses To Certify Arizona Election Until Questions Are Answered

I'm not reading the article, but literally nothing in that sub heading is true other than Katie's refusal to debate. The rest of it is objectively and observably false.

They are ****ing lying to make money off rubes and have no concern for the whole "destabilizing our democracy with lies" thing. They should be thrown in ****ign jail.. unbelievable.
that is all gateway pundit ever does. its pure trash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I'm not reading the article, but literally nothing in that sub heading is true other than Katie's refusal to debate. The rest of it is objectively and observably false.

They are ****ing lying to make money off rubes and have no concern for the whole "destabilizing our democracy with lies" thing. They should be thrown in ****ign jail.. unbelievable.
This nation was founded as a constitutional republic and the free citizens want that back. Only the most shameless partisan could objectively look at the facts of what happened on and around election day in AZ and say nothing illegal occurred. Your side is saying we are trying to destroy the nation after blatant cheating occurred. Kari Lake was up double digits in most polls conducted right before this election. This election needs to be redone with no mail ins in the near future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
This nation was founded as a constitutional republic and the free citizens want that back. Only the most shameless partisan could objectively look at the facts of what happened on and around election day in AZ and say nothing illegal occurred. Your side is saying we are trying to destroy the nation after blatant cheating occurred. Kari Lake was up double digits in most polls conducted right before this election. This election needs to be redone with no mail ins in the near future.

your understanding of what constitutes a "fact" (along with the gateway pundit and all of its adherents) is lacking, at best.

example: only a single poll had her up "double digits" and almost all of them were within the margin of error, which means they were statistically tied in the polling. look for yourself.


at that link, you'll see katie leading in most polls, until a slight shift toward lake resulted in the polling in october predicting a slight lake win, but again, within the margin of error.

you people are so ****ing brainwashed you can't even see whats immediately in front of you.
 

another "fact".

katie didint campaign?

she outraised Lake by a wide margin. Thats, quite literally, what a campaign for a statewide office looks like.


****ing embarassing.
 
your understanding of what constitutes a "fact" (along with the gateway pundit and all of its adherents) is lacking, at best.

example: only a single poll had her up "double digits" and almost all of them were within the margin of error, which means they were statistically tied in the polling. look for yourself.


at that link, you'll see katie leading in most polls, until a slight shift toward lake resulted in the polling in october predicting a slight lake win, but again, within the margin of error.

you people are so ****ing brainwashed you can't even see whats immediately in front of you.
i feel that you are brainwashed and conflicted due to professional democrat politics being how you make your living. You are wrong and I am right. Its that simple. LOL!!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

@TigerGrowls Deep State Republicans right? Instead of being proud that your party has people of integrity that ignores threats, political attacks, and does their jobs, you will attack them,call them names, etc. You should be proud of them and embarrassed of the Kari Lakes of the world.
 
@TigerGrowls Deep State Republicans right? Instead of being proud that your party has people of integrity that ignores threats, political attacks, and does their jobs, you will attack them,call them names, etc. You should be proud of them and embarrassed of the Kari Lakes of the world.
Kari Lake was crying foul before voting day. It seems to be the new normal for the GOP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
This one has a way to go. Maricopa County did this one very messy and left a lot of evidence.
 
at that link, you'll see katie leading in most polls, until a slight shift toward lake resulted in the polling in october predicting a slight lake win, but again, within the margin of error.

you people are so ****ing brainwashed you can't even see whats immediately in front of you.
Libs are so disingenious SMDH

Let's say this election had played out this way in the last Presidential election:

Trump is running versus Hiden. But Trump oversees the election and its results. Libs would have lost their minds right there, but when Hobbs is over her own election they think it's just fine.

Then on election day, machines conveniently malfunction in areas where Hiden voters were expected to have a better turnout, with delays of hours. Again, the cries of voter suppression from the libs would have been deafening.

Then we were told it would take a week or more to count all the votes. Again, libs would scream foul.

Then we were told the inner city would break 60/40 for Hiden, and the rural areas 60/40 for Trump. We were told it would be a nip and tuck race as a result.

The rural areas come in first, at 62/38 for Trump. Slightly better than expected, but in line.

So the urban area for Hiden comes in last. It is dragged out for a week. Only a drop or two every day. Libs would say Trump, who oversees the election, is manufacturing the votes he needs to stay in front.

Each drop comes in better than expected for Trump. Instead of 60/40 for Hiden, it comes in 52/48 for Hiden. Libs would again scream cheating.

Trump wins easily in a race where Hiden was polling solidly ahead for weeks leading up to election.

Here's the best part: The secretary of treasury position sees the dem win easily, by 300k votes. But Hiden and all other dems on the ticket that ran with him, all lost. Doesn't pass the smell test on any level, and the dems again say cheating.

But when all that happens for their party, they love it. Most dishonest people in the nation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Libs are so disingenious SMDH

Let's say this election had played out this way in the last Presidential election:

Trump is running versus Hiden. But Trump oversees the election and its results. Libs would have lost their minds right there, but when Hobbs is over her own election they think it's just fine.

Then on election day, machines conveniently malfunction in areas where Hiden voters were expected to have a better turnout, with delays of hours. Again, the cries of voter suppression from the libs would have been deafening.

Then we were told it would take a week or more to count all the votes. Again, libs would scream foul.

Then we were told the inner city would break 60/40 for Hiden, and the rural areas 60/40 for Trump. We were told it would be a nip and tuck race as a result.

The rural areas come in first, at 62/38 for Trump. Slightly better than expected, but in line.

So the urban area for Hiden comes in last. It is dragged out for a week. Only a drop or two every day. Libs would say Trump, who oversees the election, is manufacturing the votes he needs to stay in front.

Each drop comes in better than expected for Trump. Instead of 60/40 for Hiden, it comes in 52/48 for Hiden. Libs would again scream cheating.

Trump wins easily in a race where Hiden was polling solidly ahead for weeks leading up to election.

Here's the best part: The secretary of treasury position sees the dem win easily, by 300k votes. But Hiden and all other dems on the ticket that ran with him, all lost. Doesn't pass the smell test on any level, and the dems again say cheating.

But when all that happens for their party, they love it. Most dishonest people in the nation.
 
It's easy to support the right thing when you show PROOF dingleberry
But you didn't do that. 'Investigation claims' is what your article says.

See you guys are being hypocrites once again. When we mention voter fraud in 2020 and 2022, you say unless a COURT RULED IT WAS FRAUD, then it didn't happen.

Where is the court ruling that said Kemp committed fraud?

Well?

So hypocritical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
But you didn't do that. 'Investigation claims' is what your article says.

See you guys are being hypocrites once again. When we mention voter fraud in 2020 and 2022, you say unless a COURT RULED IT WAS FRAUD, then it didn't happen.

Where is the court ruling that said Kemp committed fraud?

Well?

So hypocritical.
"DEKALB CO., Ga. – Federal Judge Eleanor Ross ruled against Gov. Brian Kemp in a recent lawsuit brought by investigative journalist Greg Palast to compel the State of Georgia to open up its complete files on the mass purge of over half a million voters from the rolls, according to a February 9 post from gregpalast.com.

Judge Ross ruled that Kemp’s defense was so weak that no trial is needed. The judge acted “sua sponte” — on her own initiative, unrequested by Palast’s attorneys."

 
"DEKALB CO., Ga. – Federal Judge Eleanor Ross ruled against Gov. Brian Kemp in a recent lawsuit brought by investigative journalist Greg Palast to compel the State of Georgia to open up its complete files on the mass purge of over half a million voters from the rolls, according to a February 9 post from gregpalast.com.

Judge Ross ruled that Kemp’s defense was so weak that no trial is needed. The judge acted “sua sponte” — on her own initiative, unrequested by Palast’s attorneys."

So where are the criminal charges?

When was Kemp arrested?

Again, that's the standard you libs have for Katie Hobbs, why is it different when it comes to RINO Kemp?

With Hobbs and AZ, we were told unless there's a guilty verdict in court, nothing happened.

But with Kemp, all you need is an investigation and a lawsuit and someone saying something mean about Kemp.

Funny thing is....Kari is doing all that in AZ, and you say it proves nothing.

So hypocritical.
 
So where are the criminal charges?

When was Kemp arrested?

Again, that's the standard you libs have for Katie Hobbs, why is it different when it comes to RINO Kemp?

With Hobbs and AZ, we were told unless there's a guilty verdict in court, nothing happened.

But with Kemp, all you need is an investigation and a lawsuit and someone saying something mean about Kemp.

Funny thing is....Kari is doing all that in AZ, and you say it proves nothing.

So hypocritical.
There's always another thing. You twerps are pathetic.
 
Also weird. You have no problem with someone running for office, being in charge of voting.

You are ok with banana republic bs, until they turn on you.

That's not how it works, but you guys don't care to hear that. Arizona elections are controlled at most levels by Republicans. The idea that their is massive corruption in favor of a Democrat in this election is laughable.
 
That's not how it works, but you guys don't care to hear that. Arizona elections are controlled at most levels by Republicans. The idea that their is massive corruption in favor of a Democrat in this election is laughable.
Well then, it should have been a no brainer for her to recuse herself of the role. Same with Kemp. If for no other reason than perception. The thing you dems aren’t taking into consideration is that a large percentage of America doesn’t believe our elections are secure. That’s a problem

See how easy it is to be non partisan and have morals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Well then, it should have been a no brainer for her to recuse herself of the role. Same with Kemp. If for no other reason than perception. The thing you dems aren’t taking into consideration is that a large percentage of America doesn’t believe our elections are secure. That’s a problem

See how easy it is to be non partisan and have morals?

You realize that the reason some people don't believe in the accuracy elections is due to Donald J Trump?

I would posite that most people do believe in our elections and the accuracy due to to facts that election deniers performed far worse than their counterparts.
 
You realize that the reason some people don't believe in the accuracy elections is due to Donald J Trump?

I would posite that most people do believe in our elections and the accuracy due to to facts that election deniers performed far worse than their counterparts.
I sit here today as an election denier and it has zero to do with Donald trump.

It has everything to do with what I witnessed in 2020.

We are in the year 2022, and live in the most technologically advanced nation in the world. In 1980, with far less technology we could do elections in a day.

In the early 2000’s your democrat politicians agreed that mail in voting was the easiest way to commit fraud. What changed?

I am also going to ask a few questions that NO ONE has been able to answer.

What was the criteria used to determine 2020 as the most secure election in our history? Which elections did they compare it to? Which elections weren’t secure if this one was the “most” secure? If that cannot be answered and proven then it’s propaganda.
 
I sit here today as an election denier and it has zero to do with Donald trump.

It has everything to do with what I witnessed in 2020.

We are in the year 2022, and live in the most technologically advanced nation in the world. In 1980, with far less technology we could do elections in a day.

In the early 2000’s your democrat politicians agreed that mail in voting was the easiest way to commit fraud. What changed?

I am also going to ask a few questions that NO ONE has been able to answer.

What was the criteria used to determine 2020 as the most secure election in our history? Which elections did they compare it to? Which elections weren’t secure if this one was the “most” secure? If that cannot be answered and proven then it’s propaganda.

What did you "witness" in 2020? Did you present it in court cases? Oh, you mean you read about other people witnessing things that they also wouldn't swear to under oath.

You guys are an absolute joke. Don't believe I need to engage anymore with this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
What did you "witness" in 2020? Did you present it in court cases? Oh, you mean you read about other people witnessing things that they also wouldn't swear to under oath.

You guys are an absolute joke. Don't believe I need to engage anymore with this one.
Much like others, you didn’t/can’t answer the questions. That’s what I thought/knew.

Of course you won’t engage. You have no answers.
 
ADVERTISEMENT