Climate Scam Incoming

[TigerGrowls]

Would not put it past China Joe to do it. Hes a puppet.



"The White House is now considering declaring a national climate emergency."

"If Joe Biden declares a national climate emergency, he would have COVID-like powers. He would impose the Green New Deal on America without a vote in Congress.

"The AP is urging other news outlets to use the term "Climate Crisis"

 

[areeves]

Would not put it past China Joe to do it. Hes a puppet.

View embedded media

"The White House is now considering declaring a national climate emergency."

"If Joe Biden declares a national climate emergency, he would have COVID-like powers. He would impose the Green New Deal on America without a vote in Congress.

"The AP is urging other news outlets to use the term "Climate Crisis"

I’ve been telling ya’ll this for four years & telling people outside of here the same since 2010

 

[TigerGrowls]

Just the facts.

 

[hopefultiger13]

Well, that's his right as US President to declare whatever he wants to as a crisis and then grab whatever funds he pleases to fund said crisis. RIGHT? That's just the way it is.

Remember when Trump called the border a crisis and then grabbed cash from the Defense budget that was allocated by congress. Dems screamed bloody murder and Trump said that was within his power as Commander in Chief. The SCOTUS sided with Trump on this. It's settled law. None of you Trumpians said a word.

NOW the shoe is on the other foot and it's you guys screaming bloody murder and Dems not saying a word. That's the way it goes.

Personally, I thought it was BS when Trump did it. I think it's BS if Biden is doing it now. See how that works? But the bottom line is that you Trumpians are OK with Trump doing whatever, but not OK when others do the same thing.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Well, that's his right as US President to declare whatever he wants to as a crisis and then grab whatever funds he pleases to fund said crisis. RIGHT? That's just the way it is.

Remember when Trump called the border a crisis and then grabbed cash from the Defense budget that was allocated by congress. Dems screamed bloody murder and Trump said that was within his power as Commander in Chief. The SCOTUS sided with Trump on this. It's settled law. None of you Trumpians said a word.

NOW the shoe is on the other foot and it's you guys screaming bloody murder and Dems not saying a word. That's the way it goes.

Personally, I thought it was BS when Trump did it. I think it's BS if Biden is doing it now. See how that works? But the bottom line is that you Trumpians are OK with Trump doing whatever, but not OK when others do the same thing.

I see your logic. There is a big difference though. Any purported climate emergency is an untrue scam while the border emergency was and is a fact.

 

[hopefultiger13]

I see your logic. There is a big difference though. Any purported climate emergency is an untrue scam while the border emergency was and is a fact.

Says you... There were no more folks crossing the border when Trump declared his crisis than usual. And that was part of the point of the left... namely that this was an untrue scam and just a ploy to get money to do border stuff that Trump wanted and congress wouldn't give him. Now the right (including you) is making the same argument that the left made... namely that this is a BS crisis and the POTUS shouldn't be able to do this.
The case went to the SCOTUS under Trump and they said that the POTUS is the one who decides what a crisis is and he can take money that Congress has allocated in other areas and move it to address the "crisis". You guys LOVED this ruling. But now the shoe is on the other foot.

And Biden is probably going to take money from from some place that you don't think he should and apply it to the climate crisis... Probably on Green sources of energy. I bet you don't like that at all. And for what it's worth, I agree with you. The POTUS shouldn't have that power.

And that's the primary difference between us. I'm a law and order guy. The same rules apply to everyone, regardless of whether I agree with them or not. You are not a law and order guy. You are all about Trump having unlimited ability to do whatever he wants... Everyone ELSE has to obey the law.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[PAWrocka]

View embedded media

…. Uhhhhhh no …. No we don’t ….. I don’t believe fossil fuels, hydrocarbons … whatever are formed in the earths mantle

And on the second part … to quote the great George Carlin “The earth will be fine, it’s not going anywhere, … WE ARE!”

 

[TigerGrowls]

…. Uhhhhhh no …. No we don’t ….. I don’t believe fossil fuels, hydrocarbons … whatever are formed in the earths mantle

And on the second part … to quote the great George Carlin “The earth will be fine, it’s not going anywhere, … WE ARE!”

I think there is something to the abiotic oil idea. The idea that all of the oil is being created by the remains of dead animals has never made sense to me. Respect contrary opinions of course.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[BlueRidgedf]

Just the facts.

View embedded media

Where did he get these "facts" ?

 

[TigerGrowls]

CNBC: "Bill Gates is backing the first high-altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution—creating a massive chemical cloud that could cool the Earth. It's called solar geo-engineering."

"But it also comes with significant risks and uncertainties: Things like mass famine, mass flooding, drought."

"It could eradicate blue sky... You have less direct light, which is the same thing as saying it looks hazy and white."

 

[TigerGrowls]

Look at this green energy.

 

[WapPride]

this is good news

 

[WapPride]

Look at this green energy.

View embedded media

They can be recycled, the handful of recycling facilities in the US that can process turbine blades are at capacity. So they store them at stockpiles like below until capacity opens up and then they’re sent onward.

 

[TigerGrowls]

We will all die if they get rid of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Wake up people.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

Jordan Peterson, in conversation with Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: For the last 500 million years, the planet was not only much warmer than it is now, but there was five to ten times more CO2 in the atmosphere than now.


"Yet during that period, life flourished abundantly."


"Also, the carbon dioxide and the temperature during that period are radically out of sync and not obviously causally related."


Credit: @jordanbpeterson @EcoSenseNow

 

[PAWrocka]

View embedded media

This is a control burn on a firebreak/dirt road. In the distance/back ground you can see that there is already a fire burning. They are burning this section in a controlled manner to get control of an existing wildfire.

Now with that said, I do believe the “climate crisis” is mostly fabricated bullshit; however, I also believe that we should be good stewards to our planet. In every direction you look …. this SUCKS for trillions and trillions of miles. We ought to keep our house clean.

 

[TigerGrowls]

This is a control burn on a firebreak/dirt road. In the distance/back ground you can see that there is already a fire burning. They are burning this section in a controlled manner to get control of an existing wildfire.

Now with that said, I do believe the “climate crisis” is mostly fabricated bullshit; however, I also believe that we should be good stewards to our planet. In every direction you look …. this SUCKS for trillions and trillions of miles. We ought to keep our house clean.

Good to know and totally agree on the climate scam and the need for great stewardship of the environment.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false."

"First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth."

"Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth."

"The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas."

"So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth."

Credit: @EcoSenseNow @martinigrimaldi

 

[TigerGrowls]

42 Years Ago CBS Told The World Earth’s Temperature Was Rising Out Of Control Due To Burning Coal & Oil

25% of Florida is about to be flooded and a “widespread disruption of agriculture” is coming

It’s been 42 years and literally nothing has changed.

“Concerned about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of coal and oil. And in recent months, as David Culhane reports, research has uncovered facts to support that theory.

Many scientists claim that the temperature of the atmosphere has been rising over the past 100 years, that the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that the sea level has been rising with increasing swiftness over the past 40 years. If these scientists are correct, about 25% of Florida would be flooded along with low lying areas all over the world.

Climate changes could produce widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be too dry and the wheat and corn crops would have to move to Canada.

Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet. It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to filter down and warm the Earth, but like the glass of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat so that it cannot rise into space.

The scientists maintain that the coal, oil, and gas we've been burning for a 100 years have produced more and more carbon dioxide and helped overheat the Earth.

Now some political leaders endorse the demands for more C02 monitoring stations like this one in Hawaii, and they share the anger of the scientists at Reagan administration budget cuts at a time when they feel closer to getting definitive answers.

We are not doing the kind of research that we should be doing to determine whether or not these scientists who are so alarmed are correct in their assessment.

And what they find out will affect the lives and fortunes of millions of people, the very survival of cities like this one (See video), David Culhane, CBS News, New York.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[iceheart08]

View embedded media

Lololololololol

You people are so ****ing stupid.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

UK Gov’t Caught ‘Inventing’ Climate Data from 103 Non-Existent Stations to Push Net Zero Agenda

A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being promoted by globalist interests.

Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving alarmist narratives.

Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations, investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302 sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.

“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real and simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.

He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of existing published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.

In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the second decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[iceheart08]

View embedded media

this post, and the fact that its got so much engagement, is next level stupid. you people live in a world where you've decided that only your own notions of "common sense" dictate how things work. the ****ing hubris of you lunatics.

 

[Cocks are Number 1]

this post, and the fact that its got so much engagement, is next level stupid. you people live in a world where you've decided that only your own notions of "common sense" dictate how things work. the ****ing hubris of you lunatics.

Says the guy that didn’t even know which political side he belonged to.

 

[SGTiger]

this post, and the fact that its got so much engagement, is next level stupid. you people live in a world where you've decided that only your own notions of "common sense" dictate how things work. the ****ing hubris of you lunatics.

Are you crying? Have you not been paying attention to what your side of the aisle has been spewing the last 4 years ? Where was your outrage then? I never figured you for a sanctimonious hypocrite.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

Read the facts.



🚨🚨 They’ve somehow managed to turn the GAS that gives LIFE to this planet into a pollutant

Right now our atmosphere has 400 PPM of CO2 = 0.04%

At 600-1000 PPM of CO2 we get optimal FARMING conditions.

At 200 PPM OF CO2, all plant life DIES.

Companies use a Carbon dioxide generator to reach these conditions of 600 - 1000 PPM :

(1) To increase yield by 30% or MORE

(2) To produce an earlier harvest

(3) To improve plants resistance to DISEASE and PESTS

(4) If we increase CO2 in the atmosphere, we get OPTIMAL farming conditions

(5) If we DECREASE CO2 in the atmosphere, we get an ICE AGE and DEATH of most life on the planet

Isn’t it crazy that we are using billions of dollars of our own tax money to potentially cause death to most life on this planet? You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to understand these basic facts, so, why do our “experts” and “scientists” not understand this?

Is it corruption?

Is it incompetence?

Is it intentional?

Is it a part of the depopulation agenda of the elites? If it is, how would they be able to guarantee their own safety?

I would love to hear an explanation, because I really don’t get it.

 

[CUTiger1977]

Read the facts.

View embedded media

🚨🚨 They’ve somehow managed to turn the GAS that gives LIFE to this planet into a pollutant

Right now our atmosphere has 400 PPM of CO2 = 0.04%

At 600-1000 PPM of CO2 we get optimal FARMING conditions.

At 200 PPM OF CO2, all plant life DIES.

Companies use a Carbon dioxide generator to reach these conditions of 600 - 1000 PPM :

(1) To increase yield by 30% or MORE

(2) To produce an earlier harvest

(3) To improve plants resistance to DISEASE and PESTS

(4) If we increase CO2 in the atmosphere, we get OPTIMAL farming conditions

(5) If we DECREASE CO2 in the atmosphere, we get an ICE AGE and DEATH of most life on the planet

Isn’t it crazy that we are using billions of dollars of our own tax money to potentially cause death to most life on this planet? You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to understand these basic facts, so, why do our “experts” and “scientists” not understand this?

Is it corruption?

Is it incompetence?

Is it intentional?

Is it a part of the depopulation agenda of the elites? If it is, how would they be able to guarantee their own safety?

I would love to hear an explanation, because I really don’t get it.

2030 agenda