ADVERTISEMENT

Cops behaving badly… “just a few bad apples”

i will answer-because they are criminals
This thread is a perfect example of what happens when a state doesn’t invest in education. The suggestions in this thread lack total nuance and are so simplistic that it is what Neanderthals would come up with. Research is a beautiful thing because it allows to solutions beyond “just punish them more!” Which at no point in time has proven to be effective.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cocks are Number 1
This thread is a perfect example of what happens when a state doesn’t invest in education. The suggestions in this thread lack total nuance and are so simplistic that it is what Neanderthals would come up with. Research is a beautiful thing because it allows to solutions beyond “just punish them more!” Which at no point in time has proven to be effective.
You are clueless
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
This thread is a perfect example of what happens when a state doesn’t invest in education. The suggestions in this thread lack total nuance and are so simplistic that it is what Neanderthals would come up with. Research is a beautiful thing because it allows to solutions beyond “just punish them more!” Which at no point in time has proven to be effective.
What do you expect from a bunch of 50/60+ year olds from South Carolina public education who probably grew up under power lines with lead paint in their house?

They’re not playing with a full deck
 
We should be questioning some of the training and policies of our law enforcement organizations.

If you really want to start an argument to get you off the rails

Based on studies and information instead of changing police training and policies you go to the source of the problem

Any male or female person found guilty of a serious crime would be sterilized so they could not bear children who based on research of genetics are predisposed to be criminals as their parents were.

Solved a lot of crimes just takes a few generations
 
Yeah, I don’t buy the bad apple argument with cops. My issues are with training, in that the majority of it is fear-based “if you don’t do this you may not come home to your family”, instead of learning how to de-escalate. A cop should never lead the interaction with a mentally ill person. That should be a therapist.

Teachers are underpaid, for certain. I think the benefits and overtime cops get is pretty good for those with minimal education. And frankly, most who want to do that job can get a job as a cop.

My other issue is that bad cops who get fired are frequently hired in other districts. If you get fired in one district, then you should not be allowed to be a cop again.
First bold part? So if someone is breaking in your house or threatening you and you call 911, you want them to fist have you identify exactly who the person is and then have the police do background checks on them to see if they may possibly be mentality ill before the police can respond. Got it. Sounds completely reasonable and practical to do. So simple.

Second bold part? Do feel the same way about people who have committed crimes? If you have a criminal history of violent crime or theft, should you not be allowed to be employed in environments where violence or theft would be a problem? Do cops who made a mistake not get a second chance, or are those just for criminals?
 
lol that’s so stupid. Why do you think people commit crime?
I would say suppose being uneducated(dropping out of school), and not having a two parent home would represent a large portion of the why.
If not educated, you have limited options for income production that is legal. Why don't you research some on the % of dropouts who commit crimes vs those who completed at least high school and let us know what you find.

In a single parent home, you have less likelihood of being taught boundaries, learning respect for others, being molded into a productive member of society.
 
First bold part? So if someone is breaking in your house or threatening you and you call 911, you want them to fist have you identify exactly who the person is and then have the police do background checks on them to see if they may possibly be mentality ill before the police can respond. Got it. Sounds completely reasonable and practical to do. So simple.

Second bold part? Do feel the same way about people who have committed crimes? If you have a criminal history of violent crime or theft, should you not be allowed to be employed in environments where violence or theft would be a problem? Do cops who made a mistake not get a second chance, or are those just for criminals?
Easy answer - there are plenty of situations where cops are called for someone having a mental health episode. When it’s called in as such, have a therapist lead the interaction.

Second - communities need to trust police. If you violated that trust - and firings only happen for extreme negligence - then how can any other community trust you?
 
I would say suppose being uneducated(dropping out of school), and not having a two parent home would represent a large portion of the why.
If not educated, you have limited options for income production that is legal. Why don't you research some on the % of dropouts who commit crimes vs those who completed at least high school and let us know what you find.

In a single parent home, you have less likelihood of being taught boundaries, learning respect for others, being molded into a productive member of society.
Why don’t you actually present this research vs throwing out your opinion and asking me to refute it?
 
Why don’t you actually present this research vs throwing out your opinion and asking me to refute it?





 
Last edited:
Easy answer - there are plenty of situations where cops are called for someone having a mental health episode. When it’s called in as such, have a therapist lead the interaction.

Second - communities need to trust police. If you violated that trust - and firings only happen for extreme negligence - then how can any other community trust you?

I like the have the therapist lead the interaction

So the therapist is awakened in the dead of night showing up with a notepad confronting a half naked person screaming armed with a knife or gun and being unarmed disarms the perp and by force of talking nice and reasonable solves the problem

I like the plan

Only problem is we probably need to increase the therapists as they will suffer more than likely aa very high mortality rate

But hey committed people to social justice don’t mind dying for the better good
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I like the have the therapist lead the interaction

So the therapist is awakened in the dead of night showing up with a notepad confronting a half naked person screaming armed with a knife or gun and being unarmed disarms the perp and by force of talking nice and reasonable solves the problem

I like the plan

Only problem is we probably need to increase the therapists as they will suffer more than likely aa very high mortality rate

But hey committed people to social justice don’t mind dying for the better good


Perhaps reading this will help.


Mental health crisis teams​

Other police departments delegate specific law enforcement officers to mental health calls and involve mental health professionals whenever necessary. One of the oldest programs in the United States is the CAHOOTS public safety system in Eugene, Oregon, started in 1989, a model that many police departments and cities have looked to for guidance in developing their own programs. When a call involving a mental health crisis come s in to the CAHOOTS non-emergency line, responders send a medic and a trained mental health crisis worker; if the call involves violence or medical emergencies, they involve law enforcement. In 2019, out of 24,000 CAHOOTS calls, mobile teams only requested police backup 150 times. The city estimates that CAHOOTS saves taxpayers an average of $8.5 million per year by handling crisis calls that would otherwise fall to police
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
I like the have the therapist lead the interaction

So the therapist is awakened in the dead of night showing up with a notepad confronting a half naked person screaming armed with a knife or gun and being unarmed disarms the perp and by force of talking nice and reasonable solves the problem

I like the plan

Only problem is we probably need to increase the therapists as they will suffer more than likely aa very high mortality rate

But hey committed people to social justice don’t mind dying for the better good
There's actually been mental health professionals working in tandem with law enforcement in US cities for decades, and it's worked extremely well.

Denver’s Support Team Assisted Response (STAR) program, which launched in June 2020, similarly sends healthcare workers to respond to incidents related to mental health, poverty, homelessness, and substance use. Over the past 11 months, STAR has successfully responded to 1,323 calls. No one was injured or arrested, and police backup was never requested. Denver’s police chief has said the program “saves lives” and “prevents tragedies.”

 
There's actually been mental health professionals working in tandem with law enforcement in US cities for decades, and it's worked extremely well.

Denver’s Support Team Assisted Response (STAR) program, which launched in June 2020, similarly sends healthcare workers to respond to incidents related to mental health, poverty, homelessness, and substance use. Over the past 11 months, STAR has successfully responded to 1,323 calls. No one was injured or arrested, and police backup was never requested. Denver’s police chief has said the program “saves lives” and “prevents tragedies.”

This makes a lot of sense if executed intelligently. I know for a period of time - and I’m not super educated on this front - that cities like Seattle and others implemented programs where mental health specialists/social workers were responding to certain types of calls. I don’t think some of those pilot programs went very well, but iirc it was social workers independently responding without law enforcement. I think you probably need both in most circumstances.

That said, I’d absolutely support a solution that integrated mental health professionals into certain law enforcement/emergency response pieces. Not sure how best to do that logistically. Do municipalities employ them full time? What calls do they go on/what triggers the mental health response? Do they go in in tandem? Independently? Again, I’d fully support adoption of mental health integration into law enforcement/emergency response. I just don’t know enough to discuss the finer points of how that would be implemented. I think it’s probably similar to tighter gun control/access laws. There probably isn’t a perfect solution, but a starting point is needed from which you can refine/change things as the body of evidence/data dictates.
 
OP must be sitting posting in the prison. The only way I can imagine someone thinks all the lawbreakers are the good guys and all the cops are the bad guys. This is also on top all whites being racist I guess in his worldview.
 

This always seemed to be a violation of rights IMO. But ending stop and frisk reduces high school dropout rate by 44%. Even more harmful consequence of this policy.
"Coinciding with the reform, we document a sharp 44% reduction in the likelihood of dropping out of high school due to criminal justice involvement."

do you have a reading disability or just wanted to completely misrepresent what was stated?

i mean i get kids make mistakes and there should be efforts made to prevent kids from getting tied up in the justice system, especially if we're talking anything non-violent/not distributing hard drugs. that said, you know where this solution starts? in the fkn home. raise your gd kids. that's on the parents. that's on the schools. you know who doesn't get tied up in the criminal justice system due to stop and frisk? kids who aren't breaking the law.

you can btch and moan til you're blue in the face about systemic racism, institutional racism, policy brutality, stop and frisk, antitransformerism....whatever it is tomorrow. you can come up with every excuse under the sun to lower the bar for some because victimhood and all you're doing is lowering their expectations for themselves. you can implement as many nonsensical rules to prevent anyone who happens to be a certain color, religion, sexuality, a new gender etc from being held accountable and all you're doing is enabling young people to grow into adults who believe they're entitled to do whatever they want without consequence. you know where that gets you? more shtty parents raising more rudderless kids to have their worst habits enabled perpetually until they wind up dead or in jail.

this is not a remotely complicated solution. the only, and i mean only answer to improving the quality of life and chances of success for kids in underprivileged areas is really fkn simple...parents raising children. that means discipline, accountability, and expectations. the problem people have with that answer is it actually means they need to take responsibility for themselves and their kids.

obviously the long answer needs to be more communal and nuanced given the realities of how many individual situations leave many kids without almost any parental guidance etc. i get that. it also doesn't change the only solution. however it's done, the bottom line is if kids don't have discipline, expectations, or are held accountable, they have almost no chance. you can throw money at the school systems or community programs, you can lower standards, you can make exceptions with rules, you can do whatever the hell you want....none of it will make a gd difference. kids need people around them who give a sht about them as well as hold raise them with expectations, and they need to understand consequences. it's simple. do it, or don't.

you'd gain more knowledge watching paint dry than reading nonsense papers with manipulated statistics like these though. the solution is always in the mirror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loveoysters
You want solutions? Here are 10:
1) end qualified immunity
2) create a federal database and any cop who gets fired will not be allowed to be a cop in any other district
3) mandate civilian oversight boards
4) allocate police budget to mental health and domestic abuse counselors
5) eliminate police unions
6) end stop & frisk
7) end “no knock” warrants
8) stop indemnifying officers
9) eliminate the transfer of military grade equipment to police departments
10) eliminate civil asset forfeitures

This is a good list that doesn't solve the problem.

It's the culture of policing and guns in America.

Shooting people, even "bad" people shouldn't be celebrated.

Police shouldn't see themselves in an adversarial relationship with the public, but they do, I have a bunch of friends who are/were police. It's them versus us. And, given that they have the power, they are the ones who will dictate the terms of engagement.

Change the whole ****ing culture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
This is a good list that doesn't solve the problem.

It's the culture of policing and guns in America.

Shooting people, even "bad" people shouldn't be celebrated.

Police shouldn't see themselves in an adversarial relationship with the public, but they do, I have a bunch of friends who are/were police. It's them versus us. And, given that they have the power, they are the ones who will dictate the terms of engagement.

Change the whole ****ing culture.
Truth.

My favorite is all the cops and LEO culture celebrating and promoting the punisher as if that’s someone worth emulating. The damn creator had to come out and literally state that the punisher and cops weren’t on the same side despite them all hero worshipping him.
 
Ashli thinks you’re full of shit. Oh wait, that was the hard R’s flip flopping on the don’t be a criminal thing.

Babbit? She deserved to get shot. I watched the tape.

This shit isn’t hard. Don’t commit major fvck ups and you’ll probably be okay. Like try not to pass counterfeit cash while high on fentynal.

Too far?
 
Babbit? She deserved to get shot. I watched the tape.

This shit isn’t hard. Don’t commit major fvck ups and you’ll probably be okay. Like try not to pass counterfeit cash while high on fentynal.

Too far?
Don't kill unarmed people without just cause and you'll probably be okay.

And if you do happen to kill an unarmed person without cause, claim self-defense.
 
Babbit? She deserved to get shot. I watched the tape.

This shit isn’t hard. Don’t commit major fvck ups and you’ll probably be okay. Like try not to pass counterfeit cash while high on fentynal.

Too far?
What specific action did she take to justify being killed? Keep in mind there were hundreds of other people in that building and some were being given tours by the policemen.
 
Last edited:
This cannot be justified in my mind and my feeling has nothing to do with skin color at all.



"At 2:45 p.m., or within one minute after shooting Ashli, Lt. Byrd made the following radio call:

405B. We got shots fired in the lobby. We got shots shots fired in the lobby of the House chamber. Shots are being fired at us and we’re sh, uhh, prepared to fire back at them. We have guns drawn. Please don’t leave that end. Don’t leave that end.

Approximately 35 seconds later, Lt. Byrd made another radio call, stating, “405B. We got an injured person. I believe that person was shot.” In fact, no shots were fired at Lt. Byrd or his fellow officers. The only shot fired was the single shot Lt. Byrd fired at Ashli. He heard the loud noise of the gunshot. He saw her fall backwards from the window frame.

The facts speak truth. Ashli was ambushed when she was shot by Lt. Byrd. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, 'you just murdered her.'

Lt. Byrd was never charged or otherwise punished or disciplined for Ashli’s homicide."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT