I'm pretty sure there were videos of immigrants eating pets.
And there it is. And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
I'm pretty sure there were videos of immigrants eating pets.
People take him seriously. It is just only the people who already agree with him.And there it is. And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
I am highly confident that Trump and maga is right the vast majority of the time.Serious question, if every single news story that came out that the left didn't agree with, we said cover story, or "no one believes that", etc and dismissed it, what would you do? I don't get it. At some point, you are going to be wrong about something. It's not even a big deal. Someone sees someone else's wealth, and says, must be fraud! Which, given what they make, I get it. But people do make money, people have spouses, etc. Sometimes there just is explanations behind things. You can still think there's corruption, but understand that not every case is actually corruption. Makes it really hard for you to convince anyone that doesn't already agree with you. If literally everything is a conspiracy, and you don't think you're ever wrong, just that there is some other nefarious reason, I would never be able to trust you. Because no one, myself included, is right 100% of the time.
I'll never understand how you just relentlessly post false propaganda after being busted hundreds of times, including several times today. You just ignore it and keep on lying and it's not just white lies, it's ridiculously absurd stuff and you don't slow down for a second. Seriously, why is it so important to you to fool people? When you were a kid did you tell yourself that you couldn't wait until you grew up so you could tell a blizzard of lies every day? What's in it for you?I am highly confident that Trump and maga is right the vast majority of the time.
What I am trying to say to tell you is that admitting the times you end up not being correct would gain you credibility, not lose it.I am highly confident that Trump and maga is right the vast majority of the time.
I can say the same for you left wards but for the record I posted on this board in early 2021 after it was apparent that Trump would not be potus acknowledging that I was wrong for some reason which turned out to be mass election fraud.What I am trying to say to tell you is that admitting the times you end up not being correct would gain you credibility, not lose it.
Ok cool, hook emI can say the same for you left wards but for the record I posted on this board in early 2021 after it was apparent that Trump would not be potus acknowledging that I was wrong for some reason which turned out to be mass election fraud.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣I'll never understand how you just relentlessly post false propaganda
What if she wasn't truly an Obama?
Thats right. The kids are rumored to not be biologically related to Big Mike and Barry.What if she wasn't truly an Obama?
I'm picking up what you are putting down.Thats right. The kids are rumored to not be biologically related to Big Mike and Barry.
LOL, remember that if something seems too dumb to be true, it likely is.
are you saying there is no evidence of immigrants eating pets?People take him seriously. It is just only the people who already agree with him.
My total point is that if you are not willing to confront evidence counter to your opinion without just waving them away, no one that disagrees with you is going to be persuaded because they won't trust you.
And there it is. And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
You do not know that at all. You have an opinion and that's fine.LOL, remember that if something seems too dumb to be true, it likely is.
Not one part of this story is true.
So you believe that story?You do not know that at all. You have an opinion and that's fine.
I've already debunked it for you once and now you're posting it again?You do not know that at all. You have an opinion and that's fine.
This applies to you too🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think it's very possibly true. Rampant fraud. I do not believe the daughter set it up but someone could of set it up for her. How can you not believe after what has been shown since doge started?So you believe that story?
Nope.I've already debunked it for you once and now you're posting it again?
Watch thousands of hillbillies attack the Capitol - tourists!are you saying there is no evidence of immigrants eating pets?
I honestly believe there were videos of immigrants cooking pets. I saw the videos with my own two eyes and yes i believe what was in them.
Now, i certainly agree that it was very limited circumstances. Maybe only one or two times. Maybe those don't count for you or you want to ignore those one or two cases on the basis that they were rare occurrences and, therefore, not that big of a deal. That is fine and a totally reasonable position.
However, that does not contradict reality and my position. That immigrants were eating pets. It happened. There was video evidence with eye witness. I'm not a liar. a bad person, or pushing "disinformation" for observing it.
If you don't want to take me seriously because i observe and comment on reality that is your prerogative. Don't take a message board too seriously anyway.
USAID has a public budget. Find it?I think it's very possibly true. Rampant fraud. I do not believe the daughter set it up but someone could have set it up for her. How can you not believe after what has been shown since doge started?
Prove it's fake. Waiting.USAID has a public budget. Find it?
FYI it originated from a satirical Facebook page set up as if it was Malia. It’s super easy to find that out. The story was “too good to be true” if you hate the Obama’s. Which should make you pause and say, hmmm maybe I should do two seconds worth of research.
Instead, you shared, look foolish, and then instead of just saying, woopsie daisy, you right, you’re now doubling down.
No doubt Congress when choosing charities to give money to chose their own, and likely profited from being on the board of those charities. I hate that too. But also no doubt that was “both sides”.
Would love two laws:
1. Members of Congress have to put any money they want to invest into a blind trust while serving the People.
2. They should not be able to profit from any action or budget item they vote on (from defense contractors to charity boards). They can serve on the board of a charity/non profit, but has to be volunteer, while they serve (maybe put language for x years after service or something too idk).
Such a lazy response to defeat.That's because you're in a cult.
Friday irony.I'll never understand how you just relentlessly post false propaganda after being busted hundreds of times, including several times today. You just ignore it and keep on lying and it's not just white lies, it's ridiculously absurd stuff and you don't slow down for a second. Seriously, why is it so important to you to fool people? When you were a kid did you tell yourself that you couldn't wait until you grew up so you could tell a blizzard of lies every day? What's in it for you?
What proof would you accept?Prove it's fake. Waiting.
You believe Malia Obama was paid 2.3mm and then claimed she earned it because she wrote the letters?Friday irony.
Show some solid credible documentation and I will rescind the one post if proven wrong.What proof would you accept?
What documentation could I show to prove something didn't happen? You're claiming money was sent to her from a budget that is public, would you not be the one to prove something did happen? But let me know what I could provide.Show some solid credible documentation and I will rescind the one post if proven wrong.
NM. I do not stand corrected.What documentation could I show to prove something didn't happen? You're claiming money was sent to her from a budget that is public, would you not be the one to prove something did happen? But let me know what I could provide.
So there's nothing I could provide?NM. I do not stand corrected.
NM. I do not stand corrected.
You've been reading Growls' posts on here for years. Do you really believe HE doesn't exhibit cultish behavior?Such a lazy response to defeat.
No more than several of the libs here.You've been reading Growls' posts on here for years. Do you really believe HE doesn't exhibit cultish behavior?