ADVERTISEMENT

Elon Musk Offers $100 per person in exchange for votes in Wisconsin state supreme court

johnhugh

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 23, 2003
17,321
26,809
113
Parent’s house
www.msnbc.com
Mmmm, keep those tears coming

3o7TKQV9L46v1ZZR2E.gif
 

Those pesky libs buying votes sure is ridiculous. Wait, it’s Trump’s Troglodytes buying votes? Say it ain’t so!!

L-O-Fvcking-L at trump supporters. How can anyone defend this? An immigrant just buying out our country day in and day out?

Must be embarrassing to be a Trump supporter. I can’t imagine what life must be like to be so dense
Remember when the US had laws that were enforced? I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: purenonsense
Imagine reveling in open voter fraud after accusing the other side of voter fraud (that was never proved by the way)

It’s actually crazy how true the assertion that for every Republican accusation is just a confession is. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad
All they need to do is follow Californias (and a few other lib states) lead and make asking for ID to vote illegal. Then it’s open voter fraud but “by the books” wink wink. lol bro. That’s how yall do it right?
 

Those pesky libs buying votes sure is ridiculous. Wait, it’s Trump’s Troglodytes buying votes? Say it ain’t so!!

L-O-Fvcking-L at trump supporters. How can anyone defend this? An immigrant just buying out our country day in and day out?

Must be embarrassing to be a Trump supporter. I can’t imagine what life must be like to be so dense
Imagining a life of depending on daddy, and staying this miserable, is the part that tickles me.
 

Those pesky libs buying votes sure is ridiculous. Wait, it’s Trump’s Troglodytes buying votes? Say it ain’t so!!

L-O-Fvcking-L at trump supporters. How can anyone defend this? An immigrant just buying out our country day in and day out?

Must be embarrassing to be a Trump supporter. I can’t imagine what life must be like to be so dense
Has a law been broken? If so I’m sure there’s a judge out there ready to make a name for himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cabotiger
Lol, no substantive counter argument. Not surprised, as this is indefensible
Greatest President in our history has broken you down into a crying little bitch. Bet your wife wishes she had a real man like Trump instead of a limp-wristed soy twink.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
Now do George Soros. We hear you beta cucks cry about him enough.
Awwww, another soy boy is crying now. It's ok. I'm sure his wife doesn't care that you're plowing him. Does yours? Easy to see why Boeing is such a shit company right now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
This is dumb and I'm sure illegal. Yall don't have to defend every Trump and Elon do you?
You may not agree with it but it’s apparently not illegal. I actually read the article. It’s a PAC, not Elon directly. The PAC did something similar ($1 million/day) before the presidential election. That was already tried in a Philly court and the judge was cool with it (not illegal lottery).
 
Are you willing to agree that this is NOTHING like anything we’ve seen domestically in the last few years. Unprecedented.
I think the CEO of an active company being such a public figure within the government, seemingly setting policy, making governmental decisions, meeting with heads of state of other countries at the White House, etc is also unprecedented, but sure.

I agree that companies making company policy decisions weren't being attacked or vandalized like Tesla's have. They were just boycotted. I don't want to make any excuses. The above being unprecedented still doesn't give anyone the right to cause property damage, etc. It is wrong, full stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTTiger19
I think the CEO of an active company being such a public figure within the government, seemingly setting policy, making governmental decisions, meeting with heads of state of other countries at the White House, etc is also unprecedented, but sure.

I agree that companies making company policy decisions weren't being attacked or vandalized like Tesla's have. They were just boycotted. I don't want to make any excuses. The above being unprecedented still doesn't give anyone the right to cause property damage, etc. It is wrong, full stop.
This is a good take and reasonable. Only problem I’d have is why is the Elon thing so worrisome. It’s being done out in plain view of everyone. The same cannot be said for Soros or even people like Zuckerberg who are actively behind the scenes trying to destroy the fabric of our nation. I have no problem with transparency. I’d be much more alarmed if a journalist had uncovered Elon manipulating policy behind closed doors to benefit him.
 
This is a good take and reasonable. Only problem I’d have is why is the Elon thing so worrisome. It’s being done out in plain view of everyone. The same cannot be said for Soros or even people like Zuckerberg who are actively behind the scenes trying to destroy the fabric of our nation. I have no problem with transparency.
I think you'd have to show me Soros is making actual policy decisions, having his products out on the front lawn, meeting with heads of state at the White House, etc. I know Soros gives a lot of money to various causes, lobby's etc (and likely has MASSIVE influence, don't get me wrong here), but a lot of his influence etc is assumed to be there more than provingly there. I'm sure that's the transparency you're talking about, but also think due to that you're able to accuse and assume whatever you want against Soros whether it is truly there or not (on the flip, I can't prove you wrong either).
 
I think you'd have to show me Soros is making actual policy decisions, having his products out on the front lawn, meeting with heads of state at the White House, etc. I know Soros gives a lot of money to various causes, lobby's etc (and likely has MASSIVE influence, don't get me wrong here), but a lot of his influence etc is assumed to be there more than provingly there. I'm sure that's the transparency you're talking about, but also think due to that you're able to accuse and assume whatever you want against Soros whether it is truly there or not (on the flip, I can't prove you wrong either).
So you have a problem with finding and eliminating wasteful tax spending? I’m not sure I follow. Elon is not loading the coffers of activist judges and politicians. He was asked by the president to take over a department that Obama founded. It’s not unusual for citizens to be asked to take over government departments. What exactly is the problem here? Because the president asked him to do something that justifies this behavior? This is just excuse making. Soros and etc have given millions to the exact judge in Wisconsin. Is your claim civil service has more of an opportunity to be used for political gain than money????
 
So you have a problem with finding and eliminating wasteful tax spending? I’m not sure I follow. Elon is not loading the coffers of activist judges and politicians. He was asked by the president to take over a department that Obama founded. It’s not unusual for citizens to be asked to take over government departments. What exactly is the problem here? Because the president asked him to do something that justifies this behavior? This is just excuse making. Soros and etc have given millions to the exact judge in Wisconsin. Is your claim civil service has more of an opportunity to be used for political gain than money????
It's a Monday and I'm not sure I want to do our back and forth today so this will likely be my last. I've said before I agree with cutting waste, finding fraud, etc. My issue is the constant lying or misrepresenting or borderline trolling that comes from him. And I think government should watch their words better (a constant issue I have with Trump, and I hate that I am seeing more and more trolling etc from Democrats as well). Don't call something fraud that isn't fraud. Don't list millions of savings when money is already spent. Don't fire huge groups of people before understanding the consequences. I will definitely admit my bias comes in in that I just straight don't trust him with all the data he's been given (some of that because he's a billionaire, some of that because I don't believe he's been responsible with his screenshots and shares to this point). But I genuinely hope you have a great week.

Edit to add: The not loading coffers of activist judges and politicians seems to overlook all the money Elon has given to many, many candidates, and the president himself, and giving money to individuals if they will sign petitions etc. He is most certainly using his money, not just volunteering his time.
 
It's a Monday and I'm not sure I want to do our back and forth today so this will likely be my last. I've said before I agree with cutting waste, finding fraud, etc. My issue is the constant lying or misrepresenting or borderline trolling that comes from him. And I think government should watch their words better (a constant issue I have with Trump, and I hate that I am seeing more and more trolling etc from Democrats as well). Don't call something fraud that isn't fraud. Don't list millions of savings when money is already spent. Don't fire huge groups of people before understanding the consequences. I will definitely admit my bias comes in in that I just straight don't trust him with all the data he's been given (some of that because he's a billionaire, some of that because I don't believe he's been responsible with his screenshots and shares to this point). But I genuinely hope you have a great week.

Edit to add: The not loading coffers of activist judges and politicians seems to overlook all the money Elon has given to many, many candidates, and the president himself, and giving money to individuals if they will sign petitions etc. He is most certainly using his money, not just volunteering his time.
Ok. That’s fine. Just know you’re being contradictory. There’s a shitload of people on the left that use their money, power, celebrity and influence every single day. But you feel the need to isolate one person. It’s a wild time to be alive. Your position is it’s ok to do that as long as you agree with the premise. Well 85 million didn’t agree with that. And damn right he’s using his money. He’s doing precisely what the democrats have been doing for decades, he beat you at your own game and you can’t stand it lol. If yall don’t like it, pass a law. That’s the answer I’ve got on illegals. If it’s good for that it’s good for this.
 
Don't list millions of savings when money is already spent.

?????? The savings is that money on many of those expenditures will not continue to be spent. I don't really see how that is misrepresenting anything. No one thinks, wow, money that has been spent will be returned.

If I tell my neighbor I have canceled all my subscriptions and as such I am saving $1000 per month, he knows I am referring to future savings. Pretty sure he knows that Netflix isn't returning what has already been spent.

You're coming across like you're trying incredibly hard to pick apart the wording because the Trump administration is in power.
 
?????? The savings is that money on many of those expenditures will not continue to be spent. I don't really see how that is misrepresenting anything. No one thinks, wow, money that has been spent will be returned.

If I tell my neighbor I have canceled all my subscriptions and as such I am saving $1000 per month, he knows I am referring to future savings. Pretty sure he knows that Netflix isn't returning what has already been spent.

You're coming across like you're trying incredibly hard to pick apart the wording because the Trump administration is in power.
That’s the pivot recently. Recurring payments throws them off.
 
?????? The savings is that money on many of those expenditures will not continue to be spent. I don't really see how that is misrepresenting anything. No one thinks, wow, money that has been spent will be returned.

If I tell my neighbor I have canceled all my subscriptions and as such I am saving $1000 per month, he knows I am referring to future savings. Pretty sure he knows that Netflix isn't returning what has already been spent.

You're coming across like you're trying incredibly hard to pick apart the wording because the Trump administration is in power.

The best part is he doesn’t trust Elon bc he’s a billionaire yet simultaneously says it’s ok if Soros pumps money into his beloved party. They confuse me.
 
The best part is he doesn’t trust Elon bc he’s a billionaire yet simultaneously says it’s ok if Soros pumps money into his beloved party. They confuse me.
I've never once said anything close to beloved party. I think you're putting things on to me that aren't me once again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT