This isn't the trial I wanted to come first because I agree it has the appearance of partisanship but on the other hand, because this was a Presidential candidate and not an ordinary Joe, that's precisely the reason it did require a closer look.
Are you telling me he didn't pay off McDougal and Stormy for political reasons? Because if you are, I'm calling you a liar. This man would not have been elected had this come out beforehand and you know it, but because he paid the hush money, our country has gone through eight years of absolute chaos. And let it be said that Hillary didn't get the opportunity to pay off Comey before he reopened her email investigation right before the election. Prior to that, all the polls showed her winning and she would have if not for Trump's crimes. That's a big fvckin deal.
And spare me your lame false equivalency story about a laptop that didn't have a single shred of evidence that pointed to Joe commiting a crime, not a shred. If you think that Twitter preventing that story from being shared for a couple days was responsible for Trump's loss then he never deserved to win in the first place - that's a fable for losers.
And again, you have zero evidence that Joe was involved in that investigation and that means he was hands off because that's the way it's supposed to be - he didn't tell Bragg to push it or pull it because that's not his job. I know who would have meddled in investigations of their political opponent and you do too - Trump! He was even impeached for it so cry me a river about your imaginary Joe crimes that you want him prosecuted for. If you want it for Joe, you damn sure should want it for Trump - unless you're full of shit.
There is nothing illegal about paying someone to sign an nda. It happens all the time. Of course he did it bc he didn't want her talk, why else do you get people to sign nds'a? However, that is is no way election interference. Not even close. Doing something for political reasons is not a crime in and of itself. LOL at the appearance of partisanship. It is completely partisan.
Bragg said years ago he would find a crime to charge trump with. The refusal to change venues from a place where trump is clearly hated by the vast majority where you know you are seating biased jurors. The made up election interference nonsense just to be able to try him. Any one of these things should cause this case to be thrown out. The preponderance of all of it is overwhelming.
Also, who out there thought Trump was some kind of saint and husband of the year before hand? Did you? Has it hurt his polling or chances of winning again that he was unfaithful to his wife? No.
Also, I'm not saying what Joe did when he lied about the laptop was what won the election. I'm not even advocating it was even election interference. BUT, if trump having a porn star sign an nda is election interference, then what Joe did is absolutely beyond that. The FBI knew the laptop was real at that point and so did Joe.
LOL if you think Hilary would have won without comer. that election wasn't as close as 2020.
Again, you are just completely dishonest. I have not heard one attorney say the case being presented is credible. Everyone I have heard give an opinion thinks it is highly suspect. When highly respected dem layers are telling you the case is a sham, you should listen.
But like I said, you are just like trump. You don't care if it's right or wrong, you just want what you want.
As for trumps impeachments, he was acquitted of both.
