ADVERTISEMENT

FBI confirms laptop is real and wasn't tampered with?

Solid Orange Blood

Woodrush
Gold Member
Aug 3, 2012
24,138
58,115
113
On the lawn
Meh...seems like we've been hearing about these types of bombshells for three years but they never seem to be able to confirm the allegations. What ever happened to the laptop that we heard three years ago was going to take Joe down?

Get back to me when you have something factual.

Reality check: That is not the case, as even Grassley has acknowledged: "It is a very serious allegation. I wish I could say that I knew it was true or untrue," the senator told Newsmax on Thursday.

Between the lines: White House officials and the Oversight Committee's top Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), have raised concerns about the timing of the alleged FBI source interview.

  • In June 2020, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and his associates were seeking to revive debunked claims alleging Biden pressured Ukraine in 2016 to fire a prosecutor investigating his son, Hunter Biden, over his role on the board of the energy company Burisma.
  • The FBI later assessed that Russia was promoting disinformation campaigns aimed at denigrating Biden in an effort to interfere in the 2020 election, including via a Russian agent who worked with Giuliani.
  • Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) released a report in September 2020 alleging that Hunter Biden had "cashed in" on his father's name to secure foreign business deals. But the investigation uncovered no evidence of wrongdoing by the future president.
The bottom line: Republicans have been searching for a Biden bribery bombshell since 2019. So far, nothing has stuck.


Sure thing my beautiful sheep,

 
Idk how many times it has to be said, but the 51 agents signed off saying it showed the signs of a classic Russian disinformation campaign. Not that it was a Russian disinformation campaign. Blame the media and politicians that misinterpreted what the agents did, not the agents themselves.
 
Idk how many times it has to be said, but the 51 agents signed off saying it showed the signs of a classic Russian disinformation campaign. Not that it was a Russian disinformation campaign. Blame the media and politicians that misinterpreted what the agents did, not the agents themselves.
This is like when slick Willie proclaimed that "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman.". You do show the signs of being a lawyer. We all know exactly what these 51 professional spies said and what they knew to be true at the time.
 
It is clear that our Democrat Left has fully gone Communist with the constant lies and propaganda backed up by the new American version of Pravda - the American Mainstream media. It is sickening how bad it is and that they want to tear down the foundations of this country and make USA a Socialist state.
 
Idk how many times it has to be said, but the 51 agents signed off saying it showed the signs of a classic Russian disinformation campaign. Not that it was a Russian disinformation campaign. Blame the media and politicians that misinterpreted what the agents did, not the agents themselves.
They knew it was a lie. End of story
 
It is clear that our Democrat Left has fully gone Communist with the constant lies and propaganda backed up by the new American version of Pravda - the American Mainstream media. It is sickening how bad it is and that they want to tear down the foundations of this country and make USA a Socialist state.
It's both aisles and the entirety of the MSM. What's the right doing to stop the left? Nota got dayum thing. Their pockets are getting stuffed, too.
 
Idk how many times it has to be said, but the 51 agents signed off saying it showed the signs of a classic Russian disinformation campaign. Not that it was a Russian disinformation campaign. Blame the media and politicians that misinterpreted what the agents did, not the agents themselves.
Back to what the definition of "is" is i see
 
They knew it was a lie. End of story
You're welcome to read their actual letter. It's literally the 4th and 5th paragraphs where they say they don't know if Russia did it, but that "it has all the classic earmarks of a Russian operation."


Once again, take it up with the media and politicians who misinterpreted the letter. The agents themselves did nothing wrong but provide their input based on years of experience.
 
You're welcome to read their actual letter. It's literally the 4th and 5th paragraphs where they say they don't know if Russia did it, but that "it has all the classic earmarks of a Russian operation."


Once again, take it up with the media and politicians who misinterpreted the letter. The agents themselves did nothing wrong but provide their input based on years of experience.

He has said 51 agents so many times he doesn't actually know what it refers to... It's just part of his mantra at this point.
 
You're welcome to read their actual letter. It's literally the 4th and 5th paragraphs where they say they don't know if Russia did it, but that "it has all the classic earmarks of a Russian operation."


Once again, take it up with the media and politicians who misinterpreted the letter. The agents themselves did nothing wrong but provide their input based on years of experience.
So they are "coincidentally" totally incompetent?

All 51 of them? How are people this naive? Seriously.
 
So they are "coincidentally" totally incompetent?

All 51 of them? How are people this naive? Seriously.
How is it incompetence? I get that you're a completely disingenuous poster who is either as dumb as a box of rocks, or just trolls because i guess that's what middle aged MAGA guys do, but please put an iota of thought into this. Saying something resembles something does not equate to saying it is something.

51 agents: "We don't know if Russia did it, but it looks like something Russia would do."

HURR DURR *drools all over keyboard reading kanekoa the great tweets*
 
Idk how many times it has to be said, but the 51 agents signed off saying it showed the signs of a classic Russian disinformation campaign. Not that it was a Russian disinformation campaign. Blame the media and politicians that misinterpreted what the agents did, not the agents themselves.
So you would be fine if those same 51 signed a letter saying all the cases against Trump show signs of political prosecution by the ruling political party, right. Whether you think that is the case or not, you can absolutely say it shows signs of such.
The vast majority, if not all, of them knew at the time of that letter that the laptop was real. What signs were there of Russian disinformation other than being bead news for Biden?
 
How is it incompetence? I get that you're a completely disingenuous poster who is either as dumb as a box of rocks, or just trolls because i guess that's what middle aged MAGA guys do, but please put an iota of thought into this. Saying something resembles something does not equate to saying it is something.

51 agents: "We don't know if Russia did it, but it looks like something Russia would do."

HURR DURR *drools all over keyboard reading kanekoa the great tweets*

It's amazing how obtuse one must be not to be able to grasp the simple concept that our govt and the MSM work hand in hand.
 
It's amazing how obtuse one must be not to be able to grasp the simple concept that our govt and the MSM work hand in hand.
I think most reasonable people believe this. Or at least would hope so by now. MSM is in lockstep with most stories they throw our way. Every government uses media as a tool for propaganda. Some more/worse than others.
 
So you would be fine if those same 51 signed a letter saying all the cases against Trump show signs of political prosecution by the ruling political party, right. Whether you think that is the case or not, you can absolutely say it shows signs of such.
The vast majority, if not all, of them knew at the time of that letter that the laptop was real. What signs were there of Russian disinformation other than being bead news for Biden?
Yes, if 51 agents with experience in studying institutions that use political prosecution of their adversaries as a weapon signed a letter saying that I would be fine with it. Why would I have a problem with the opinion of experts in that field?

Your entire 2nd paragraph is conjecture.

It's amazing how obtuse one must be not to be able to grasp the simple concept that our govt and the MSM work hand in hand.
Do I think the gov't leaks stories to the MSM to influence public opinion? Yes, i'm sure they do.

Do I think the 51 gov't agents were lying when they signed the letter saying that the leaked pictures of emails that, at the time, purportedly came from Hunter's laptop had all the same earmarks of classic Russian disinformation? No, I don't think they were lying. I think they were sharing their opinion that it could potentially be Russian disinformation with the intention of damaging Biden's campaign. Nothing I've seen would lead me to believe they were intentionally deceiving the population when they signed that letter.
 

Scroll to Jun 4.
Thank you
"So from the data that was extracted from both the iCloud back ups and this -- the laptop, investigators were able to go through largely WhatsApp messages, iMessages, and text messages, and found evidence of addiction within the messages," Jensen said.


Ok. So does this mean Trump's innocent or that Joe Biden is going to prison? Are we through the outrage phase of this story or are we going to hear more bemoaning?
 
I do have a question. Isn't the FBI part of Joe Biden's corruption and weaponizing of the government? Didn't they have a "Hit Order" on Trump? If those things are so, when why are they saying this? Shouldn't they be saying the opposite?
 
I do have a question. Isn't the FBI part of Joe Biden's corruption and weaponizing of the government? Didn't they have a "Hit Order" on Trump? If those things are so, when why are they saying this? Shouldn't they be saying the opposite?

They like this FBI, this version isn't deep state I guess?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT