Harris/Trump Debate
- Thread starter harristeeter
- Start date
Im not against it, but at the same time I havent called for it either. If they get caught breaking the law then deport them. I have no issues with that. Not for the gov running around doing CCP style roundups either....
You dont even know what a conservative is. You have lied so much about conservatives that you have started to believe your own lies. You are lost in a storm of darkness that you have created and are too lost to realize it...
look at the polls most people do. People saw what ABC was trying to do. While Kamala didnt do poor she didnt do great. She had no answers for immigration or the economy and thats where Trump won lastnight. Trump also won on Ukraine and Russia. Unlike you chickenhawks on the left that want WW3, most people want to avoid it like the plague...
Sure and when you die, just go away. With what they find out it wont help you get any smarter...
I was always taught, "Those who fail to prepare, prepare to fail." Prepping for a debate is standard and has been for years. Neither candidate needs to be fed questions ahead of time to know what to prepare for, if you're not prepared for a question, that is just bad preparation. Both candidates should have been prepared for every question and had a prepared answer for each one, they should also have been prepared for a whole bunch of questions that weren't asked. If either of the candidates was asked a question they weren't prepared for, that's on them and their team. Both candidates dodged questions and answered with prepared responses, that was totally expected and why the first 25 minutes was boring. To complain that one candidate or the other was given the questions ahead of time is stupid, there were no surprise questions or zingers.
Well, yeah, that's what happens to everyone when they die. Good one.
Oh yeah, can you link that CNN poll or any poll for that matter that shows that Trump won? Outside of your lone source(twatter).
Oh no, no, no. You said the polls showed that Trump won, then you said he won the CNN after-debate poll. here it is so you lied again.
Debate watchers said, 63% to 37%, that Harris turned in a better performance onstage in Philadelphia. Prior to the debate, the same voters were evenly split on which candidate would perform more strongly, with 50% saying Harris would do so and 50% that Trump would. And afterward, 96% of Harris supporters who tuned in said that their chosen candidate had done a better job, while a smaller 69% majority of Trump’s supporters credited him with having a better night.
63% of registered voters who watched Tuesday's debate say Harris outperformed Trump
Prior to the debate, those voters were evenly split on who would do a better job.Q: Regardless of which candidate you support, who do you think (did/is likely to do) the better job in the presidential debate?
Bar chart showing registered voters who watched the Sept. 10 presidential debate saying Harris did better than Trump onstage, 63% to 37%. Before the debate, they were evenly split on who would do a better job in the debate.
Harris
Trump
Post-debate
63%
37%
Pre-debate
50%
50%
Methodology: The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 605 registered US voters who said they watched the debate Tuesday, and the poll findings are representative of the views of debate-watchers only. Results for the full sample of debate watchers have a margin of sampling error of ±5.3 percentage points.
We don't GAF what some random twatters said Ragu. Thinking this proves some kind of point just makes you seem dumber.
Can you link that poll or are we supposed to blindly trust Insurrection Barbie? 🤣
I said nothing about a question.
I said that the moderators were trying to fact check Trump and did not try to fact check Harris one time.
I also said that one of the moderators gave an opinion on the matter, not fact.
Your opinion as a moderator shouldn’t matter in this type of setting.
Hahaha.
Man your reading comprehension is poor. I would expect prep.
Dpic said:
“Where are all the posters that said she only talks in word salads and isn't able to speak fluently without a teleprompter? She also had no notes...”
Very dumb to try and use this debate to prove that point when she prepped her ass off.
Now put her in front of a mic without prep and a teleprompter. It hasn’t happen yet and won’t because she avoids it like the plague.
Someone come in here and explain why Americans think its a good thing if Russia wins its war with Ukraine. WHY would any US president not want Ukraine to win. Because if you think Russia's stopping with Ukraine, you are wrong.
Well, I'll give him that. He is an open book ... the kind that they tear the cover off of and throw away.
She did the CNN Dana Bash interview as well as several podcasts and she did fine. But if you want to compare her to Trump's interviews, she was amaze balls.
It’s strategy, something the Trump campaign doesn’t know dick about. Let the RW media apparatus spam their dullard followers for a month about how Kamala is a shit public speaker and then when she comes out and posterizes Trump for 65 million people to see live, it makes her look so much better. She’s probably going to do a bunch of interviews going forward now that she successfully baited RW media and had their talking heads talking about how wrong they were about her live on the air after the debate.
She was admittedly bad on the public stage 4 years ago, but she’s a complete 180 from that now. It’s probably why Trump is crying about not doing another debate - he knows she’ll pants him again for the world to see.
nobody said anything about Russia winning thats a leftist talking point. Need the war to end and let tension cooldown
Not to mention they were feeding her lines thru her earrings
Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffftttttttt
Hahahahahahshahahahajahajahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Similar threads
