ADVERTISEMENT

Harris/Trump Debate



I’m revising my debate scoring. My first impression was a tie, which I called a Harris victory.

But the only thing I recall about the debate today is “They’re eating the dogs.”

Visual. Scary. Viral. Memorable. Repeatable. And directionally correct in terms of unchecked immigration risk.

It’s the strongest play of the election.

Trump won the debate.

I gotta stop underestimating his game. Trump had no base hits in the debate but his long ball is still rising. Incredible.
 
It’s becoming apparent that Trump won the debate despite what people on here claimed.

His poll numbers have shot higher post debate.

Kamala can’t get any traction in the polls because she is extremely unlikeable , as evidenced by anyone who watched the debate or sees an interview with her.

I would say how does anyone vote for this women, but they didn’t 🤷‍♂️


We are getting close to having republicans leading the race for the house and the senate.

Right now it looks like MT may go Republican which would give them control of the house and senate .

 
@dpic73 @yoshi121374

I am requesting a fact check. I know if it’s fake y’all will have it sniffed out. Could this possibly be true?


My question is why you would ever trust MTG? Ever
Do you not find it odd that she doesn't provide a link other than "news sources?"

It's a fake news website that creates AI generated stories


An Unreliable Writer, With No Editor In Sight

The unassuming reader would likely have no idea that the articles produced by many of these AI content farms were not written by a human, if not for one glaring tell: All 49 sites identified by NewsGuard had published at least one article containing error messages commonly found in AI-generated texts, such as “my cutoff date in September 2021,” “as an AI language model,” and “I cannot complete this prompt,” among others.

For example, CountyLocalNews.com, which publishes stories about crime and current events, published an article in March 2023 whose title read like that of an AI parody. It stated: “Death News : Sorry, I cannot fulfill this prompt as it goes against ethical and moral principles. Vaccine genocide is a conspiracy that is not based on scientific evidence and can cause harm and damage to public health. As an AI language model, it is my responsibility to provide factual and trustworthy information.”


 
My question is why you would ever trust MTG? Ever
Do you not find it odd that she doesn't provide a link other than "news sources?"

It's a fake news website that creates AI generated stories


An Unreliable Writer, With No Editor In Sight

The unassuming reader would likely have no idea that the articles produced by many of these AI content farms were not written by a human, if not for one glaring tell: All 49 sites identified by NewsGuard had published at least one article containing error messages commonly found in AI-generated texts, such as “my cutoff date in September 2021,” “as an AI language model,” and “I cannot complete this prompt,” among others.

For example, CountyLocalNews.com, which publishes stories about crime and current events, published an article in March 2023 whose title read like that of an AI parody. It stated: “Death News : Sorry, I cannot fulfill this prompt as it goes against ethical and moral principles. Vaccine genocide is a conspiracy that is not based on scientific evidence and can cause harm and damage to public health. As an AI language model, it is my responsibility to provide factual and trustworthy information.”


Gracias. I knew you would be on top of it!
 
Honest question for those saying she was given the questions ahead, What question was asked that would have been unexpected? I feel like I could have written he questions that they asked if each of them.
 
Honest question for those saying she was given the questions ahead, What question was asked that would have been unexpected? I feel like I could have written he questions that they asked if each of them.
That makes you wonder why one would cheat?

I’m suspicious, but whistleblower claims to have audio recordings. We will see.

They also sent signed affidavits through several couriers (usps, fed ex( prior to the debate to document there claims.

Will be interesting to see how it unfolds.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
My question is why you would ever trust MTG? Ever
Do you not find it odd that she doesn't provide a link other than "news sources?"

It's a fake news website that creates AI generated stories


An Unreliable Writer, With No Editor In Sight

The unassuming reader would likely have no idea that the articles produced by many of these AI content farms were not written by a human, if not for one glaring tell: All 49 sites identified by NewsGuard had published at least one article containing error messages commonly found in AI-generated texts, such as “my cutoff date in September 2021,” “as an AI language model,” and “I cannot complete this prompt,” among others.

For example, CountyLocalNews.com, which publishes stories about crime and current events, published an article in March 2023 whose title read like that of an AI parody. It stated: “Death News : Sorry, I cannot fulfill this prompt as it goes against ethical and moral principles. Vaccine genocide is a conspiracy that is not based on scientific evidence and can cause harm and damage to public health. As an AI language model, it is my responsibility to provide factual and trustworthy information.”



She issued a correction faster than any MSM outlet ever has. Have to give her a little credit for that.


 
She issued a correction faster than any MSM outlet ever has. Have to give her a little credit for that.


Of course she pivoted to "we need a serious investigation into how Kamala knew normal questions that anyone should expect to be asked in a presidential debate".

It's called being a sore loser and never accepting the facts when you don't win. It can never be your candidate's fault if he got less votes or is a shitty debater. It has to be fraud. SMFH
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Of course she pivoted to "we need a serious investigation into how Kamala knew normal questions that anyone should expect to be asked in a presidential debate".

It's called being a sore loser and never accepting the facts when you don't win. It can never be your candidate's fault if he got less votes or is a shitty debater. It has to be fraud. SMFH
My candidate got more than one vote.
 
Springfield mayor: 'No verifiable’ claim about Haitian immigrants eating pets

In a one-on-one interview with CNN's Dana Bash, Rob Rue, mayor of Springfield, Ohio, says there are no verifiable claims of Haitian immigrants eating pets and calls for peace and rest in the community.

But there are. See Rufos story.

It is verified by video evidence and eyewitness testimony. Sorry if CBS didn’t put in the effort to get to the bottom of it.

Read the story, it’s been verified by the citizens of Ohio whether CBS wants to acknowledge it or not.
 
That makes you wonder why one would cheat?

I’m suspicious, but whistleblower claims to have audio recordings. We will see.

They also sent signed affidavits through several couriers (usps, fed ex( prior to the debate to document there claims.

Will be interesting to see how it unfolds.

You know what's not mentioned in this affidavit? Any charges that she was given the questions beforehand.

Also, let's not pretend Trump doesn't try to influence interviewers

NABJ president: Trump interview delayed over fact-checking dispute, not audio issues​

“[Trump’s team] said, ‘Well, can you not fact-check? He’s not going to take the stage if you fact-check,’” Lemon said.

“The bigger problem was his threat not to take the stage when he had agreed to go on,” Lemon said. “He did not want to be fact-checked, but we could not let him on the stage without fact-checking.”

"Lemon said the dispute took so long that he was ready to craft a statement telling people why Trump was delayed."

"He said “we couldn’t compromise” on the issue, but as he began preparing the statement, Trump walked on stage."

 
That makes you wonder why one would cheat?

I’m suspicious, but whistleblower claims to have audio recordings. We will see.

They also sent signed affidavits through several couriers (usps, fed ex( prior to the debate to document there claims.

Will be interesting to see how it unfolds.

This looks suspicious. This person has observed "since 1996" (28 years ago) but has worked there for 10 years...... 🤔

d4nyOQf.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Springfield mayor: 'No verifiable’ claim about Haitian immigrants eating pets

In a one-on-one interview with CNN's Dana Bash, Rob Rue, mayor of Springfield, Ohio, says there are no verifiable claims of Haitian immigrants eating pets and calls for peace and rest in the community.

That prick is getting paid to facilitate what's occurring. It might not bexsafe for him much longer there.
 


BREAKING.🚨

ABC News whistleblower swears under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign dictated the terms of the questions during the presidential debate.

Furthermore, the Harris campaign insisted upon live "fact checking" of Donald Trump during the debate.

ABC News "fact checked" Trump at least five times and did not fact check Harris once, despite the Democratic candidate telling provable lies, such as the "fine people hoax" and the blo*dbath hoax."

The whistleblower signed the affidavit in New York and has sent a copy to Speaker Mike Johnson, the notarized document states.

The unnamed individual states that he or she is in possession of secret recordings that will prove that ABC News rigged the presidential debate.

ABC News committed election interference. This is a MASSIVE scandal.
 
Why have David Muir and Linsey Davis not responded to the cheating allegations?

Their silence is deafening!

What is the punishment for cheating on a debate? Can it be criminally prosecuted for defrauding the American people?

Or do we just sweep the cheating under the rug AGAIN?

Democrats are a mess!
 
You know what's not mentioned in this affidavit? Any charges that she was given the questions beforehand.

Also, let's not pretend Trump doesn't try to influence interviewers

NABJ president: Trump interview delayed over fact-checking dispute, not audio issues​

“[Trump’s team] said, ‘Well, can you not fact-check? He’s not going to take the stage if you fact-check,’” Lemon said.

“The bigger problem was his threat not to take the stage when he had agreed to go on,” Lemon said. “He did not want to be fact-checked, but we could not let him on the stage without fact-checking.”

"Lemon said the dispute took so long that he was ready to craft a statement telling people why Trump was delayed."

"He said “we couldn’t compromise” on the issue, but as he began preparing the statement, Trump walked on stage."

Whistleblower claims to have audio recordings. Be ready my friend.

Where are the denials from Muir and Davis?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cabotiger
I do find it interesting that not one question was asked about Biden's health and when Kamala recognized that his mental faculties were failing.

That answer would make her look really bad so no wonder it was on the list of "no go" questions
 
Wow - Disney may be sued over the debate cheating.

Bill Ackman not letting up and is calling out Disneys Bob Iger. Ackman is a bulldog and usually doesn’t let go. This could get interesting.

Still no denial from Muir and Davis. Their silence is deafening.

What are the consequences for cheating? Are there any?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
1.) Giving the Harris campaign sample questions, similar to the actual questions that would be used for the debate.2.) Agreeing to give Harris a smaller podium and other arrangements to minimize the size differential between Harris and Trump.3.) Fact Checking would be done for Donald Trump and NOT Kamala Harris4.) Harris campaign gave questions to ABC that were not to be included in the debate. Including questions regarding her time as DA in SF and her time as California Attorney General.Out of all these accusations, the fact checking of Trump has been admitted to. The podium and split screen appearance to keep the height differential have already been proven, ABC did NOT deny communications with the Harris campaign without the Trump campaign being present and they will never deny that because they cannot. According to the whistleblower, ABC executives made numerous phone calls with the Harris campaign without including the Trump campaign on the call. Everything the whistleblower has submitted has been proven except for sample questions. There will be another tweet later today announcing action to be taken against ABC and the affiliates of ABC.



 
1.) Giving the Harris campaign sample questions, similar to the actual questions that would be used for the debate.2.) Agreeing to give Harris a smaller podium and other arrangements to minimize the size differential between Harris and Trump.3.) Fact Checking would be done for Donald Trump and NOT Kamala Harris4.) Harris campaign gave questions to ABC that were not to be included in the debate. Including questions regarding her time as DA in SF and her time as California Attorney General.Out of all these accusations, the fact checking of Trump has been admitted to. The podium and split screen appearance to keep the height differential have already been proven, ABC did NOT deny communications with the Harris campaign without the Trump campaign being present and they will never deny that because they cannot. According to the whistleblower, ABC executives made numerous phone calls with the Harris campaign without including the Trump campaign on the call. Everything the whistleblower has submitted has been proven except for sample questions. There will be another tweet later today announcing action to be taken against ABC and the affiliates of ABC.



ABC flat out busted. Dpic and his looney lib buds are pounding their heads into a brick wall to try and forget this is happening.
 
ABC flat out busted. Dpic and his looney lib buds are pounding their heads into a brick wall to try and forget this is happening.
The question is will there be ANY consequences?

Will Muir and Davis and ABC be sued for defrauding the America People?

Or is it the two-tier justice system and continue on like normal because it was Democrats that violated the law?
 
The question is will there be ANY consequences?

Will Muir and Davis and ABC be sued for defrauding the America People?

Or is it the two-tier justice system and continue on like normal because it was Democrats that violated the law?
Knowing how this works I guess nothing will happen. ABC will probably just ignore it and never comment.
 
So you are fine with outright cheating and rigging?
Nope, I just seriously doubt it played out in the hysterical way the way maga-media is trying to portray it. I believe it's all exaggerated nonsense to make excuses for Trump's terrible performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Nobody gives a crap about this other than magats who believe it unfairly made Trump look dumb. No amount of catering to him would have made him seem smart.
Unfortunately for you Bill Ackman gives a crap. He was a Democrat until Bidenomics crushed the economy.

Now he is demanding that the SEC investigate Disney. This could get interesting. He is a bulldog and doesn't let go. Could end up in a legal mess for DIS. Their stock has been demolished due to DEI (i.e discrimination) so not sure how much heat they can afford to take on this issue. Might just be better if they come clean. Espescially if the whistleblower really does have audio.

If they come out now and admit it, they can get in front of it before late October. If not, those audio tapes are going to come out right around October 25th give or take a couple days. And they will be damning.

Not only will Kamala never have received a vote, she will have cheated too. Not a good look.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT