ADVERTISEMENT

I’m starting it now

A huge chunk of us independents could support a Dem who doesn't kowtow to far left progressive idiocy and focuses on the issues that matter to everyday Americans.

And, for the love of God, drop the isms and identify politics. It's abhorrent and divisive.
Come on now. OP suggested "butt plug" for POTUS.
 
You keep throwing the word "Nazi" around, but do you know what is means?

I'll help you out: its stands for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, or the National Socialist German Workers' Party, or simply, the Nazis. Which party does that label really better describe? Let's break it down, shall we?

Nationalsozialistische

The concatenation of National and Socialist--demonstrating the two are indistinguishable and inseparable. However, for our purpose we'll sperate them anyway.

Nationalism

The Dems certainly are not Nationalists--I'll give you that. You guys hate your country with a passion. But that's not what "National" means in this context. It means bringing about a unified "national" system of government--vice a confederation such as the one we have and most on the American Right want to see reasserted. The "National" goes hand-in-hand with Socialism

Socialism

A system of government whereby key goods and services are held as common property and where private property is largely verboten. Remind me, which party is the party that at least says they are for small government and touts the primacy of private property rights?

Arbeiterpartei

AKA, the Workers Party. Hitler's nod to the labor unions and his supposed platform of being for the German worker. Do I realy need to dissect this further?

NAtionalsoZialistische ArbeiterparteI, AKA Nazi, AKA a nationwide system of unified government on the principle where most keys goods and services are held in common and where labor unions reign supreme. Does that appear on the masthead somewhere in the DNC?

And for the coup de grâce, which was the only American party in modern times to imprison its citizens in concentration camps? And don't even get me started on which party started the KKK, or who had public and high-ranking members of the Klan throughout their party as recently as just a few decades ago.


You know what. I have to thank you. This was fun. What other names do you have for us?
Not knowing that the democrats then live where the conservatives live now. Excellent look for a six mile high school graduate such as yourself.
 
Not knowing that the democrats then live where the conservatives live now. Excellent look for a six mile high school graduate such as yourself.
Another ad hominem attack..... does it not matter to you at all that I strive not to attack someone personally for disagreeing with me on these boards?

I admit that it is convenient sleight of hand to use the political ideology reversal that occurred between the 1860s and 1960s to nominally absolve the Republican party from blame in the sins of the past. I'll give you that. I withdraw the comment. But what about the rest of it?

Let's step through this at least somewhat objectively:
Neo-Nazis and while supremacist build their platforms on national socialism. Which party is most closely aligned with Socialism?

Or better yet, which party has espoused near unanimous vociferous and vehement opposition to Socialism?

Which party is rampant with antisemitism?

Which part is the party of Zionism?


Oh yeah, and what's a "six mile high school graduate"?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
That is firggin weird. Please let the be an AI generated image.
It is. I do find it pretty screwed up to refer to him as "butt plug" as one of your compatriots did earlier in this thread.

I try really hard to be respectful and mature, that crap makes it hard. Debate his policies,debate his performance, but attacking his sexuality should be off limits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and leetp
It is. I do find it pretty screwed up to refer to him as "butt plug" as one of your compatriots did earlier in this thread.

I try really hard to be respectful and mature, that crap makes it hard. Debate his policies,debate his performance, but attacking his sexuality should be off limits.
There's a lot of sophomoric comments on these boards. I can't claim that I don't engage in some of it myself, although I'd like to think it's always purely in jest. After all, I try not to take things too seriously.

Still, when trying to have conversations about political and social issues I do make my best effort to refrain from personal insults and attacks, even as posters hurl their invective at me. I do occasionally block posters when it gets over the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT