Here's the thing. It's clear you don't really know what's going on or the details of the case or her charges.
She broke the law. The testimony made it clear she knew it too. This isn't in question.
The "expert" witness was excluded by a Republican judge in a heavily Republican district because they had nothing to do with the charges levied against Tina.
Nobody gives a **** if Tina thought the election was rigged or going to be rigged in this case. It has no bearing on whether she did illegal shit (she did).
She broke the law. Hopefully she ends up in jail.
Edit: the thing that our good friend
@Dbatz thinks no objective person would believe is criminal includes the following:
Lying to state government to get access into a secure room for a person who wasn't background checked or an employee of the state.
Illegally gaining access herself to the secure room where voting equipment is stored, through the key card obtained illegally, mentioned above.
Instructed county staff to turn off cameras in the voting systems rooms she shouldn't be in but went into when the cameras were turned off.
Putting a hard drive that she illegally copied using the above-mentioned methods into the regular mail containing election data and personal information of thousands in an effort to further her conspiracy.