I'm not a tin foil hat dude, but Alex Jones is entertaining. And Tim Dillon is a funny dude. I bet the Great Reset gets talked about. https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/beware-those-bearing-simplistic-lessons-pandemic
alex jones would be entertaining if there werent hundreds of thousands of people out there who believe what he has to say.I'm not a tin foil hat dude, but Alex Jones is entertaining. And Tim Dillon is a funny dude. I bet the Great Reset gets talked about. https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/beware-those-bearing-simplistic-lessons-pandemic
alex jones would be entertaining if there werent hundreds of thousands of people out there who believe what he has to say.
as a reminder:
![]()
Judge orders Alex Jones to pay $100,000 in Sandy Hook case
A Texas judge has ordered conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $100,000 in another court setback over the Infowars host.apnews.com
Yeah, I mean he’s off his rocker, but whatever
The censorship is out of line. I don’t care what he claims, and I don’t care if Twitter, Facebook, etc are private entities, we shouldn’t be ok with people being censored in the US. That should be frowned upon by everyone, yet here we are
Just the free market at work. Businesses can choose what content they allow and customers can choose whether to continue to use the service. Facebook announcing Q3 results Thursday so we’ll see how they’re doing. Will be interested in how much they were hurt by companies pulling ads from them and how much that has to do with their more aggressive censoring policies.Yeah, I mean he’s off his rocker, but whatever
The censorship is out of line. I don’t care what he claims, and I don’t care if Twitter, Facebook, etc are private entities, we shouldn’t be ok with people being censored in the US. That should be frowned upon by everyone, yet here we are
I have lost absolutely all respect for Joe Rogan for having this piece of garbage on his show again.
I'm sure it will keep him up at night.
facebook not allowing his nonsense on their platform isnt censorship. He's free to speak his "truth" elsewhere.
I have lost absolutely all respect for Joe Rogan for having this piece of garbage on his show again.
I'm sure it will keep him up at night.
In other words you lose respect for anyone who doesn’t think just like you do?
facebook not allowing his nonsense on their platform isnt censorship. He's free to speak his "truth" elsewhere.
Of course. The craziest thing is when Jamie/Rogan pull up the actual history on Google to confirm it's real.Have you seen the one w Bravo?
Its kind of retarded i really agree about the censorship but its a nuanced argument. Private companies can deny service to whoever the fvck they want as long as its not based on racism or sexism right? So Alex Jones trolled himself off the platforms.Yeah, I mean he’s off his rocker, but whatever
The censorship is out of line. I don’t care what he claims, and I don’t care if Twitter, Facebook, etc are private entities, we shouldn’t be ok with people being censored in the US. That should be frowned upon by everyone, yet here we are
No the ISP's do.... which we've given them free reign to censor as we refuse to treat internet as a commodity and yet here people are whining about it. Hilarious.They own the means of content distribution.
It’s the definition of censorship.
Stop bringing logic and nuance into this discussion. It doesn't suit this board.Its kind of retarded i really agree about the censorship but its a nuanced argument. Private companies can deny service to whoever the fvck they want as long as its not based on racism or sexism right? So Alex Jones trolled himself off the platforms.
I really don't think anyone should be booted off platforms honestly, I think people should understand that when you listen to nutcases you can't believe them and you shouldn't believe them. His comments on Sandy Hook were horrible and indefensible and led to him being black listed. He even argued in a court of law that he was fabricating a story as he is acting out a character. His ultimate legal and ethical reason why he's 'censored' is the same reason someone can be charged with inciting a riot. His followers were contacting the parents of dead kids and demanding they come clean. Disgusting.
I'm a Libertarian and I'm going to disagree with this. Section 230 was put in place to protect social media from getting sued from what others posted. The whole idea of it was to protect them from a lawsuit so they wouldn't censor. Now Facebook and Twitter have censored the oldest newspaper in the US (NY Post). Twitter has still banned them from posting content. They censor the President. They censor the Press Secretary for posting a NY Post article. Many people get their news from social media platforms. I believe they should be treated as utilities. Verizon doesn't have the authority to censor my text messages to my friends.Just the free market at work. Businesses can choose what content they allow and customers can choose whether to continue to use the service. Facebook announcing Q3 results Thursday so we’ll see how they’re doing. Will be interested in how much they were hurt by companies pulling ads from them and how much that has to do with their more aggressive censoring policies.
I'm not a tin foil hat dude, but Alex Jones is entertaining. And Tim Dillon is a funny dude. I bet the Great Reset gets talked about. https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/beware-those-bearing-simplistic-lessons-pandemic
You’re a Libertarian and believe that these businesses should be regulated as public utilities?I'm a Libertarian and I'm going to disagree with this. Section 230 was put in place to protect social media from getting sued from what others posted. The whole idea of it was to protect them from a lawsuit so they wouldn't censor. Now Facebook and Twitter have censored the oldest newspaper in the US (NY Post). Twitter has still banned them from posting content. They censor the President. They censor the Press Secretary for posting a NY Post article. Many people get their news from social media platforms. I believe they should be treated as utilities. Verizon doesn't have the authority to censor my text messages to my friends.
I don't care who's the President or Press Secretary. If Biden tweeted that fornicating with frogs (A Book of Mormons reference) will treat Covid.... that post shouldn't be censored.
Yes, or let them be sued like any other company. You can't have your cake and eat it to. The Government shouldn't be protecting them, while letting them censor.You’re a Libertarian and believe that these businesses should be regulated as public utilities?
Isn’t that 90% of TI posters?In other words you lose respect for anyone who doesn’t think just like you do?
No the ISP's do.... which we've given them free reign to censor as we refuse to treat internet as a commodity and yet here people are whining about it. Hilarious.
Nothing free about this leftist oligarchy that you euphemistically call a “market”. Its chickens are roosting on your future and crapping all over it. But do go on with strawman arguments about markets and freedom.Just the free market at work. Businesses can choose what content they allow and customers can choose whether to continue to use the service. Facebook announcing Q3 results Thursday so we’ll see how they’re doing. Will be interested in how much they were hurt by companies pulling ads from them and how much that has to do with their more aggressive censoring policies.
Anyone who sees the ISP’s as being more relevant than the platforms in regards to the topics in this thread, I can’t even fathom.Determine the choke point wherever you would like, but it’s most impactful at its most dominant. The ISPs can be changed, modified, or eliminated, the platforms truly hold the power
Isn’t that 90% of TI posters?
Shouldn’t you be sniffing Pelosi’s panties or something?alex jones would be entertaining if there werent hundreds of thousands of people out there who believe what he has to say.
as a reminder:
![]()
Judge orders Alex Jones to pay $100,000 in Sandy Hook case
A Texas judge has ordered conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $100,000 in another court setback over the Infowars host.apnews.com
Great postI'm a Libertarian and I'm going to disagree with this. Section 230 was put in place to protect social media from getting sued from what others posted. The whole idea of it was to protect them from a lawsuit so they wouldn't censor. Now Facebook and Twitter have censored the oldest newspaper in the US (NY Post). Twitter has still banned them from posting content. They censor the President. They censor the Press Secretary for posting a NY Post article. Many people get their news from social media platforms. I believe they should be treated as utilities. Verizon doesn't have the authority to censor my text messages to my friends.
I don't care who's the President or Press Secretary. If Biden tweeted that fornicating with frogs (A Book of Mormons reference) will treat Covid.... that post shouldn't be censored.
facebook not allowing his nonsense on their platform isnt censorship. He's free to speak his "truth" elsewhere.
I find this so funny. We can disagree but the isps are like the railroad and you are complaining about the trains. If you did t realize the ones who own the railroad are far and away more powerfulAnyone who sees the ISP’s as being more relevant than the platforms in regards to the topics in this thread, I can’t even fathom.
I find this so funny. We can disagree but the isps are like the railroad and you are complaining about the trains. If you did t realize the ones who own the railroad are far and away more powerful
And you don't even know what you're talking about!Isn’t that 90% of TI posters?
Nothing free about this leftist oligarchy that you euphemistically call a “market”. Its chickens are roosting on your future and crapping all over it. But do go on with strawman arguments about markets and freedom.
you’re right about “free” being at the core of this problem. We need “free” for viewpoint diversity, not totalitarian oligarchy.