The university brought in Rittenhouse????? why?
i dont think the university hosted rittenhouse, but i could be wrong
TPUSA did, and those guys are pretty consistently just trying to stir up controversy. Total dorks
Got it - the flyer made it sound like the administration brought him in
The university didn't invite him but he was at the Strom Thurmond institute and required police protection to leave. I was told 250 people showed up to "listen"
While I don't think there's much point of bringing Rittenhouse to college campuses, left-wingers dislike him for shooting the people who attacked him, even if it was determined he did it in self-defense. So, because they don't like him, they tried to put pressure on Clemson to prevent him from speaking by making it out like the university officially invited him.
Protest, sit-ins are fine and are a great release valve to express your opinion. Blocking people from entering or physically assaulting people should be stopped immediately and given no tolerance.
Hate speech should be combatted with better speech to expose the hate.
The US House passing that bill yesterday was a disgrace and ignorant but par for the course, unfortunately.
I had to look up what you were talking about. I guess it must've been some sort of controversy that this passed in corners of the internet I don't frequent, because this bipartisan bill that passed with a large majority didn't get much attention elsewhere. It appears it adopts an expanded definition of "anti-Semitism" for non-discrimination in the Dept of Ed that the government already uses in other agencies, to encompass "claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor" and "drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."
I'm not sure how the Dept of Ed enforces anti-discrimination law, but the sponsor of the bill said this, "When people engage in harassment or bullying of Jewish individuals where they justify the killing of Jews or use blood libel or hold Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the Israeli government — that is antisemitic. It's unfortunate that needs to be clarified, but that's why this bill is necessary." I think it remains to be seen if this would actually have an effect on protected speech any more-so than other provisions of anti-discrimination law, or that it would supersede speech protections if it conflicts with them. I do wonder if some of the reason some people oppose this is because it makes it harder to avoid their own anti-Semitism...
just what do they want clemson to do here???
They saw it on tv and want to be included too.
I know great people on both sides of this and neither of them are wrong. Its the revenge that both sides want..thats the issue ultimately. The 3kmurdered last fall was wrong. The 30k murdered since then is also wrong.
One of these sides is gonna have to forgive here. Even if Hamas is destroyed, there are children seeing war today in their homes that are gonna grown up as orphans due to either side iulling their family and theyll be the next ones ready for war as soon as theyre old enough.
30k murdered? What are you talking about? It's ridiculous to compare the total number Hamas says have been killed in Gaza while Israel has been trying to recover hostages and root out terrorists to the total number of people killed in a terrorist raid.
To be fair, the fact that simply engaging in things like open dialogue on hot button topics is considered “trying to stir up controversy”, may be exactly why it’s necessary.
But what's the "controversy" they're stirring up here? I think they should be allowed to bring Rittenhouse to campus, but I think it's dumb because it doesn't really serve any education purpose. He's a hero to people who wanted to see a more forceful response to the rioting in 2020, but he's also a guy who went to a riot with a gun and unfortunately had to use it in a deadly way to defend himself. Even though he didn't commit a crime, I don't think it's a good idea to flaunt what he did.
Kyle Rittenhouse should not get the poster boy for anything. Turning Point USA is dumb as shit to use him in the first place. What exactly is it necessary.
I also think it's silly to be needlessly provocative by bringing him to campus, and that he doesn't have much worthwhile to say. However, the point of this kind of provocation is to get left-wingers to try to prevent him from speaking and to make themselves look like they're being antagonized by anti-free speech leftists. Of course, it worked, because those people just can't help themselves.