ADVERTISEMENT

****Meanwhile, at Clemson...

I get the not liking him part for sure... But simply doing a bit of math on some of these claims before voicing them would be a good thing.

I actually voted for Graham his first time running for Senate b/c of this. His opponent (a Democrat) had a solution for illegals... just arrest them and deport them. It was commonly accepted that there were 15 million illegals in the US at that point (not unlike today). Grab a calculator and run some quick numbers on how many people you'd have to have arresting x number of immigrants per day and how many buses you'd have to have to deport that many folks.
@hopefultiger13 check the video you're not correct here
 
So some randon upstate group wants to go to Sikes Hall to protest. I call BS on this. As noted above, you can't allow any random group to show up on a controversial topic. If its students only and peaceful, that's one thing but this is the issue with all these campuses. Outside groups should not be allowed to protest/block/vandalize college campuses and rouse up a handful of students. Have a feeling that the majority of these protests include a low percentage of enrolled students, especially as it pertains to places other than California
 
What a stupid caption. Regardless, as long as they're there to peacefully and legally support terrorists, leave them alone. Or go counter-protest and let them know they're supporting terrorists. If they break the law or decide to occupy space/be violent, then kick them out and suspend them.
 
TPUSA did, and those guys are pretty consistently just trying to stir up controversy. Total dorks

To be fair, the fact that simply engaging in things like open dialogue on hot button topics is considered “trying to stir up controversy”, may be exactly why it’s necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
"I had no role in the confiscation of property. I was a spectator."
I can't tell if you are serious. That is his reasoning as to why he felt no guilt.

He's not claiming moral responsibility as it would have happened anyways in his mind. He still helped in confiscation of property this is not controversial and has been well established. Listen again. Are you missing the part where he says "that's right" to the direct question of confiscating property from Jews?
 
To be fair, the fact that simply engaging in things like open dialogue on hot button topics is considered “trying to stir up controversy”, may be exactly why it’s necessary.
If they were actually looking for dialogue, I'd agree it's necessary.
 
To be fair, the fact that simply engaging in things like open dialogue on hot button topics is considered “trying to stir up controversy”, may be exactly why it’s necessary.

Kyle Rittenhouse should not get the poster boy for anything. Turning Point USA is dumb as shit to use him in the first place. What exactly is it necessary.
 
I can't tell if you are serious. That is his reasoning as to why he felt no guilt.

He's not claiming moral responsibility as it would have happened anyways in his mind. He still helped in confiscation of property this is not controversial and has been well established. Listen again. Are you missing the part where he says "that's right" to the direct question of confiscating property from Jews?
I am not defending Soros. But I don't believe he was trained to track down Jews. He accompanied someone who had been paid off to (hopefully) save his life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
I'm not looking at the video because I don't really care... I googled Soro's age. Is he not 93? I did say he was born in 1931, but he was actually born in late 1930. That means that he was 13/14 and tracking down Jews for the Nazis. That seems unlikely.

You care enough to correct someone else that said it but don't care to actually take 30 seconds to see if you are even right on the matter? That is an interesting choice.

I agree it seems unlikely, hard to imagine, which makes it even crazier as that is exactly what happened.
 
The university brought in Rittenhouse????? why?

i dont think the university hosted rittenhouse, but i could be wrong

TPUSA did, and those guys are pretty consistently just trying to stir up controversy. Total dorks

Got it - the flyer made it sound like the administration brought him in

The university didn't invite him but he was at the Strom Thurmond institute and required police protection to leave. I was told 250 people showed up to "listen"
While I don't think there's much point of bringing Rittenhouse to college campuses, left-wingers dislike him for shooting the people who attacked him, even if it was determined he did it in self-defense. So, because they don't like him, they tried to put pressure on Clemson to prevent him from speaking by making it out like the university officially invited him.
Protest, sit-ins are fine and are a great release valve to express your opinion. Blocking people from entering or physically assaulting people should be stopped immediately and given no tolerance.

Hate speech should be combatted with better speech to expose the hate.

The US House passing that bill yesterday was a disgrace and ignorant but par for the course, unfortunately.
I had to look up what you were talking about. I guess it must've been some sort of controversy that this passed in corners of the internet I don't frequent, because this bipartisan bill that passed with a large majority didn't get much attention elsewhere. It appears it adopts an expanded definition of "anti-Semitism" for non-discrimination in the Dept of Ed that the government already uses in other agencies, to encompass "claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor" and "drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."

I'm not sure how the Dept of Ed enforces anti-discrimination law, but the sponsor of the bill said this, "When people engage in harassment or bullying of Jewish individuals where they justify the killing of Jews or use blood libel or hold Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the Israeli government — that is antisemitic. It's unfortunate that needs to be clarified, but that's why this bill is necessary." I think it remains to be seen if this would actually have an effect on protected speech any more-so than other provisions of anti-discrimination law, or that it would supersede speech protections if it conflicts with them. I do wonder if some of the reason some people oppose this is because it makes it harder to avoid their own anti-Semitism...
just what do they want clemson to do here???

They saw it on tv and want to be included too.


I know great people on both sides of this and neither of them are wrong. Its the revenge that both sides want..thats the issue ultimately. The 3kmurdered last fall was wrong. The 30k murdered since then is also wrong.


One of these sides is gonna have to forgive here. Even if Hamas is destroyed, there are children seeing war today in their homes that are gonna grown up as orphans due to either side iulling their family and theyll be the next ones ready for war as soon as theyre old enough.
30k murdered? What are you talking about? It's ridiculous to compare the total number Hamas says have been killed in Gaza while Israel has been trying to recover hostages and root out terrorists to the total number of people killed in a terrorist raid.
To be fair, the fact that simply engaging in things like open dialogue on hot button topics is considered “trying to stir up controversy”, may be exactly why it’s necessary.
But what's the "controversy" they're stirring up here? I think they should be allowed to bring Rittenhouse to campus, but I think it's dumb because it doesn't really serve any education purpose. He's a hero to people who wanted to see a more forceful response to the rioting in 2020, but he's also a guy who went to a riot with a gun and unfortunately had to use it in a deadly way to defend himself. Even though he didn't commit a crime, I don't think it's a good idea to flaunt what he did.
Kyle Rittenhouse should not get the poster boy for anything. Turning Point USA is dumb as shit to use him in the first place. What exactly is it necessary.
I also think it's silly to be needlessly provocative by bringing him to campus, and that he doesn't have much worthwhile to say. However, the point of this kind of provocation is to get left-wingers to try to prevent him from speaking and to make themselves look like they're being antagonized by anti-free speech leftists. Of course, it worked, because those people just can't help themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cemtiger
IMO, I think the administration should not suspend, but expel any students who have been warned and are later arrested and later convicted. Let the students and parents know this by email. I would think this would at least give pause and especially if the parents are calling their child and say " so you really want to jeopardize your education as well as your future?"

Just my .02
If they don't follow the rules, expulsion.
 
I'm not looking at the video because I don't really care... I googled Soro's age. Is he not 93? I did say he was born in 1931, but he was actually born in late 1930. That means that he was 13/14 and tracking down Jews for the Nazis. That seems unlikely.
He took part in some of that stuff because the guy who was taking care of him took him along. He was just there, he wasn't actively "tracking down Jews." But he was a kid, and a Jewish one, at that. I don't agree with much that he does, but the people insisting that what happened when he was a kid and in danger as a result of being Jewish are being really ridiculous. You really don't have to reach for stuff like this to disagree with Soros.
 
While I agree that these heathens shouldn't be allowed to hide their face there is no way to enforce that since covid and they know it.
While I agree with you.......the law doesn't say, "unless its to prevent COVID." There's no government mandate to wear masks anymore. You can enforce it, you just have to have the nads to do it.
 
Hate speech is legal speech
There's a limit to free speech. Depending on the message and circumstances, free speech rights are superseded by public concerns (i.e., you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater).
 
He took part in some of that stuff because the guy who was taking care of him took him along. He was just there, he wasn't actively "tracking down Jews." But he was a kid, and a Jewish one, at that. I don't agree with much that he does, but the people insisting that what happened when he was a kid and in danger as a result of being Jewish are being really ridiculous. You really don't have to reach for stuff like this to disagree with Soros.
So he did or did not partake?

You can justify it any way you like - it's irrelevant. People do many things survive - what was he going to do say he's Jewish and end up getting murdered? Not much of a choice for a 14 year old.

Regardless unless you have a time machine to prevent it from happing it's reality. Weird to pretend it didn't happen for emotional reasons.
 
You can justify it any way you like - it's irrelevant. People do many things survive - what was he going to do say he's Jewish and end up getting murdered? Not much of a choice for a 14 year old.

Regardless unless you have a time machine to prevent it from happing it's reality. Weird to pretend it didn't happen for emotional reasons.
What if you just don't care that it happened, and think people are bringing it up because they're using it to discredit the guy?

For instance, "Soros is the biggest piece of shit to walk the planet in our lifetime. He was one of the Jews that helped track down others Jews for the nazis."
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
What if you just don't care that it happened, and think people are bringing it up because they're using it to discredit the guy?
That's fair game to not care. I don't in particular. It's not fair game to deny that it happened just because some are using it as an excuse to discredit him or anything he's involved in.

Your example would be an ad hominem fallacy in my view. I put them in the same boat as being intellectually dishonest
 
Last edited:
If it’s legal, it doesn’t matter what you think should be tolerated. The First Amendment gives the right to anybody to express whatever they might like, regardless of insult, hurt feelings or other mental discomfort imbued upon others.

And what does Clemson being a public university have to do with anything?

Btw, I’m against hate speech but I am for its continued protection under the law. Slippery slopes and whatnot.
I completely understand the sentiment here, and I am fully supportive of free speech - but one simply can't say certain things and expect to keep their job in many cases, for example...or, continue studying at a place like Clemson.
 
I’m sure for many of us it was much simpler times while attending clemson…

Just the score on terror, big bro patriot act and the new found intrusion into our personal lives…

The intro to Barack…one of the failed Hillary bids…roller coaster Bowden years….matket collapse…housing failures…hmmm

I guess it wasn’t actually.

Just keep making us more comfortable with chaos, higher costs, higher taxes…more socialist agenda…gradually it becomes more normalized. Shock and awe…encroach…take a little more.give a little less…pacify…scream racism…rinse and repeat. Pretty good playbook.
 
Screw Palenstine. What have they done for the USA? They along with their best friend Iran constantly and publicly say death to America and death to Israel. These people hate the West and Israel. People tend to forget these are the bastards that went in and murdered tons of innocent civilians, cutting babies heads off, raping and kidnapping women, etc. They have terrorized the world for decades. They started this deal. I would have no problem if Israel completely destroys all of them and Iran as well. They are a cancer to the West that needs to be destroyed. I have had it with America being so soft on these country's that sponsor terroism, our border, transgender and LGTV basically changing all the laws, foreign imposters running our government, college campus and cities letting these groups do whatever they want, Illegal voting, and much more I hate to say it, but this country could be heading for another revolution. Clemson administration needs to put and end to all political/religious demonstrations on campus.
 
Do any of you children know about the protests, both on and off campuses, of the 60's and 70's. Just wondering. What about participating in the Clemson campus protests of 1985 or early 1990's?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
The entire situation in the Middle East and those against Israel in particular only makes sense to those who read and understand the Bible and the history of the people in this area. One side teaches its children from birth to hate and want to eliminate the other side (and they justify that based on instructions from their god), while the other side would prefer to live in peace with one another without wars and bloodshed. Unfortunately, this will continue until Jesus returns and then every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that He is Lord.

And George Soros will spend eternity in hell unless he finds Jesus and changes his life. I am confident in saying that.
 
Protesters of all types are pussies. People fight and die overseas for this country so that these losers can menstruate over some bullshit cause that they know nothing about.

Palestinians would behead and execute these same bastards simply because they are liberal freaks
 
I completely understand the sentiment here, and I am fully supportive of free speech - but one simply can't say certain things and expect to keep their job in many cases, for example...or, continue studying at a place like Clemson.

Right and I understand that, especially as it pertains to work and similar settings.

I just think we might want to be careful about curbing speech on college campuses. If there can’t be free and open dialog in that setting (and governmental settings, as well) then we might be doomed as a society.

Also, who gets to determine what is considered hateful speech? There are just too many pitfalls to limiting the 1st beyond what is already limited (yelling fire in a crowded theater).

Anyway, I’m very wary of limited freedom of any kind.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT