ADVERTISEMENT

So now they want to change the National Anthem?

I agree. the only way we will know slavery rape and murder is wrong is to keep looking at the statues of those that have committed the atrocities.

That sounds great but most of the statues these nutjob, lazy communist bastards want to tear down were not the type of person you described.

Abe Lincoln? George Washington? Teddy Roosevelt? GTFO.
 
I agree. the only way we will know slavery rape and murder is wrong is to keep looking at the statues of those that have committed the atrocities.
How about the ones being removed or vandalized that didn't have nothing to do with slavery?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pvilletigerfan
But why does it have to be go to a different country? Just say no. No. No we're not doing that. Sorry. We won't be doing that.

When Trump said all the things that were wrong with America no one said maybe he should try living in another country. Or get out and go where your ancestors came from. The next presidential candidate and the next and the next will tell us how horrible the country is and how they can fix it. All the amendments made to the constitution, imagine if with each one they said just go to another country and live. I agree with your point about the anthem but just because people want to change something about the country doesn't mean they should leave. Plenty of proposed changes to our country get rejected daily during the legislative process without people being told why don't you just leave.
There is a difference between saying you want to greatly improve the country that you love and trying to burn down a country when you don't get your way. I am not a Trump fan so I don't want this to be perceived as defending Trump. Trump says a lot of ridiculous stuff that I strongly disagree with, but he was elected President of the United States by the people. His voice/opinions/decisions should be heard and should not be censored.
 
You guys are like the total SWEET SPOT for Fox News and right wing propaganda. The American way of life is CONSTANTLY UNDER ATTACK. And you've got to be always vigilant against those evil left-wingers. They can't wait to have total government takeover of all the private companies.

LOL, as said previously.

Enjoy your freakout


Well, the militant speaks. I am sure you agree with burn it down. The BLM mantra. Despicable.
 
The party of outrage strikes again. Their way of life is under attack, again. The government is coming for their freedoms, again. No wonder conservatives don't age well, they're mad all the damn time
The left is further left, just as the right is further right. But, no one(on this board) seems to recognize that and act as if it’s only the left that has moved while the right has stood still. It’s all a balance and is where we are right now on the pendulum swing.
I was in the middle, but when everybody on the left got totally detached from any form of reasonable argument I made may way on over to the right the past couple of weeks.
 
Mostly because the Nazi's were left wingers...that's why they call it National Socialist Workers party.

:rolleyes:

https://fullfact.org/online/nazis-socialists/

Historians have regularly disavowed claims that Hitler adhered to socialist ideology. Historian Richard Evans wrote of the Nazis’ incorporation of socialist into their name in 1920, “Despite the change of name, however, it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth from, socialism….Nazism was in some ways an extreme counter-ideology to socialism”. Or as simply put by historian and Hitler expert Ian Kershaw, “Hitler was never a socialist.

Socialism, for supporters of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, appeared to substitute Marx’s idea of class war with a race one.

Socialists, along with other left-wing political activists opposed the Nazi regime and were persecuted under it.


******


Or you can continue believing what you see on Facebook.
 
yet these protesters revere Mao and Lenin, who each are responsible for the deaths of millions and millions.

History shouldnt be white washed, and the whole story about these historical figures should be told ... but its the attempt to cancel these historical figures, combined with ridiculous things like cancelling Paw Patrol and the hypocrisy of honoring socialist, communists, and Marxists who are each responsible for plague, famine, mass incarceration, and mass death that keeps the reasonable and silent majority from listening to a discussion about potential reforms.
I imagine most of the protesters would respond with a blank stare of ignorance if you asked them who Mao or Lenin were. The organizers and much of the democratic leadership is a different story.
 
You guys are like the total SWEET SPOT for Fox News and right wing propaganda. The American way of life is CONSTANTLY UNDER ATTACK. And you've got to be always vigilant against those evil left-wingers. They can't wait to have total government takeover of all the private companies.

LOL, as said previously.

Enjoy your freakout
Did you type that with a straight face?
 
Good to see we have some real native Americans on the board.
Not really, although I have been working for many Native American tribes for the last 5 years.
My wife descends from Cherokee Indians on her Father side of the family. Irish on the other side. We both trace our roots to the first two ships to land at Plymouth Rock. Over 20 of my direct lines fought in the Revolutionary War on the winning side. The latest any of my direct lines came to America was in the 1700 hundreds. I am a true American Mutt that has direct lines from North Africa, France, England, Ireland, Wales, Sweden, Germany and Spain. We were the very first Settlers of Anderson, Pickens and Oconee Counties that was Cherokee Indian land before my ancestors ran them into the North Carolina mountains for siding with the British. Yes, Clemson is located on tribal land. My wife doesn't want it back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scartiger
I imagine most of the protesters would respond with a blank stare of ignorance if you asked them who Mao or Lenin were. The organizers and much of the democratic leadership is a different story.

one of my best friends is a DC fire fighter. His time is split between the fire truck and the ambulance. He has some amazing stories to tell ( as all first responders do). Sure there are BLM protestors but from his description the protests range from BLM, LBGTQ, climate, reproductive rights, immigration ..... basically all these douche canoes came out of the wood work. He said it’s a sea of rainbows and bullshit and the black residents of DC are pissed that their cause has been hijacked by white gender studies and philosophy students.

Look at this shit .....


I say that to say this .... a lot of those protestors absolutely know who Mao, Lenin, Castro, and Che are but they only know that they stood for “equality” and stood against the “evils” of capitalism. Their college professors skim over the chapters involving blight/famine, inflation, and genocide. They fail to teach these children that their hero’s came to believe that “all are equal ... but some are more equal than others”.


Animal Farm should be required reading by all.


And just some numbers ... between 1500 and 1860 approximately 10 to 15 Million Africans were forcefully transported from Africa to North America. Awful ... terrible ...

Since the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 it is estimated that 200 Million people have died worldwide because of hunger, sickness, or murder associated with modern socialism revolts. (Majority of deaths in the Soviet Union and China of course ... but socialism always ends in murder and death)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: scartiger
This is a good post. You point out the important difference between being a reformer who believes we're not living up to our ideals, which are still attainable; and a revolutionary, who thinks the whole thing is rotten and should be gotten rid of. Radicals look at the the institutions and processes we have as being corrupt, and inadequate for the task of whatever it is they want to do.

I think sometimes the reason people react to people wanting radical changes with "just leave if you dislike it here so much," it's because they perceive radicalism as being anti-American because it really is against the American system of government and way of doing things.

I agree with you. But we have a radical nation. That's what makes us unique and special. From the start we were a bunch of upstart rebels who thought they could do it a totally different way updating on the run. I don't mind radical ideas as long as there's a process where we can say yes we'll try that or also no we ain't trying that. The answer is always a mix of what's offered. But I agree with your post and why some people may react that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scartiger
You think the left would consider God Bless America as a replacement??
IDGAF about this battle between the left and the right. I just said the current song is bad and gave two better options. All the nutjobs can fight this one out.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes:

https://fullfact.org/online/nazis-socialists/

Historians have regularly disavowed claims that Hitler adhered to socialist ideology. Historian Richard Evans wrote of the Nazis’ incorporation of socialist into their name in 1920, “Despite the change of name, however, it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth from, socialism….Nazism was in some ways an extreme counter-ideology to socialism”. Or as simply put by historian and Hitler expert Ian Kershaw, “Hitler was never a socialist.

Socialism, for supporters of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, appeared to substitute Marx’s idea of class war with a race one.

Socialists, along with other left-wing political activists opposed the Nazi regime and were persecuted under it.


******


Or you can continue believing what you see on Facebook.
you're wasting your time. people who are stupid enough to think that Nazism is a far right ideology aren't worth debating. i mean, hell, the Nazis gained notoriety and power in the '20s and '30s by aggressively stomping out any communists they could find. As in fascist Italy, Nazi ideas were self-consciously formulated to negate those of the left, not to imitate them. When Hitler took over the party in 1921, he shredded the anti-capitalist parts of the old party's platform.
 
Last edited:
these assaulting protesters, looters, rioters, vandals, keyboard communist warriors

fukk them all- this is over

check their credit ratings or their bank accounts-

none of them aint got shyt, absolutely nothing.

they want the ones who have worked and saved to give them their shyt because they are too lazy or too dumb to make it in capitalism. (most are actually dumbass crackers)

apparently since they aren't good enough to make it under a capitalistic system.

fukk em...

especially the dumba$$ crackers...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: scartiger
I agree with you. But we have a radical nation. That's what makes us unique and special. From the start we were a bunch of upstart rebels who thought they could do it a totally different way updating on the run. I don't mind radical ideas as long as there's a process where we can say yes we'll try that or also no we ain't trying that. The answer is always a mix of what's offered. But I agree with your post and why some people may react that way.
I'm not sure I totally agree. We had a revolution, and then we figured out how to have a continuous government where power changed hands without revolutions. I'm not saying that radical ideas should be out of bounds, but that we need to know what it means when somebody says that they don't think the system can reform itself to the point that they'd like. Either way, your perspective is appreciated.
 
Not because of anything in it, but evidently Francis Scott Key owned slaves and made at least one bad statement. I don't really know anything about him. Don't know if he was a murderer like Ben Tillman .


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...ner-with-a-new-national-anthem-023741108.html

In an increasingly antiracist era when problematic iconography — ranging from Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben to even the Dukes of Hazzard General Lee car and country band Lady Antebellum’s name — is being reassessed, revised or retired, America’s national anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner,” seems to be striking a wrong note.


Last week, protesters in San Francisco toppled a statue of the song’s composer, Francis Scott Key, a known slaveholder who once said that African-Americans were “a distinct and inferior race of people, which all experience proves to be the greatest evil that afflicts a community.”
A lot of people have been wanting to change the National Anthem to "America the Beautiful" for many years. And it has nothing to do with slavery or racism. But, that is another story.
 
you're wasting your time. people who are stupid enough to think that Nazism is a far right ideology aren't worth debating. i mean, hell, the Nazis gained notoriety and power in the '20s and '30s by aggressively stomping out any communists they could find. As in fascist Italy, Nazi ideas were self-consciously formulated to negate those of the left, not to imitate them. When Hitler took over the party in 1921, he shredded the anti-capitalist parts of the old party's platform.
Of course, none of this means that they weren't inspired by socialism or that they didn't appropriate Marxist ideology for their own aims. They certainly weren't orthodox socialists, but they were absolutely using their playbook. How else would you "negate" leftist ideas? You're also eliding the fact that Mussolini, whose Italian fascism of course inspired German racial fascism, had been a leading socialist intellectual before he was expelled for being too much of a nationalist. Mussolini's fascism was explicitly socialist, in the sense that it was the kind of "state capitalism" that Lenin argued was an advance from liberal capitalism. Whether Hitler was ever an orthodox socialist or not, he was never a laissez-faire liberal capitalist.

The confusion over placing fascism on the American political spectrum is that American conservatism is largely a species of liberalism. Some question whether there even is a conservative tradition, like the one in Europe, in America. Fascism is clearly right-wing in the European context, but it's not clear that it's "on the right" in America, where liberal economics and limiting the state is such a big part of conservative thinking.
 
Last edited:
Of course, none of this means that they weren't inspired by socialism or that they didn't appropriate Marxist ideology for their own aims. They certainly weren't orthodox socialists, but they were absolutely using their playbook. How else would you "negate" leftist ideas? You're also eliding the fact that Mussolini, whose Italian fascism of course inspired German racial fascism, had been a leading socialist intellectual before he was expelled for being too much of a nationalist. Mussolini's fascism was explicitly socialist, in the sense that it was the kind of "state capitalism" that Lenin argued was an advance from liberal capitalism. Whether Hitler was ever an orthodox socialist or not, he was never a laissez-faire liberal capitalist.

The confusion over placing fascism on the American political spectrum is that American conservatism is largely a species of liberalism. Some question whether there even is a conservative tradition, like the one in Europe, in America. Fascism is clearly right-wing in the European context, but it's not clear that it's "on the right" in America, where liberal economics and limiting the state is such a big part of conservative thinking.
Meh idk about italian fascism being explicitly socialist. Mussolini's fascism specifically promoted class collaboration which is something socialists vehemently oppose. Italian fascism separated groups into different classes, similar to what we see in the caste system of Hinduism, whereas Socialists have the belief that there are should be no classes and everyone should be equal.
 
Meh idk about italian fascism being explicitly socialist. Mussolini's fascism specifically promoted class collaboration which is something socialists vehemently oppose. Italian fascism separated groups into different classes, similar to what we see in the caste system of Hinduism, whereas Socialists have the belief that there are should be no classes and everyone should be equal.
Right, it was heterodox socialism that emphasized the nation. Obviously the people who liked singing The Internationale aren't going to love that level of nationalism. But their economic ideology can easily be appropriated by fascists who believed the state was supreme above any other interest. But fascism is a form of socialism. You can find Mussolini calling his economic system both "state capitalism" (again, a phrase borrowed from Lenin) and "state socialism," and saying things like "we declare war on socialism, not because it is socialist, but because it has opposed nationalism." Fascists thought of themselves less as an alternative to socialism than as the successor to it.
 
I'm not sure I totally agree. We had a revolution, and then we figured out how to have a continuous government where power changed hands without revolutions. I'm not saying that radical ideas should be out of bounds, but that we need to know what it means when somebody says that they don't think the system can reform itself to the point that they'd like. Either way, your perspective is appreciated.

Yeah we're talking semantics now. When I say a system can't reform itself I think oversight. I think we agree. They can no longer be trusted to make changes themselves. Law enforcement getting a citizen's review board or something like that. Vague example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
socialism cannot work. everyone cannot be equal in any system. its impossible.

the human mind cannot be made to all think alike.

and their is a difference between all of us being all equal and who actually controls the power.

equality and power are 2 different beast
 
Until true Americans stand up and say, "enough is enough"

2 ways to do that

silently vote for trump

all the polls are still wrong.

silly to even broadcast.

and

all businesses stop paying qtrly taxes.

i see the property owners are gonna sue seattle.

cant wait to watch the spd try to retake the 3rd.

be cool if the spd tells the mayor to come suit up and lead uus thru the front door.

wish I was a journalist. I sure would be asking the mayor if she planned on leading her police force back into the fort. lol
 
Not because of anything in it, but evidently Francis Scott Key owned slaves and made at least one bad statement. I don't really know anything about him. Don't know if he was a murderer like Ben Tillman .
I’ve told y’all this before, It’s a NWO Takeover

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...ner-with-a-new-national-anthem-023741108.html

In an increasingly antiracist era when problematic iconography — ranging from Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben to even the Dukes of Hazzard General Lee car and country band Lady Antebellum’s name — is being reassessed, revised or retired, America’s national anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner,” seems to be striking a wrong note.


Last week, protesters in San Francisco toppled a statue of the song’s composer, Francis Scott Key, a known slaveholder who once said that African-Americans were “a distinct and inferior race of people, which all experience proves to be the greatest evil that afflicts a community.”
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT