The “big bang” is, at present, the most logical explanation based on available evidence. Therefore, it is the most widely accepted explanation for how the universe started by scientists who spend the bulk of their lives studying this stuff.
So yeah I’m a “big bang guy” until more evidence comes along, though I doubt we’ll find anything that completely changes the logic around the Big Bang, more likely will just add to it or change some detail.
Appreciate the response.
Appreciate, as well, all of the work you do and have done in the past.
I think putting (Long) in the title of a thread is directly attributable to you. haha, love it
Questions for you.
And, btw I'm good with the Big Bang theory, too.
So.... what was before the Big Bang? Many will answer 'nothing'.
OK.
Just how long does it take for 'nothing' to become 'something'......let alone everything in the still expanding universe?
'SOMETHING' got 'there' for it to go 'bang'.
UPS didn't deliver it.
WHOEVER did supply it ........well that 'whoever' had to be there before that 'something' showed up. Or....it wouldn't have showed up. Ever.
Where did that 'something' come from?
Out of nothingness.
You and too many are too smart to believe that nothing= becomes something=everything, but it all happened randomly out of nowhere?
How can anyone possibly believe that?
Furthermore, where did the immense, unfathomable energy to blow up this little 'thing' (that turned into everything) come from?
Why did that incredible energy enter the picture?
Where did it come from?
You know, if there was nothing but nothing.
To believe all that, is MUCH harder than accepting maybe there's something else to all of this.
Because the Big Bang theory doesn't hold water.
Much less the entire universe.