So in a COMPLETELY PREDICTABLE event, True the Vote (TTV) responds to the Ga Court's demand that they show the evidence for TTV claims in the 2020 Ga Election. I'm not going to bother with media accounts, here's the ACTUAL court document that True the Vote submitted. Again, this isn't a prosecutor or judge, these are the folks that told us over and over that the election was fraudulent and all the evidence they had proving it.
www.documentcloud.org
Here's a Cliff's Notes of their response (I encourage you to view the document above to make sure I'm not reading it wrong) This is the response to the TTV claim that they had a Contracted Team of Researchers and Investigators that investigated and interviewed people with personal knowledge of election fraud. I'm picking this one out b/c I get that TTV might have had some folks that spoke to them with the expectation of not being outed... fair enough. But when you actually HIRE people to do the investigation for you and collect evidence of the fraud, it also seems fair that the group of people that have the job to investigate the TTV claims should be able to look at what TTV is claiming as evidence. After all, TTV supposedly did all this to PROVE election fraud. Wouldn't that proof require AT SOME POINT actually showing that proof in court? Wouldn't that be a reasonable expectation at some point?
------------------------
3. The identity and contact information of the “contracted team of researchers and investigators” referenced in your Complaint and any recordings, transcripts, testimonies, statements, summaries, witness interviews, notes, or other documents evidencing what the “several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods, and organization involved in ballot trafficking in Georgia,” told them.
Response: TTV does not have in its possession, custody, or control such identity and contact information. Any otherwise potentially responsive and non-privileged items that are within TTV’s possession, custody, or control are being provided.
---------------------------
So TTV is saying that they don't have the contact information of the people they contracted (and presumably paid) to do investigative work for them? REALLY?
Because the Ga investigators have said over and over again that they have NOTHING showing election fraud. TTV has said over and over again that TTV have PROOF. This was the chance for TTV to show IN COURT... PUBLICALLY the Evidence that Ga investigators supposedly missed. This is their response. Check out the link above for complete details.
Again, this isn't a "one off". This is a pattern. Stolen Election folks have had change after chance to show real proof of fraud in court where the truth is ultimately determined. And EVERY time, the result is exactly this... NOTHING.
As I've said repeatedly, I have no special insight into election fraud or the lack thereof. I'm just a regular dude that doesn't mind looking stuff up. I'd rather read the actual court document that have someone tell me what it says. But for me, if you are going to make the extraordinary claim of a stolen election, you have to bring the evidence of this to court and it has to be SOLID. I can believe a stuffed ballot box here or there... sure. But when you try and sell me on a nationwide conspiracy to subvert a Presidential Election, you best bring the receipts. And nearly 4 years later, we have seen a whole bunch of NOTHING.
![www.documentcloud.org](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.documentcloud.org%2Fdocuments%2F24428471%2Fpages%2Ftrue-the-vote-response-p1-normal.gif&hash=94511a6f2fb6d4545f09e767b5062b88&return_error=1)
True The Vote Response
![www.documentcloud.org](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.documentcloud.org%2Fdocuments%2F24428471-true-the-vote-response%2F..%2F..%2Ffavicon.png&hash=1ad253f21690bbbf614fc845823da559&return_error=1)
Here's a Cliff's Notes of their response (I encourage you to view the document above to make sure I'm not reading it wrong) This is the response to the TTV claim that they had a Contracted Team of Researchers and Investigators that investigated and interviewed people with personal knowledge of election fraud. I'm picking this one out b/c I get that TTV might have had some folks that spoke to them with the expectation of not being outed... fair enough. But when you actually HIRE people to do the investigation for you and collect evidence of the fraud, it also seems fair that the group of people that have the job to investigate the TTV claims should be able to look at what TTV is claiming as evidence. After all, TTV supposedly did all this to PROVE election fraud. Wouldn't that proof require AT SOME POINT actually showing that proof in court? Wouldn't that be a reasonable expectation at some point?
------------------------
3. The identity and contact information of the “contracted team of researchers and investigators” referenced in your Complaint and any recordings, transcripts, testimonies, statements, summaries, witness interviews, notes, or other documents evidencing what the “several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods, and organization involved in ballot trafficking in Georgia,” told them.
Response: TTV does not have in its possession, custody, or control such identity and contact information. Any otherwise potentially responsive and non-privileged items that are within TTV’s possession, custody, or control are being provided.
---------------------------
So TTV is saying that they don't have the contact information of the people they contracted (and presumably paid) to do investigative work for them? REALLY?
Because the Ga investigators have said over and over again that they have NOTHING showing election fraud. TTV has said over and over again that TTV have PROOF. This was the chance for TTV to show IN COURT... PUBLICALLY the Evidence that Ga investigators supposedly missed. This is their response. Check out the link above for complete details.
Again, this isn't a "one off". This is a pattern. Stolen Election folks have had change after chance to show real proof of fraud in court where the truth is ultimately determined. And EVERY time, the result is exactly this... NOTHING.
As I've said repeatedly, I have no special insight into election fraud or the lack thereof. I'm just a regular dude that doesn't mind looking stuff up. I'd rather read the actual court document that have someone tell me what it says. But for me, if you are going to make the extraordinary claim of a stolen election, you have to bring the evidence of this to court and it has to be SOLID. I can believe a stuffed ballot box here or there... sure. But when you try and sell me on a nationwide conspiracy to subvert a Presidential Election, you best bring the receipts. And nearly 4 years later, we have seen a whole bunch of NOTHING.