Trump Witch Hunt
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
When trump's lawyers tell us they have evidence of something, they never actually do. Much like rudy's electiuon fraud proof that he could no show us.
Trump is the grand poobah of dirty and he should be in jail. If his election chances are interfered with because of this, he bigly deserves it because that's what he's earned. Just because you don't like it when the criminal you love is held accountable, doesn't mean it's wrong. These patriots are doing a service to America. Cry more magat boy
They are trying to uphold the Constitution - you know the founding document that your corpulent carrotman thinks should be overturned because America couldn't see Hunter's dick pics for a few days.
You do not know what you are talking about. The requirements to invoke the 14th amendment have not been met Einstein.
It has been used for much less than what Trump did! In fact, no President has ever come close to doing what that seditious POS did.
"States have also enforced Section 3 against their officials, both before and after the passage and repeal of the Ku Klux Klan Act. In one early example, county commissioners in North Carolina refused to induct a man who had been elected Sheriff due to his service to the Confederate government in the same position.18 This action was eventually approved by the North Carolina Supreme Court; the United States Supreme Court dismissed the sheriff’s appeal.19 The most recent Section 3 disqualification occurred in September 2022, when a New Mexico court disqualified county commissioner Couy Griffin in a state-law quo warranto lawsuit brought by New Mexico residents.20"
The Constitution’s Disqualification Clause Can Be Enforced Today
Legal processes at the state and federal level can be used to ensure that those who engage in insurrection do not serve in public office. The January 6 Select Committee can aid these efforts by offering some key findings in its final report.
www.pogo.org
This is far left wing propaganda and wish porn."States have also enforced Section 3 against their officials, both before and after the passage and repeal of the Ku Klux Klan Act. In one early example, county commissioners in North Carolina refused to induct a man who had been elected Sheriff due to his service to the Confederate government in the same position.18 This action was eventually approved by the North Carolina Supreme Court; the United States Supreme Court dismissed the sheriff’s appeal.19 The most recent Section 3 disqualification occurred in September 2022, when a New Mexico court disqualified county commissioner Couy Griffin in a state-law quo warranto lawsuit brought by New Mexico residents.20"
The Constitution’s Disqualification Clause Can Be Enforced Today
Legal processes at the state and federal level can be used to ensure that those who engage in insurrection do not serve in public office. The January 6 Select Committee can aid these efforts by offering some key findings in its final report.
Are you telling me these cases aren't real? Because you can read the case details for yourself, derp.
Worthy v. Barrett and Others, 63 N.C. 199 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Worthy v. Barrett and Others, 63 N.C. 199, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
State ex rel. White v. Griffin, 604 F. Supp. 3d 1143 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read State ex rel. White v. Griffin, 604 F. Supp. 3d 1143, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
I am not disputing those cases but its not a valid comparison. Watch it play out as even if one of these cases that are rigged in blue states gets decided along that path then it will go to scotus and be squashed promptly. The total fear of General Trump has you crazy libs going out of your minds and I am getting a great chuckle over it.
Why can't you keep the conversation straight without re-directing it? I said,
You said
Which I did, I told you how it had been used for far less...holy herp derperson
All the sordid characters and connections that show up time after time in these shady scams against President Trump. @iceheart08 needs to fess up and do a tell all right here.
Go after Dominion again dipshit. It worked out well for your ilk the first time.
Ignored by the Fake News: Kash Patel Just Destroyed the Left’s Lawfare Suit Against Trump in Colorado – Drops Truth Bombs on Liberal Prosecutors, Dashes Hopes of Radical Left to Ban Trump from 2024 Race (VIDEO)
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Ignored by the Fake News: Kash Patel Just Destroyed the Left's Lawfare Suit Against Trump in Colorado - Drops Truth Bombs on Liberal Prosecutors, Dashes Hopes of Radical Left to Ban Trump from 2024 Race (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Former Chief of Staff to the Acting Director of Defense and author, Kash Patel, joined Steve Bannon on the War Room on Thursday to discuss his testimony before the Colorado court in the left’s latest attempt to remove President Trump from the ballot in Colorado.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
This shit AGAIN?Ignored by the Fake News: Kash Patel Just Destroyed the Left’s Lawfare Suit Against Trump in Colorado – Drops Truth Bombs on Liberal Prosecutors, Dashes Hopes of Radical Left to Ban Trump from 2024 Race (VIDEO)
Ignored by the Fake News: Kash Patel Just Destroyed the Left's Lawfare Suit Against Trump in Colorado - Drops Truth Bombs on Liberal Prosecutors, Dashes Hopes of Radical Left to Ban Trump from 2024 Race (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Former Chief of Staff to the Acting Director of Defense and author, Kash Patel, joined Steve Bannon on the War Room on Thursday to discuss his testimony before the Colorado court in the left’s latest attempt to remove President Trump from the ballot in Colorado.
"There is no evidence that Trump actually signed any order requesting 10,000 Guard troops, let alone 20,000, for Jan. 6. Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense provided a timeline of the agency’s involvement in preparing for and responding to the attack on the Capitol. The timeline shows no such order, and notes only that on Jan. 3, the president concurred with activating the D.C. National Guard to support law enforcement at the behest of Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser.
National Guard troops were already activated and deployed to checkpoints around Washington before the violence began. When the rioting started, Bowser requested more Guard help, on behalf of the Capitol Police. That request was made to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, who then went to Miller, who approved it.
The Pentagon said Miller approved the request without speaking with the White House because he had gotten direction from the president days earlier to do whatever he deemed necessary with the Guard.
Neither Pelosi nor the House sergeant at arms could have stopped an ordered deployment of National Guard troops because Congress doesn’t control the National Guard, legal experts say. Guard troops are generally controlled by governors, though they can be federalized, said William C. Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University.
The online claims “make no sense at all,” Banks said, adding, “The House sergeant at arms, he or she is not in the chain of command. Nor is Nancy Pelosi.”
“The speaker was no more in charge of the security of the U.S. Capitol that day than Mitch McConnell,” Drew Hammill, Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, told the AP in an email.
The AP has previously reported on false claims that Pelosi blocked the National Guard from coming to the capitol on Jan. 6. As the newly released footage showed, she and McConnell, then Senate majority leader, called for military assistance, including the National Guard, during the attack.
The House sergeant at arms does sit on the Capitol Police Board, which also includes the Senate sergeant at arms and the architect of the Capitol. That board opted not to request the Guard ahead of the insurrection, but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun. There is no evidence that either Pelosi or McConnell directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request."
Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6
New footage released Thursday of House lawmakers on Jan. 6 has sparked a resurgence of false claims and conspiracy theories about the insurrection.
apnews.com
What is so damn frustrating is that Trump, and his fanboys on here just keep trumpeting their greatest hits of Fake News such as Dominion, mules etc no matter how many times and how thoroughly it's been debunked. At what point do you admit that something isn't true?
Apparently for MAGA idiots like Rudy, Jenna Ellis, etc it's when you are about to go to jail. Honestly @TigerGrowls don't you think if there was a shred of actual, legal, and verifiable proof of any of this garbage they would be trumpeting it in the court of law? It's literally been 3 years and still not one of these things has been proven to be true.
Apparently for MAGA idiots like Rudy, Jenna Ellis, etc it's when you are about to go to jail. Honestly @TigerGrowls don't you think if there was a shred of actual, legal, and verifiable proof of any of this garbage they would be trumpeting it in the court of law? It's literally been 3 years and still not one of these things has been proven to be true.
Literally the only thing that Trump can complain about is the amount of mail in voting due to the pandemic. That certainly helped Biden.
Literally helped Biden because Trump is an idiot who spent months railing against Mail in voting and insuring that he would have a low turn out. Not the best strategy for the Trump team.
Literally helped Biden because Trump is an idiot who spent months railing against Mail in voting and insuring that he would have a low turn out. Not the best strategy for the Trump team.
Also, those Trump boys are morons. Saying you signed the documents,but didn't read them literally means you are responsible for what is in them. It doesn't matter what the accountants said when you signed that it was true. Saying you suck at,aren't qualified for, and are clueless at your job isn't an excuse.
Seriously, that is a shockingly stupid thing to say in court.
Seriously, that is a shockingly stupid thing to say in court.
You liberal guys have drank way too much of the commie kool-aid. It's funny to read this wacky stuff yall write though. Thanks for life's little pleasures. LOL!!
Borrowed from Mike Davis.This shit AGAIN?
"There is no evidence that Trump actually signed any order requesting 10,000 Guard troops, let alone 20,000, for Jan. 6. Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense provided a timeline of the agency’s involvement in preparing for and responding to the attack on the Capitol. The timeline shows no such order, and notes only that on Jan. 3, the president concurred with activating the D.C. National Guard to support law enforcement at the behest of Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser.
National Guard troops were already activated and deployed to checkpoints around Washington before the violence began. When the rioting started, Bowser requested more Guard help, on behalf of the Capitol Police. That request was made to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, who then went to Miller, who approved it.
The Pentagon said Miller approved the request without speaking with the White House because he had gotten direction from the president days earlier to do whatever he deemed necessary with the Guard.
Neither Pelosi nor the House sergeant at arms could have stopped an ordered deployment of National Guard troops because Congress doesn’t control the National Guard, legal experts say. Guard troops are generally controlled by governors, though they can be federalized, said William C. Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University.
The online claims “make no sense at all,” Banks said, adding, “The House sergeant at arms, he or she is not in the chain of command. Nor is Nancy Pelosi.”
“The speaker was no more in charge of the security of the U.S. Capitol that day than Mitch McConnell,” Drew Hammill, Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, told the AP in an email.
The AP has previously reported on false claims that Pelosi blocked the National Guard from coming to the capitol on Jan. 6. As the newly released footage showed, she and McConnell, then Senate majority leader, called for military assistance, including the National Guard, during the attack.
The House sergeant at arms does sit on the Capitol Police Board, which also includes the Senate sergeant at arms and the architect of the Capitol. That board opted not to request the Guard ahead of the insurrection, but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun. There is no evidence that either Pelosi or McConnell directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request."
Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6
New footage released Thursday of House lawmakers on Jan. 6 has sparked a resurgence of false claims and conspiracy theories about the insurrection.
So, if you want to disqualify President Trump for insurrection or rebellion, you have to have a federal prosecutor bring federal charges under this specific insurrection or rebellion statute, you have to have a federal jury find him guilty unanimously with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, the federal judge has to convict, and that conviction has to be upheld on appeal. If that happens, then you can disqualify President Trump or any other person who participated on January 6. The reason that has not happened, despite Democrats on the January 6 committee spending tens of millions of dollars and the Biden Justice Department, including Jack Smith, spending tens of millions of dollars, is the evidence does not exist. Otherwise, Jack Smith would have charged Trump with insurrection. He’s charged Trump with just about everything else except for insurrection under the relevant federal criminal statute that you need to use to disqualify.
Similar threads
