Not sure what point he's trying to make? Just turn back in the documents that don't belong to you. This is really stupid of Trump. Just don't be a dumbass, listen to your lawyers.
The angry responses from the “nonpartisan” (Democrat or Trump-deranged) “national-security experts” (hacks) is comical.
The hacks desperately want to throw Trump in prison for the rest of his life.
Because they hate him.
And fear he will win back the White House in November 2024.
The hacks are intentionally ignoring the plain language of the Presidential Records Act.
Regardless of whether a President considers his records “personal” (which he owns; see Clinton sock drawer case) or “presidential records” (which the government owns), the President can have his presidential records.
“[T]he Presidential records of a former President shall be available to such former President or the former President’s designated representative.” 44 U.S.C. § 2205(3).
That statute trumps any press release from librarians or other bureaucrats–or any tweet from the hacks.
It doesn’t matter whether his presidential records are national-defense information or marked classified.
That is why Congress funds the Office of the Former President, with secure office space, staff with clearances, and Secret Services protection.
Former presidents don’t get to access any classified or national-defense information they want.
But they have an absolute statutory right to access their presidential records, even if the government owns them.
And former presidents can share their presidential records with their designated representatives.
The hacks pretend to believe a former President of the United States (somehow) commits “espionage”–and should die in prison–for simply retaining copies of his personal or presidential records.
And fighting with librarians and other bureaucrats over them. (Gasp, “obstruction.”)
Even if they are declassified.
Even if there is zero evidence the former President used them to harm America.
This is an absurd legal argument.
Presidents and Former Presidents are treated differently than everyone else as it relates to their presidential records (regardless of ownership).
The hacks are ignoring the Presidential Records Act, which doesn’t even have a criminal component.
And peddling an unconstitutional reading of the Espionage Act.
The remedy is negotiations and civil lawsuits, not raids and indictments.
But Jack Smith is used to getting reversed by the Supreme Court, with his absurd legal arguments.
Indeed, he managed the nearly impossible:
Getting a unanimous Supreme Court to reverse his (bogus) conviction of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell and likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate.
But the damage was already done. Jack Smith took out a Republican presidential candidate in 2016. Mission accomplished, Jack.
Biden and Garland have Jack Smith on his new mission in 2024: take out Trump.
The hacks, of course, have been eerily quiet about President Biden’s 5 sets of stolen classified records as the vice president and even senator, unguarded for years, moved several times, accessible by a foreign national, and potentially used to secure millions in foreign bribes and corruption.
Biden and Garland sent a raid after Trump.
They secretly colluded for 2 months on Biden’s stolen classified records.
When they got caught and Garland appointed a Special Counsel, the FBI found Biden’s 5th set of stolen classified records. What did Biden and his attorneys misrepresent about their 4 prior searches? How did this miss this 5th set? How is this not obstruction of justice, like Garland and Smith are charging Trump?
If the hacks cared about “national security,” evidence that a sitting President is compromised by espionage, foreign bribery, and other foreign corruption would be a 5-alarm fire.
But, of course, they are hacks.
They know this is all about Trump’s declassified (and damning) Crossfire Hurricane records.
And deflection from evidence the FBI covered up then VP-Biden and his son Hunter taking a $10 million foreign bribe and change U.S. policy.
Why are they so scared to let the American people decide in November 2024 whether they trust Trump or Biden more with our national security?
Trump rips ‘nasty’ Bret Baier after Fox News interview
Former President Trump took a shot at Bret Baier, Fox News’s chief political anchor, for what he described as a “hostile” line of questioning during an interview that aired on the…thehill.com
This is the exact root of all the bullshit. A perfect shield for a total narcissist who lies more than any president in history
Go read the indictment. You look stupidTRUMP IS RIGHT! The Presidential Records Act Allows Presidents To Take Whatever Documents They Want
TRUMP IS RIGHT! The Presidential Records Act Allows Presidents To Take Whatever Documents They Want
By: Reed Cooper | President Trump has turned Jack Smith’s frivolous federal indictment of him on its head as he cites the...dcenquirer.com
LOL!! I think you look stupid!Go read the indictment. You look stupid
...acknowledge you were duped and wrong. Its a fact so just come clean and move on.
Nope.Are you ready to acknowledge that you were duped and wrong about the number of mail-in ballots requested in PA? It's a fact, so just come clean and move on.
Right here @yoshi121374 Please reply as you have multiple times stated that Trump was only charged since he did not cooperate and this information clearly shows that he did.I want all the libs like @yoshi121374 and a few others in particular who have been consistently talking shit about Trump not cooperating to respond and acknowledge you were duped and wrong. Its a fact so just come clean and move on. The magistrate judge unsealed the full unredacted document and it showed the dirty low down crap being done by the DOJ.
REVEALED: Corrupt DOJ Prosecutor Caught Trying to Bribe Lawyer Redacted Every Reference to Trump Cooperating with Subpoenas
REVEALED: Corrupt DOJ Prosecutor Caught Trying to Bribe Lawyer Redacted Every Reference to Trump Cooperating with Subpoenas | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
New court documents show that DOJ prosecutor Jay Bratt, an Obamaite-Russiagate-DNC donor, redacted every reference to Trump cooperating with subpoenas.www.thegatewaypundit.com
New court documents show that DOJ prosecutor Jay Bratt, an Obamaite-Russiagate-DNC donor, redacted every reference to Trump cooperating with subpoenas.
Recall, Jay Bratt tried to bribe Walt Naut’s lawyer Stanley Woodward in order to get his client to testify against Trump.
New court documents show Jay Bratt purposely redacted all references to Trump cooperating with grand jury subpoenas.
Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart approved new aspects of the Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant to be unsealed.
Right here @yoshi121374 Please reply as you have multiple times stated that Trump was only charged since he did not cooperate and this information clearly shows that he did.
Let's see what happens in court. The GWP doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for accuracy.
Now what about Lindell? He has actually been proven to have lied and been fraudulent
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.Let's see what happens in court. The GWP doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for accuracy.
Now what about Lindell? He has actually been proven to have lied and been fraudulent
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.
Trump is my guy Clarence.He was sure your guy when you thought he was gonna prove the steal and get the libs. When did he quit being your guy?
For your record you were wrong and do not want to admit it. You said multiple times that Trump was indicted when Joe was not because he refused to cooperate which is not correct as proven by the unredacted indictment. Instead of owning up to being wrong you are just moving on with more bs.For the record, the full indictment was presented in court and lead to a Grand Jury indictment. The reality is he broke the law, wait and see how this plays out.
For your record you were wrong and do not want to admit it. You said multiple times that Trump was indicted when Joe was not because he refused to cooperate which is not correct as proven by the unredacted indictment. Instead of owning up to being wrong you are just moving on with more bs.
You are 100% wrong. Read back up this page and you will see.He did not cooperate with the subpoena and intentionally hid and directed others to hide documents. Let's see what comes out in court. You do understand that the allegedly redacted parts were seen in court and still lead to his indictment?
You are 100% wrong. Read back up this page and you will see.
In your dreams.I am willing to wait and see. Based on our posting history, you have a substantially higher history of being wrong than I do. You are batting like .002 right now.
In your dreams.
Hilarious but it's more like "per day"I don't really want to do the math, but you conservatively post at least 25 "articles" or "Tweets" every week. That's about 100 per month so 1200 per year. You have gotten about 10 right so that's 0.008 so I apologize for being overly critical.