ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Witch Hunt


According to Mike Davis, the former law clerk for Neil Gorsuch, the language within the Presidential Records Act could potentially serve as Trump’s salvation.



Here’s what Mike had to say in his tweet:

The angry responses from the “nonpartisan” (Democrat or Trump-deranged) “national-security experts” (hacks) is comical.
The hacks desperately want to throw Trump in prison for the rest of his life.
Because they hate him.
And fear he will win back the White House in November 2024.
The hacks are intentionally ignoring the plain language of the Presidential Records Act.
Regardless of whether a President considers his records “personal” (which he owns; see Clinton sock drawer case) or “presidential records” (which the government owns), the President can have his presidential records.
“[T]he Presidential records of a former President shall be available to such former President or the former President’s designated representative.” 44 U.S.C. § 2205(3).
That statute trumps any press release from librarians or other bureaucrats–or any tweet from the hacks.
It doesn’t matter whether his presidential records are national-defense information or marked classified.
That is why Congress funds the Office of the Former President, with secure office space, staff with clearances, and Secret Services protection.
Former presidents don’t get to access any classified or national-defense information they want.
But they have an absolute statutory right to access their presidential records, even if the government owns them.
And former presidents can share their presidential records with their designated representatives.
The hacks pretend to believe a former President of the United States (somehow) commits “espionage”–and should die in prison–for simply retaining copies of his personal or presidential records.
And fighting with librarians and other bureaucrats over them. (Gasp, “obstruction.”)
Even if they are declassified.
Even if there is zero evidence the former President used them to harm America.
This is an absurd legal argument.
Presidents and Former Presidents are treated differently than everyone else as it relates to their presidential records (regardless of ownership).
The hacks are ignoring the Presidential Records Act, which doesn’t even have a criminal component.
And peddling an unconstitutional reading of the Espionage Act.
The remedy is negotiations and civil lawsuits, not raids and indictments.
But Jack Smith is used to getting reversed by the Supreme Court, with his absurd legal arguments.
Indeed, he managed the nearly impossible:
Getting a unanimous Supreme Court to reverse his (bogus) conviction of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell and likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate.
But the damage was already done. Jack Smith took out a Republican presidential candidate in 2016. Mission accomplished, Jack.
Biden and Garland have Jack Smith on his new mission in 2024: take out Trump.
The hacks, of course, have been eerily quiet about President Biden’s 5 sets of stolen classified records as the vice president and even senator, unguarded for years, moved several times, accessible by a foreign national, and potentially used to secure millions in foreign bribes and corruption.
Biden and Garland sent a raid after Trump.
They secretly colluded for 2 months on Biden’s stolen classified records.
When they got caught and Garland appointed a Special Counsel, the FBI found Biden’s 5th set of stolen classified records. What did Biden and his attorneys misrepresent about their 4 prior searches? How did this miss this 5th set? How is this not obstruction of justice, like Garland and Smith are charging Trump?
If the hacks cared about “national security,” evidence that a sitting President is compromised by espionage, foreign bribery, and other foreign corruption would be a 5-alarm fire.
But, of course, they are hacks.
They know this is all about Trump’s declassified (and damning) Crossfire Hurricane records.
And deflection from evidence the FBI covered up then VP-Biden and his son Hunter taking a $10 million foreign bribe and change U.S. policy.
Why are they so scared to let the American people decide in November 2024 whether they trust Trump or Biden more with our national security?
 
Its pouring gloriously!


Congress unmasks a multi-year government plot to protect Biden, sully Trump​

From search warrants to charges, federal agencies put thumb on scale of justice and elections, new evidence suggests

By John Solomon
Updated: June 25, 2023 - 11:20pm
When the Justice Department discovered from journalists a storage locker containing evidence against ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a search was executed immediately.
But when IRS agents found a similar storage area containing evidence in the Hunter Biden criminal tax probe, they were denied the right to search despite meeting the probable cause standard, then Biden's lawyers were tipped off, according to new congressional testimony.
Likewise, when federal prosecutors believed there was evidence of crimes at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, they launched an unprecedented and full scale-raid on the former president. But when agents wanted to execute a search warrant at Joe Biden’s Delaware home because they had probable cause to believe evidence of Hunter Biden tax crimes, they were turned down for a warrant to raid the guest house in which the first son was living.
And when FBI agents believed former Trump adviser Michael Flynn had committed no crime in the Russia collusion case, they nonetheless conducted an interview with him in what a supervisor concluded smacked of an effort to lure him into a lying charge. But when IRS and FBI agents wanted to interview witnesses in the Biden case, they were told most were off limits, including the Biden grandchildren whom agents believed may have unwittingly been entangled in a tax scheme.
A federal prosecutor “told us it will get us into hot water if we interview the president's grandchildren,” IRS supervisory criminal investigative agent Gary Shapley told Congress in blockbuster testimony released last week that furthers an unmistakable portrait being painted by congressional investigators of a whole-of-government effort to preserve Joe Biden’s viability as a presidential candidate while attempting to destroy Trump’s re-election effort in 2020.
File
Whistleblower 1 Transcript_Redacted.pdf
The pattern and evidence about the behavior of federal bodies – ranging from the IRS, FBI and spy agencies to the Justice Department, U.S. attorney’s office and National Archives – is enough to even convince one unabashed Joe Biden supporter there has been a scheme to administer unequal justice.
“I don't agree that this is necessarily Republicans versus Democrats. A lot of FBI agents are Republicans. This is a separate system of justice for Donald Trump and anybody who defended him, or who was close to him and everybody else, Republicans and Democrats alike,” said Alan Dershowitz, the famed Harvard law professor emeritus who voted for Biden but also represented Trump at an impeachment trial.
Dershowitz wrote a whole book about the disparate system for Trump world called “Get Trump.” But it was completed before bombshell evidence began emerging that showed:
  • The FBI long held evidence from a confidential source that Joe Biden was involved in a possible bribery scheme that was allegedly captured on 17 tape recordings;
  • Biden's son Hunter was engaged in a $2.2 million tax evasion-and-avoidance scheme that IRS agents were thwarted from fully investigating;
  • The infamous Hunter Biden laptop had been validated by the FBI in 2019, a full year before it was falsely portrayed as Russian disinformation by intelligence professionals, Joe Biden and the news media – in a blitz that misled voters ahead of the 2020 election.
Dershowitz said the plea deal Hunter Biden reached last week on two misdemeanor charges related to tax evasion isn’t the biggest reason for concern.
“Where he may have gotten not only a sweetheart deal, but an incredibly unjust deal, is for [the government's] failure to investigate and perhaps prosecute the laptop, Burisma, those 17 tapes," he said
The latter two in that list refer to the Burisma Holdings Limited in Ukraine in which Hunter Biden had a questionable business dealing and audio tapes a foreign national who allegedly bribed then-Vice President Joe Biden and son Hunter allegedly has in connection to the alleged bribe.
Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, a House Judiciary Committee member, said the FBI is the tip of the spear of a judicial and intelligence system that has been corrupted by political bias.
"There were investigations open that should not have been opened," he said. "There were Americans being spied on, officials of a political campaign for president were being spied on, just based on political preferences of those in charge. And we cannot have a system where political bias gets in the way of what what the head of the FBI or with the leaders of the FBI, are directing or deciding."

John Solomon Reports
Rep. Lance Gooden says after Durham, whistleblowers testimony, GOP set to spar with FBI over FISA reauthorizationRep. Lance Gooden says after Durham, whistleblowers testimony, GOP set to spar with FBI over FISA reauthorization

That sentiment is shared by some of the federal agents who investigated both Biden and Trump dating to 2016.
“Investigators assigned to this investigation were obstructed from seeing all the available evidence,” Shapley testified in the transcript released Thursday detailing a mountain of political interference in their investigation of the Bidens.
He also said the FBI had testimony and text messages showing Joe Biden was likely involved in meeting with Hunter Biden’s Chinese partners as the family was pressing energy officials from the communist country to pay them millions but were kept from probing the 46th president’s potential culpability.
“Based on guidance provided by the prosecutors on a recurring basis to not look into anything related to President Biden, there is no way of knowing if evidence of other criminal activity existed concerning Hunter Biden or President Biden,” Shapley testified.
He and a second IRS agent, who have been granted whistleblower status by the House Ways and Means Committee, said their team had compelling evidence that Hunter Biden failed to pay taxes all the way back to some of the original monies taken from the Ukrainian energy firm, Burisma Holdings, but they were twice turned down by political appointees of Joe Biden to bring charges on those offenses and then, inexplicably, the statute of limitations was allowed to expire.
“It was a conscious decision by DOJ to let that run,” Shapley said of the statute of limitations. “They could've had them extend '14 and '15, but they said no. … Letting a statute of limitations expire in an active criminal investigation is not normal.”
Shapley was the supervisor of the IRS team investigating the Hunter Biden case.
The formal case agent for the probe backed up his whistleblowing, detailing in an anonymous interview to Congress how evidence of culpability from the Hunter Biden laptop was kept from the team and that the FBI never revealed it had a trusted informant who obtained evidence that the Burisma monies may have been part of a larger bribery scheme involving Joe Biden that were was captured on the 17 tape recordings kept by a Burisma official.
The second agent’s lawyer, Dean Zerbe, wrote a letter last week to Congress revealing his client “has stated to me that he has never seen this FBI Form 1023 and that he does not recall ever hearing about this information being turned over in any meetings with the prosecution team in Delaware."
The agent believes “this information could have been relevant” to the Hunter Biden probe because “it related to a claim of $5 million being paid to the subject,which directly ties to email correspondence reviewed between subject and a business partner,” Zerbe wrote.
File
WB 2 Supplemental Submission_Redacted.pdf
Statute of limitations expiring, evidence withheld, witnesses and searches declared off limits, and agents being warned of political consequences for normal investigative tactics are all unusual in a single case, the two agents told Congress.
But they weren’t the only aberrant behavior seen by law enforcement since Trump burst on the scene, records and testimony show.
Former Special Counsel John Durham made clear earlier this month that the FBI and DOJ opened and sustained for 2.5 years an investigation into alleged Trump-Russia collusion without a single shred of evidence it existed.
File
Durham Report
The agents forced to work that case also chronicled and blew the whistle on what they believed was improper conduct by DOJ and the FBI.
Agent William Barnett told the Justice Department in 2020 that “he did not see any evidence of collusion between the TRUMP campaign and the Russian government,” but that senior executives as high as then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe kept pressing investigators to charge on, according to a summary of that interview obtained by Just the News.
Barnett said he and other agents found the investigation into collusion so farcical that it could be made into a game, which they referred to as "Collusion Clue." In the hypothetical game, investigators were able to choose any character conducting any activity in any location and pair this individual with another character and interpret it as evidence of collusion, he testified.
You can read the document here:
File
04518073623.pdf
Likewise, former Assistant FBI Director William Priestap recounted in his notes his heartburn when the FBI and DOJ decided to interview Flynn, then-national security adviser to Trump, without a basis of evidence of a crime and after career agents had concluded the Flynn part of the probe should be closed.
Priestap’s notes fretted the bureau was "playing games" with the Flynn probe and opined whether the goal was to get the truth or simply to get Flynn to lie so he could be prosecuted and fired.
File
FlynnFBINotes.pdf

The efforts to sway the public and the investigative machinery away from Biden and toward Trump involved the intelligence community as well.
An intelligence assessment in summer 2020 suggested evidence about Joe and Hunter Biden's wrongdoings in Ukraine was Russian disinformation, causing a part of the Hunter Biden probe to stop months before the presidential election and thwarting a probe by GOP Sens. Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley.
The false narrative of Russian disinformation persisted and expanded in October 2020 when 51 intelligence officials, including former CIA Directors John Brennan and Mike Morell, signed a letter without citing evidence declaring the Hunter Biden laptop that emerged in public in October 2020 was Russian disinformation. The letter was used by Joe Biden and the media and Big Tech to censor stories abut the Bidens before Election Day.
In fact, the FBI had already corroborated the laptop and prosecutors had concluded it had not been manipulated months before the intelligence community letter, according to a summary written by case agents. You can read that here.
File
IRS-HBLaptopMemo.pdf
Morell would later admit to Congress he had no evidence of Russian disinformation and simply organized the letter to help Joe Biden win the election by giving a “talking point” to blunt Trump’s arguments at the last presidential debate.
Johnson, who led a 2020 Senate investigation into the Bidens, said the all-of-government effort now exposed in recent months was backed by the legacy news media and clearly tried to protect Biden and harm Trump.
“Now, unfortunately, in our multi-tiered system of justice, this is how justice is carried out in this country, which is why so very few Americans now have faith in federal law enforcement,” Johnson told Just the News. “I mean, you you're seeing the polls. It's it's sad. I mean, it would be nice if we had complete confidence in the spirit of federal agencies and federal law enforcement, but they've given us no reason to have confidence in them.”
 
On Tuesday Trump was asked about the recording and insisted that “what was said was absolutely fine and very perfectly. We did nothing wrong. This is a whole hoax.”

“My voice was fine. What did I say wrong on those recordings? I didn’t even see the recording. All I know is I did nothing wrong. We had a lot of papers, a lot of papers stacked up. In fact, you hear the rustle of the paper. And nobody said that I did anything wrong other than the fake news, which of course is Fox, too.”


giphy.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I want all the libs like @yoshi121374 and a few others in particular who have been consistently talking shit about Trump not cooperating to respond and acknowledge you were duped and wrong. Its a fact so just come clean and move on. The magistrate judge unsealed the full unredacted document and it showed the dirty low down crap being done by the DOJ.

REVEALED: Corrupt DOJ Prosecutor Caught Trying to Bribe Lawyer Redacted Every Reference to Trump Cooperating with Subpoenas​


New court documents show that DOJ prosecutor Jay Bratt, an Obamaite-Russiagate-DNC donor, redacted every reference to Trump cooperating with subpoenas.

Recall, Jay Bratt tried to bribe Walt Naut’s lawyer Stanley Woodward in order to get his client to testify against Trump.

New court documents show Jay Bratt purposely redacted all references to Trump cooperating with grand jury subpoenas.


Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart approved new aspects of the Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant to be unsealed.





 
Last edited:

Mark Levin: Trump Attorneys Must File Motion to Investigate the Biden DOJ and Jack Smith – Leaks Against Trump Are Biggest Leaks in History of United States – VIDEO​

 
I want all the libs like @yoshi121374 and a few others in particular who have been consistently talking shit about Trump not cooperating to respond and acknowledge you were duped and wrong. Its a fact so just come clean and move on. The magistrate judge unsealed the full unredacted document and it showed the dirty low down crap being done by the DOJ.

REVEALED: Corrupt DOJ Prosecutor Caught Trying to Bribe Lawyer Redacted Every Reference to Trump Cooperating with Subpoenas​


New court documents show that DOJ prosecutor Jay Bratt, an Obamaite-Russiagate-DNC donor, redacted every reference to Trump cooperating with subpoenas.

Recall, Jay Bratt tried to bribe Walt Naut’s lawyer Stanley Woodward in order to get his client to testify against Trump.

New court documents show Jay Bratt purposely redacted all references to Trump cooperating with grand jury subpoenas.


Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart approved new aspects of the Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant to be unsealed.





Right here @yoshi121374 Please reply as you have multiple times stated that Trump was only charged since he did not cooperate and this information clearly shows that he did.
 
Right here @yoshi121374 Please reply as you have multiple times stated that Trump was only charged since he did not cooperate and this information clearly shows that he did.

Let's see what happens in court. The GWP doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for accuracy.

Now what about Lindell? He has actually been proven to have lied and been fraudulent
 
Let's see what happens in court. The GWP doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for accuracy.

Now what about Lindell? He has actually been proven to have lied and been fraudulent
Let's see what happens in court. The GWP doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for accuracy.

Now what about Lindell? He has actually been proven to have lied and been fraudulent
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.
 
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.

He was sure your guy when you thought he was gonna prove the steal and get the libs. When did he quit being your guy?
 
Was not reported from TGP and the story is a fact as it was from the unsealed unredacted indictment. I do not have anything to say about Lindell. I like him but he is not my guy.

For the record, the full indictment was presented in court and lead to a Grand Jury indictment. The reality is he broke the law, wait and see how this plays out.
 
For the record, the full indictment was presented in court and lead to a Grand Jury indictment. The reality is he broke the law, wait and see how this plays out.
For your record you were wrong and do not want to admit it. You said multiple times that Trump was indicted when Joe was not because he refused to cooperate which is not correct as proven by the unredacted indictment. Instead of owning up to being wrong you are just moving on with more bs.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
For your record you were wrong and do not want to admit it. You said multiple times that Trump was indicted when Joe was not because he refused to cooperate which is not correct as proven by the unredacted indictment. Instead of owning up to being wrong you are just moving on with more bs.

He did not cooperate with the subpoena and intentionally hid and directed others to hide documents. Let's see what comes out in court. You do understand that the allegedly redacted parts were seen in court and still lead to his indictment?
 
He did not cooperate with the subpoena and intentionally hid and directed others to hide documents. Let's see what comes out in court. You do understand that the allegedly redacted parts were seen in court and still lead to his indictment?
You are 100% wrong. Read back up this page and you will see.
 
I don't really want to do the math, but you conservatively post at least 25 "articles" or "Tweets" every week. That's about 100 per month so 1200 per year. You have gotten about 10 right so that's 0.008 so I apologize for being overly critical.
Hilarious but it's more like "per day"
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Everyone knows not a damn thing will happen in the Biden case. They just opened it to show a sliver of perceived fairness. Meanwhile the crooked prosecutor Smith who was tasked to look at the documents at Maralago is also working to go after Trump related to J6. This whole deal is rotten.

TRUMP: “Whatever Happened to the Biden Documents Case?”
 
What Trump posted on Twitter on J6.


Yeah. When did he post that? Who had to make him post that? There are plenty of statements that he did not do that willingly. In fact, there are witnesses that he was applauding and celebrating what they were doing.

He is a narcissist, he loves the attention and he loves the power he wields, no matter how low functioning and illogical those followers are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT