Vance VP Pick
- Thread starter Orange&Purple
- Start date
Stuff he says is no crazier to you than the stuff Harris says is to me. We have different world views and different views of the role of government. One has a lot more historical precedence than the other but nevertheless, they are two different views.
That being said, I never felt he should have picked Vance. He's an albatross and his views are closer to Bernie Sanders than they are to a truly conservative viewpoint in terms of how the government/economy should work. He should have picked Youngkin all day long. In the end, VP picks rarely matter all that much. We'll see if this time is different.
The wildcard is the overtly lying media which is just out of control right now. Funny to me that people like you say you stand for truth but when it suits you, we hear nothing about the importance of honesty. Basically, it's only lying if it doesn't suit your agenda. Par for the course these days.
First of all, government should not be in the business of taxing behavior. He's on a very dangerous slope there with those comments in the way that he's saying it. However, from an economic standpoint, it is wise to tax people with kids far less than people without. We already do that with the child tax credit. I'm not sure why this is even an issue because it's something that is already in place.
And there is your usual fruitful, educated, incisive, expert analysis that we've come to expect. I surmise you even lose arguments to yourself.
Doesn't everyone?And there is your usual fruitful, educated, incisive, expert analysis that we've come to expect. I surmise you even lose arguments to yourself.
And I don't even pretend to take maga voters seriously anymore. I'm not legitimizing fascism as something like real political discourse.
I am not MAGA in any way, shape or form. And it's not fascism anyway. You reveal so much about your level of ignorance with those kinds of statements. Have a nice afternoon.
Wait. I don't have kids, shouldn't I be taxed less since I am not using Education.
This pick was so bad, it might cause Trump to lose this election, whereupon he will stand for numerous criminal trials, and then he will go to jail. He has everything riding on the election, that he is going to lose.
My favorite part about this whole JD James Halen Bowman Vance fiasco is that this is only the first week. People have barely had time to really dig into his past. Just....it's going to be epic.
Jd, in his own words, endorsing Project 2025 and other weirdo shit.
Yeah but she's just a liberal expert on authoritarian regimes. What would she know?
I might just put in a $500 futures bet of my own right now.
And we're still just scratching the surface with this clown. I'm so loving the JD Vance era of Maga.
Okay, it's getting harder and harder for me to deny my curiosity at JD's continued efforts to torpedo Trump's campaign.
Is he seriously this terrible at politics? Maybe he's just unable to get out of the far right podcast head space, but the scrutiny is off the charts now compared to when he was pandering on the Charlie Kirk show and the Tim Pool podcast.
Simply amazing
LIBERAL NARRATIVE FAIL: WSJ Poll Finds JD Vance is More Popular Than Kamala Harris
www.thegatewaypundit.com
LIBERAL NARRATIVE FAIL: WSJ Poll Finds JD Vance is More Popular Than Kamala Harris | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance
Democrats and the media are in a mad dash to define Trump’s running mate JD Vance.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
🤣JesusLIBERAL NARRATIVE FAIL: WSJ Poll Finds JD Vance is More Popular Than Kamala Harris
LIBERAL NARRATIVE FAIL: WSJ Poll Finds JD Vance is More Popular Than Kamala Harris | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance
Democrats and the media are in a mad dash to define Trump’s running mate JD Vance.
He'd be smart to switch to Elise Stefanik, but we all know there's no place for a woman at that level in the Trump world. So he won't be smart.
