Nope, he made the claim, he has to prove it.Define "Rigged" so that we may further consider this bet.
Nope, he made the claim, he has to prove it.Define "Rigged" so that we may further consider this bet.
I make more than that doing my daily work, so no thanks.How about this - I'll bet $25,000 if you can prove the election was rigged and I'll give you a week to gather the evidence. If you fail, you owe me. We know both of us will honor our word so what do you say?
Do you have a link for missing voters? I legitimately don't know what claim you're referring to.I make more than that doing my daily work, so no thanks.
How about this… I’ll let you explain where the missing voters went, and maybe you can earn some credibility.
But again… Americans saw it, and rejected the left.
You are the one walking back. You are the one who said despite the very language that exempted those programs, that those payments were going to stop yesterday @ 5pm. They didn't and now you are the one trying to backtrack.Considering WIC isn't given directly to individuals, it's given to states who then dole it out, it's a walkback, my guy.
FTR, I don't think that's the reason you won't bet but it's easy to explain where the 3 million voters went unless you're a conspiracy theorist.I make more than that doing my daily work, so no thanks.
How about this… I’ll let you explain where the missing voters went, and maybe you can earn some credibility.
But again… Americans saw it, and rejected the left.
Checks and balances being eroded. The centralizing of power which could destroy our democracy.Guy wins election, hires people with his ideology. Story as old as time.
What are we crying about in here?
Dude... I get where you are coming from, but did ANYONE actually believe Trump when he said he didn't know about Project 2025 and didn't endorse it? I know I thought he was lying at the time. Any MAGAs on here actually believe Trump when he said that?And how a major part of it was changing federal employees to schedule F so that the President could hire/fire them? And then remember how it was suggested this might lead to the administration putting “loyalty tests” in place and hiring only people who were politically loyal instead of actually qualified and competent? Then ya’ll remember how Trump said he didn’t endorse project 2025, and ya’ll said that people were being ridiculous and it would never happen?
Well… If this ain’t Fascism I don’t know what is.
Loyalty tests and MAGA checks: Inside the Trump White House's intense screening of job-seekers
Job-seekers hoping to join the new Trump administration are facing a series of intense loyalty tests.apnews.com
Oh you mean like the government forcing health decisions on people? You mean the government violating the constitution and censoring speech? You mean like vaccine passports? You mean like the government de-banking people?Checks and balances being eroded. The centralizing of power which could destroy our democracy.
Of course Trump had heard of 2025. Did he not technically read it so he had plausible deniability? Maybe.Dude... I get where you are coming from, but did ANYONE actually believe Trump when he said he didn't know about Project 2025 and didn't endorse it? I know I thought he was lying at the time. Any MAGAs on here actually believe Trump when he said that?
It's like the abortion issue. Trump painted himself as moderate on Abortion and distanced himself from Project 2025 b/c the moderates that he needed to vote for him might not have otherwise. It worked and Trump got reelected. He got what he needed from those folks that believed him and now it's business as usual b/c he doesn't need them anymore.
Trump being Trump.
Strange how much they overlap huh?Of course Trump had heard of 2025. Did he not technically read it so he had plausible deniability? Maybe.
Either way, project 2025 was not his policy position. His policy positions were clearly stated on his website. And by all means he is adhering to those polices and delivering to the voters on the mandate he was given.
Not really strange at all.Strange how much they overlap huh?
? Yes, I believe WIC/Snap/etc will be paused at 5pm today.
lol, what? What was my 4th post on this very topic? Don't worry, I quoted it for you below. It's not my fault the dipshits Elon appointed at the OMB (a 28 year old, 21 year old, and 18 year old) decided to release a vague memo that led to hordes of people calling their congressmen to pressure Trump to stop the EO. This is all so very reminiscent of his first term where he'd do something idiotic/break something, and then back off/fix the problem he caused, and then claim victory.You are the one walking back. You are the one who said despite the very language that exempted those programs, that those payments were going to stop yesterday @ 5pm. They didn't and now you are the one trying to backtrack.
I think the public backlash will be so severe he'll end up walking it back and not have it apply to WIC/SNAP/school lunches/etc. I just don't understand the rationale behind cutting programs that help the poorest/youngest in our nation, by the "pro-life party" nonetheless, but then again that's what happens when your country is run by billionaires and grifters.
Don't worry, none of the MAGAs will watch this. Or if they do, they'll just claim Pritzker is lying bc Donnie from Queens can't be in the wrong.
Well I quoted your 9th post yesterday for you below where you said it would be stopped/paused yesterday even after I pointed out the fact that I thought they would not stop it due to the direct individual pmt exemptions. You doubled down and said they would. This was after your 4th post just fyi.lol, what? What was my 4th post on this very topic? Don't worry, I quoted it for you below. It's not my fault the dipshits Elon appointed at the OMB (a 28 year old, 21 year old, and 18 year old) decided to release a vague memo that led to hordes of people calling their congressmen to pressure Trump to stop the EO. This is all so very reminiscent of his first term where he'd do something idiotic/break something, and then back off/fix the problem he caused, and then claim victory.
? Yes, I believe WIC/Snap/etc will be paused at 5pm today.
They rescinded the whole damn thing before 5pm yesterday. I apologize for being wrong about how quickly they'd back off their idiotic EO. Once again, WIC doesn't fall under direct individual payments - but SNAP does.Well I quoted your 9th post yesterday for you below where you said it would be stopped/paused yesterday even after I pointed out the fact that I thought they would not stop it due to the direct individual pmt exemptions. You doubled down and said they would. This was after your 4th post just fyi.
Not so fast as Lee Corso would say.And just like that the whole order has been rescinded.
Good work, guys
It's not to me and I've mentioned it many times on this board that there's nary a difference between Agenda 47 and Project 2025 and that's why I found it so disingenuous when all you magas mocked us for screaming about Project 2025. Your statement just proved you knew it was true all along too and you didn't care.And it's easy to see that you love the cruelty of it.Not really strange at all.
If you read both beforehand they had many similar policies. Why is that shocking?
It's not to me and I've mentioned it many times on this board that there's nary a difference between Agenda 47 and Project 2025 and that's why I found it so disingenuous when all you magas mocked us for screaming about Project 2025. Your statement just proved you knew it was true all along too and you didn't care.And it's easy to see that you love the cruelty of it.
Can you provide an example of the government prosecuting someone for speech?Oh you mean like the government forcing health decisions on people? You mean the government violating the constitution and censoring speech? You mean like vaccine passports? You mean like the government de-banking people?
Democrats trampled on individual rights and that influenced a lot of voters.
If you ignore the twitter files that is your own fault. It's real. It happened. And it's scary. It's also disqualifying.Can you provide an example of the government prosecuting someone for speech?
First off, this past election and the one previous had legitimate results.If you ignore the twitter files that is your own fault. It's real. It happened. And it's scary. It's also disqualifying.
And no one has been prosecuted. Yet.