Yall remember project 2025
- Thread starter dbjork6317
- Start date
I make more than that doing my daily work, so no thanks.
How about this… I’ll let you explain where the missing voters went, and maybe you can earn some credibility.
But again… Americans saw it, and rejected the left.
Do you have a link for missing voters? I legitimately don't know what claim you're referring to.
You are the one walking back. You are the one who said despite the very language that exempted those programs, that those payments were going to stop yesterday @ 5pm. They didn't and now you are the one trying to backtrack.
FTR, I don't think that's the reason you won't bet but it's easy to explain where the 3 million voters went unless you're a conspiracy theorist.
Some 2020 Biden voters voted for Trump and some 2020 voters didn't vote at all, out of apathy.
Americans didn't see sh*t except for a usb disguised as a ginger mint LULZ
Embarrassing for you
Checks and balances being eroded. The centralizing of power which could destroy our democracy.
Dude... I get where you are coming from, but did ANYONE actually believe Trump when he said he didn't know about Project 2025 and didn't endorse it? I know I thought he was lying at the time. Any MAGAs on here actually believe Trump when he said that?And how a major part of it was changing federal employees to schedule F so that the President could hire/fire them? And then remember how it was suggested this might lead to the administration putting “loyalty tests” in place and hiring only people who were politically loyal instead of actually qualified and competent? Then ya’ll remember how Trump said he didn’t endorse project 2025, and ya’ll said that people were being ridiculous and it would never happen?
Well… If this ain’t Fascism I don’t know what is.
Loyalty tests and MAGA checks: Inside the Trump White House's intense screening of job-seekers
Job-seekers hoping to join the new Trump administration are facing a series of intense loyalty tests.apnews.com
It's like the abortion issue. Trump painted himself as moderate on Abortion and distanced himself from Project 2025 b/c the moderates that he needed to vote for him might not have otherwise. It worked and Trump got reelected. He got what he needed from those folks that believed him and now it's business as usual b/c he doesn't need them anymore.
Trump being Trump.
Oh you mean like the government forcing health decisions on people? You mean the government violating the constitution and censoring speech? You mean like vaccine passports? You mean like the government de-banking people?
Democrats trampled on individual rights and that influenced a lot of voters.
Of course Trump had heard of 2025. Did he not technically read it so he had plausible deniability? Maybe.
Either way, project 2025 was not his policy position. His policy positions were clearly stated on his website. And by all means he is adhering to those polices and delivering to the voters on the mandate he was given.
Not really strange at all.
If you read both beforehand they had many similar policies. Why is that shocking?
lol, what? What was my 4th post on this very topic? Don't worry, I quoted it for you below. It's not my fault the dipshits Elon appointed at the OMB (a 28 year old, 21 year old, and 18 year old) decided to release a vague memo that led to hordes of people calling their congressmen to pressure Trump to stop the EO. This is all so very reminiscent of his first term where he'd do something idiotic/break something, and then back off/fix the problem he caused, and then claim victory.
Don't worry, none of the MAGAs will watch this. Or if they do, they'll just claim Pritzker is lying bc Donnie from Queens can't be in the wrong.
Well I quoted your 9th post yesterday for you below where you said it would be stopped/paused yesterday even after I pointed out the fact that I thought they would not stop it due to the direct individual pmt exemptions. You doubled down and said they would. This was after your 4th post just fyi.
They rescinded the whole damn thing before 5pm yesterday. I apologize for being wrong about how quickly they'd back off their idiotic EO. Once again, WIC doesn't fall under direct individual payments - but SNAP does.
It's not to me and I've mentioned it many times on this board that there's nary a difference between Agenda 47 and Project 2025 and that's why I found it so disingenuous when all you magas mocked us for screaming about Project 2025. Your statement just proved you knew it was true all along too and you didn't care.And it's easy to see that you love the cruelty of it.
So... when the depart of education is shut down, and kids go hungry in NC, TX, KY etc.
How do you think that generation is going to grow up and react to a Trump legacy? Serious question yall.
Those states don't have the damn money to even feed their kids. They rely THE MOST on federal funding.
.. why would Trump do this?
How do you think that generation is going to grow up and react to a Trump legacy? Serious question yall.
Those states don't have the damn money to even feed their kids. They rely THE MOST on federal funding.
.. why would Trump do this?
If you ignore the twitter files that is your own fault. It's real. It happened. And it's scary. It's also disqualifying.
And no one has been prosecuted. Yet.
First off, this past election and the one previous had legitimate results.
Second, you were probably the kid who lost in sports and then took the ball so no one else could play.
So, no. You cannot cite one example of someone being prosecuted for speech in the US. Just say that next time.
State champion in tennis and basketball. Try again.
You people could not live further from reality.
What I will say is this. The democratic, Joe Biden lead, administration demanded twitter censor Americans speech.
And Jim Baker was fired for it.
Try what again? I stand by my point that you handle losses like a spoiled child. You've said nothing to refute that.
Ok, even if we take what you’re saying at face value - if what you’re saying happened exactly as you say it happened - that’s not a violation of constitutional free speech.
ok.
It's disqualifying to me as a voter. And to many other voters. We know what happened.
Ok cool, that’s fine to say that you believe it’s unethical or that it’s disqualifying to you. But it’s wrong to say that it’s a constitutional violation. Be upset about it, but don’t lie about it.
Similar threads
