This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

acwill07 said:

[...] but the Republican party has become way too worried about trans people and the issues surrounding that. [...}

Click to expand...

Not at all concerned about "trans people", and I dare say neither is the Republican party at large. It is, however, ALL ABOUT "the issues surrounding it". How can you possibly divorce yourself from that?

You mentioned one of the issues surrounding it yourself: protecting girls' sports. Here's another revealed in a personal anecdote you perhaps did not consider...

I have twin girls. When the NC bathroom bill was at its fever-pitch, my girls were taking swim lesson at the base pool. If you are not familiar with the layout, boys enter via a locker room on one side, girls on another. The locker rooms are all open--that is, no stalls or private changing booths. On the occasions that I am not with my wife, I had to let my girls navigate this locker room by themselves. I really don't want them getting an eyeful of some weird dude with massive boobs and a penis. Before this trans insanity, a man exposing himself in such a manner to a child is a criminal offense. Now its apparently supposed to be a protected civil right.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

yoshi121374 said:

So what is the plan to replace the massive amount of federal funds that make up the vast majority of Education costs for every state?

Stupid Idea that like many of his "plans" have no actual plan. South Carolina can't fund their education without the federal funds. Get ready for massive State Tax increases.

Click to expand...

I'm skeptical of how this will work as well, but my understanding is that there isn't going to be less federal funding. How it's used will just be more at the discretion of the state.

firegiver said:

One such promise: "We're going to give our police their power back," he told rallygoers in Waukesha, "and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."

Between police and prosecutors, law enforcement officers are arguably already the most powerful people in government, so it's unclear what Trump means by giving them "their power back." His second promise, though—immunity from prosecution—is more concrete, and a reminder of the former president's views on government accountability.

You guys gave him a mandate right? Or is this just hyperbole? Or is this just Trump saying how it really is? Who knows?

Trump is actually in the OP. The tweet references him and qualified immunity, the thread starting post is literally criticizing the former presidents position on Qualified Immunity. So maybe I am confused, because words and context have meaning to me.

Click to expand...

Yes, we need to support Police. However, when they **** up like this clown and go beyond his authority, he needs to be held accountable like the rest of us...

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

There are a few I'm worried about. There were at least two frequent posters who had become unhinged.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

It’s our right as southerners to not teach the public!

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.