No. Alex left the phone at the house and returned to the kennels. Paul's snapchat video confirms he was at the Kennels. He later calls Maggie's phone from the house. He took 59 steps with it to the golf cart. Road the cart to the main house. Got his phone at 2102 and called her phone at 2104. He jumps in his car and leaves by 2107.
This is a question I have asked as well...
www.wjcl.com
I would be surprised if AM told him to go by Granddad's house and quietly pick up the blue tarp and dispose of it where no one will find it.
It has everything in it, including non-admitted evidence and argument that jury can’t hear
Why didn’t Maggie’s phone register him moving? Or it being moved at anytime after locking
You are missing the logical conclusion that can be taken given all the technical evidence presented about the phone usage and lack thereof, the lies AM has told about his presence there, and the numerous other bits of evidence that point to the time of death being most likely right after both phones show no activity and certainly no more than five minutes after. All the empirical evidence points to this. This is what the data has told us.
I'm assuming the attention is to confuse and focus on the splatter. Otherwise why on earth are you providing new witnesses on the "last day" that completely refute your entire defense up until this point that no way AM could be the killer because he's 6'4" and couldn't have made that trajectory.
I haven’t been able to watch any today, so thanks for the synopsis. What do you mean “from the top”? Meaning killer was standing over them?
Did Alex steal his money? IF so the jury may see this at the financial trials. I do not believe they will be able to plea those charges because prosecution is not gonna go below 25-30 years and guarantee you Alex thinks he can get it down say to say 10. He is gonna use the addicted to drugs excuse. He has already laid the groundwork for this. He has a plan.
That's exactly the defense strategy this morning. Raise reasonable doubt as to exact time of death due to coroner not employing use of rectal thermometer. And then of course muddying the water as to shooter's location and likelihood that there would have been lots of blood spatter on shooter and possible injuries. Had AM not lied so many times as to not being at the scene, I believe he'd easily be found innocent. My opinion several weeks ago remains unchanged -- AM is guilty (whether the shooter or he hired someone else) but one or more jurors who will hang this trial up.
Happens pretty frequently.....Husband killing wife, husband killing wife and kids, etc.
LE and the prosecution have been almost totally inept. That’s why. Waters shot his wad Friday and except for the very end failed miserably. He isn’t playing well so they may be giving someone else the chance to be in front of the jury.
thank you on a plane reading this and not able to watch. the top of the head was confusing how does a 5’2 person do that lol
3D Poot Chess to create reasonable doubt in the jury's mind.
Happened near me last week. 42 year old man killed his wife and two teenage kids.
They have is on star Dara
Sure that’s what it leads to but I do not believe it removes all doubt. Just because Maggie’s phone tried to unlock but didn’t doesn’t mean it wasn’t her. My phone doesn’t always recognize me. I have to put in my code sometimes. I think most do or she went to unlock it and only looked at he time. To my knowledge there isn’t any evidence to discredit this. Those are assumptions.
Because he’s going to hammer time of death in his closing and sled lying about the blood spatter.
