⚖️ MURDAUGH MURDERS & TRIAL THREAD ⚖️
- Thread starter OldMTPTiger
- Start date
notice in 10 days he said, then 30 to file and then that will take months I think I heard and that they'll take it all the way to Federal Supreme Court if needed
He is standing strong and gonna fight hard against this botched crime scene bull shit argument all the way to supreme court
I wonder if Griffin’s tweet of that article criticizing the investigation, for which he was then reprimanded by the judge, was some attempt to get kicked off the case or have his role reduced. Don’t know if that’s even a thing, but Griffin was definitely becoming detached the last couple of weeks.
And that is precisely why this glorious thread will remain atop this board for the foreseeable future.
I would tell Alec to find a different lawyer if I was Griffin or Harpootlian.
And that is precisely why this glorious thread will remain atop this board for the foreseeable future.
you just want a million
He was there but is that where others wanted him to be? I mean, his grandfather was dying so shouldn’t he come to be there with the family?
I know he used to work at Buffalo Wild Wings in Rock Hill - before the trial.
a question I have had as well. The lack of emotion, smug smiles throughout, and seemingly nothing today almost makes you think he knew something. I don't know but seems it
Consider me a fan of Judge Newman. He was tough, but fair, throughout the trial. Kept the proceedings moving along. And, contrary to the facts of this case, reflected positively on our state. I hope that he enjoys as many productive years on the bench.
Unfortunately, $$$ is always going to buy privilege. There is no way to keep out all bad actors out of any profession or group of people. It can be argued that many people's socioeconomic status is at least in part of their own choosing. Even so, socioeconomic status is far and away the most negative influencing factor that exits in almost any society.
If something does happen to him, does his life insurance policy still pay out? I assume so unless (unless he instigated something in prison and dies as a result of that).
Ted Bundy was reportedly well liked by most of the people he knew(that he did not kill).
So you've gone from, "There's not enough evidence to convict" to "Hang'm from the highest tree." ?
Prison is far worse than the death penalty.
I don't know how frightening that is, honestly.
I like the fact that if my car gets stolen I can easily find where it is. I also like the fact that I can monitor where my kids are.
I guess I should say there are plenty of positives. Just don't do something stupid, and the positives probably outweigh the negatives.
I thought the judge knocked it out of the park. That was excellent.
We've all known "that guy." The guy who is real nice. A good friend. Then he gets a few drinks in him and he's the biggest asshole in the world. Some people are mellow drunks. Some are happy drunks. Some are just jerks. My best friend from El Cid was/is that way. I steer clear of him when he's drinking.
Paul was probably that way.
I'd willing to bet that Alex was on drugs when the crime happen. I'm surprised not toxicology was done on him. Shame he wasn't taken in on day one. I'm betting Alex was a angry drunk as well.
That I do not know. Just know he called him to tell him about the murders and he immediately dro ve home with his girlfriend
On the stand he said something along the lines of his dad sounding odd and asked if he was sitting down. Told him the news his brother and mom had been shot and they left immediately.
Said he walked in gave his dad a hug and that his dad was destroyed
Bill Gibbons, The Ledger Editor. That's who Martin wrote his letters to.
apparently from what I remember reading a long time ago was that the husband of first victim seemed to be the murderer and then more bodies started popping up
Buster wasn't the one being sued for the boat crash that was going to expose Alex
I thought he was named because he gave Paul his ID that was used to buy the beer. I think Buster is more at fault than Parkers
This does not make sense. You cannot say you have reasonable doubt, then argue that justice was served.
This is like saying you believe OJ did it, but arguing you also believe justice was served because a jury of his peers found him not guilty.
You are hedging your bets, in a way. You are also making the argument that in every single jury trial, justice is served. Which is obviously untrue.
How many are surprised by what seems to be the reaction of Maggie's family and even Alex's family. No one from Maggie's side spoke at the sentencing. Do they really think Alex didn't do it or just don't want to talk about it. Is Buster & John Marvin totally blinded to the evidence and believe Alex didn't do it or at least have strong suspicion about it
No victim statements.
If Buster and John Marvin truly believe Alex, then surely their next step is commencing the manhunt for the real killers right?
