No chief, I actually OWN a business as opposed to reading about it.Spoken like a true non-academic. Hey at least your daughter is breaking the chain.
No chief, I actually OWN a business as opposed to reading about it.Spoken like a true non-academic. Hey at least your daughter is breaking the chain.
CU graduate of '92.Spoken like a true non-academic. Hey at least your daughter is breaking the chain.
Proof of vaccination? Lol. Apparently 1/4 of our country can't even get an id.🙄The reasons why you’d continue to have a mask mandate right now are:
- We’re not at the point where there’s population immunity from infections and immunizations. But we’ll be pretty close to there soon. If you can avoid having any major outbreaks between now and then, it would be great.
- people are most likely to spread virus indoors where they’re spending an extended amount of time. So you might consider tailoring that mandate to indoor spaces.
- mask policies are intended to mitigate risk in the riskiest situations so that you don’t have to close stuff down. If the choice is between something being open at all and requiring masks, then isn’t it better to require masks?
- public health can’t just be about individual choice, or else it won’t work. You have to have broad and nearly universal participation.
- having a mandate makes it easier for private businesses to enforce their own mask rules.
- nobody knows who’s vaccinated, and the vaccines aren’t 100% effective.
On the other hand, while we know that masks are fairly effective at presenting the spread between individuals, mask mandates might not work very well as public health policy because there are lots of places that won’t be subject to a mandate, and mandates are difficult to enforce. At this point, the choice doesn’t really seem like it’s between closing stuff down and wearing masks. And businesses could decide for themselves whether they want to have a mask policy or not (but, then, you’re just back to not liking being told what to do in those businesses). Unfortunately, there seems to be bipartisan agreement about not letting businesses decide for themselves, whether it’s about masks or about requiring proof of vaccination.
Congrats bubba now go finish cutting my grassNo chief, I actually OWN a business as opposed to reading about it.
None of your points are at all in opposition of anything I said. Relax.Staunchly disagree. I'm not passing judgement. It's true and it's idiotic. Especially when all the older residents have had ample time to get the vaccine and college kids aren't at risk.
The median age for SC is about 40 years old. Clemson is extremely young comparatively. Nearly half actually if your numbers are correct.
Areas in SC with substantially higher median ages, much larger populations, and a lot of out of state travel have already let theirs expire. Many did weeks or months ago.
Even the City of Columbia is set to have theirs expire in a week from now.....
Clemson needs to drop this crap and allow businesses to make their own decisions at this point. There is nothing special about Clemson to keep this dumb rule going while other cities are done with it. It's the opposite. It's an incredibly low risk area.
Wow...really no need for that no matter how much you disagree with someone.
Yall sound like huge complete faggits.... Seriously Grow a dick you are embarrassing yourself
And I'm going easy right now
EDIT : also masks have negligible affect on spread... Read a book why don't you
You must not get out much.. they wrote a shit ton of tickets last summer and fallI live in Clemson and didn't know this existed.... No dude abides and the cops don't gaf
Just letting you know I’m stealing your info on other citiesSo ridiculous in a city like Clemson where the majority of the people that live there are students who are NOT at risk and the vaccine is available to everyone.
Lexington dropped their mask mandate like 2 months ago.
West Columbia let theirs expire May 1.
Bluffton let theirs expire April 14th.
Beaufort county let theirs expire April 15th.
City of Beaufort, who has been one of the more strict places in the state, let theirs expire last Friday April 30th.
Port Royal let theirs expire April 30th.
Hilton Head is letting theirs expire on May 16th.
So heavily populated areas full of tourists are letting theirs go but oh heck no....Can't let a city full of low risk college kids go without a mask.
Technically campus is not in the city of ClemsonAre you supposed to wear a mask at the baseball game? Because I didn’t and no one said a thing. I can deal with that type of mandate.
I went back and watched the portion of the Council meeting where masks were discussed. They extended it a couple of days beyond the next council meeting on the 17th. So technically not a full extension. They voted down a measure to repeal it 5-2.What I was told by a councilman is that they actually didn’t vote to extend they just didn’t vote to repeal it. It’s due to expire May 18th. I started a pole on the Nextdoor website and you can see some of the post from the liberal forever maskers...
I was downtown Monday eating at loose change. Basically no one on the street had them on and I walked right by a cop without oneYou must not get out much.. they wrote a shit ton of tickets last summer and fall
My wife and I go out A LOT. We have traveled quite a bit in state and out of state during the pandemic. I have not seen a single person get a ticket. Now, the places we have traveled have been in the south. So there is that aspect. The only thing I have seen is some businesses will ask you to put one on if you aren't wearing it but that's about it. A lot of businesses don't care anymore.I was downtown Monday eating at loose change. Basically no one on the street had them on and I walked right by a cop without one
We feel the same about youhaha this fanbase is really embarrassing sometimes
I had a freshman there this year. I second this. Some teachers (few as far as I can tell) have done well with virtual but most of my son’s teachers completely mailed it in. Plus, the attendance policy for virtual classes was ridiculous because the system used to monitor attendance was flawed, but that didn’t stop them from dropping kids left and right from classes. I don’t blame the university for not being prepared but they needed to be more flexible at least with that policy.Have a daughter at CU. F academia.
Seems like you want to talk about something else. I’m not sure why people want to turn anything to do with COVID into some sort of broader political agenda.Proof of vaccination? Lol. Apparently 1/4 of our country can't even get an id.🙄
Yeah, that’s not how it works. The virus has to travel on another particle, it doesn’t just float around by itself. The respiratory particles that are the most likely culprits for virus spread are larger than the holes in the best cloth masks. You could find that out by looking at any study/any of the information out there from reputable sources, but I’m guessing you’re reporting on stuff that just validates what you want to think.The sars cov 2 virus is over 1,000 times smaller than the size of the gaps in the threads of the masks. That’s all.
There is some irony there- people who are vaccinated need masks less than unvaccinated people, but people who got vaccinated first were also the people who were most cautious about the virus. People not interested in getting vaccinated also aren’t cautious about the virus.![]()
This is so true in Atlanta. Today, I was at Lee's Bakery and everyone has a mask on before sitting down at the table. It appears that mask use has gone up. Because you know it's science...Tables have invisible force fields. People keep forgetting that people who already had the virus have higher immunity than the shot. If cloth masks worked...you wouldn't smell farts.
The CDC has evidence that mask mandates somewhat reduce deaths, which means they probably also reduce cases by a larger number. That doesn’t mean they’re particularly effective as public health measures, or that they’re better than letting businesses decide what to do. Just claiming that they only work as behavioral deterrents is wrong, though.![]()
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3
Background: Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from...www.acpjournals.org
Here’s just one after the COVID craze. There are TONS from before the COVID craze.
They may “work” as a behavioral deterrent to keep people from interacting with each other, that’s about it, and, if that’s the case, it’s Government restraint on the 1st Amendment.
I’ve read tons of the CDC data. They do not isolate masks from all other factors such as social distancing, hand washing, lockdowns, sanitization, etc etc.The CDC has evidence that mask mandates somewhat reduce deaths, which means they probably also reduce cases by a larger number. That doesn’t mean they’re particularly effective as public health measures, or that they’re better than letting businesses decide what to do. Just claiming that they only work as behavioral deterrents is wrong, though.
Studies have come out showing that masks work both as source control (which was already well established) and less well as protection for wearer (which has been further established during the pandemic). However, that doesn’t mean that mask mandates are great public health policies, because mass mask wearing still might not reduce the spread even if they work to reduce the spread at an individual level.I’ve read tons of the CDC data. They do not isolate masks from all other factors such as social distancing, hand washing, lockdowns, sanitization, etc etc.
If you have studies that do isolate them, I’m more than willing to change my viewpoint.
Before COVID this was an issue that was completely one sided in the scientific literature: meaning cloth/paper towel masks do not work to deter primary aerosol transmission of a respiratory virus.
IMO it’s simply a way to “show that we’re doing something”, at minimum.
Again, I’m more than open to reading data that isolates masks.
"Hiden" is an idiot and I am beginning to believe Fauci is too . No one needs a mask outside especially if you have had both vaccine shots .Look, just do what the government says...get vaccinated, double mask, stay socially distant, etc....
If we all do that, Biden says we can have some small family BBQs for the 4th of July!
He might be smart but he’s letting fear override any actual reasoning or evidence to support mask use. So if he is smart he’s a p^ssy who is being riddled with fear.Dr. Quattlebaum is one of the smartest people I have ever met. I'd be willing to bet that all the information he provided was accurate, but may just need further explanation.
There is a TREMENDOUS amount of pressure from certain portion of local residents to keep masks mandates active. You can't fault leadership for representing that population as well.
I feel like the 2 weeks was just to get us past the festivities surrounding moving out and graduation. I drove through downtown earlier today and it was busier than I had seen it in some time. I'd be willing to bet after the two weeks they will lift the mandate. That's just my interpretation of the meeting.
Prolly b/c that's exactly what our "politicians" are doing.Seems like you want to talk about something else. I’m not sure why people want to turn anything to do with COVID into some sort of broader political agenda.
Have not seen all those. Thank you, ill read and get back.Studies have come out showing that masks work both as source control (which was already well established) and less well as protection for wearer (which has been further established during the pandemic). However, that doesn’t mean that mask mandates are great public health policies, because mass mask wearing still might not reduce the spread even if they work to reduce the spread at an individual level.
Here’s what the CDC put out a little while ago showing that mass mask wearing does reduce viral spread: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html
I totally agree that liberals have “Science” as part of their tribal identity, rather than just being willing to acknowledge cold hard facts. But I also don’t think conservatives should let their tribalism make them reactionary.Prolly b/c that's exactly what our "politicians" are doing.
I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the "science" crowd wanting the vaccine documentation is more often than not, the same group that thinks it's just too hard and unfair to get a GD I'd. Yet, those same folks, have to have an id to cash the stimulus money my tax dollars awarded them. I didn't get jack other than an expectation of more taxes. Its maddening. Both sides have turned covid into a political football. Anything to divide us more.
Keep the masks permanently!!! They single handedly eliminated the flu! 😂😂😂😂
The sars cov 2 virus is over 1,000 times smaller than the size of the gaps in the threads of the masks. That’s all.
Agree. Neither side worth a damn. May be time for a 3rd party to gain traction.I totally agree that liberals have “Science” as part of their tribal identity, rather than just being willing to acknowledge cold hard facts. But I also don’t think conservatives should let their tribalism make them reactionary.
It's a cloth mask bro😂Actually, the masks probably did lead to the drastic decrease in influenza transmission. SARS-CoV-2 has an R0 at least two to three times greater than the flu, meaning that the rather drastic measures taken to combat Covid will have an even greater impact on similarly spread, but less infectious viruses.
I’m not for that. I’d rather try to encourage the better angels on a particular side.Agree. Neither side worth a damn. May be time for a 3rd party to gain traction.
https://www.businessinsider.com/6-ft-social-distancing-rule-exposure-indoors-2021-4 Follow the ScienceThere is some irony there- people who are vaccinated need masks less than unvaccinated people, but people who got vaccinated first were also the people who were most cautious about the virus. People not interested in getting vaccinated also aren’t cautious about the virus.
As far as masks and restaurants go, there’s obviously not “forcefields” around restaurant tables. But when you’re at your table, you can be distanced from people who you don’t know and live with, and you’re limiting the time without masks as much as possible. That’s because, again, the whole mask deal is about mitigating risk so that you don’t have to completely shut otherwise risky things down.
The whole smelling farts thing keeps getting repeated, but is just more silliness. The particles that carry the virus are different than air particles that you can smell.