ADVERTISEMENT

COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?

Let the finger pointing begin.

 
325301988_545720907483243_814139951287089041_n.jpg
 
"COVID-19 is killing more Republicans than Democrats, according to a new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research. The study, titled Excess Death Rates for Republicans and Democrats During the COVID-19 Pandemic, used voter registration and death records to answer a question: is there a link between political affiliation and rates of COVID related death in the U.S.?"

"The excess death rate difference isn’t small. “In the summer of 2021—after vaccines were widely available—the Republican excess death rate rose to nearly double that of Democrats, and this gap widened further in the winter of 2021,” the study said. This rose to a 153% difference after all adults could take the vaccine in Florida and Ohio."


 
WOW!! Incredibly disturbing.


The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal. We should be concerned. Very concerned.​

After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded. It looks like the vax gave at least 50M Americans heart damage.​


Steve Kirsch
24 hr ago
How airlines plan to create new generation of pilots at time of crisis
The FAA just telegraphed the fact that a substantial number of airline pilots have had serious heart damage from the COVID vaccine by widening the ECG parameters for pilots.
In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the FAA quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal range (from a PR max of .2 to unlimited). And they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout.
This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it.
But you can’t hide these things for long.
This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.
The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots.
My best guess right now is that over 50M Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.
That’s a lot of people who will be very upset when they realize the vaccine they took to reduce their chance of dying from COVID actually worked in reverse making it:
  1. More likely that people will get COVID
  2. Be hospitalized from COVID and other diseases
  3. Die from COVID (and other diseases)
  4. You also have an excellent chance of getting a lifetime of heart damage for no extra charge.
But don’t worry; you can’t sue them. They fixed the law so none of them aren’t liable (the doctors, the drug companies, the government). After all, you took the vaccine of your own free will. It’s not like you were forced (or coerced) to take it or anything like that! And there were plenty of people warning you not to take the shots (even though they censored most of them).
In this article, I will explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims.
As I learn more, I will refine the estimate.

Introduction​

On October 24, 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the EKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly.
The PR (a measure of heart function) used to be in the range of .12 to .2.
It is now: .12 to .3 and potentially even higher.
This is a very wide range; it accommodates people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change:

Why did they make the change?​

Why would they do that?
I’ll take an educated guess as to why they did that. I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted.
And why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media?
I’m pretty sure they won’t tell me, so I’ll speculate: it’s because they didn’t want anyone to know.
In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren’t allowed to do that.

Why we sure it was the vaccine that did it​

There are several clues that are consistent with “it was the vaccine and not COVID”:
  1. They were quiet about it. If it was COVID, you can be public. But the vaccine is supposed to be safe.
  2. The timing. October 2022 is late for COVID. If it was due to COVID, it would have happened well before now. They can make changes every month.
  3. The vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID (which creates NO added risk per this large-scale Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults after Covid infection).
  4. Anecdotally, cardiologists only started to notice the damage post-vaccine.
  5. All the sudden deaths started post-vaccine.

The data supporting my 20% damage estimate​

I know from a study of 177 people in Puerto Rico (97% of whom were vaccinated) ages 8 to 84, that 70% of those people, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device (from Heart Care Corp), exhibited objective signs of cardiac injury.
There was a study done on pilots. It will be published in The Epoch Times later this week. That indicated heart damage in over 20% of pilots screened (The Epoch Times will release the exact number).
The Thailand study showed nearly 30% of kids were injured. But kids are indestructible so a 30% injury rate in kids translates into a higher rate for adults.
VAERS shows that cardiac damage happens at all ages, not just the young:

Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nations pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly.
The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that.

The change: from 200 msec to 300 msec and beyond

The changes were made on October 24, 2022 to the GUIDE FOR AVIATION MEDICAL EXAMINERS.
Here is the change log where you can see the change listed (see page 4):

Here is what the policy was before the change. It was just one row:

Here are what it looks like as of Oct 24, 2022 (click the image to see the context):

So it’s now two rows, one for less than 300 ms (it used to be 200 ms), and a second row to handle 300 ms or more.
For more information about the change, see Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.

The Thailand study​

In the US, we are not allowed to do lab tests on people before and after the vaccine.
The reason for that is simple: it would make it crystal clear that the vaccines are unsafe. That is why there are no before/after studies in the US. There never will be.
Why? Because that is how science works in America today: it’s unethical to design a study that might expose that the COVID vaccines that they forced us to take cause harm.
Think I’m kidding about how they game the trials? Get yourself a copy of Turtles All the Way Down and just read the first chapter. It’s eye opening.
Even though we can’t do a before/after study in the US, they did such a study in Thailand on 301 kids. They found that 29.24% of the participants developed cardiac injuries within days after they got the second shot:

But here’s the most important part about that study that nobody points out:
None of the tests that were done in the Thailand study included doing a cardiac MRI with contrast on all the participants since that would be expensive and invasive. That test is the gold-standard for cardiac injury.
In other words, the 29% rate of injury was a lower bound of injury.
If you did a cardiac MRI on all those kids, you are going to find stuff that you will not find using the cheap and easy tests. Maybe a lot of stuff.

Summary​

I believe that the actual rate of heart injury from these vaccines will be found to be well over the 29.7% rate of heart damage in the Thailand study.
At a more conservative 20% injury rate, we are looking at 50M Americans with heart damage caused by the jab.
As more studies are done, it’s going to be crystal clear why so many people are dying suddenly, especially kids. It’s also going to explain why nursing homes have lost up to 33% of their residents in 12 months where before they were losing only 1 or 2% a year. It’s going to explain why I was unable to find even a single nursing home where the all-cause mortality dropped after the vaccines rolled out. And it’s going to explain why none of the nursing homes wanted to talk to me about what happened to people after the shots rolled out.
Confidence in the CDC and the medical community should hit rock bottom after it is revealed how extensive the damage caused by these vaccines is.
The fact that the Thailand study was published in a peer-reviewed journal, that they only did the easy-to-do assessments (which only found a portion of the damage), and the FAA quietly changed their EKG guidance should at least open your mind to the possibility that I might be right.
This narrative is going to start falling apart at an accelerated rate.
Stay tuned. The best is yet to come. And it’s going to be epic.
 

"reportedly" soooooo someone heard from a friend who knew someone that had a cousin who dated someone that had an uncle who used to work as a janitor in the hospital he died in said it?

meanwhile even leana wen, one of the more unhinged covid fearporn proselytizers, is realizing its time to admit the bullsht that went on. i'm sure she's now just another right wing extremist though. just like that damned tim robbins. i suppose its easier for some people to live in denial than accept being wrong on covid, but that group is shrinking by the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Is this like when you said in error that Diamond died from covid?
Do you know that she didn't? Her sister could clear this up quickly if she'd just release the cause of death....unless she's worried the donations would stop rolling in.....
WOW!! Incredibly disturbing.


The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal. We should be concerned. Very concerned.​

After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded. It looks like the vax gave at least 50M Americans heart damage.​


Steve Kirsch
24 hr ago
How airlines plan to create new generation of pilots at time of crisis
The FAA just telegraphed the fact that a substantial number of airline pilots have had serious heart damage from the COVID vaccine by widening the ECG parameters for pilots.
In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the FAA quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal range (from a PR max of .2 to unlimited). And they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout.
This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it.
But you can’t hide these things for long.
This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.
The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots.
My best guess right now is that over 50M Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.
That’s a lot of people who will be very upset when they realize the vaccine they took to reduce their chance of dying from COVID actually worked in reverse making it:
  1. More likely that people will get COVID
  2. Be hospitalized from COVID and other diseases
  3. Die from COVID (and other diseases)
  4. You also have an excellent chance of getting a lifetime of heart damage for no extra charge.
But don’t worry; you can’t sue them. They fixed the law so none of them aren’t liable (the doctors, the drug companies, the government). After all, you took the vaccine of your own free will. It’s not like you were forced (or coerced) to take it or anything like that! And there were plenty of people warning you not to take the shots (even though they censored most of them).
In this article, I will explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims.
As I learn more, I will refine the estimate.

Introduction​

On October 24, 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the EKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly.
The PR (a measure of heart function) used to be in the range of .12 to .2.
It is now: .12 to .3 and potentially even higher.
This is a very wide range; it accommodates people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change:

Why did they make the change?​

Why would they do that?
I’ll take an educated guess as to why they did that. I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted.
And why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media?
I’m pretty sure they won’t tell me, so I’ll speculate: it’s because they didn’t want anyone to know.
In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren’t allowed to do that.

Why we sure it was the vaccine that did it​

There are several clues that are consistent with “it was the vaccine and not COVID”:
  1. They were quiet about it. If it was COVID, you can be public. But the vaccine is supposed to be safe.
  2. The timing. October 2022 is late for COVID. If it was due to COVID, it would have happened well before now. They can make changes every month.
  3. The vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID (which creates NO added risk per this large-scale Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults after Covid infection).
  4. Anecdotally, cardiologists only started to notice the damage post-vaccine.
  5. All the sudden deaths started post-vaccine.

The data supporting my 20% damage estimate​

I know from a study of 177 people in Puerto Rico (97% of whom were vaccinated) ages 8 to 84, that 70% of those people, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device (from Heart Care Corp), exhibited objective signs of cardiac injury.
There was a study done on pilots. It will be published in The Epoch Times later this week. That indicated heart damage in over 20% of pilots screened (The Epoch Times will release the exact number).
The Thailand study showed nearly 30% of kids were injured. But kids are indestructible so a 30% injury rate in kids translates into a higher rate for adults.
VAERS shows that cardiac damage happens at all ages, not just the young:

Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nations pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly.
The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that.

The change: from 200 msec to 300 msec and beyond

The changes were made on October 24, 2022 to the GUIDE FOR AVIATION MEDICAL EXAMINERS.
Here is the change log where you can see the change listed (see page 4):

Here is what the policy was before the change. It was just one row:

Here are what it looks like as of Oct 24, 2022 (click the image to see the context):

So it’s now two rows, one for less than 300 ms (it used to be 200 ms), and a second row to handle 300 ms or more.
For more information about the change, see Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.

The Thailand study​

In the US, we are not allowed to do lab tests on people before and after the vaccine.
The reason for that is simple: it would make it crystal clear that the vaccines are unsafe. That is why there are no before/after studies in the US. There never will be.
Why? Because that is how science works in America today: it’s unethical to design a study that might expose that the COVID vaccines that they forced us to take cause harm.
Think I’m kidding about how they game the trials? Get yourself a copy of Turtles All the Way Down and just read the first chapter. It’s eye opening.
Even though we can’t do a before/after study in the US, they did such a study in Thailand on 301 kids. They found that 29.24% of the participants developed cardiac injuries within days after they got the second shot:

But here’s the most important part about that study that nobody points out:

In other words, the 29% rate of injury was a lower bound of injury.
If you did a cardiac MRI on all those kids, you are going to find stuff that you will not find using the cheap and easy tests. Maybe a lot of stuff.

Summary​

I believe that the actual rate of heart injury from these vaccines will be found to be well over the 29.7% rate of heart damage in the Thailand study.
At a more conservative 20% injury rate, we are looking at 50M Americans with heart damage caused by the jab.
As more studies are done, it’s going to be crystal clear why so many people are dying suddenly, especially kids. It’s also going to explain why nursing homes have lost up to 33% of their residents in 12 months where before they were losing only 1 or 2% a year. It’s going to explain why I was unable to find even a single nursing home where the all-cause mortality dropped after the vaccines rolled out. And it’s going to explain why none of the nursing homes wanted to talk to me about what happened to people after the shots rolled out.
Confidence in the CDC and the medical community should hit rock bottom after it is revealed how extensive the damage caused by these vaccines is.
The fact that the Thailand study was published in a peer-reviewed journal, that they only did the easy-to-do assessments (which only found a portion of the damage), and the FAA quietly changed their EKG guidance should at least open your mind to the possibility that I might be right.
This narrative is going to start falling apart at an accelerated rate.
Stay tuned. The best is yet to come. And it’s going to be epic.
 
You stated it as a fact. That is incorrect per Silk who would know.
Wait a minute Growler, you NEVER care if stories are accurate before you spam the board with them 365 days a year. Silk DID NOT say she DIDN'T die of COVID, another mis-truth by you.
 
"reportedly" soooooo someone heard from a friend who knew someone that had a cousin who dated someone that had an uncle who used to work as a janitor in the hospital he died in said it?

meanwhile even leana wen, one of the more unhinged covid fearporn proselytizers, is realizing its time to admit the bullsht that went on. i'm sure she's now just another right wing extremist though. just like that damned tim robbins. i suppose its easier for some people to live in denial than accept being wrong on covid, but that group is shrinking by the day.
Conflating issues much? Leana Wen has NOT said that people are dying suddenly from vaccination and you can **** right off with your "reportedly" nonsense. How thoroughly do you vet the anti-vaccine pablum you post here?
 
Wait a minute Growler, you NEVER care if stories are accurate before you spam the board with them 365 days a year. Silk DID NOT say she DIDN'T die of COVID, another mis-truth by you.
She did and so did Mike Lindell.
 
Conflating issues much? Leana Wen has NOT said that people are dying suddenly from vaccination and you can **** right off with your "reportedly" nonsense. How thoroughly do you vet the anti-vaccine pablum you post here?

conflating? where did i say she said people were dying from the vax? can you point that out for me? of course not, just reading whatever you want to as usual. she particularly pointed out how badly deaths were overcounted. for his part, tim robbins came forward to admit how wrong and dystopian the covid response was. once again you read what you want while failing the grasp the point - more and more people waking up to and admitting bullsht that went on with how covid was handled. if you're gonna run your mouth you should probably be able to respond competently. how many times are you gonna embarrass yourself?

ps...learn what anti-vax means too. just one more way you embarrass yourself sounding like a radicalized zealot that just parrots words without any understanding of what they mean or why you think they apply. its hard to watch happen repeatedly
 
conflating? where did i say she said people were dying from the vax? can you point that out for me? of course not, just reading whatever you want to as usual. she particularly pointed out how badly deaths were overcounted. for his part, tim robbins came forward to admit how wrong and dystopian the covid response was. once again you read what you want while failing the grasp the point - more and more people waking up to and admitting bullsht that went on with how covid was handled. if you're gonna run your mouth you should probably be able to respond competently. how many times are you gonna embarrass yourself?

ps...learn what anti-vax means too. just one more way you embarrass yourself sounding like a radicalized zealot that just parrots words without any understanding of what they mean or why you think they apply. its hard to watch happen repeatedly
Let me see if I can make this easy for you. You and Growls are posting stories about people who are dying suddenly and the implication is that the vaccine was the cause.

I respond with a post about an anti-vaxxer who died suddenly - so the subject is "people who die suddenly" GET IT?

Then you respond with this word mash that references Leana Wen, who was NOT discussing the subject we are talking about in this thread - therefore you are conflating two different subjects that you believe will make sense, but it's really just an excuse to make an unrelated jab that you believe will own me. This shouldn't be this hard.

"reportedly" soooooo someone heard from a friend who knew someone that had a cousin who dated someone that had an uncle who used to work as a janitor in the hospital he died in said it?

meanwhile even leana wen, one of the more unhinged covid fearporn proselytizers, is realizing its time to admit the bullsht that went on. i'm sure she's now just another right wing extremist though. just like that damned tim robbins. i suppose its easier for some people to live in denial than accept being wrong on covid, but that group is shrinking by the day.
 
Hard cold science here but the mrna brigade will blow it off. I bet big pharma is secretly trying to develop cures for the vaccine damage and rna modifications.


VERY URGENT: After four shots, Covid jabs sharply REDUCED immune function in mice​

Chinese researchers reported the results in a peer-reviewed paper published last month. The finding has gotten no attention. It needs attention.​


Alex Berenson

Mice who received more than four Covid vaccine jabs had a collapse in their ability to fight the coronavirus, Chinese researchers have found.
The damage extended past antibodies, the immune system’s front line of defense against viruses and bacteria, to the T-cells that form the crucial backup.
The researchers reported the finding in a peer-reviewed paper published December 22 in the journal iScience. In surprisingly clear language, they warned:
Our findings demonstrate potential risks with the continuous use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, providing immediate implications [emphasis added] for the global COVID-19 vaccination enhancement strategies.
Later in the paper, the researchers were even more direct:
We found that the protective effects from the humoral immunity and cellular immunity established by the conventional immunization were both profoundly impaired during the extended vaccination course.
The finding has not been confirmed in humans.
But the mice the researchers used are genetically altered to model accurately the human response to the coronavirus and have “been shown to share profound similarities [emphasis added] with humans in response to SARS-CoV-2 infections,” as the paper explains.
The scientists used a vaccine that has a different mechanism of basic action than the mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna, which turn our own cells into spike protein factories. But like them, the Chinese-tested vaccine causes the immune system to focus on a specific part of the coronavirus spike protein to the near-exclusion of other responses.
The finding may help to explain why large epidemiological studies keep finding that people who have received multiple boosters are at higher risk for Omicron infection than unvaccinated people.
(Highlights: Extended immunizations destroy the immune system’s ability to fight the coronavirus)


SOURCE

(SUBSCRIBE NOW! BUT ONLY IF YOU’RE READY FOR THE TRUTH.)
Subscribe


The Chinese report comes as Covid deaths are rising again in several highly mRNA vaccinated countries, including Australia, Denmark, and Japan - where they have now reached an all-time high, the population-adjusted equivalent of about 9,000 weekly deaths in the United States.
Meanwhile, large epidemiological studies - which measure real-world vaccine results - keep showing that mRNA jabs have “negative efficacy” against the coronavirus. In other words, people who received them are more likely to become infected than those who were never vaccinated.
Last month, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic reported that they had found “the higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19."
And last week a very large French study reported that a second mRNA booster was less effective than the first at every comparable time interval - and that after four months it actually raised the risk for infection compared to people who had not received it. Even worse,
In the chart below, lower dots represent a higher risk of infection. The horizontal axis is time, roughly one dot per month. The blue dots are people who have received a second mRNA booster, or fourth shot. After six months, they have a 30 percent higher risk of infection than they did before they got it. Worse, the negative efficacy appears to accelerate over time.
(With apologies to Howard Cosell: Down goes efficacy! Down goes efficacy! Down goes efficacy! The area in yellow represents higher risk in people who received the fourth shot.)


SOURCE

In contrast, the Chinese researchers were looking at Covid vaccine effects at the cellular level. They injected mice with several doses of purified spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD).
The receptor binding domain is the most crucial part of the coronavirus spike protein. It attaches to the receptors on our cells that allow the virus to dump its payload into them.
BioNTech and Pfizer initially considered targeting it alone for their mRNA vaccine before deciding to make a broader version that would cause our cells to make the entire spike. (The RBD-only version was called BNT162b1, as opposed to BNT162b2, which ultimately became the version BioNTech and Pfizer sell.)
The vaccine the Chinese scientists used differs from the Pfizer or Moderna shots because does not cause cells in the recipient to produce the coronavirus spike protein. It is more like the Novavax vaccine, which is spike protein itself.
But both the mRNA and Novavax vaccines ultimately work by producing an immune response that is highly focused not just on the spike protein but its RBD portion. In this way they are very similar to the vaccine the Chinese researchers used.
The researchers found that after receiving three or four doses of the vaccine, the mice had an strong immune response, similar to the early response in people who received the standard two-dose mRNA regimen:
We found that the conventional immunization course could stimulate sustained levels of neutralizing antibodies and promote the antigen specific CD4+ and CD8+T cell reactivity.
But when the researchers gave the mice fifth and sixth doses, they found a paradoxical weakening effect in both antibodies and underlying parts of the immune system, including B-cells and T-cells.
Essentially, the mice appeared to suffer immune tolerance or outright exhaustion and to become more vulnerable to coronavirus infection. The researchers wrote:
When we administrated additional doses of the same vaccine booster, with the attempt to induce a similarly enhanced or at least sustained immune response, we observed an overt reduction of the overall immune responses.

(A lot of charts, all saying the same thing: more than four doses are not good for mouse T-cells.)



The researchers suggested that one potential solution to the problem would be to switch vaccine types for boosters, a strategy known as “heterologous” boosting. Unfortunately, neither they nor anyone else has offered any evidence that strategy will work.
The paper has so far received almost no notice.
I found it only because the French preprint about the second booster made a glancing reference to it: “Moreover, it has been shown in animal model that repeated boosters induce humoral and cellular immune tolerance.”
But as governments around the world continue to press boosters on largely unwilling populations, this paper shows more clearly than ever the risks they are running - and why further Covid vaccinations must be suspended unless researchers can prove that the immune collapse found in mice will not also happen in humans.
 
Let me see if I can make this easy for you. You and Growls are posting stories about people who are dying suddenly and the implication is that the vaccine was the cause.

I respond with a post about an anti-vaxxer who died suddenly - so the subject is "people who die suddenly" GET IT?

Then you respond with this word mash that references Leana Wen, who was NOT discussing the subject we are talking about in this thread - therefore you are conflating two different subjects that you believe will make sense, but it's really just an excuse to make an unrelated jab that you believe will own me. This shouldn't be this hard.

i posted a video thats pretty ironic. you decided to respond with some story about a guy who didnt get the vaccine "reportedly" dying of covid. interesting they used the cya verbiage because why let facts get in the way of celebrating someones death. irrelevant but ok.

the important subject, especially for you, is coming to terms with lies and bullsht throughout the entirety of covid, all of which youve ardently supported. its not a good look that you continue to deny reality that the damage done by policies in the name of covid protection is astronomically greater than anything positive generated. its similarly not a good look to continue ignorantly stumping for the experimental vaccine that is producing far more health problems than i ever anticipated - and doing so to mostly young people. see i'm trying to help you here bud...im giving you a couple examples of the many, many people waking up and admitting they were wrong. theres absolutely no one going the other direction for a reason. theres no point in going down with the ship
 
i posted a video thats pretty ironic. you decided to respond with some story about a guy who didnt get the vaccine "reportedly" dying of covid. interesting they used the cya verbiage because why let facts get in the way of celebrating someones death. irrelevant but ok.

the important subject, especially for you, is coming to terms with lies and bullsht throughout the entirety of covid, all of which youve ardently supported. its not a good look that you continue to deny reality that the damage done by policies in the name of covid protection is astronomically greater than anything positive generated. its similarly not a good look to continue ignorantly stumping for the experimental vaccine that is producing far more health problems than i ever anticipated - and doing so to mostly young people. see i'm trying to help you here bud...im giving you a couple examples of the many, many people waking up and admitting they were wrong. theres absolutely no one going the other direction for a reason. theres no point in going down with the ship
Again, you use the word "reportedly" for my post after I respond to a post of yours that shows a lady fainting. What was the implication there Beavis?

Isn't it funny how anti-vaxxers know of seemingly endless cases of vaccine injury when the percentage of actual confirmed cases is 0.00320045721%. Take your MAGA influenced propaganda somewhere else - we should be dealing with reality, not amplifying fear porn.

"Findings: From 14 December 2020 through 31 May 2022 (persons 18–39 years) and 20 August 2022 (persons 5–17 years), 320 potential cases of myocarditis/pericarditis were identified 1 to 98 days after 6 992 340 vaccine doses as part of primary series COVID-19 vaccination, with 224 (70%) verified."

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jjh7
Again, you use the word "reportedly" for my post after I respond to a post of yours that shows a lady fainting. What was the implication there Beavis?

Isn't it funny how anti-vaxxers know of seemingly endless cases of vaccine injury when the percentage of actual confirmed cases is 0.00320045721%. Take your MAGA influenced propaganda somewhere else - we should be dealing with reality, not amplifying fear porn.

"Findings: From 14 December 2020 through 31 May 2022 (persons 18–39 years) and 20 August 2022 (persons 5–17 years), 320 potential cases of myocarditis/pericarditis were identified 1 to 98 days after 6 992 340 vaccine doses as part of primary series COVID-19 vaccination, with 224 (70%) verified."


my post? because there's a reasonable chance it was the vax and its funny because she was actively defending it. but mostly its funny because i knew youd get your jimmies rustled.

you might wanna try turning your brain on. normal people don't base their identity or views on a party or politician. until you get that you're beyond clueless.

the idea you think you've been right on anything to do with covid is a seriously concerning level of delusion. if you dont get it at this point its pretty unfortunate
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
my post? because there's a reasonable chance it was the vax and its funny because she was actively defending it. but mostly its funny because i knew youd get your jimmies rustled.

you might wanna try turning your brain on. normal people don't base their identity or views on a party or politician. until you get that you're beyond clueless.

the idea you think you've been right on anything to do with covid is a seriously concerning level of delusion. if you dont get it at this point its pretty unfortunate
😅 🤣 😅 🤣 😅
 
very good job you found emojis eh bud? cool now dont come back until youre capable of processing, forming, and expressing independent thought.
🤣 Says the conspiracy theorist who walks in lock-step with every tenet of MAGA doctrine.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT