ADVERTISEMENT

Democrat Corruption



Buckle up, folks, because the Democrats have been caught red-handed raiding Medicare like it’s their personal ATM!

They siphoned off a whopping $250 BILLION from the Climate Action Fund and poured it straight into their pet projects.

But wait it gets worse! That’s on top of the $850 BILLION they’ve already drained from the Affordable Care Act. Add it all together, and that’s a staggering $1.1 TRILLION snatched from Medicare’s coffers!

A gut-wrenching, trust-shattering scandal!😡
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73



Where were all the lovers of the Constitution when:

1. The Biden administration extended the eviction moratorium after COVID by abusing their emergency powers at the expense of private property rights.

2. Issued vaccine mandates for workers because their “patience” had run thin. This was struck down by the courts as unconstitutional.

3. Our constitution gives the legislative branch the power to pass laws. Biden was not able to cancel student loan debt by getting Congress to vote on a bill to do so. So, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris did this by executive of fiat. They did this after the Supreme Court said it was unconstitutional. Twice.

4. In violation of our first amendment, they tried to enact a disinformation governing board to censor your free speech. Ultimately the public backlash was so great that they scrapped the project for now.

5. Through executive fiat and death by regulation they upended our energy policies making our emergency oil reserves drop to the lowest they have been since 1984. They killed the Keystone pipeline and they defied court rulings and continued to opt out against holding oil drilling sales.

6. They threatened and coerced social media companies to silence the speech of American citizens because it did not agree with the position of the government in violation of the first amendment.

7. Ignored immigration laws, and granted parole to like millions of illegal aliens.

9. In violation of our laws they have failed to secure our border and have allowed 425,000 criminals who have been convicted into the country.

10. Targeted parents for protesting at their children’s school board meetings in violation of their first amendment rights of free speech and have had the FBI place them on a watchlist.

11. Targeted pro-life demonstrators and thrown them in prison while letting pro-abortion activists burn down clinics.

12. They were not able to pass any legislation in Congress to force their transgender agenda into the school system so they passed it by executive fiat and the courts struck down much of it at this point.

Where were all the people screaming authoritarian dictator and all these other things that they are now running around here screaming about in the media?

Serious question?
 
These scumbags do have nuts though. Theft on a grand scale.

LIE

Critical Analysis
  • Plausibility of the Claims: The scale of the alleged laundering—billions of dollars funneled to fronts with no accountability—is extraordinary and would require significant coordination and concealment across multiple federal agencies. While the IRA’s rapid rollout and complex grant processes have faced criticism for oversight gaps, there’s no concrete evidence of systemic criminality on the scale claimed. The EPA’s GGRF, for instance, is subject to federal audits and reporting requirements, though delays in disbursing funds (only $2.8 billion of $27 billion awarded by mid-2024) have fueled perceptions of mismanagement.
  • Source Reliability: The primary sources for these allegations are X posts and outlets like Infowars, which often amplify unverified or speculative claims. The lack of corroboration from primary documents, court filings, or official investigations undermines their credibility. The Stacey Abrams allegation, for example, appears only in X posts and lacks any official confirmation.
  • Podesta’s Involvement: As a senior advisor, Podesta’s role was strategic, not operational. Direct oversight of fund allocation would fall to agency heads like EPA Administrator Michael Regan. Claims that Podesta personally ran a "slush fund" oversimplify the bureaucratic process and lack evidence tying him to specific misdeeds.
  • Paris Agreement Connection: The reference to the Paris Agreement as a laundering mechanism is vague and unsupported. The Paris Agreement is an international framework for climate commitments, not a funding mechanism. U.S. contributions to global climate funds (e.g., the Green Climate Fund) are separate from the IRA and far smaller in scale.
Establishment Narrative vs. Skepticism
The establishment narrative, as reflected in government statements and mainstream media, portrays the IRA as a landmark climate investment, with oversight mechanisms to ensure accountability. Critics, including those on X, argue that the rapid creation of NGOs and the complexity of grant programs create opportunities for waste or corruption. While some concerns about transparency are valid—new NGOs receiving large grants raise legitimate questions—the leap to "the greatest money laundering operation in history" is hyperbolic and unsubstantiated without hard evidence like indictments or whistleblower testimony.

Conclusion
The claim that John Podesta oversaw a $375 billion climate fund that was "the greatest money laundering operation on the planet" is not supported by credible evidence. The $375 billion refers to the IRA’s climate provisions, which are administered by federal agencies with oversight, not by Podesta alone. Allegations of widespread laundering stem from X posts and lack corroboration from official sources. While there are valid concerns about transparency in some EPA grant programs, the scale and specifics of the accusations—especially ties to terrorism or figures like Stacey Abrams—remain unproven and speculative. For further details on the IRA or EPA programs, official sources like epa.gov or congressional reports are more reliable than social media claims.

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
LIE

Critical Analysis
  • Plausibility of the Claims: The scale of the alleged laundering—billions of dollars funneled to fronts with no accountability—is extraordinary and would require significant coordination and concealment across multiple federal agencies. While the IRA’s rapid rollout and complex grant processes have faced criticism for oversight gaps, there’s no concrete evidence of systemic criminality on the scale claimed. The EPA’s GGRF, for instance, is subject to federal audits and reporting requirements, though delays in disbursing funds (only $2.8 billion of $27 billion awarded by mid-2024) have fueled perceptions of mismanagement.
  • Source Reliability: The primary sources for these allegations are X posts and outlets like Infowars, which often amplify unverified or speculative claims. The lack of corroboration from primary documents, court filings, or official investigations undermines their credibility. The Stacey Abrams allegation, for example, appears only in X posts and lacks any official confirmation.
  • Podesta’s Involvement: As a senior advisor, Podesta’s role was strategic, not operational. Direct oversight of fund allocation would fall to agency heads like EPA Administrator Michael Regan. Claims that Podesta personally ran a "slush fund" oversimplify the bureaucratic process and lack evidence tying him to specific misdeeds.
  • Paris Agreement Connection: The reference to the Paris Agreement as a laundering mechanism is vague and unsupported. The Paris Agreement is an international framework for climate commitments, not a funding mechanism. U.S. contributions to global climate funds (e.g., the Green Climate Fund) are separate from the IRA and far smaller in scale.
Establishment Narrative vs. Skepticism
The establishment narrative, as reflected in government statements and mainstream media, portrays the IRA as a landmark climate investment, with oversight mechanisms to ensure accountability. Critics, including those on X, argue that the rapid creation of NGOs and the complexity of grant programs create opportunities for waste or corruption. While some concerns about transparency are valid—new NGOs receiving large grants raise legitimate questions—the leap to "the greatest money laundering operation in history" is hyperbolic and unsubstantiated without hard evidence like indictments or whistleblower testimony.

Conclusion
The claim that John Podesta oversaw a $375 billion climate fund that was "the greatest money laundering operation on the planet" is not supported by credible evidence. The $375 billion refers to the IRA’s climate provisions, which are administered by federal agencies with oversight, not by Podesta alone. Allegations of widespread laundering stem from X posts and lack corroboration from official sources. While there are valid concerns about transparency in some EPA grant programs, the scale and specifics of the accusations—especially ties to terrorism or figures like Stacey Abrams—remain unproven and speculative. For further details on the IRA or EPA programs, official sources like epa.gov or congressional reports are more reliable than social media claims.

He's a crook and you condone it.
 

It is more fiscally responsible to try and free illegals in this country than it is to waste all that money flying to el salvador and trying to bring them back. And as a bonus we can arrest them here and jail them here.

Costs less money and we get a better outcome. I like it.
 
You should know from the J6 thread but a lot were detained in the DC jail for years with no trial or bail.
So they did or did not receive a trial, with a jury or bench, representation, right to appeal, etc? I am fine with the argument that maybe some of them didn’t get a fair trial, or had unnecessary procedural delays (on purpose or not, idk). But don’t see how any of that relates to due process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374


🚨 CBS Colorado investigation finds Denver Democrat Mayor Mike Johnston has directed his staff to move over to a messaging service that AUTO DELETES all their messages so Trump Admin can’t recover their conversations

“Our investigation has found that Mayor Mike Johnston and about 14 of his appointees and advisors turned to an encrypted messaging app in January that automatically deleted their messages and conversations.

The administration of Mayor Johnston says that they went to this encrypted messaging in auto deletion because of President Trump and his immigration policies and the way he was treating cities like Denver.

Advocates for open records say that what we've uncovered here was an intentional evasion of Colorado public records laws”
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Allornothing
Good point.



What’s the point of political discourse if one party is not bound by the truth? Every single Democrat is lying through their freaking teeth about Medicaid and nobody in the media calls them out on it, and it’s the only narrative that sticks and it makes political discourse in this country. Impossible to freaking deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT