ADVERTISEMENT

Democrat Corruption

You know what affected the elections? Using government resources, i.e. the FBI along with Hillary Clinton. to FABIRCICATE claims that a political opponent was a Russian asset. You don't think that affected the election?
Were you this upset when Comey publicly announced the investigation into Clinton 1-2 weeks before the election in '16, but refused to acknowledge the Trump investigation publicly?
 
You know what affected the elections? Using government resources, i.e. the FBI along with Hillary Clinton. to FABIRCICATE claims that a political opponent was a Russian asset. You don't think that affected the election?
The election he WON? No, I don't think your made up version of events affected that election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
The election he WON? No, I don't think your made up version of events affected that election.
And the two year "investigation" that was required because ........ they made it up. It was a fake investigation designed to sabotage. That is cheating.
 
And the two year "investigation" that was required because ........ they made it up. It was a fake investigation designed to sabotage. That is cheating.
YOUR party under Trump's admin investigated him because of a tip from the Aussie ambassador that Papadopolous was trying to peddle fake Hillary dirt from the Russians. THAT'S WHAT CHEATING IS!

Get it through your head that these claims were made up BY YOU

 
YOUR party under Trump's admin investigated him because of a tip from the Aussie ambassador that Papadopolous was trying to peddle fake Hillary dirt from the Russians. THAT'S WHAT CHEATING IS!

Get it through your head that these claims were made up BY YOU

It's a lost cause. They're living in their own world of misinformation.
 
Little @dpic73 still uses Newsweek as a source? Lol They should have just said 100%.

One day dpic, one day, you will realize what propaganda is.

And lol at him being guilty. Not gonna happen, even with this NYC jury and activist judge. If he somehow were convicted though it will be reversed by the supreme ct.
No Comrade Dipshyt will never learn because he knows he is full of shyt. I mean nobody can be that stupid to think the things he says and even when you show the law he will deny it lol. He's either evil and dishonest or just dumb and ignorant. Either one is not good...
 
YOUR party under Trump's admin investigated him because of a tip from the Aussie ambassador that Papadopolous was trying to peddle fake Hillary dirt from the Russians. THAT'S WHAT CHEATING IS!

Get it through your head that these claims were made up BY YOU



This is 100% false and well documented as such.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
No Comrade Dipshyt will never learn because he knows he is full of shyt. I mean nobody can be that stupid to think the things he says and even when you show the law he will deny it lol. He's either evil and dishonest or just dumb and ignorant. Either one is not good...
And you know this how? Licking Tim Pool's taint doesn't give you the knowledge to disprove anything I've said, nor could you ever because you don't deal with facts - only your uneducated feelings. F your feelings
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
This is 100% false and well documented as such.
PROVE IT

"Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said a GOP memo alleging FBI misconduct has nothing to do with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s actions in the 2016 election and possible links to President Donald Trump’s campaign.

“Not to me, it doesn’t — and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it,” Gowdy told CBS’s Margaret Brennan for an interview set to air on “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower.”

“The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos’ meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice.”
 
And you know this how? Licking Tim Pool's taint doesn't give you the knowledge to disprove anything I've said, nor could you ever because you don't deal with facts - only your uneducated feelings. F your feelings
Ive linked you laws not a twitter post or wiki in the past and you deny the law for a twitter post because it fits your argument when the law didnt. Your a very dishonest person and a real pos to be blunt. After my brother-in-law passed 3 weeks after getting a jab you mocked him. You are the kind of pos that I dont care to ever get along with ever. If you want to save the planet, democracy, and Ukraine so bad please go and join the fight there. Stop trying to get everybody killed by starting WW3 trying to save a bunch of real Nazi's in Ukraine... PS- Pool is way more trustworthy than you could ever be...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
Ive linked you laws not a twitter post or wiki in the past and you deny the law for a twitter post because it fits your argument when the law didnt. Your a very dishonest person and a real pos to be blunt. After my brother-in-law passed 3 weeks after getting a jab you mocked him. You are the kind of pos that I dont care to ever get along with ever. If you want to save the planet, democracy, and Ukraine so bad please go and join the fight there. Stop trying to get everybody killed by starting WW3 trying to save a bunch of real Nazi's in Ukraine... PS- Pool is way more trustworthy than you could ever be...
"You're"

if you can't get that right you need to shut up about everything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
It's a lost cause. They're living in their own world of misinformation.

I have come to realize this. Most of these guys are lost causes. kudos to @TigerGrowls for openly admitting that he only looks at new sources that corroborate his existing beliefs, and ignores everything else.

Sadly, @fatpiggy is not that self aware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Didn’t we already do this election once? How’d that turn out for Donnie? Landslide if I’m remembering correctly.

They are just setting the table so that when trump loses, they can claim he was cheated again.
 
Is this what America wants?




Boston Mayor @wutrain said she would support a policy that refuses to prosecute the following crimes:

-shoplifting
-larceny
-disorderly conduct
-receiving stolen property
-driving with a suspended license
-breaking and entering with property damage
-wanton and malicious destruction of property
-threats
-minor in possession of alcohol
-marijuana possession
-possession with intent to distribute
-non-marijuana drug possession

Democrats want to protect criminals and put Americans in danger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

Interesting. The 20 year NDAs that crew on the apprentice are expiring this year. There are already several coming forward to discuss how often trump used the N word. It would be a shame if the recordings of that dropped before the election.

A damn shame.

I would offer to bring you in our ban bet over the election results.... but you know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and okclem


Ever since Donald Trump emerged as a presidential contender nine years ago, America’s most esteemed scholars and journalists have argued that he was violating democratic norms. Trump, they said, was ignoring the stabilizing, unwritten rules and values of American politics. This was evident in his vulgar language, vilification of immigrants, criticisms of the press, lack of cooperation with the intelligence community, and refusal to accept the 2020 election results.

But the Democrats’ relentless effort to imprison Trump has undermined the rule of law, faith in the criminal justice system, and democratic norms more than anything Trump has ever done.

According to multiple credible sources, President Barack Obama’s Director of the CIA, in the summer of 2016, illegally mobilized foreign spy agencies to target 26 Trump advisors to claim, falsely, that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin controlled Trump.

Then, in January 2017, after Trump had been elected but before he took office, the U.S. Intelligence Community falsely claimedthat Putin had favored the election of Trump when, in reality, the intelligence showed that Putin favored Hillary Clinton.

After taking office, current and former US government intelligence operatives and Democrats falsely claimed that Russian disinformation on social media had resulted in Trump’s election and worked with the Department of Homeland Security to censor social media platforms.

None of this is a defense of Trump. He uses extreme and inflammatory rhetoric, particularly about immigrants, that I strongly disagree with. He was wrong to deny and try to change the results of the 2020 elections. And I think people are right to fear that, if he were re-elected, he could weaponize the government to exact revenge on his political enemies.

But that fear is further proof of the danger of Democrats weaponizing the government. Democrats went far beyond anything Trump did when it came to abusing their political power. After the Supreme Court ruled that Biden could not legally forgive student loans, he did so anyway. By contrast, Trump did not violate any Supreme Court rulings.

It’s true that Trump has criticized judges, journalists, and intelligence agencies, but why is that a bad thing? We have a separation of powers for a reason.

As for the intelligence agencies, they broke the law multiple times in targeting Trump. As for the news media, they deserve criticism for losing the public’s trust after lying about everything from the origins of Covid to the efficacy of the Covid vaccine to the Russiagate hoax.

Or consider the prosecution of Trump for supposedly taking and holding onto classified documents. It’s not obvious that Trump put national security in greater danger than Biden. There is evidence that the Biden administration worked with the National Archives and Department of Justice to demand the confrontation. And there is the possibility that the raid was motivated in order to recover documents related to the Russiagate hoax.

And the abuse of the court system by Democrats in an effort to incarcerate Trump and keep him off the ballot is far more of a violation of norms than anything Trump ever dreamed of.

The recent felony conviction of Trump for falsifying business records relies on the idea that he misclassified campaign payments. Democrats say, “Nobody is above the law,” which is true. But Democrats are wrong to ignore the fact that prosecutors are constantly making choices about whether to pursue certain cases over others. Indeed, Hillary Clinton was found to have mislabeled payments related to the Steele dossier during her 2016 campaign, and she was never prosecuted. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) merely fined Clinton and the Democratic National Convention (DNC)) for this misconduct.

In fact, everything about New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s recent conviction of Trump is abnormal. For starters, Bragg campaigned on the promise to prosecute Trump. He turned the misdemeanor of falsifying business records into a felony by tying it to election interference. The case was so weak that both the Department of Justice and the former DA refused to prosecute it.

The judge in the case donated to Biden and his daughter is the president of a Democratic Party fundraising firm whose clients include Rep. Adam Schiff, who led the Russiagate hoax. The judge told the jurors that they didn’t need to agree on what crime Trump intended to commit by falsifying records.

The case confused even legal experts. “At the start of closing arguments,” wrote legal scholar Jonathan Turley, “most honest observers were still wondering what the prosecutors were alleging as to the crime that Trump was allegedly concealing with the falsification of business records.”

Even CNN’s top legal scholar, Elie Honig, who is also a former colleague of Bragg, said the trial violated norms. “Prosecutors Got Trump But They Contorted the Law,” explained Honig in New York Magazine. “The charges against Trump are obscure and nearly entirely unprecedented,” he said. “In fact, no state prosecutor— in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime against anyone for anything. None. Ever.”

All of this is a radical change from the ideals of the Democratic Party just a few years ago. In the 1970s and 1980s, Democrats fought to restrict and reform the intelligence community so that it would stop spying on American citizens for their political activities. Democrats defended a high standard for free speech, including the right of Nazis to march through neighborhoods of Holocaust survivors. And since the 1990s, Democrats have raised the alarm about the abuse of prosecutorial power and elected progressive prosecutors, including Bragg, to reduce prosecutions of nonviolent crimes.

Today, Democrats are pioneering new ways to weaponize the government....
 


Headlines in just the last few hours:

- Biden gives under the table amnesty to 350k illegals

- Biden breaking immigration law to give work permits to illegals

- Fauci’s agency scientists received $700M in royalties during pandemic

Our government is actively transforming the electorate to win elections while corrupt health bureaucrats are enriching themselves with hundreds of millions from the same companies whose products they tried to force on the public (except for illegals).

The DC ruling class hate you with every fiber of their being.
 


Tomorrow Joe Biden is expected to unveil his much-publicized "border security" executive order. According to reports, this order will limit new arrivals to 2,500/day — “only” 912,000 a year!

But did you know that Biden already took 296 executive actions on immigration during his first year in office alone?

89 of those actions directly reversed Trump policies.

207 of them did other horrible things, like:

- Greatly narrowing the number of illegals subject to arrest, detention and removal
- Reducing barriers to U.S. entry
- Granting illegals access to government benefits
- Raising the refugee resettlement ceiling to 125,000
- Removing more than 1 million illegals from Myanmar and Venezuela from deportation lists
- Seeking to remove other nationalities from deportation (was blocked by the courts)
- Granting "deferred action" for people claiming to be victims of crime

This was all in the first 365 days of his presidency! Biden gloated about all of this at the time.

This should be your only takeaway from the discussion of tomorrow’s order: We have the technology and the manpower to have zero illegal immigrants crossing the Mexican border, right now.

Every single smuggler, trafficker, and criminal entering this country is a choice. And for three years, Joe Biden chose to flood this country with millions of the rest of the world’s criminals, welfare cases, and parasites.

Now he fears losing reelection, so he’s trying to slow things down just long enough to keep the scam going another four years.

Don’t fall for it.
 


Insane! Corroborated Sources Confirm the US Government is giving the Taliban $40-87 Million Dollars a Week

“We’re now giving the Taliban $40-87 Million Dollars a Week…

We spent 20+ years fighting the Talibans (Al-Qaeda)… and at the drop of a hat, $40 million a week!

Everything is a f*cking lie…”

$40-87 million dollars a week equates to $2 to $4.5 billion dollars a year…
 
@LaniKaiTiger



🚨🚨We need to get this Judges name out there!🚨🚨

Judge Kollar-Kotelly sentenced
Paula Paulette Harlow, 75, of Kingston, Massachusetts, today to 24 months incarceration for praying outside an abortion clinic.

After Harlow's husband begged for mercy, expressing his fear that his wife would die alone in prison, the judge taunted that maybe Harlow would "make an effort to remain alive” because that is a “tenet of [Harlow’s] religion.”
 
@LaniKaiTiger



🚨🚨We need to get this Judges name out there!🚨🚨

Judge Kollar-Kotelly sentenced
Paula Paulette Harlow, 75, of Kingston, Massachusetts, today to 24 months incarceration for praying outside an abortion clinic.

After Harlow's husband begged for mercy, expressing his fear that his wife would die alone in prison, the judge taunted that maybe Harlow would "make an effort to remain alive” because that is a “tenet of [Harlow’s] religion.”

You don't have a 1st Amendment right to physically block others from accessing an abortion clinic.

Yell or pray outside the clinic all you want to. That aint what got her the jail time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT