Thanks fo that answer. Well thought out and I understand it.
I will have to give your points some more thought, but initially for me there are 3 things that come to my head:
- while kneeling is certainly a sign of respect in some situations, it can also be a sign of surrender. It can also be a sign of humility. The point is, the meaning of any action is based on context. Which brings me to my second point...
- The long standing tradition for the national anthem has been to stand. The context being that standing is a sign of respect for the country. Most people move from a sitting position to a standing, so for sure sitting would be a deliberate sign of disrespect. I will grant that since kneeling is an uncommon position to be in, there could be some gray area, but that brings me to my 3rd thought...
- The intention, the very nature of a protest is to break a norm in order to gain attention for a cause. As I recall, Kapernick knelt because he could not stand (show respect) for a country that let the type of police brutality that had been going on to continue. While that form of protest definitely breaks a norm, it is also, at the same time, is intentionally disrespecting the country. This is where for me - because of the intention behind how Kapernick started this form of protest - I cannot reconcile kneeling as a sign of respect.
I guess now that I have broken it down, I guess it does really come down to intent. If I am wrong about Kapernick’s intent let me know, but for me, because he set the standard, it applies to everyone that engages in that form of protest. Even if their personal view is that kneeling is not disrespectful.
I appreciate the dialogue.