ADVERTISEMENT

Has Pentagon depleted own stocks by sending Javelin missiles to Ukraine?

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
20,848
12,116
113
Another day and more dimwit decisions and just imagine if Kamalatoe somehow became potus. It can get worse and thats hard to say.

Why are the US taxpayers without any input on the hook for financing a losing war in Ukraine? Why is our military reserve supply being depleted for a losing cause. We are not in this war and there is no vital US interest.

This 33B that Biden wants to send Ukraine now includes 8BILLION dollars to fight disinformation around the globe! WTF!! THIS IS THE DEMS STEALING MONEY FROM THE US TAXPAYERS AND LAUNDERING IT IN A FOREIGN AID BILL. THEY LIKELY SEND SOME OF IT TO SOROS WHO THEN DONATES IT BACK TO THEM IN THE US TO STEAL OUR ELECTIONS AND CONTINUE TO TAKE AWAY OUR FREEDOMS AT HOME. THIS HAS TO STOP!!! THEY ARE USING OUR OWN MONEY TO BEAT THE HELL OUT OF US AND ARE NO DOUBT LAUGHING ABOUT IT!!! The dirty lying marxist dems were fighting tooth and nail to stop Trump from spending less than 10B dollars to fully fortify our southern border and yet they are happy to just blow money out the ass for any foreign cause. This is treasonous behaviour. We are not the United States of the World! Start asking serious questions and look at facts and you will see a bleak picture of what our formerly trusted leaders are doing to our nation. WAKE UP AMERICANS!


"Military planners are likely getting nervous," according to Mark Cancian, a security analyst for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

By Susan Katz Keating
Updated: May 4, 2022 - 11:05pm

The United States has delivered so many Javelin tank-buster missiles to Ukraine that the Pentagon's own stocks have dwindled perilously, according to defense insiders.
The U.S. has sent more than 5,000 Javelins to Ukraine, the Pentagon said, with analysts estimating that some 20,000-25,000 of the missiles remain in the Defense Department's inventory — an amount that may not be sufficient for potential U.S.-involved conflicts.
"Military planners are likely getting nervous," according to Mark Cancian, a security analyst for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The U.S. maintains a weapons stockpile in reserve in case conflict erupts in North Korea, Iran, or other potential hot spots, Cancian noted in an essay for CSIS.
"At some point, those stocks will get low enough that military planners will question whether the war plans can be executed," he wrote. "The United States is likely approaching that point."
Described by manufacturer Lockheed Martin as "the world's premier shoulder-fired anti-armor system," the 49-pound Javelin guides itself to the target and "takes the fight to the enemy." The missile can be fired from 2.5 miles away from the target, and climbs over the target in order to strike from above.
The system has been a boon to Ukrainian forces, who use the missile to strike Russian armor at its weakest spot, on top of each tank. The missile has produced a 90% kill rate against Russian armor in Ukraine, a senior defense official told reporters this week at the Pentagon.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday praised the missile and its assembly-line workers while visiting a Lockheed Martin production site in Alabama.
"You're allowing the Ukrainians to defend themselves and, quite frankly, they're making fools of the Russian military in many instances," Biden said while visiting the site in Troy, Ala. "A big part of the reason they've been able to keep up fighting and to make this war a strategic failure for Russia is because the United States together with our allies and partners have had their back."
Biden made the trip as part of his push for Congress to approve more funds to help Ukraine fend off a months-long assault that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered in February.
"You're changing the nation," Biden told the Lockheed workers. "You really are."
The Javelin deliveries to Ukraine might also bring changes to the U.S. in terms of depleted missile stocks, others have noted.
"The obvious answer is to build more missiles," Cancian wrote, adding that the U.S. has been buying Javelins at the rate of about 1,000 per year. "The delivery time is 32 months; that is, once an order is placed, it will take 32 months before a missile is delivered," he wrote. "This means that it will take about three or four years to replace the missiles that have been delivered so far."
The Pentagon downplayed the potential threat to U.S. Javelin missile stocks and deflected questions on how many remain on hand.
"We're not going to talk about what our own inventory is of anything," Defense Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters Monday at the Pentagon. "And I think you can understand why we wouldn't do that. We don't think it's particularly helpful to lay out what our inventory level is for any one particular system or set of munitions."
Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) last week said the stocks were depleted to the point that Biden should invoke the Defense Production Act in order to jumpstart new production lines.
"The cupboard is empty, or it will be very, very shortly unless the president invokes the Defense Production Act to provide that demand signal on an expedited basis," Blumenthal said at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The stocks are in good shape, Kirby countered.
"With every drawdown package, we make an assessment about the impact on our readiness," he said. "And what I can tell you is that thus far, we have not seen any negative impact on our ability to defend this nation across a range of military capabilities."
The issue "is not something we take lightly," Kirby said.
"It is a legitimate thing that we look at with each and every drawdown package," he added.
Ukraine likely could use additional Javelins, according to Cancian. Open-source reports show that Russia has lost about 1,300 armored vehicles in Ukraine, but has thousands more on hand.
"The bottom line is that the Russians are not going to run out of armored vehicles anytime soon," Cancian wrote.
 
I personally believe the insane marxist leaders of the dem party and repub party would absolutely invite a war with Russia in an attempt to save themselves being in power. Put nothing past those psychopaths!
 
Dude, at about $250k a piece, Javelin's are cheap. Raytheon will be happy to crank out more. What's more, most weapons have a shelf life. The Javelin's is 10 years. The electronics have to be tested and believe it or not, they components break even in storage. The explosive in the warhead can become unstable. And the propellant is often corrosive. The the missiles will be retired at some point.

We'll just buy more. Invest in Raytheon stock.
 
Another day and more dimwit decisions and just imagine if Kamalatoe somehow became potus. It can get worse and thats hard to say.

Why are the US taxpayers without any input on the hook for financing a losing war in Ukraine? Why is our military reserve supply being depleted for a losing cause. We are not in this war and there is no vital US interest.

This 33B that Biden wants to send Ukraine now includes 8BILLION dollars to fight disinformation around the globe! WTF!! THIS IS THE DEMS STEALING MONEY FROM THE US TAXPAYERS AND LAUNDERING IT IN A FOREIGN AID BILL. THEY LIKELY SEND SOME OF IT TO SOROS WHO THEN DONATES IT BACK TO THEM IN THE US TO STEAL OUR ELECTIONS AND CONTINUE TO TAKE AWAY OUR FREEDOMS AT HOME. THIS HAS TO STOP!!! THEY ARE USING OUR OWN MONEY TO BEAT THE HELL OUT OF US AND ARE NO DOUBT LAUGHING ABOUT IT!!! The dirty lying marxist dems were fighting tooth and nail to stop Trump from spending less than 10B dollars to fully fortify our southern border and yet they are happy to just blow money out the ass for any foreign cause. This is treasonous behaviour. We are not the United States of the World! Start asking serious questions and look at facts and you will see a bleak picture of what our formerly trusted leaders are doing to our nation. WAKE UP AMERICANS!


"Military planners are likely getting nervous," according to Mark Cancian, a security analyst for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

By Susan Katz Keating
Updated: May 4, 2022 - 11:05pm

The United States has delivered so many Javelin tank-buster missiles to Ukraine that the Pentagon's own stocks have dwindled perilously, according to defense insiders.
The U.S. has sent more than 5,000 Javelins to Ukraine, the Pentagon said, with analysts estimating that some 20,000-25,000 of the missiles remain in the Defense Department's inventory — an amount that may not be sufficient for potential U.S.-involved conflicts.
"Military planners are likely getting nervous," according to Mark Cancian, a security analyst for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The U.S. maintains a weapons stockpile in reserve in case conflict erupts in North Korea, Iran, or other potential hot spots, Cancian noted in an essay for CSIS.
"At some point, those stocks will get low enough that military planners will question whether the war plans can be executed," he wrote. "The United States is likely approaching that point."
Described by manufacturer Lockheed Martin as "the world's premier shoulder-fired anti-armor system," the 49-pound Javelin guides itself to the target and "takes the fight to the enemy." The missile can be fired from 2.5 miles away from the target, and climbs over the target in order to strike from above.
The system has been a boon to Ukrainian forces, who use the missile to strike Russian armor at its weakest spot, on top of each tank. The missile has produced a 90% kill rate against Russian armor in Ukraine, a senior defense official told reporters this week at the Pentagon.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday praised the missile and its assembly-line workers while visiting a Lockheed Martin production site in Alabama.
"You're allowing the Ukrainians to defend themselves and, quite frankly, they're making fools of the Russian military in many instances," Biden said while visiting the site in Troy, Ala. "A big part of the reason they've been able to keep up fighting and to make this war a strategic failure for Russia is because the United States together with our allies and partners have had their back."
Biden made the trip as part of his push for Congress to approve more funds to help Ukraine fend off a months-long assault that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered in February.
"You're changing the nation," Biden told the Lockheed workers. "You really are."
The Javelin deliveries to Ukraine might also bring changes to the U.S. in terms of depleted missile stocks, others have noted.
"The obvious answer is to build more missiles," Cancian wrote, adding that the U.S. has been buying Javelins at the rate of about 1,000 per year. "The delivery time is 32 months; that is, once an order is placed, it will take 32 months before a missile is delivered," he wrote. "This means that it will take about three or four years to replace the missiles that have been delivered so far."
The Pentagon downplayed the potential threat to U.S. Javelin missile stocks and deflected questions on how many remain on hand.
"We're not going to talk about what our own inventory is of anything," Defense Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters Monday at the Pentagon. "And I think you can understand why we wouldn't do that. We don't think it's particularly helpful to lay out what our inventory level is for any one particular system or set of munitions."
Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) last week said the stocks were depleted to the point that Biden should invoke the Defense Production Act in order to jumpstart new production lines.
"The cupboard is empty, or it will be very, very shortly unless the president invokes the Defense Production Act to provide that demand signal on an expedited basis," Blumenthal said at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The stocks are in good shape, Kirby countered.
"With every drawdown package, we make an assessment about the impact on our readiness," he said. "And what I can tell you is that thus far, we have not seen any negative impact on our ability to defend this nation across a range of military capabilities."
The issue "is not something we take lightly," Kirby said.
"It is a legitimate thing that we look at with each and every drawdown package," he added.
Ukraine likely could use additional Javelins, according to Cancian. Open-source reports show that Russia has lost about 1,300 armored vehicles in Ukraine, but has thousands more on hand.
"The bottom line is that the Russians are not going to run out of armored vehicles anytime soon," Cancian wrote.

If Biden had chosen not to send support to the Ukrainians, you would be on here complaining about that.
 
Dude, at about $250k a piece, Javelin's are cheap. Raytheon will be happy to crank out more. What's more, most weapons have a shelf life. The Javelin's is 10 years. The electronics have to be tested and believe it or not, they components break even in storage. The explosive in the warhead can become unstable. And the propellant is often corrosive. The the missiles will be retired at some point.

We'll just buy more. Invest in Raytheon stock.
You do make a valid point here, but to me its about the unadulterated unilateral decisions to send resources and money anywhere the current regime pleases moreso than the lack of ability to replace munitions. Keep in mind our entire govt is operated on a daily basis with basically monopoly money and continual creation of this money off the press is contributing to the inflation.
 
If Biden had chosen not to send support to the Ukrainians, you would be on here complaining about that.
he’s been consistently pro Russia from the start on this one. Praising Putin all the way.
 
They're being put to good use cracking Russian armor. Hard to find a better one
 
They're being put to good use cracking Russian armor. Hard to find a better one
The point is its costing billions as the US is just giving this equipment away free basically to Ukraine and now Biden and congress are laundering billions under the heading of fighting global disinfo. Its total BS and there is no vital US interest being served in this current situation.
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: DW4_2016 and dpic73
Another perspective.


More from Jacques Baud on the Nature of the War in Ukraine​

By Larry Johnson
Published May 2, 2022 at 7:00am

JFB.jpg
Jacques Baud
Jacques Baud is a man worthy of your attention. He is a retired Swiss Army officer and served in a variety of international posts, including a stint with NATO (even though Switzerland is not a member of NATO) where he monitored the flow of small arms in the Donbass and was involved in a NATO program to assist the Ukrainian armed forces in restoring their capacities and improving personnel management.
The Postil Magazine has posted an interview with Baud that provides valuable insights into Russia and Ukraine and the nature of the war now being fought. Here are some salient points from that interview (please click on the link to read the entire interview).
In 2014, during the Maidan revolution in Kiev, I was in NATO in Brussels. I noticed that people didn’t assess the situation as it was, but as they wished it would be. This is exactly what Sun Tzu describes as the first step towards failure. In fact, it appeared clear to me that nobody in NATO had the slightest interest in Ukraine. . . .we tend to portray the enemy as we wished him to be, rather than as he actually is. This is the ultimate recipe for failure. This explains why, after five years spent within NATO, I am more concerned about Western strategic and military capabilities than before.
TRENDING: RINOs and Democrats Just Stole Future Elections in Deep Red Alaska -- And the Republican Party DID NOT LIFT A FINGER to Stop It
The current war has its roots in the events of the Maidan in 2014. Simply put, the United States and the United Kingdom facilitated a coup that removed the democratically elected President and replaced him with someone the U.S. and the U.K believed they could control. It was in the aftermath of this coup that the people of Donetsk and Luhansk declared their independence One impetus for this move was the vote of the Ukrainian policy abolishing the law that permitted Russian to be used as the second official language in those regions that were Russian speaking.
Once the Donbas “republics” declared their independence, the Ukrainian Government declared them terrorists and dispatched its army to take control of the region. Despite having numerical and materiel superiority, Ukraine utterly failed to dominate Donetsk and Luhansk. Baud offers this insight:
After 2014, Ukrainian armed forces’ command & control was extremely poor and was the cause of their inability to handle the rebellion in Donbass. Suicide, alcohol incidents, and murder surged, pushing young soldiers to defect. Even the British government noted that young male individuals preferred to emigrate rather than to join the armed forces. As a result, Ukraine started to recruit volunteers to enforce Kiev’s authority in the Russian speaking part of the country. These volunteers ere (and still are) recruited among European far-right extremists. According to Reuters, their number amounts to 102,000. They have become a sizeable and influential political force in the country.
One of the myths readily swallowed in the West is that Russian troops entered Ukraine in 2014 and fought alongside the people in the Donbass who were fighting the Ukrainian Army. Baud says this is not true:
The Western narrative of a Russian intervention in Ukraine got traction, although it was never substantiated. Since 2014, I haven’t met any intelligence professional who could confirm any Russian military presence in the Donbass. In fact, Crimea became the main “evidence” of Russian “intervention.” Of course, Western historians ignore superbly that Crimea was separated from Ukraine by referendum in January 1990, six months before Ukrainian independence and under Soviet rule. In fact, it’s Ukraine that illegally annexed Crimea in 1995. Yet, western countries sanctioned Russia for that…
Think about this for a minute–if the Ukrainian Army could not defeat the militias in the republics of Luhansk and Donetsk over the last 8 years, how in the world is that Army going to defeat the Russian Army? It is delusional.
Baud also comments on the role that the United States and Europe played in training and equipping right-wing Ukrainian extremists who espoused anti-semitism and racial purity:
In October 2021, the Jerusalem Post published a disturbing report on the training of Ukrainian far-right militias by American, British, French and Canadian armed forces. The problem is that the “collective West” tends to turn a blind eye to these incestuous and perverse relationships in order to achieve its own geopolitical goals. It is supported by unscrupulous far-right biased medias against Israel, which tend to approve the criminal behavior of these militias. This situation has repeatedly raised Israel’s concerns. This explains why Zelensky’s demands to the Israeli parliament in March 2022 were not well received and have not been successful.
I encourage you to peruse the Jerusalem Post piece for more background on the west’s role in training groups that openly celebrate Hitler:
The report found that members of Centuria, a far-right organization intent on reshaping Ukraine’s military to align with its ideology, received training from Western countries while at the Hetman Petro Sahaidachny National Army Academy (NAA).
Centuria describes itself as a military order of “European traditionalist” military officers who aim to “defend” the “cultural and ethnic identity” of European peoples against “Brussels’ politicos and bureaucrats,” according to the report. The group is led by people with ties to Ukraine’s far-right Azov movement. Members have been photographed giving Nazi salutes and have made extremist statements online.
The American people are inundated with a barrage of propaganda that portrays the Ukrainian neo-Nazi militias as principled patriots fighting a communist horde. The military forces we are supporting in Ukraine are not Jeffersonian democrats committed to the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness“. Our political class in the United States is betting on the ignorance of their constituents in order to spend billions of dollars in propping up the Ukrainian Government and Army. I for one am praying they lose that bet.
 
The point is its costing billions as the US is just giving this equipment away free basically to Ukraine and now Biden and congress are laundering billions under the heading of fighting global disinfo. Its total BS and there is no vital US interest being served in this current situation.
Watching the Russian army get cooked while we don't get directly involved is good strategic business. I hope Trump's boss Putin sends another 20k or so to the wood chipper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawsFan_
Watching the Russian army get cooked while we don't get directly involved is good strategic business. I hope Trump's boss Putin sends another 20k or so to the wood chipper.
I disagree on the opinion that its good business for the US.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
Not hundreds of billions of dollars.
I could have sworn i saw an earlier package in the hundreds of billions. I cant find that so stand corrected. I still think its too much. 33B aid package which includes 8B to fight global disinfo which is total BS!! I know they are already sending javelins and other stuff over there already so that has a value also. Keep in mind not a cent of this will ever be repaid.
 
The psychopathic marxist deep state operatives running our govt would absolutely start a war if they decide its the only best way to stay in power.
 
You do make a valid point here, but to me its about the unadulterated unilateral decisions to send resources and money anywhere the current regime pleases moreso than the lack of ability to replace munitions. Keep in mind our entire govt is operated on a daily basis with basically monopoly money and continual creation of this money off the press is contributing to the inflation.
All Presidents send lots of arms all over the world. Nothing buys love like American military hardware.

American Defense Industry = high paying American jobs.
 
Another perspective.


More from Jacques Baud on the Nature of the War in Ukraine​

By Larry Johnson
Published May 2, 2022 at 7:00am

JFB.jpg
Jacques Baud
Jacques Baud is a man worthy of your attention. He is a retired Swiss Army officer and served in a variety of international posts, including a stint with NATO (even though Switzerland is not a member of NATO) where he monitored the flow of small arms in the Donbass and was involved in a NATO program to assist the Ukrainian armed forces in restoring their capacities and improving personnel management.
The Postil Magazine has posted an interview with Baud that provides valuable insights into Russia and Ukraine and the nature of the war now being fought. Here are some salient points from that interview (please click on the link to read the entire interview).

TRENDING: RINOs and Democrats Just Stole Future Elections in Deep Red Alaska -- And the Republican Party DID NOT LIFT A FINGER to Stop It
The current war has its roots in the events of the Maidan in 2014. Simply put, the United States and the United Kingdom facilitated a coup that removed the democratically elected President and replaced him with someone the U.S. and the U.K believed they could control. It was in the aftermath of this coup that the people of Donetsk and Luhansk declared their independence One impetus for this move was the vote of the Ukrainian policy abolishing the law that permitted Russian to be used as the second official language in those regions that were Russian speaking.
Once the Donbas “republics” declared their independence, the Ukrainian Government declared them terrorists and dispatched its army to take control of the region. Despite having numerical and materiel superiority, Ukraine utterly failed to dominate Donetsk and Luhansk. Baud offers this insight:

One of the myths readily swallowed in the West is that Russian troops entered Ukraine in 2014 and fought alongside the people in the Donbass who were fighting the Ukrainian Army. Baud says this is not true:

Think about this for a minute–if the Ukrainian Army could not defeat the militias in the republics of Luhansk and Donetsk over the last 8 years, how in the world is that Army going to defeat the Russian Army? It is delusional.
Baud also comments on the role that the United States and Europe played in training and equipping right-wing Ukrainian extremists who espoused anti-semitism and racial purity:

I encourage you to peruse the Jerusalem Post piece for more background on the west’s role in training groups that openly celebrate Hitler:

The American people are inundated with a barrage of propaganda that portrays the Ukrainian neo-Nazi militias as principled patriots fighting a communist horde. The military forces we are supporting in Ukraine are not Jeffersonian democrats committed to the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness“. Our political class in the United States is betting on the ignorance of their constituents in order to spend billions of dollars in propping up the Ukrainian Government and Army. I for one am praying they lose that bet.
Yeah........I'm hoping that the Ministry of Disinformation blocks this babble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DW4_2016
Yeah........I'm hoping that the Ministry of Disinformation blocks this babble.
The Ukrainian army has demonstrated its capabilities over the past two months. They've had tactical setbacks, particularly in the south and along the Donbass front, but they are holding up well strategically against a larger enemy and inflicting a lot of pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: other1
I could have sworn i saw an earlier package in the hundreds of billions. I cant find that so stand corrected. I still think its too much. 33B aid package which includes 8B to fight global disinfo which is total BS!! I know they are already sending javelins and other stuff over there already so that has a value also. Keep in mind not a cent of this will ever be repaid.
I agree. we should let Putin save ukraine. after all, they're a bunch of Nazis anyway, right? at least that's what my media is telling me.
 
Dude, at about $250k a piece, Javelin's are cheap. Raytheon will be happy to crank out more. What's more, most weapons have a shelf life. The Javelin's is 10 years. The electronics have to be tested and believe it or not, they components break even in storage. The explosive in the warhead can become unstable. And the propellant is often corrosive. The the missiles will be retired at some point.

We'll just buy more. Invest in Raytheon stock.
I work for Raytheon on the commercial side ... I moved the max I could in my 401k in company stock in January because
1) With the pandemic losing steam, commercial aviation and travel is picking up, which helps the commercial side
2) with the Russian build up on the Ukraine border, I figured something would happen and that the defense side of the business would be cranking out orders. Additionally once China and Russia had successful supersonic missile tests, I knew the US would spend whatever was necessary to catch up and surpass Russia and China's capabilities. Raytheon is prime on the sonic missile program.

Doing so has mitigated the losses I have seen elsewhere in my portfolio
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawsFan_
The Ukrainian army has demonstrated its capabilities over the past two months. They've had tactical setbacks, particularly in the south and along the Donbass front, but they are holding up well strategically against a larger enemy and inflicting a lot of pain.
Perhaps...but they have no capacity to counter-attack. They can't gain back lost territory without outside help. They have proven that the last several years at not being able to take back the Crimea.

We have seen a lot of video of Ukrainian forces attacking Russian convoys etc. What we aren't seeing is the video of the Russians F#$%ing up Ukraine forces. Ukraine certainly isn't the pushover I thought they may be. I over estimated Russian capabilities/professionalism. But Ukraine doesn't have the mass to retake lost ground. If they did, they would have launched a major counterattack by now. I'm only hearing of local counterattacks to stabilize certain areas. This will turn into a stalemate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Perhaps...but they have no capacity to counter-attack. They can't gain back lost territory without outside help. They have proven that the last several years at not being able to take back the Crimea.

We have seen a lot of video of Ukrainian forces attacking Russian convoys etc. What we aren't seeing is the video of the Russians F#$%ing up Ukraine forces. Ukraine certainly isn't the pushover I thought they may be. I over estimated Russian capabilities/professionalism. But Ukraine doesn't have the mass to retake lost ground. If they did, they would have launched a major counterattack by now. I'm only hearing of local counterattacks to stabilize certain areas. This will turn into a stalemate.
That's a fair assessment. It's difficult for Ukraine to get fuel and supplies all the way out to Donbass front, where it's comparatively easier for Russia. This constrains Ukraine's ability to counterattack along with the disparity in armor and air support across open terrain. That being said, we will see if this NE push out of Kharkiv towards Vovchansk has any teeth. I would not consider that a purely local counterattack. The game plan seems similar to what it was around Kyiv. Trade land for time, permit the Russians to overextend, threaten supply junctures to render Russian offensives non-sustainable in the long term.
 
I work for Raytheon on the commercial side ... I moved the max I could in my 401k in company stock in January because
1) With the pandemic losing steam, commercial aviation and travel is picking up, which helps the commercial side
2) with the Russian build up on the Ukraine border, I figured something would happen and that the defense side of the business would be cranking out orders. Additionally once China and Russia had successful supersonic missile tests, I knew the US would spend whatever was necessary to catch up and surpass Russia and China's capabilities. Raytheon is prime on the sonic missile program.

Doing so has mitigated the losses I have seen elsewhere in my portfolio

Coulda used that tip back in Q1 pal
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
I disagree on the opinion that its good business for the US.

How? We are watching one of our very few global rivals destroy their military, destroy their economy, expose their ineptitude, expose their horrible culture, lose global trading partners, destroy credibility and generally just fvck themselves in a way that will take decades to overcome, if it ever happens.

Glory to Ukraine.
 
How? We are watching one of our very few global rivals destroy their military, destroy their economy, expose their ineptitude, expose their horrible culture, lose global trading partners, destroy credibility and generally just fvck themselves in a way that will take decades to overcome, if it ever happens.

Glory to Ukraine.
He’s a pro Russia conservative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
How? We are watching one of our very few global rivals destroy their military, destroy their economy, expose their ineptitude, expose their horrible culture, lose global trading partners, destroy credibility and generally just fvck themselves in a way that will take decades to overcome, if it ever happens.

Glory to Ukraine.
I disagree with your analysis. Russia is going to have a substantial amount of land from the Ukraine when this is over and the US economy is tanking more by the day. The US has no vital interest in helping Ukraine.
 
How? We are watching one of our very few global rivals destroy their military, destroy their economy, expose their ineptitude, expose their horrible culture, lose global trading partners, destroy credibility and generally just fvck themselves in a way that will take decades to overcome, if it ever happens.

Glory to Ukraine.
 
I disagree with your analysis. Russia is going to have a substantial amount of land from the Ukraine when this is over and the US economy is tanking more by the day. The US has no vital interest in helping Ukraine.
Yep, what Russia needed is more land, massive capital outflow, and its military to get crippled fighting a smaller peer while NATO adds Finland and Sweden. Real genius move from Putin. Russia's GDP is smaller than that of several US states and has contracted over the past decade.

There is literally no pleasing you Trump sycophants. Biden doesn't do enough, he's weak and inept. Biden does too much, it's not necessary, a waste of money, and some conspiratorial distraction from other problems. You live in a country with historically unprecedented wealth and security.
 
Last edited:
Yep, what Russia needed is more land, massive capital outflow, and its military to get crippled fighting a smaller peer while NATO adds Finland and Sweden. Real genius move from Putin. Russia's GDP is smaller than that of several US states and has contracted over the past decade.

There is literally no pleasing you Trump sycophants. Biden doesn't do enough, he's weak and inept. Biden does too much, it's not necessary, a waste of money, and some conspiratorial distraction from other problems. You live in a country with historically unprecedented wealth and security.
I am in favor of non intervention and that just happens to be a Trump strategy also. Trump and I believe in peace through strength. Most of everything you just said is speculation.
 
I am in favor of non intervention and that just happens to be a Trump strategy also. Trump and I believe in peace through strength. Most of everything you just said is speculation.
So what would you have done? Asked Putin to nicely reconsider invading? Threaten him with xyz if he does so? Do you consider Russia to be geopolitical enemy of the United States or not
 
So what would you have done? Asked Putin to nicely reconsider invading? Threaten him with xyz if he does so? Do you consider Russia to be geopolitical enemy of the United States or not
Peace through strength. In the end, Ukraine is not part of the United States and not part of Nato, so I would not have recommended any action and thats with Biden or Trump running the show. I am sure you know about the proxy war going on in Ukraine, Syria and the like. US has been poking the Russians for a long time and Putin has drawn his lines in the sand.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT