ADVERTISEMENT

I’ve got sunshine….

My kids are 8 and 3, my company has paid out bigger bonuses the last 4 years, I'm middle class and yet my taxes went UP under Trump, and my stock portfolio (IRA, 401K, etc) has gone UP the last 4 years.

I get I'm a minority here, but I absolutely am better off today, even with the GLOBAL inflation. I was in Germany 3 weeks ago and have had the same issues as we have.

OK Taxes went up because you made more money

Thats the way it works when you make more you pay more

And how anyone has not made money in a 401 in stock market last 10 years is beyond me

My wife asked my son and I to invest in something for her

Invested a modest amount but up 60% this year

Mostly magnificent 7 and tech

Looks like a European River Cruise fishing off the back off the boat for a couple trips

So I have not really suffered on the macro scale but I see the average person taking a licking

BidenHarris was Toxic snd Harris Waltz will be worse for the average 300 million plus Americans
 
It's sad if you really believe that. I don't know if the "uninformed women" you speak of will make the difference, but I can tell you all women I know professionally and most that I know personally are voting for Harris, and they all informed and intelligent.
Trump is not going to take away the ability for someone to get an abortion. That’s insane to believe that.

I wouldn’t fault someone to disagree with his policies compared to the democrats or fault someone if they “just don’t like him”.

Let’s just don’t act like he’s going to get rid of abortion. That’s ridiculous. More children were aborted in 2023 than any year in our history, well after Dobbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy
It's sad if you really believe that. I don't know if the "uninformed women" you speak of will make the difference, but I can tell you all women I know professionally and most that I know personally are voting for Harris, and they all informed and intelligent.

I know plenty of Professional women voting Trump

They tell me that Harris is an Empty Suit and brings nothing to the table as to policy and helping them
 
Trump is not going to take away the ability for someone to get an abortion. That’s insane to believe that.

I wouldn’t fault someone to disagree with his policies compared to the democrats or fault someone if they “just don’t like him”.

Let’s just don’t act like he’s going to get rid of abortion. That’s ridiculous.
Trump is NOT GETTING RID OF ABORTIONS
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy
I know plenty of Professional women voting Trump

They tell me that Harris is an Empty Suit and brings nothing to the table as to policy and helping them
No doubt there are intelligent, informed women that are voting for Trump. Just making an anecdotal point in response to what I found to be an absurd comment from the other poster.
 
No doubt there are intelligent, informed women that are voting for Trump. Just making an anecdotal point in response to what I found to be an absurd comment from the other poster.
I didn’t say intelligent women.

I said uninformed or misinformed women.
 
OK. And I said both informed and intelligent. I guess ignore intelligent if you'd like.
I’m not sure what we are arguing, lol. I wasn’t talking about informed or intelligent women. I was talking about uninformed women (who may be very intelligent) who react to a commercial.

My point is that I believe a non issue may flip the whole election.
 
OK Taxes went up because you made more money

Thats the way it works when you make more you pay more

And how anyone has not made money in a 401 in stock market last 10 years is beyond me

My wife asked my son and I to invest in something for her

Invested a modest amount but up 60% this year

Mostly magnificent 7 and tech

Looks like a European River Cruise fishing off the back off the boat for a couple trips

So I have not really suffered on the macro scale but I see the average person taking a licking

BidenHarris was Toxic snd Harris Waltz will be worse for the average 300 million plus Americans
My tax change under Trump was not due to more money being made.

My Pro-Trump father is a CPA and told me all along that the new tax plan would work out in my favor. It did not and he told me that I was in a weird group that got affected negatively by Trump's administration changing deductions, which made the tax plan unfavorable to me. (I frankly do not recall what exactly it was but I believe it was something to do with a property related deduction)
 
I’m not sure what we are arguing, lol. I wasn’t talking about informed or intelligent women. I was talking about uninformed women (who may be very intelligent) who react to a commercial.

My point is that I believe a non issue may flip the whole election.
It's not a non-issue. Kamala isn't getting the female support she is because they are uninformed and listened to a commercial. Many of these women made up their mind when Trump's packed court took away the fundamental right they've had for 50 plus years.

And sure, Trump can't pass an executive order banning abortion. But if the Republicans take the Senate, as an informed female voter, would you be comfortable assuming that he would veto a national abortion ban (which Kamala would do, and would have 0% chance of getting 2/3rds vote to overturn).

There's a lot of talk about resume / record between the two candidates in this election. That's Trump's legacy, and he was very proud of it. Hid behind the "states' rights" argument for as long as he could--and now it's all about backtracking.
 
Hang yourself. This is a horrible day for America no matter who wins.

Hang myself? Shame on you. If I don’t agree with you…you want me to die? You have serious issues. This will be a glorious day in America if Donald J Trump becomes the 47th President. Go check yourself in somewhere.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
I agree that the only reason Trump could lose would be due to uninformed women who truly believe that Trump is going to ban abortion, which is impossible for a president to do.

It’s the only commercials that Kamala has been playing. Without that issue, it would be a landslide win for Trump.

Trump has been campaigning for three years. He was asked many times if he would refuse to sign a national abortion ban if he were president. For three years he dodged the question.

It was only one month ago, when Kamala was up in the polls that he finally gave an answer to that question, bc he had to. Interestingly, he started moving back up in the polls.

So the question for women is, do you believe this lying scum bag piece of shit when it took three years to answer a simple question?

Can't blame them for not believing him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
What do you want done? Do you really think evil people won’t be able to get these weapons regardless of what gun laws are passed?
None of my responses are going to be surprising here, but I'm in favor of universal background checks, red flag laws and a go-forward ban on the sale AR-15s and similar "assault" weapons. Think most common sense people can agree on the first two. I get that the third point is more controversial (and I'm not advocating that those who currently own these guns turn them back in to the State). All that said, after 4 children and 4 school administrators we're killed in our community (which is blue in a very red state), our elected officials refused to entertain any reform at the state level, and instead said we would just arm our teachers as long as they had (no shit) 40 hours of training. So, I think some federal involvement is required here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
It's not a non-issue. Kamala isn't getting the female support she is because they are uninformed and listened to a commercial. Many of these women made up their mind when Trump's packed court took away the fundamental right they've had for 50 plus years.

And sure, Trump can't pass an executive order banning abortion. But if the Republicans take the Senate, as an informed female voter, would you be comfortable assuming that he would veto a national abortion ban (which Kamala would do, and would have 0% chance of getting 2/3rds vote to overturn).

There's a lot of talk about resume / record between the two candidates in this election. That's Trump's legacy, and he was very proud of it. Hid behind the "states' rights" argument for as long as he could--and now it's all about backtracking.
I think very few women would be against a 15 week abortion ban, similar to Europe.
 
Last edited:
Hang myself? Shame on you. If I don’t agree with you…you want me to die? You have serious issues. This will be a glorious day in America if Donald J Trump becomes the 47th President. Go check yourself in somewhere.
Wow. Who knew a brain surgeon couldn’t pick out sarcasm? They’re both loser candidates.
 
It’s not an insult. Just the truth. But that’s par for the course for you to report someone because they hurt your feelings. I really should put you on ignore because you contribute nothing to the board.

You wait a minute you little liar. This is far more than your UNPROVOKED, barrage of public insults on this board. This is about you direct messaging me with your insults and threats. Multiple times. You cross lines with your ignorant entitled self. Keep it up and I’ll do all I can to see you’re gone.
 
"universally regarded as a failure" --by peop[le who hate him. As a piece of objective, empirical evidence, his bank account says otherwise. If that is what a failure looks like, sign me up!

The Reagan comparison is weird. How is this even a serious comparison? 8 years as governor of the largest state in the union trumps any amount of time as a state DA or AG or her 3+ years as a senator. Prior to Reagan becoming governor, yes, he had ZERO experience. For the record, I am not contending that Kamala has no experience, I just think, along with the general sentiment of even the leftist media prior to July, is that she was terrible in her role as VP.
Kamala is the only presidential candidate in 300+ years of history to work in all three federal branches - executive, legislative, and judiciary.

I’d say that makes her qualified.
 
Kamala is the only presidential candidate in 300+ years of history to work in all three federal branches - executive, legislative, and judiciary.

I’d say that makes her qualified.

Only candidate to get in without a vote, too.
And that makes her unqualified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wta21080
You wait a minute you little liar. This is far more than your UNPROVOKED, barrage of public insults on this board. This is about you direct messaging me with your insults and threats. Multiple times. You cross lines with your ignorant entitled self. Keep it up and I’ll do all I can to see you’re gone.
Ignorant? LOL. Last I checked I’m not the one voting for fascism, racism, tyranny, and war. Way to threaten me though. I would apologize for offending you and upsetting you, but it wouldn’t be genuine. I’m sorry you’re such a sensitive snowflake.

Edit: I just checked the direct message you’re so upset about. There was no threat or insult. It was just facts
 
Only candidate to get in without a vote, too.
And that makes her unqualified.
Bless your heart. Guess I’ll just say more prayers for you.

Leviticus 19:18 “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.”
 
Bless your heart. Guess I’ll just say more prayers for you.

Leviticus 19:18 “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.”

You sir, are a piece of work. A genuine piece of work. What’s your response to her not getting a single vote?

Matthew 7:15 “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves”.
 
Kamala is the only presidential candidate in 300+ years of history to work in all three federal branches - executive, legislative, and judiciary.

I’d say that makes her qualified.
Judiciary? DA/AG is part of the Executive Branch. And she did not serve either of those roles at the Federal level.
 
I think very few women would be against a 15 week abortion ban, similar to Europe.
Perhaps. I think many more were comfortable with the fundamental rights afforded under the Roe framework that Dobbs took away in favor of letting state elected officials decide on their behalves.
 
Ok. I guess it was in April of 2020. But that was different from state to state. Please answer me one question. And be honest. Which party was in favor of shutting down the country and which party was not?
Shutting down was not a political decision Amy. The political decision was made by one party to not listen to epidemiologists. As a brain surgeon yourself, I'm sure you can appreciate how dangerous and stupid that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem
Perhaps. I think many more were comfortable with the fundamental rights afforded under the Roe framework that Dobbs took away in favor of letting state elected officials decide on their behalves.
So, babies don't have fundamental rights? Under Roe, they certainly didn't. Roe was twisted to stop ANY limits on abortion at the state level, which put America WAY to the left of even Europe on abortion.

Here's socialist Germany's abortion policy:
Abortion in Germany is legal on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy upon condition of mandatory counseling. The same goes later in pregnancy in cases that the pregnancy poses an important danger to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman

More sickening still, there are at least 277 KNOWN cases in which an infant has been born alive following an abortion. However, even leftist know this number is much higher as several state don't require this information to be reported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wta21080
You sir, are a piece of work. A genuine piece of work. What’s your response to her not getting a single vote?

Matthew 7:15 “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves”.
My response is that Biden’s cognitive state was clearly not one in which he could be a candidate. The party decided that Kamala was the best person to replace him, which I think is most inline with voters since she was part of his admin.

I’d rather give the country a choice of Trump vs Kamala than Trump vs a vegetable. That is the spirit of democracy.
 
You sir, are a piece of work. A genuine piece of work. What’s your response to her not getting a single vote?

Matthew 7:15 “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves”.

The sheer lack of self awareness when you literally follow the Wolf in Sheeps clothing is shocking. You are a weird women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruePatriot
Shutting down was not a political decision Amy. The political decision was made by one party to not listen to epidemiologists. As a brain surgeon yourself, I'm sure you can appreciate how dangerous and stupid that is.
Strange hill to die one.

Who was it that was proven to be wrong at nearly every turn? (Hint: it was the so-called "experts")

Trump bowed to "the experts" initially and shut everything down but vowed to not do so anymore after that. That took courage and posterity shows that it was absolutely the RIGHT decision.
 
Ignorant? LOL. Last I checked I’m not the one voting for fascism, racism, tyranny, and war. Way to threaten me though. I would apologize for offending you and upsetting you, but it wouldn’t be genuine. I’m sorry you’re such a sensitive snowflake.

Edit: I just checked the direct message you’re so upset about. There was no threat or insult. It was just facts
Well…….yes you are ignorant if you think that’s what a vote for Trump is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amynhop
Strange hill to die one.

Who was it that was proven to be wrong at nearly every turn? (Hint: it was the so-called "experts")

Trump bowed to "the experts" initially and shut everything down but vowed to not do so anymore after that. That took courage and posterity shows that it was absolutely the RIGHT decision.

Anthony Fauci should be behind bars.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
So, babies don't have fundamental rights? Under Roe, they certainly didn't. Roe was twisted to stop ANY limits on abortion at the state level, which put America WAY to the left of even Europe on abortion.

Here's socialist Germany's abortion policy:


More sickening still, there are at least 277 KNOWN cases in which an infant has been born alive following an abortion. However, even leftist know this number is much higher as several state don't require this information to be reported.
"babies don't have fundamental rights"? That was the point of Roe. Defining that line, at viability, as to when a fetus had rights in addition to the woman carrying it. We saw the initial disaster when it came to IVF after Dobbs, which was the initial cause of Republicans to turn course. And, to address the implicit question, no, I do not believe ensoulment happens at conception, and there's nothing in the Bible to support that position. Regardless, one's view on when life begins is a moral/religious consideration that (IMHO) doesn't give you the right to enforce your view on others as a matter of law.

Don't really understand the reference to "socialist" Germany. Socialism is an economic policy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT