J6
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Yep!
Edited to add, his stupid a@@ is going to post this picture at least until the election. He has vowed to do so.
Get used to seeing it, because that's all he has.
Why would Trump send his agents to attack the police and then get them arrested? You are a loser.
You are dense and I will give you that. This entire fiasco from late 2015 was a rolling coup against POTUS so as part of that the agents were not being directed by POTUS. Barr was part of it.
Well since they arrested these seditious agents, why are you complaining about their treatment? And how terrible was Trump that he had no control over anything it seems?
Holy shit you are so fvcked up in the head.
LMAO... I think the fake Robert highjacked the RealRobert's account, b/c that's a stupid hot take. Mitch is a Republican hack (just like Pelosi is a Democratic one). Trump could have killed someone in the street and Mitch would have backed him as long as he kept the R by his name. IF he'd wanted Trump convicted, Trump would have been convicted. Period.
The Senate voted 57-43 to convict Trump in the 2nd Trial. Mitch would have only needed 8 votes (not counting his own) if he wanted Trump out. That would have been child's play and Trump would have been gone, Pence would have replaced him and IMHO would be President right now.
He was impeached for "incitement of insurrection". Not that it matters for the purpose of this argument. You posted that Mitch was trying to get him convicted. I merely pointed out that McConnell defended Trump and voted to not convict him. Not only that, I pointed out quite reasonably that the Minority Leader of the Senate could have probably provided AT LEAST 9 votes if he'd wanted Trump convicted. After all, 9 votes and Trump would have been removed from office.
In other words, just a usual Monday morning pointing out the crap that you post.
What part of that do you disagree with? That McConnell defended Trump... that's a fact:
McConnell says best for country to hold Senate trial after Trump leaves office
After the House impeachment vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said it would be best for the country if a Senate trial were held after Trump leaves office.
He voted to let Trump off. That's part of the congressional record.
You seriously think McConnell couldn't come up with 8 votes if he wanted to? Come on!
Fact of the matter is that Trump would have been tossed out of office if McConnell had wanted that to happen. Sure McConnell blasted him AFTER the trial, but when the vote came down McConnell and Company VOTED with Trump.
He did that only because he knew it was going to fail anyway....duh. You probably think Paul Ryan was in there helping Trump too. Bless your deluded little heart.What part of that do you disagree with? That McConnell defended Trump... that's a fact:
McConnell says best for country to hold Senate trial after Trump leaves office
After the House impeachment vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said it would be best for the country if a Senate trial were held after Trump leaves office.abcnews.go.com
He voted to let Trump off. That's part of the congressional record.
You seriously think McConnell couldn't come up with 8 votes if he wanted to? Come on!
Fact of the matter is that Trump would have been tossed out of office if McConnell had wanted that to happen. Sure McConnell blasted him AFTER the trial, but when the vote came down McConnell and Company VOTED with Trump.
Like I said, McConnell only needed 8 more votes in the Senate and Trump would have been out... How many times has Trump tried to have McConnell removed as the Republican leader there? Several, and he failed each time. The thought that McConnell couldn't get 8 more Republican votes if he wanted to is the deluded thinking. Trump got acquitted BECAUSE McConnell wanted him acquitted. I mean you spend half your time moaning about RINOs including McConnell... Yet you somehow think they didn't have the votes?
LOVE these types of responses. No evidence that McConnel EVER tried to oust Trump and plenty that he helped Trump out. So you just say you disagree and quote some random tweet that again provides no evidence to support your opinion.
You wouldn't know evidence if it hit you in the mouth dude. Go watch some mystery crime drama shows on TV. You need some help.
As per the news that just broke, the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group voted in the affirmative tonight that the January 6th Committee was Illegitimate all along - as were all the subpoenas they levied.
I trust even the dummies in the back understand that the fallout from this is gonna hurt...just not Trump or anyone they had illegally bullied during the scope of their "investigation."
Oh, and Bannon isn't going to jail - unlike all these rat bastards.
Enjoy! 😄
Sure I would. I'm NOT the guy that posts random tweets as BOMBSHELLS and SMOKING GUNS. That would be you. It's seems you have the same problem with evidence as you do with Fact/Opinion.
SCOTUS b1t<h slaps communist DC judges and Corrupt DOJ.
250+ J6 prisoners could now be set free from prison. Two of four J6 obstruction charges against Trump will be thrown out.
www.scotusblog.com
250+ J6 prisoners could now be set free from prison. Two of four J6 obstruction charges against Trump will be thrown out.
SCOTUSblog - Independent News & Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court
Devoted to covering the US Supreme Court comprehensively, without bias according to the highest journalistic standards as a public service
www.scotusblog.com
Check out your girl calling you dumb ****s out.SCOTUS b1t<h slaps communist DC judges and Corrupt DOJ.
250+ J6 prisoners could now be set free from prison. Two of four J6 obstruction charges against Trump will be thrown out.
SCOTUSblog - Independent News & Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court
Devoted to covering the US Supreme Court comprehensively, without bias according to the highest journalistic standards as a public service
"In a pointed dissent, Justice Amy Coney Barrett skewered her fellow justices over their decision to narrow an obstruction charge used to prosecute scores of rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
The Supreme Court voted 6-3 on Friday to side with Joseph Fischer, a former police officer accused of partaking in the Capitol attack who challenged the provision as being improperly applied to rioters.
Barrett, an appointee of former President Trump — who himself faces a criminal charge that could be impacted by the court’s opinion — noted the high court does not dispute that the certification of the 2020 presidential election results that day qualifies as an “official proceeding.” Nor does it dispute that rioters — including Fischer himself, allegedly — delayed the proceeding.
“Given these premises, the case that Fischer can be tried for ‘obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding’ seems open and shut. So why does the Court hold otherwise?” the conservative justice wrote in a dissent joined by liberals Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. “Because it simply cannot believe that Congress meant what it said.”
"Barrett acknowledged that the Congress that enacted the law likely did not have the riot in mind when creating it. She quipped, “Who could blame Congress for that failure of imagination?”
This weaponization of the Justice Department goes back to Barack Obama.
He very effectively put leftists in key positions in the FBI and many important career DOJ jobs.
Biden cranked it up to a new level, maliciously prosecuting January 6th defendants.
His administration dispatched the full force of the FBI and Justice Department to ruin their lives.
There must be severe legal, financial, and political consequences for what Biden, Garland, and all the henchmen did to these defendants.
These people must be held accountable.
List of shame (of course they have none)--
DC judges who went along with the DOJ's unlawful application of 1512(c)(2) in J6 cases:
Judge Beryl Howell (Obama, former chief judge)
Judge James Boasberg (Obama, current chief judge)
Judge Rudolph Contreras (Obama)
Judge Trevor McFadden (Trump)
Judge John Bates (GW Bush)
Judge Amit Mehta (Obama)
Judge Dabny Friedrich (Trump)
Judge Royce Lamberth (Reagan)
Judge Richard Leon (GW Bush)
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (Clinton)
Judge Amy Berman Jackson (Obama)
Judge Timothy Kelly (Trump)
Judge Randolph Moss (Clinton)
Judge Paul Friedman (Clinton)
Judge Christopher Cooper (Obama)
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Florence Pan (Biden)—Pan wrote both appellate court decisions upholding 1512c2
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Justin Walker (Trump)
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Cornelia Pillard
List of shame (of course they have none)--
DC judges who went along with the DOJ's unlawful application of 1512(c)(2) in J6 cases:
Judge Beryl Howell (Obama, former chief judge)
Judge James Boasberg (Obama, current chief judge)
Judge Rudolph Contreras (Obama)
Judge Trevor McFadden (Trump)
Judge John Bates (GW Bush)
Judge Amit Mehta (Obama)
Judge Dabny Friedrich (Trump)
Judge Royce Lamberth (Reagan)
Judge Richard Leon (GW Bush)
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (Clinton)
Judge Amy Berman Jackson (Obama)
Judge Timothy Kelly (Trump)
Judge Randolph Moss (Clinton)
Judge Paul Friedman (Clinton)
Judge Christopher Cooper (Obama)
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Florence Pan (Biden)—Pan wrote both appellate court decisions upholding 1512c2
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Justin Walker (Trump)
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Cornelia Pillard
The Biden Justice Department illegally and maliciously contorted, politicized, and weaponized a post-Enron obstruction-of-justice statute to cruelly drop the hammer on Biden's political enemies.
Real Americans in Real America who dared to question--and protest--the rigged and corrupt 2020 election.
January 6th was a lawful protest, permitted by the National Park Service, that devolved into a riot.
There are 3 categories of protesters, including those who:
1. Follow the rules, even if you think their positions are wrong or even crazy = protected.
2. Trespass = charge with trespass.
3. Violent = treat most severely.
But we can’t have different rules, based upon political views.
The Biden DOJ has charged no one with "insurrection"--because the evidence does not exist. How many "insurrectionists" go unarmed into a nation's capitol, get to the senate floor, walk through velvet ropes, follow police direction, and don't burn down the damn place?
The Biden DOJ destroyed the lives of hundreds of Americans and their families who supported Biden's political enemy, with these malicious prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 1512.
All while the Biden DOJ gives amnesty to Biden's allies--like BLM, antifa, Hamas, Planned Parenthood and other abortion-industry activists, and trans terrorists.
I served as the Senate staff leader for the Kavanaugh confirmation, when abortion-industry paid activists and other radicals trespassed, disrupted proceedings, threatened senators and their staffs, and attempted to stop the peaceful transfer of power on the Supreme Court. Not a damn thing happened to them.
The Supreme Court, including even Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, drove a stake through the heart of the Biden DOJ's political persecutions with its Fischer decision.
(Shame on Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a rattled law professor with her head up her ass, for her appalling dissent.)
Now the Biden DOJ is spinning to minimize the damage it has done--and as @julie_kelly2 reported months ago, even plotting to do an end-run around the Court's ruling by stacking misdemeanor sentences against Trump's January 6th supporters.
Most shockingly, the Biden DOJ states "only 27" are still sitting in federal prison right now following their bogus, political 1512 convictions.
These 27 are political prisoners--and the courts must free them immediately.
Starting on January 20, the Biden White House, DOJ, and outside allies who concocted and perpetuated these 1512 political persecutions must face severe legal, political, and financial consequences for their malicious prosecution of Trump and his allies.
Similar threads
