ADVERTISEMENT

Job vacancies everywhere

@Superica28 is just playing the greatest hits from the Politics thread on another board.

It is very scary that so many people from his demographic/age group believe this nonsense. But there is no reasoning with them.

It was dumb for Trump to give out free money like this, and it is equally dumb for Biden to continue it.
What exactly do you think I believe? Let me lay it out for you.
1. The government has created an unemployment problem. There’s incentive for folks to just stay home.

2. Businesses need to adapt.
 
No, unlimited vacation is a current trend. Get your work done and we don’t care about the hours you’re behind you desk.
This is actually true and what they find is people generally take less time for pto than a traditional allotment but they tend to use flex time more for everyday life events. Might as well call that what I have. I get an allotment but I never use it all because my work is so flexible. I only use pto for real vacations and never for little stuff. If I need to leave work early to hunt or golf or something I just flex and make it up rather than using pto as long as I am able to get my work done and perform well. Same thing for errands and such any time of the day.
 
Last edited:
Tried to order food and send it to a sick friend recently. No drivers available in Greenville area. Delivered it myself instead of Uber Eats, Door Dash, Grubhub etc..

Friends in Litchfield used Uber last night to go out to eat. They got stranded and couldn’t get a ride home. Sent my daughter to pick them up.
 
If is paying some of their employees so little that $650/week from the government is enough for them to stay home, that’s on them. Find better talent and pay that talent a great salary.

If you are a fan of pure capitalism, here ya go. A competing employer (the govt in this case) is paying more money in wages than you are....what do you do?

Complain about how your business can’t survive by raising prices? Or change your business model and tap into other revenue streams?
Probably not always paying more. But some folks might do nothing for a little less than working for more. Maybe.
My MIL’s assistant living facility can’t keep workers due to the expansion of unemployment benefits. Which means they probably were not paying enough, but I don’t know what would happen to their occupancy if they charged more because they were paying more.
I wonder how these folks are getting any unemployment benefits if they quit? Because that is at least the story we get from the assisted living facility director.
 
If is paying some of their employees so little that $650/week from the government is enough for them to stay home, that’s on them. Find better talent and pay that talent a great salary.

If you are a fan of pure capitalism, here ya go. A competing employer (the govt in this case) is paying more money in wages than you are....what do you do?

Complain about how your business can’t survive by raising prices? Or change your business model and tap into other revenue streams?

Not sure if a troll or not. The government paying out free money to sit at home is not a competing employer. That is them handing out the working people's money to people who are not working. Many businesses are trying to pay more than $650/week but the opportunity cost of actually going vs. sitting home, some choose sit at home.
 
Not sure if a troll or not. The government paying out free money to sit at home is not a competing employer. That is them handing out the working people's money to people who are not working. Many businesses are trying to pay more than $650/week but the opportunity cost of actually going vs. sitting home, some choose sit at home.
Whatever you want to call it, there’s an entity you’re going up against and you’ve gotta figure out a path forward.
 
This has become a major problem. I can’t wait for those benefits to end. The issue with requiring proof of searching for work is that people have found a way to get around this. Nearly every company has an online website to apply. Once you apply the website sends a thank you email with confirmation. The person will get called for an interview and just not show up. They show the confirmation email as proof that they are looking. So many people are abusing the system. Really wish they would look at each case instead of doling out a blanket amount.

I was laid off here in FL two weeks before Christmas. I've since found a new position with better pay, but I digress. I've never collected unemployment in my adult life. When I initially signed up, it required me to search for 3-5 jobs a week. But I was incurring problems and errors submitting a claim. So I give the unemployment office a call and they relay none of that is needed. No job search. No web search. Nothing. The woman on the phone said, 'Just put suspended due to covid-19 in any required fields and they'll process it.'

I drew $2300 dollars for one month without picking up a phone or writing an email to inquire about working.

I felt ashamed for doing it one month. I can't imagine doing it for months on end.
 
Last edited:
What exactly do you think I believe? Let me lay it out for you.
1. The government has created an unemployment problem. There’s incentive for folks to just stay home.

2. Businesses need to adapt.

Get ready for the $20 loaf of bread then. The answer to the "government unemployment problem" needs to be addressed by the government lessening the incentive to stay home.

I think you are underestimating the amount of each American's quality of life directly tied to small businesses and blue collar workers. I think your proposed solution (businesses need to pay more to match an arbitrary government income) will result in inflation and a general degradation of the American quality of life for the vast majority of Americans.
 
No, unlimited vacation is a current trend. Get your work done and we don’t care about the hours you’re behind you desk.
That's only a small part of the reason for "unlimited vacation", there's a big benefit to companies that is driving that trend. Like not having earned vacation on the books as a tax burden and like not having to pay earned vacation when an employee leaves. It also makes it easier to fire people because the job is purely pay for performance. So when they don't get their work done because they keep taking PTO - you're gone.
 
Whatever you want to call it, there’s an entity you’re going up against and you’ve gotta figure out a path forward.
The solution is to get people off of these subsidies and back to work. Not to increase benefits above and beyond what the market dictates for work. That causes massive inflation and government market manipulation which are both very bad long term. Unemployment Benefits are not there for you to live comfortably by sitting on your rear end. They are a last resort, enough to keep food on the table, and and not meant to out pace the free market labor rates. People need to work. And economy doesn't work if people aren't working and paying taxes. There are tons of fair wage jobs out there to be had. Simply put, for SC, the benefits are too high right now. For other markets in big metro areas in other states it probably makes more sense to get what they are getting but not here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freedom Dr. Tiger
The solution is to get people off of these subsidies and back to work. Not to increase benefits above and beyond what the market dictates for work. That causes massive inflation and government market manipulation which are both very bad long term. Unemployment Benefits are not there for you to live comfortably by sitting on your rear end. They are a last resort, enough to keep food on the table, and and not meant to out pace the free market labor rates. People need to work. And economy doesn't work if people aren't working and paying taxes. There are tons of fair wage jobs out there to be had. Simply put, for SC, the benefits are too high right now. For other markets in big metro areas in other states it probably makes more sense to get what they are getting but not here.
That’s definitely the solution, but in the world we live in, it’s not going to happen this year. Agree on all points for unemployment.
 
Not to hijack this thread but my wife received a big promotion and we are moving to the Greenville area the end of this month. I am coming without a job so I am looking everyday. My background is sales and customer service, mainly in outside services but can adapt very easily. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Get ready for the $20 loaf of bread then. The answer to the "government unemployment problem" needs to be addressed by the government lessening the incentive to stay home.

I think you are underestimating the amount of each American's quality of life directly tied to small businesses and blue collar workers. I think your proposed solution (businesses need to pay more to match an arbitrary government income) will result in inflation and a general degradation of the American quality of life for the vast majority of Americans.
Don't forget about socialized Medical/Healthcare for all.
 
The government is supposed to work for the people...not the people working for the government. That is the issue
That’s correct.

It’s not doing that in this case. So, what do you do as a business being negatively affected? Adapt? Or fail?
 
No, unlimited vacation is a current trend. Get your work done and we don’t care about the hours you’re behind you desk.
You are smarter than that. Unemployment is not going to people who work behind a desk and have autonomy to work harder in order to get their work done faster. It is primarily going to people who have hourly paying jobs in mostly unskilled, or low skill, jobs that require that person to be there at all times to complete the job requirements. Let's just go ahead and offer the cashier at McD's the golden parachute deal the CEO has to "compete" right?
Also, the govt is not a competing employer. They take $$$ from actual employers and give it to potential employees not to work. The govt does not, and is not able to "pay" anyone. All they can do is take your/my $$$ and spend it. It would be like expecting Ford to be able to compete if the govt made them pay for GM employees.
 
It is creating a crisis. In SC, fed (300)and state unemployment (338), for a combined 638 (15.95 p/h) to sit at home. What incentive does someone have to get up and go to work? Just another example of Sam trying to keep people addicted and dependent

This is only a problem because wages have been kept at historically low levels for the better part of of 20 years & it’s only an issue in low wage states.
 
This is only a problem because wages have been kept at historically low levels for the better part of of 20 years & it’s only an issue in low wage states.
you do realize that the "low wage states" typically have a corresponding cost of living, dont you? Is that you, Nancy? If so, I really have a lot that I would like to discuss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clemsonu96
"unlimited vacation time".......so basically you want the mom and pop companies to "compete" with the Federal gov and just pay employees to stay home, ok.....


Unlimited Vacation Time is an incentive is attractive but ultimately is not a great benefit to the employee. We have to make employees take their pto and almost all save it for the end of the year. If it was unlimited they wouldn’t take it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Intracoastal
This is actually true and what they find is people generally take less time for pto than a traditional allotment but they tend to use flex time more for everyday life events. Might as well call that what I have. I get an allotment but I never use it all because my work is so flexible. I only use pto for real vacations and never for little stuff. If I need to leave work early to hunt or golf or something I just flex and make it up rather than using pto as long as I am able to get my work done and perform well. Same thing for errands and such any time of the day.
How much of the job market do you think this actually can be applied?

I have a flexible schedule and do the same things as you, but damn, people need to get some perspective other than their own. If this is applied to every job, you would only be able to go to the grocery store a few hours a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Art of the Tiger
you do realize that the "low wage states" typically have a corresponding cost of living, dont you? Is that you, Nancy? If so, I really have a lot that I would like to discuss.
It's changing very fast in S.C., won't be a low wage/cost of living state much longer with the way the Economy is growing and Housing costs exploding.
 
FWIW, this is an oversimplification of the Delta issue. I'm close to that situation, and can tell you it's not just about getting "bodies" in roles. They lost an incredible amount of experience - by way of long-tenured employees leaving during the pandemic - and are now suffering from resulting operational issues. It is in no way connected to people who would rather stay home and collect unemployment.
This and the absolute moron that is running the show now.
 
If is paying some of their employees so little that $650/week from the government is enough for them to stay home, that’s on them. Find better talent and pay that talent a great salary.

If you are a fan of pure capitalism, here ya go. A competing employer (the govt in this case) is paying more money in wages than you are....what do you do?

Complain about how your business can’t survive by raising prices? Or change your business model and tap into other revenue streams?
I think I’m fairly center .... maybe a little right if center .... i don’t mind Democrats not do have an issue with Liberals. I have several Liberal friends ... I just can’t STAND identity politics and leftists.

With that said ... the comparison of the rate of escalation of CEO salaries compared to employee salaries before 1980 (Reagan) and after is absolutely appalling.
 
Get ready for the $20 loaf of bread then. The answer to the "government unemployment problem" needs to be addressed by the government lessening the incentive to stay home.

I think you are underestimating the amount of each American's quality of life directly tied to small businesses and blue collar workers. I think your proposed solution (businesses need to pay more to match an arbitrary government income) will result in inflation and a general degradation of the American quality of life for the vast majority of Americans.
Typically the people you are talking to live in their bubbles. They’ve had no interaction or experience with blue collar and small business type jobs. They think they’ve got all the answers on a piece of paper or a blackboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shortbus22
I have now seen probably a dozen news shows and articles where small business owners and even large corporations cannot get people to work. I think most of us have been saying it since the first unemployment checks with no strings attached were cut under Trump and continued with Biden. Why would people work when they are getting paid huge amounts to stay home? Here in Columbia SC, there is a huge need for people to work. From restaurants to moving companies, to large construction companies such as Hood. They can't find people to hire. Even Delta and other airlines have said recently that they can't find employees and have had to cancel flights because they didn't have the staff. Many local places are concerned that when the college kids go home for the summer that there will be no one to work as they students are more willing to work than the working class.

I can't tell you how many conversations I have had with others about how the unemployment payments are too high for lower income states. There is zero incentive to go back to work. Most of the small businesses here in SC have said that they didn't lay off a single person due to coronavirus yet their employees simply walked off the job and won't return. One dude interviewed on WIS that owns a moving company went for the jugular and flat out said that they are blatantly abusing the state and federal unemployment systems. The CEO of Hood construction said they are getting way behind on projects for the same reason.

SC lawmakers have said that they see this is a problem and are going to address it by eliminating the work search exemption soon. Meaning it will go back to what it normally is where you have to show proof of job searching and application statuses and limits on how long you can stay on it. So it is good news that the state government at least acknowledges this is a problem. The bad news is that when these benefits go away and people are expected to work again, weening them off the government tit is going to cause a lot of bellyaching and sob stories.
I work with people who want to work and have demonstrated that desire. Everything from janitors to register nurses and anything in between and from all corners of the state. If anyone here is looking for someone reliable hit me up. I work for the state and I put people who want to work to work. If that can be done in support of a fellow TI’er let me know. That’s even better. Shoot me a direct message
 
This is only a problem because wages have been kept at historically low levels for the better part of of 20 years & it’s only an issue in low wage states.
Sorry, but wages are market driven. If you haven't noticed, jobs paying above the proposed $15/hr minimum are going unfilled. When you add food stamps and the misnamed "earned income credit", the number of people below poverty level has been greatly reduced. We are seeing a "correction" right now where the Walmarts of the world have to pay a higher base wage - rather than have their employees leveled up by food stamps and other welfare.
 
I spend a lot of time in Rural SC as well as the metro areas. That is more than enough money for anywhere in SC to get back on your feet. In the rural areas that is enough to live like a king.
Did you just say you can live like a king for 650 a week? Please tell me you just woke up from a 35 year long coma
 
No, unlimited vacation is a current trend. Get your work done and we don’t care about the hours you’re behind you desk.

Lol. You are completely clueless in this thread. Unlimited vacation works in a bigger organization in which other employees can fill in when you are out. It doesn't work in a small business that usually has many single points of daily failure.

You are trying to apply some misguided economic theory that you learned in your MBA program to real world scenarios that simply don't align.
 
If is paying some of their employees so little that $650/week from the government is enough for them to stay home, that’s on them. Find better talent and pay that talent a great salary.

If you are a fan of pure capitalism, here ya go. A competing employer (the govt in this case) is paying more money in wages than you are....what do you do?

Complain about how your business can’t survive by raising prices? Or change your business model and tap into other revenue streams?
Is the government really an employer when they’re playing people not to work?
 
My dominoes pizza order took 1 hour and the lady said they were hiring. I know several who won't work because they make just about as much on unemployment.

We have reached a new level of insanity with government spending and people act like nothing bad is going to happen. Our Democracy has been hijacked by an even bigger spender than Trump and Pence. They say they are going to fix everything. LOL. Americans have reached a new level of economic stupidity. The likes of which I haven't seen since I was in a socialist South American country years ago. Just to make matters unbearable, they used a flue like virus to ruin last years football season and I'm sure they will do it again and the sheep believed them because that's what they are.
 
I'm no economist or economic theoretician. But is it "pure capitalism" to categorize the Federal government as a "competing employer" in this scenario? I mean, they're not competing in terms of economic productivity. They're simply paying someone more not to go be productive. It is not based on any value consideration.

Alright, that's the limits of my ability in economics.
Only a socialist would try to justify all the free handouts from the government by classifying them as a competitor but what else would you expect from the poster who tried to make that point. He's the poster child for Biden's America.
 
A lot of folks that believe the left is comprised of full blown socialists, that want to control the masses by giving them just enough to live, aren’t making the connection that the government is competing with the private sector through unemployment benefits. Amazing. Capitalism was a stretch comparison, though.
 
My dominoes pizza order took 1 hour and the lady said they were hiring. I know several who won't work because they make just about as much on unemployment.

Uber Eats in my area is constantly low on drivers. I get "no drivers nearby" all the time now. Guess I'll need to wait for the Joe Dough to burn up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92TigerME
If is paying some of their employees so little that $650/week from the government is enough for them to stay home, that’s on them. Find better talent and pay that talent a great salary.

If you are a fan of pure capitalism, here ya go. A competing employer (the govt in this case) is paying more money in wages than you are....what do you do?

Complain about how your business can’t survive by raising prices? Or change your business model and tap into other revenue streams?

There's one major issue you are missing - Capitalism is about creating value, not money. The government creates no value. They are just artifically raising prices for labor.

If it were pure capitalism we could take our money elsewhere (ie not pay the taxes used for this) but we can't do that.

I'm no economist or economic theoretician. But is it "pure capitalism" to categorize the Federal government as a "competing employer" in this scenario? I mean, they're not competing in terms of economic productivity. They're simply paying someone more not to go be productive. It is not based on any value consideration.

Alright, that's the limits of my ability in economics.

No. The US economy isn't a "pure capitalist" economy anyway but anything with mandated shutdowns or the government interfering isn't pure capitalism.

I wouldn’t take a 15% pay cut. I don’t know too many people that would tbh. The government is a competitor for employees. You have to agree there. You said it yourself; they are paying people to stay home. Right or wrong, they are competing for your talent. The federally assisted unemployment bonus should have gone away this year for folks in unaffected industries.

That’s the reality. Wrong? Absolutely. But, today, those are the obstacles you’ve gotta navigate if you want a successful business.

At some point that gravy train needs to end. I don't blame the people on it but I do blame the politicians who let this go on.

Same ones who want to handle New York the same as Texas, the same as Florida, the same as New Joisey, the same as California......
 
Sounds like you have the same problem my Wife and her company is facing.

They've raised their minimum Hourly Rate to $15 for Entry Level and still not much better.

My company did that and it is kinda working. We are still short staffed but things are better at least.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT