Actually, undocumented immigrants are afforded the right of due process. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the Constitution.
Judge that ordered deportations of illegals stopped…
- Thread starter MTTiger19
- Start date
European immigration is different than the US and why the US has historically been better. The US gives anyone, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, etc the ability to be American. Europeans still have a 19th century ethnic nationalism and so often exclude people from assimilation
I only disagree with one thing: "In all honesty laws should be written where a freshman in college could understand the application, enforcement and punishment."
I think they should be written where a freshman in high school should be able to.
That's probably more an indictment on US education than legalese. Elon's not wrong, though, wrt to text framing in legal documents, it's a PITA to navigate.
"We have no country if they all start ruling based on politics."
How do you separate a ruling "based on politics" from the general concept of having an opinon? At the moment ruling based on politics means disagreeing with the Trump administration, previously it meant disagreeing with Biden, and so on.
The more blatant introduction of "politics" into the judicial system is impeaching judges for plainly political reasons.
Clarence Thomas doesn't recuse himself from cases his family stands to benefit from, yet we are all worried about lower court activist judges. Just yawn stuff
The judical check on the federal legislature and executive as conceived by the framers resided in the SCOTUS. I don't believe that they ever conceived of whole system of 100's of federal judges at lower levels, each having the power to essentually block the actions ofthe POTUS and insert themselves into his management of the executive branch.
And here we are.
And here we are.
Section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.Interpretation:
The second sentence of Article III, Section 1, says: “The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” It’s pretty clear what’s going on here: this provision is designed to make sure that the judges are independent. They can decide cases according to what they think the law requires, without worrying about whether some powerful person—or even a majority of the people—will object. As Alexander Hamilton put it in The Federalist No. 78, judicial independence “is the best expedient which can be devised in any government to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws.”
Section 2
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Who the hell is going to check out of control activist judges? They can only be removed with 67 senate votes so that's not happening. No accountability at all. This is horse sh1t.
We are in a dire situation now similar to a world war.
More people die per day from Fentanyl coming across the border about 340 per day than WW2 DEATHS OF 300 or so a day.
Then if one wants to really get funky 1200 people die a day from results of cigarette smoking including babies and children as a result of secondhand smoke.
I have to believe this is one of the most clueless responses to immigration policy’s yet.
They have been getting healthcare and benefits upon arrival.
Dems like AoC have been protecting illegals, illegally and now mayor of Boston included
Dems wanted more “lawyers” to protect illegals and guess where that money comes from?
US Tax payers……… I know you libs hate Doge and what Elon is finding but suck it up buttercup, you can’t print money without accountability forever.
**** are you guys dumb 🤦♂️
If you lived in Latin America like I have you’d understand why the US should adopt their same laws and you rarely see any illegal immigration’s in the US other than drug use which the cartels exploit with China, Canada and Mexico.
There's nothing "activist" about following the law Growls. Also, keep in mind he didn't rule against them, he just asked for a temporary pause to give him time to investigate. He might rule in favor of the administration so this threat to impeach him is absurd. After all, we now know there were innocent, non-gang members who followed the lawful asylum process who are now doing slave labor in a foreign prison. Is that not a problem to you?
Horse crap dpic. We know what this is........pure obstruction. A judicial coup de tat underway. This issue was already ruled on by scotus in 1948 as has been mentioned all over social media and on tv this week. This radical leftist appointed as a judge by the communist dems is just doing what he has been told to do regardless of judicial precedent and history.
You really are out of your lane on this issue, step aside shut the **** up and go to bed.
He was originally appointed by George Bush dillweed. Just because you rule against Trump doesn't make you a radical leftist. Remember how you raged about radical leftist judge Tanya Chutkan before she ruled FOR Trump in the end?
You think your nano brain is the keeper of all knowledge asshole? If I wanted to listen to your bullshit, I'd have to wade through three feet of guano to hang upside down with you in your cave. Don't count your chickens.
Again, you should stay away from intellectual discussions but ironic that you called him dillweed. LOL
You and "intellectual" discussions is the funniest shit I've heard all year. Hilarious that you think you're intelligent. I assure you it doesn't show. Now quit destroying the board with your constant need to insult people because you have no self-esteem.
You're a UofSC grad, unintelligent cock fan, stfu
You need to leave TI all together because you actually never post on the REAL board because you're a liberal tard that never played sports and can't talk sports intellectually. So gfy
You are a joke and one of the most hated posters on this board besides @okclem who fortunately is gone after 4 bans so hopefully you're next.
Just because she made one ruling out of many in a certain direction doesnt change my opinion of her or change what she is in essence which is a swamp creature. This entire deal is about saving the swamp but it will fail in the end.
You're a UofSC grad, unintelligent cock fan. This explains everything!
A deep web here. @dpic73
This character goes all the way back to Russiagate.
Now isn’t this interesting
Republicans have been calling to impeach multiple federal judges for weeks, but Chief Justice Roberts only decided to speak up when Judge Boasberg was being targeted
What a “coincidence” that CJ Roberts appointed Boasberg to the same FISA court that authorized illegal spying on President Trump
Looks like CJ Robert is protecting his corrupt friend!
===
Chief Justice John Roberts doesn't like Trump demanding the removal of DC Judge Boasberg from the bench b/c it was Roberts who made the (ill-advised) decision to appoint Boasberg to a 7-year term on the corrupt FISA Court that rubber-stamped Comey & McCabe's FISAs to spy on Trump
This character goes all the way back to Russiagate.
Now isn’t this interesting
Republicans have been calling to impeach multiple federal judges for weeks, but Chief Justice Roberts only decided to speak up when Judge Boasberg was being targeted
What a “coincidence” that CJ Roberts appointed Boasberg to the same FISA court that authorized illegal spying on President Trump
Looks like CJ Robert is protecting his corrupt friend!
===
Chief Justice John Roberts doesn't like Trump demanding the removal of DC Judge Boasberg from the bench b/c it was Roberts who made the (ill-advised) decision to appoint Boasberg to a 7-year term on the corrupt FISA Court that rubber-stamped Comey & McCabe's FISAs to spy on Trump
Chuck Schumer admits the quiet part out loud— Democrat-appointed judges are really activists who are there to stop Trump:
"We did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time."
Things like this make me think back to when Trump said, "we caught them all". Obviously I don't like what is happening with these nationwide injunctions, but I'm just wondering if things like this are a trap to compound the evidence. All the people around POTUS had to know that these judges were going to do this.
I totally agree brother. The Trump team is very well prepared for all moves in this game and I think some very good things for America are coming up in the future related to this never ending battle.
Unfortunately not. Congress can roll this power for district judges back if they have the nuts to do it.
None of this is accurate wrt benefits and HC, but I wouldn’t expect a realtor living in Mexico’s Myrtle beach to understand that
Mexico's Myrtle Beach? Clueless again but I guess someone who's never left Pickens county wouldn't understand that. Tell Michael Jordan, George Clooney, Cindy Crawford and a host of other celebs and athletes that their $30mil homes are in Myrtle Beach.
Walk away dumbass before I stay rent free in your tiny brain.
They were confirmed by Congress by a majority.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has said that the idea of removing judges because you don't like the judgement is completely unconstitutional and moronic.
There is a process, use the process, or follow the laws.
Biden tried multiple times to eliminate student loans repayment. I completely disagree with the idea, and the courts did as well. They had to go back and try other methods to rise to what the court deemed as legal. That's how the process is supposed to work.
Stop trying to break the law or use laws improperly and they won't. It's really just that basic. There is also an appeals process that is in place. If the judge is wrong, they will be overruled.
Y'all really don't like the Constitution do you?
This is a GD lie and I'm sick of this asshole who intentionally tries to engage me in a fight so he can doxx me, even though Cris has told him to stop.
PLEASE READ👇
