ADVERTISEMENT

Kamala on "Special Report" w/ Bret Baier



Great job by Bret Baier in his Interview with Lyin’ Kamala Harris. She has a massive and irredeemable case of TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME - So bad, in fact, that she is barely able to talk about any subject other than the man who had the best economy ever, the strongest border in history, and who just got the UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT OF THE U.S. Border Patrol, ME! Their Endorsement was a TREMENDOUS HONOR!!! They said that Comrade Kamala did a terrible job, the absolute worst in memory, and can’t be allowed to do it again. She is also the WORST Vice President in history, but hopefully will soon be GONE. Again, congratulations to Bret Baier on a tough but very fair interview, one that clearly showed how totally incompetent Kamala is. For the good of our Nation, her inferior Cognitive ability must be tested at once!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
TRUTH!!!!



They put Bannon in prison.

They put Navarro in prison.

They are trying to bankrupt Gateway Pundit.

They indicted the CFO of Epoch Times.

They are investigating Elon Musk.

They are trying to put Donald Trump in prison.

They are trying to disbar Jeff Clark.

They disbarred John Eastman and debanked him.

They arrested the doctor who blew the whistle that a Texas hospital was illegally performing gender reassignment surgeries on minors.

They indicted and disbarred Rudy Giuliani.

They spied on Catholic Churches.

They put concerned parents who went to school board meetings on the FBI watchlists.

They imprisoned 1500 protestors, most first time nonviolent offenders.

But Donald Trump is going to weaponize the government to go after his enemies?
 
It wasn't a snap judgement. I've read enough of your posts to make up my mind. I never said whether you were civil or not. I said that there is no discourse because anyone that disagrees is seen as the enemy (wrong and malicious instead of having a different thought from a possibly grounded perspective).

I don't know your interactions with this poster and, frankly, I don't care about them. They don't prove or disprove my opinion of this particular board as a whole.

This is a place where Americans AND fellow Tiger fans, treat each other worse than I'd ever treat an actual person in my life that I detested simply because they vote a certain way. That's both sides. It's better to just avoid it and find what we agree on.

I think most of your opinions are flat out wrong and uninformed. You'd probably feel the same about me. In real life, I'd fight to defend you as a fellow American. On this board? The other side of the aisle might as well be the scum of the Earth. That's how everyone is treated here. So, as I said to the other gentleman...don't take the bait. Don't try to explain yourself. This is not a place for discourse or understanding.
The problem with trying to have equal discourse is, well, it isn't equal. We could probably civilly debate policies and opinions on Obama/Romney or Bush/Gore. But this is between a lying crooked scam artist and a run of the mill politician. The fact is that since everything that the wanna be dictator says is crazy, dangerous, and threatening to the country, it makes her the default without question. None of the socialists scare tactics you'll use as defense is reality. See Congress.

And just because the Republicans laugh it off, doesn't....as evidenced by the majority of people who worked for him and political scientists who believe him a danger to country, make it not so. You want one side to respect the other side that is completely ignorant of facts, of how government works, and just basic reality. That side, in the name of secret racism, the acceptance in the cult, loosening of socialital ethics on denigrating others will let this obscenely disqualified individual in to the hen house again. This time more armed with understanding of how to take advantage of the power. I, and many others on here, can't comprehend or respect that.
 
Ok. So, what's your point?

That even your side understands she is a historically awful candidate, but they were stuck with her.

I get the hate for trump and the idea of voting against him. I don’t understand actual enthusiasm for Kamala though. Someone on here even called her and Walz a “dream team” at one point. 🤣
 
It wasn't a snap judgement. I've read enough of your posts to make up my mind. I never said whether you were civil or not. I said that there is no discourse because anyone that disagrees is seen as the enemy (wrong and malicious instead of having a different thought from a possibly grounded perspective).

I don't know your interactions with this poster and, frankly, I don't care about them. They don't prove or disprove my opinion of this particular board as a whole.

This is a place where Americans AND fellow Tiger fans, treat each other worse than I'd ever treat an actual person in my life that I detested simply because they vote a certain way. That's both sides. It's better to just avoid it and find what we agree on.

I think most of your opinions are flat out wrong and uninformed. You'd probably feel the same about me. In real life, I'd fight to defend you as a fellow American. On this board? The other side of the aisle might as well be the scum of the Earth. That's how everyone is treated here. So, as I said to the other gentleman...don't take the bait. Don't try to explain yourself. This is not a place for discourse or understanding.
And yet, despite the nasty 40 anti-Dem threads on the first page and the 50 overnight posts from a guy who will latch onto and spread any conspiracy theory without verification, or the guy in this thread who literally pulls beliefs out of his ass that he insists are true just because (Dems created a deadly bat virus to keep Trump from winning, the election was stolen because he saw some ballot carriers under a table, I'm being paid by George Soros to post here and create multiple handles, etc...etc... etc...) I'm the bad guy here because I'm one of the few that will jump into the lion's den and push back against all the nonsense.

It's not just about being conservative because I have a couple good friends who are conservative and we get along great and rarely even talk about politics, but they aren't rude, batshit crazy assholes like you find here on this board. That and the avalanche of lies are what fuel me to get in the mud and punch back. I'd much prefer it was a space where we could civilly discuss politics but the majority of the posters on the Right aren't interested in that, so that's why you see me fighting back, because just like you, I believe I'm on the right side of most of these issues and if me and a couple others didn't speak up, it would just be an echo chamber. So I will persisit.

Thanks for your input
 
That even your side understands she is a historically awful candidate, but they were stuck with her.

I get the hate for trump and the idea of voting against him. I don’t understand actual enthusiasm for Kamala though. Someone on here even called her and Walz a “dream team” at one point. 🤣
What you're missing is that some of us feel that Trump is a much worse candidate historically speaking and we have two people to vote between, so even though she isn't our ideal candidate, she's the only thing that stands between us and an America we won't recognize.

I was the one that used the term "dream team" but you're totally missing the context. I didn't mean they were the best team, I was referring to the fact that they are complete opposites yet fit together like hand and glove. Feel free to find and re-read the post.
 
That even your side understands she is a historically awful candidate, but they were stuck with her.

I get the hate for trump and the idea of voting against him. I don’t understand actual enthusiasm for Kamala though. Someone on here even called her and Walz a “dream team” at one point. 🤣
Fair enough. But "even your side understands and historically awful" are exaggerations. Just about qualified as anyone before her, and much more so than one.

And my side? Therein lies our problem with this cultish, I need to be on team mentality we have now. I was always a libertarian/quazi republican and fairly active in the party, until I came to some realizations. Biden is first Democrat president I've voted for. And like you pointed out, yes Trump drove me to vote for Biden. And Harris. In fact, I and the majority of country usually voted split tickets until the 80's and now vast majority vote straight ticket. As I will due to maga nuts.
 
Fair enough. But "even your side understands and historically awful" are exaggerations. Just about qualified as anyone before her, and much more so than one.

And my side? Therein lies our problem with this cultish, I need to be on team mentality we have now. I was always a libertarian/quazi republican and fairly active in the party, until I came to some realizations. Biden is first Democrat president I've voted for. And like you pointed out, yes Trump drove me to vote for Biden. And Harris. In fact, I and the majority of country usually voted split tickets until the 80's and now vast majority vote straight ticket. As I will due to maga nuts.

Yea the team sports stuff and increasingly partisan nature of politics is damaging to the country. I've semi-broken from the Republican party, but I have nowhere to go because the dems are awful and a I have fundamental disagreements on core elements of their political philosophy.
 
Fair enough. But "even your side understands and historically awful" are exaggerations. Just about qualified as anyone before her, and much more so than one.

And my side? Therein lies our problem with this cultish, I need to be on team mentality we have now. I was always a libertarian/quazi republican and fairly active in the party, until I came to some realizations. Biden is first Democrat president I've voted for. And like you pointed out, yes Trump drove me to vote for Biden. And Harris. In fact, I and the majority of country usually voted split tickets until the 80's and now vast majority vote straight ticket. As I will due to maga nuts.
The "historically awful candidate" bullshit is just very thinly veiled racism/sexism. I'd love for scotchtiger to explain how/why her resume doesn't stack up with other past candidates like George W Bush or Ronald Reagan or even Obama or especially Trump whom I'm sure scotchtiger had no problem voting for in 2016.

  • Assistant DA of SF
  • DA of SF
  • AG of California
  • Senator from California
  • VP
 
Yea the team sports stuff and increasingly partisan nature of politics is damaging to the country. I've semi-broken from the Republican party, but I have nowhere to go because the dems are awful and a I have fundamental disagreements on core elements of their political philosophy.
I'm sure you've noticed the large number of traditional Republicans that are lining up behind her, not because they agree with most of her politics but because the threat of Trump is a much bigger existential issue. If you really care about the future of your party, it seems the only way to return it to it's roots is to end the cult of maga and I find it odd that you don't see that clearly. You claim to hate trump and won't vote for him yet most of your posts make it seem like you're rooting for him to win - it's confusing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: statepawdog
That even your side understands she is a historically awful candidate, but they were stuck with her.

I get the hate for trump and the idea of voting against him. I don’t understand actual enthusiasm for Kamala though. Someone on here even called her and Walz a “dream team” at one point. 🤣
There’s no actual enthusiasm for Harris. It was all fake, and now it’s showing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
And yet, despite the nasty 40 anti-Dem threads on the first page and the 50 overnight posts from a guy who will latch onto and spread any conspiracy theory without verification, or the guy in this thread who literally pulls beliefs out of his ass that he insists are true just because (Dems created a deadly bat virus to keep Trump from winning, the election was stolen because he saw some ballot carriers under a table, I'm being paid by George Soros to post here and create multiple handles, etc...etc... etc...) I'm the bad guy here because I'm one of the few that will jump into the lion's den and push back against all the nonsense.

It's not just about being conservative because I have a couple good friends who are conservative and we get along great and rarely even talk about politics, but they aren't rude, batshit crazy assholes like you find here on this board. That and the avalanche of lies are what fuel me to get in the mud and punch back. I'd much prefer it was a space where we could civilly discuss politics but the majority of the posters on the Right aren't interested in that, so that's why you see me fighting back, because just like you, I believe I'm on the right side of most of these issues and if me and a couple others didn't speak up, it would just be an echo chamber. So I will persisit.

Thanks for your input
Do you realize how ridiculous this all reads, coming from you?

You actually think Trump will end America. You type it frequently. How can you be so blind, or in such denial as to who you are on this board (and no telling how many others).

Btw, you’re gonna be just fine.
 
The "historically awful candidate" bullshit is just very thinly veiled racism/sexism. I'd love for scotchtiger to explain how/why her resume doesn't stack up with other past candidates like George W Bush or Ronald Reagan or even Obama or especially Trump whom I'm sure scotchtiger had no problem voting for in 2016.

  • Assistant DA of SF
  • DA of SF
  • AG of California
  • Senator from California
  • VP
Pulling that card, huh?

Desperation is the last straw.
 
So Trump is a better candidate. He has clearly stated that he plans to lock up people who refuses to vote for him by using the military. He has also clearly stated that most Hispanics will be deported to Concentration camps, and you think that this idiot is a deserving candidate to be president. If he becomes president, and he tries this Project 2025 junk, America will become unlivable.
So you seriously believe that:
  • Trump plans to lock up people who refuse to vote for him by using the military?
  • Trump plans to have most Hispanics deported to Concentration camps?
I'd say, give me some evidence of these very things, but don't think you are capable without pointing me to CNN talking points.
So, just think about it for a second.
Who are "MOST" Hispanics? That doesn't even make sense.
Then, is it people who "REFUSE" to vote for him or did not vote for him? Either way, can you seriously see that happening? I would think even some of the posters ITT who disagree with almost everything I say would not agree with such a far-fetched, idea of lunacy!
 
Answer the question then.

What was Donald Trump's resume like when you voted for him in 2016 compared to hers now? This should be funny.
She was the first to drop out of the democrat primary in 2020.

She NEVER would have won an open and contested primary. Never. She was highly unpopular as VP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
The "historically awful candidate" bullshit is just very thinly veiled racism/sexism. I'd love for scotchtiger to explain how/why her resume doesn't stack up with other past candidates like George W Bush or Ronald Reagan or even Obama or especially Trump whom I'm sure scotchtiger had no problem voting for in 2016.

  • Assistant DA of SF
  • DA of SF
  • AG of California
  • Senator from California
  • VP

Ah yes. 4 elected positions in super liberal SF and CA is quite the resume. Being a historically pitiful VP is a real gold star on that CV. Having the most liberal voting record in the senate - to the left of Bernie Sanders - really adds depth to her qualifications. And nevermind how horrendous she is in pretty much every interview and public appearance.

It's not about the titles she's held dude. She's awful. But you're a true believer and thus detached from reality, so I'm sure you don't realize it.

BTW, I voted for an Indian-American female in the Republican primary and plan to write in that person for president, so don't give me the racism/sexism bullshit. What a pathetic crutch that is for some of you.
 
The problem with trying to have equal discourse is, well, it isn't equal. We could probably civilly debate policies and opinions on Obama/Romney or Bush/Gore. But this is between a lying crooked scam artist and a run of the mill politician. The fact is that since everything that the wanna be dictator says is crazy, dangerous, and threatening to the country, it makes her the default without question. None of the socialists scare tactics you'll use as defense is reality. See Congress.

And just because the Republicans laugh it off, doesn't....as evidenced by the majority of people who worked for him and political scientists who believe him a danger to country, make it not so. You want one side to respect the other side that is completely ignorant of facts, of how government works, and just basic reality. That side, in the name of secret racism, the acceptance in the cult, loosening of socialital ethics on denigrating others will let this obscenely disqualified individual in to the hen house again. This time more armed with understanding of how to take advantage of the power. I, and many others on here, can't comprehend or respect that.
We had four years of Trump.

There's a precedent that's been set and over half of your talking points are whataboutisms and anomalistic possibilities that don't lie within reason.

People latching onto this narrative of impending militaristic rule if the orange man wins is incomprehensible to me, given the data we already have in our possession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
So you seriously believe that:
  • Trump plans to lock up people who refuse to vote for him by using the military?
  • Trump plans to have most Hispanics deported to Concentration camps?
I'd say, give me some evidence of these very things, but don't think you are capable without pointing me to CNN talking points.
So, just think about it for a second.
Who are "MOST" Hispanics? That doesn't even make sense.
Then, is it people who "REFUSE" to vote for him or did not vote for him? Either way, can you seriously see that happening? I would think even some of the posters ITT who disagree with almost everything I say would not agree with such a far-fetched, idea of lunacy!
Just because you'd prefer to ignore it or dismiss it because it's uncomfortable for you doesn't make it untrue. We all know if he wins, you won't give a shit if he does any of this.




This is from his right-hand SS Officer Stephen Miller

"With Trump and his team setting their sights on deporting more than a million people each year, the operation would inevitably require major infrastructure including new detention camps. Miller said that “large-scale staging grounds” would be constructed near the border, probably in Texas.

“You create this efficiency by having these standing facilities where planes are moving off the runway constantly, probably military aircraft,” Miller told Kirk.

Flesh has been placed on the bones of Trump’s immigration plans by Project 2025, a presidential transition operation spearheaded by the rightwing Heritage Foundation that has compiled a 920-page policy review aiming to “institutionalize Trumpism”. By its calculations, the daily number of beds in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) detention centers would need to rise from the current 34,000 to more than 100,000."


 
  • Like
Reactions: tboonpickens
Ah yes. 4 elected positions in super liberal SF and CA is quite the resume. Being a historically pitiful VP is a real gold star on that CV. Having the most liberal voting record in the senate - to the left of Bernie Sanders - really adds depth to her qualifications. And nevermind how horrendous she is in pretty much every interview and public appearance.

It's not about the titles she's held dude. She's awful. But you're a true believer and thus detached from reality, so I'm sure you don't realize it.

BTW, I voted for an Indian-American female in the Republican primary and plan to write in that person for president, so don't give me the racism/sexism bullshit. What a pathetic crutch that is for some of you.

Are we ever truly that excited for any candidate? I was excited for Biden bc he was not Bernie. I am excited for Harris bc she is not Biden (who can no longer speak).

Is there any dem that you can think of that you wouldn't call terrible? BTW, nobody is trying to convince you to vote for a dem.

I will be voting for Kamala and against trump. If she is awful, then he ****ing putrid.

The majority of his own hires and direct reports from his first presidency - the best people - are not supporting him this time. Many have warned that his second term would be a disaster. What more do you need?

None of us who ever led teams or businesses would hire someone like that to even manage a Wendys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Ah yes. 4 elected positions in super liberal SF and CA is quite the resume. Being a historically pitiful VP is a real gold star on that CV. Having the most liberal voting record in the senate - to the left of Bernie Sanders - really adds depth to her qualifications. And nevermind how horrendous she is in pretty much every interview and public appearance.

It's not about the titles she's held dude. She's awful. But you're a true believer and thus detached from reality, so I'm sure you don't realize it.

BTW, I voted for an Indian-American female in the Republican primary and plan to write in that person for president, so don't give me the racism/sexism bullshit. What a pathetic crutch that is for some of you.
"Historically pitiful VP"

Do you even look at the bullshit you type? Neither you nor 99.9999999999% of Americans could describe a single damn thing a VP does during their term. Again...it's very obvious where your bias is here.

I just love MAGA voters when they suddenly become experts on epidemiology or disaster relief or immunology or economics or in this case the performance of the average VP.

Please give us your VP power rankings with detailed notes from the last 50 years scotch. This shit should be good 🤦‍♂️
 
People latching onto this narrative of impending militaristic rule if the orange man wins is incomprehensible to me, given the data we already have in our possession.
You mean the data like J6 which was the only time in our country's history we didn't have a peaceful transfer of power?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Is this a good idea for her candidacy? Will it move the needle?

I love how Kamala sat down for an interview for fox news, and you guys are complaining how is was not long enough,

Meanwhile, trump held a town hall with "undecided voters" who actually turned out to be trump supporters invited by Fox to attend. One woman was the chairman of a local GOP chapter, one had a trump pin on and another had a "rnc delegate" hat.

trump is such a snowflake. the big tough guy, alpha male who cannot leave a safe space.

Donny Safe Spaces.
 
yes please spare me from this path...

  • surging economy
  • 401k through the roof
  • record DOW
  • wages outpacing inflation
  • home values through the roof
  • making Putin shred his resources for pennies on the dollar compared to our defense budget
  • replacing our old weaponry with more lethal arms
  • blocking future corrupt SCOTUS judges like Clarence "$4M in gifts" Thomas
  • protecting women from bleeding out in parking lots
  • embracing climate care
  • embracing science over Dark Ages rhetoric
  • actually doing something about border security instead of playing political football
  • flushing culture war BS
  • embracing common sense gun reform
  • not being beholden to a corrupt moron who paints his face like The Joker
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
You can't overcome this fundamental inane belief chiseled in place by a barrage of 24/7/365 MSM coverage ramming it down someone's willing gullet.
We saw it with our own eyes and don't need the MSM's take. Thank god there was finally someone willing to hold his feet to the fire and of course he dodged it, because he knows he's guilty and unfit.

 
  • Like
Reactions: tboonpickens
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT